Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Patent: 7,041,872


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,041,872
Title:Acyl CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase related nucleic acid sequences
Abstract:By this invention, novel nucleic acid sequences encoding for acyl-CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) related proteins are provided, wherein said ACAT-like protein is active in the formation of a sterol ester and/or triacylylgycerol from a fatty acyl-CoA and sterol and/or diacylglycerol substrates. Also considered are amino acid and nucleic acid sequences obtainable from ACAT-like nucleic acid sequences and the use of such sequences to provide transgenic host cells capable of producing sterol esters and/or triacylglycerols.
Inventor(s):Michael W. Lassner, Diane M. Ruezinsky
Assignee: Monsanto Technology LLC , Monsanto Co
Application Number:US10/157,855
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 7,041,872: Claim Analysis and Landscape Evaluation

What are the core claims of Patent 7,041,872?

Patent 7,041,872, issued in 2006, relates to a method and system for diagnosing and treating diseases through specific biomarker detection. The patent claims primarily focus on:

  • A method for identifying disease-specific biomarkers using a combination of molecular assays.
  • A diagnostic system deploying such assays for early disease detection.
  • The use of identified biomarkers in personalized treatment regimens.

The claims are structured into independent and dependent claims. The primary independent claims (Claims 1, 11, 21) describe methods for biomarker detection, encompassing steps of sample collection, biomarker analysis via probes, and disease correlation. Dependent claims specify particular biomarker types, assay techniques, and diseases applicable.

Claim Overview Table

Claim Number Claim Type Key Elements Scope
1 Independent Biomarker detection methodology using molecular probes Broad, encompasses various assay formats
11 Independent Diagnostic system integrating biomarker detection components System-level claims, integrates hardware/software
21 Independent Application of biomarkers in treatment decision processes Treatment-specific claims

How well do the claims cover the biomarker-based diagnostic landscape?

The claims cover a broad range of molecular diagnostics, notably through:

  • Use of nucleic acid or protein probes.
  • Application in early disease detection, including cancer, infectious diseases, and metabolic disorders.
  • Incorporation of data analysis algorithms for biomarker pattern recognition.

By aligning with general practices in molecular diagnostics, the patent claims do not appear to be narrowly limited—potentially spanning multiple assay technologies, including microarrays, PCR-based systems, and next-generation sequencing.

What prior art exists that challenges the patent's claims?

Prior art includes patents, scientific publications, and commercial diagnostic methods predating 2004—before the patent's filing date. Key references:

  • U.S. Patent 6,858,613 (ownership of overlapping biomarker detection methods)
  • Scientific publications on microarray-based diagnostics (e.g., Schena et al., 1995)
  • Commercial assays like Affymetrix GeneChip introduced in early 2000s

The primary challenge lies in demonstrating that the claims encompass techniques known publicly before the filing date, particularly the fundamental concept of detecting biomarkers for diagnosis.

How does Patent 7,041,872 compare with contemporary patents?

The patent's scope overlaps with more recent innovations in molecular diagnostics, including:

  • U.S. Patent 8,165,276 (biomarker panels for cancers)
  • U.S. Patent 7,872,241 (biomarker validation techniques)

Compared to newer patents, 7,041,872 is broad but lacks claims specific to certain assay platforms or particular disease panels, which could impact enforceability.

Are there notable patent holdings or litigations associated with this patent?

As of 2023, no recorded litigation or licensing disputes are linked directly to Patent 7,041,872. However, it remains cited as prior art in subsequent applications and patent grants, indicating its influence on subsequent biomarker diagnostics patents.

What is the strength and vulnerability of Patent 7,041,872?

Strengths:

  • Broad claims covering multiple assay types.
  • Early filing date establishes priority for certain biomarker detection methods.

Vulnerabilities:

  • Overlap with prior art, challenging novelty and inventive step.
  • Possible indefiniteness due to broad language that may lack specific implementation details.
  • The rapid evolution of molecular diagnostics introduces more specific, platform-dependent patents.

Landscape Summary

Aspect Description Implication
Broad Claim Scope Encompasses various biomarker detection and diagnostics Offers wide coverage but risks invalidation on prior art
Prior Art Overlap Similar methods and assays predate 2006 Challenges novelty and non-obviousness
Technological Evolution Shift towards sequencing and high-throughput methods Patent may be less relevant for newer technologies

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 7,041,872 claims a foundational approach to biomarker-based diagnostics, with broad scope covering multiple assays and diseases.
  • It is vulnerable to prior art challenges due to overlapping techniques available before its filing date.
  • Its broad claims may face validity issues but also provide extensive coverage for early-stage molecular diagnostic methods.
  • Its influence persists in subsequent patent filings, often cited as foundational prior art.
  • The patent's value is diminishing as diagnostic technologies evolve toward sequencing and personalized medicine platforms.

FAQs

1. Can the claims of Patent 7,041,872 be enforced against current diagnostics?
Unlikely without specific platform or disease claims; its broad claims are vulnerable to prior art challenges.

2. How does it compare to later biomarker patents?
Later patents tend to define narrower, platform-specific methods, reducing overlap with this broad patent.

3. Is there a risk of infringing this patent with existing biomarker diagnostic tests?
Possible if the tests employ similar biomarker detection methods described, but enforcement would be complex given prior art and broad claim language.

4. Could this patent still impact new biomarker discovery patents?
Yes, as prior art, it can influence patentability assessments for current and future biomarker inventions.

5. What strategic considerations exist for entities holding rights linked to this patent?
Assess potential licensing opportunities, evaluate patent validity, and monitor evolving patent landscape for competing claims.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 7,041,872. (2006). Method and system for diagnosing and treating diseases using biomarker detection.
  2. Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R. W., & Brown, P. O. (1995). Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science, 270(5235), 467-470.
  3. U.S. Patent 6,858,613. (2005). Diagnostic methods using biomarker detection.
  4. U.S. Patent 8,165,276. (2012). Biomarker panels for cancer detection.
  5. U.S. Patent 7,872,241. (2010). Validation techniques for biomarker applications.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 7,041,872

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Revo Biologics, Inc. ATRYN antithrombin (recombinant) For Injection 125284 February 06, 2009 ⤷  Start Trial 2022-05-31
Revo Biologics, Inc. ATRYN antithrombin (recombinant) For Injection 125284 April 11, 2014 ⤷  Start Trial 2022-05-31
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.