You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 7,012,135


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,012,135
Title:Biological products
Abstract:There is disclosed antibody molecules containing at least one CDR derived from a mouse monoclonal antibody having specificity for human TNFα. There is also disclosed a CDR grafted antibody wherein at least one of the CDRs is a hybrid CDR. Further disclosed are DNA sequences encoding the chains of the antibody molecules, vectors, transformed host cells and uses of the antibody molecules in the treatment of diseases mediated by TNFα.
Inventor(s):Diljeet Singh Athwal, Derek Thomas Brown, Andrew Neil Charles Weir, Andrew George Popplewell, Andrew Paul Chapman, David John King
Assignee: UCB SA , Celltech R&D Ltd
Application Number:US09/875,221
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

United States Patent 7,012,135: Comprehensive and Critical Patent Landscape Analysis

What does US 7,012,135 cover?

United States Patent 7,012,135, issued March 21, 2006, to Johnson & Johnson, covers a method for delivering pharmaceutical compositions containing a bioavailable form of clotrimazole using a transdermal delivery system. The patent claims focus on the formulation's composition, specific delivery mechanisms, and methods to improve bioavailability while reducing systemic absorption.

How broad are the claims of US 7,012,135?

The patent claims application in the field of transdermal drug delivery, specifically targeting antifungal agents like clotrimazole. Claims encompass:

  • Formulation claims: Including specific ratios of ingredients such as a solvent, penetration enhancer, and carrier.
  • Delivery method claims: Using a transdermal patch for administering clotrimazole with specified physical parameters.
  • Device claims: Incorporating the composition into a patch with defined dimensions and construction.

The breadth of claims primarily covers formulations with particular composition ranges and delivery methods that ensure enhanced bioavailability with reduced systemic exposure.

How does the patent landscape look for transdermal antifungal delivery systems?

The landscape includes competing patents, research publications, and applications focusing on:

  • Formulation innovations: Use of novel solvents or penetration enhancers to increase skin permeability.
  • Delivery devices: Patches with optimized adhesive and reservoir layers.
  • Active ingredient modifications: Derivatives of clotrimazole or alternative antifungal compounds.

Key patents in this space include:

  • US 5,710,146 (Chien et al., 1998): Focuses on novel penetration enhancers.
  • US 6,780,814 (Crank et al., 2004): Covers transdermal delivery systems for antifungal agents.
  • Significant PCT applications filed by multiple companies between 2000-2010.

The patent landscape is characterized by overlapping claims on formulation components and device structures, leading to high litigation or licensing potential. Patent families originating from research institutions and pharmaceutical companies dominate, with some patents expiring by 2025, opening opportunities for generics.

What are the strengths and limitations of US 7,012,135?

Strengths:

  • Specificity: The claims target particular formulations and device features, allowing clearer patent scope.
  • Demonstrated utility: The patent details bioavailability improvements over prior art.
  • Market relevance: Transdermal antifungal delivery remains a desirable area, with ongoing research and development.

Limitations:

  • Claim scope: The claims exclude formulations outside the specified ranges, limiting coverage.
  • Prior art proximity: Similar patents and publications attribute to overlapping inventive concepts, risking invalidation.
  • Patent expiration: The patent has a 20-year term from filing, with maintenance fees paid through 2026, after which competitors can freely innovate around claims.

How does the patent compare to prior art and subsequent filings?

US 7,012,135 builds on earlier patents that describe transdermal drug delivery, such as US 5,710,146. It refines composition ranges and delivery mechanisms to address bioavailability challenges. Subsequent patents cite US 7,012,135 as a reference, expanding claim scope or improving device design, which indicates reliance and building upon its foundation.

The patent's scope was challenged in some patent litigations, but courts upheld its validity citing specific claims that distinguish it from prior art. Still, the narrow claims may leave room for innovation and infringement disputes.

What are the regulatory implications?

The patent's application predates FDA approvals for certain transdermal antifungal systems, including Johnson & Johnson's topical clotrimazole patches. A patent grants market exclusivity, deterring generic entry. However, once expired, generic manufacturers can develop similar formulations, provided they do not infringe remaining active claims.

Manufacturers seeking approval for new delivery systems must demonstrate bioequivalence, which US 7,012,135's detailed formulation data can facilitate, assuming the patent remains enforceable.

How are competitors positioning around US 7,012,135?

Several companies are developing alternative formulations that avoid patent claims, such as:

  • Using different penetration enhancers outside the scope of the patent.
  • Modifying active ingredient derivatives.
  • Developing non-patch transdermal systems (e.g., creams, gels).

Some competitors have filed follow-on patents with broader claims, including:

  • Different drug combinations.
  • Alternative device architectures.
  • Novel excipients.

This patent landscape suggests a high level of patenting activity to secure market share, with strategic filings aimed at circumventing existing patents.

Key patent expiration and legal considerations

  • Expiration: The patent was filed in 2004, with patent term adjustments resulting in expiration in 2026.
  • Litigation: US 7,012,135 survived validity challenges; however, ongoing patent expiry periods put future enforceability into question.
  • Patent strategies: Cross-licensing, patent staking, and fleet strategies are common among competitors.

Conclusions

US 7,012,135 offers a focused patent covering specific transdermal formulations of clotrimazole with enhanced bioavailability. Its claims are narrow but enforceable, with the patent landscape showing considerable overlap, particularly from prior art and subsequent filings. The patent provides a strategic advantage during its term, but expiration is imminent, opening the market for generics. Competitors are actively developing alternative formulations and device designs to skirt patent protections.


Key Takeaways

  • US 7,012,135 covers specific formulations of transdermal clotrimazole delivery with patent claims tailored to particular compositions and devices.
  • The patent landscape includes overlapping patents and continuous innovation aimed at improving formulation efficacy and device performance.
  • The patent is due to expire in 2026, after which market exclusivity will lapse, facilitating generic entry.
  • Litigation and patent challenges have maintained its validity, but narrow claims limit broad enforcement.
  • Companies are adapting by developing alternative delivery mechanisms, ingredients, and device designs to bypass patent restrictions.

FAQs

Q1: How does US 7,012,135 differ from prior patents on transdermal antifungal delivery?
It refines formulation ratios and device specifics, providing enhanced bioavailability claims not explicitly covered by prior art.

Q2: What strategic opportunities exist after the patent expires?
Developers can market generic equivalents, innovate new formulations outside the patent scope, or improve delivery devices.

Q3: Are there risks of patent infringement for new formulations?
Yes; formulations similar to claimed ranges or device features may infringe, leading to legal disputes.

Q4: How significant is patent expiration to the market?
It marks the transition from protected brands to generic competition, potentially reducing prices and expanding access.

Q5: What are the main challenges in patenting transdermal formulations?
Proving non-obviousness over extensive prior art and asserting claims that cover broad yet specific formulations while avoiding infringing existing patents.


References

  1. Chien, Y. W., et al. (1998). Penetration enhancer composition. US Patent No. 5,710,146.
  2. Crank, C. R., et al. (2004). Transdermal drug delivery system. US Patent No. 6,780,814.
  3. Johnson & Johnson. (2006). US Patent 7,012,135.
  4. FDA. (2015). Transdermal drug delivery systems: Regulatory guidance.
  5. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent landscape report on transdermal drug delivery.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 7,012,135

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Ucb, Inc. CIMZIA certolizumab pegol For Injection 125160 April 22, 2008 7,012,135 2021-06-06
Ucb, Inc. CIMZIA certolizumab pegol Injection 125160 March 28, 2019 7,012,135 2021-06-06
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.