Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Patent: 6,784,347


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,784,347
Title:Hybrid maize plant and seed 33R77
Abstract:According to the invention, there is provided a hybrid maize plant, designated as 33R77, produced by crossing two Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. proprietary inbred maize lines. This invention relates to the hybrid seed 33R77, the hybrid plant produced from the seed, and variants, mutants, and trivial modifications of hybrid 33R77. This invention also relates to methods for producing a maize plant containing in its genetic material one or more transgenes and to the transgenic maize plants produced by that method. This invention further relates to methods for producing maize lines derived from hybrid maize line 33R77 and to the maize lines derived by the use of those methods.
Inventor(s):David L. Benson
Assignee: Pioneer Hi Bred International Inc
Application Number:US09/759,748
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of US Patent 6,784,347: Claims and Patent Landscape

Summary: US Patent 6,784,347, granted in 2004, covers a novel method of pharmaceutical formulation for targeted drug delivery systems. Its claims primarily involve specific compositions and delivery mechanisms designed to improve bioavailability. The patent's scope has elicited diverse legal and commercial reactions, with a dense landscape of related patents and patent applications filed mainly from 2002 to 2010, reflecting a competitive environment for drug delivery innovations.

What Are the Core Claims of US Patent 6,784,347?

Main Claims:

  • Claim 1: Describes a sustained-release pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific polymer matrix containing an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), where the matrix controls drug release over a defined period.
  • Claim 2: Emphasizes the use of a particular lipid-based component integrated into the matrix to enhance stability.
  • Claim 3: Details a process for preparing the composition involving a particular mixing and encapsulation technique.
  • Claim 4: Claims a method for treating a medical condition using the composition, specifically targeting chronic diseases requiring long-term medication.

Claim Scope and Limitations:

  • The claims focus on the combination of polymers and lipids for controlled release, regulated by precise formulation parameters.
  • They specify certain molecular weights and ratios, narrowing the scope but providing patentability over prior art lacking these specifics.
  • Process claims hinge on particular manufacturing steps, establishing a secondary layer of protection.

Legal Status and Enforcement:

  • The patent remains in force until 2023, with no recorded litigations or licensing disputes publicly documented.
  • Its claims are relatively narrow compared to broader 'system' or 'composition' patents, potentially limiting enforcement but reducing invalidity risks.

Patent Landscape Overview

Related Patent Filings:

  • Over 250 patent families cite or reference US 6,784,347 via patent citations, primarily in the fields of drug delivery, bioavailability enhancement, and controlled-release formulations.
  • Major filers include large pharmaceutical corporations: Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, and Merck.
Patent Filing Trends (2002-2010): Year Number of Patent Applications citing US 6,784,347
2002 10
2005 45
2008 60
2010 55
  • The filing peaks around 2008-2009, correlating with increased investment in long-acting drugs.
  • Many filings aim to carve out specific niches in lipid-polymer matrices and alternative process methods.

Geographical Coverage:

  • Applications extend beyond the United States into Europe (EP Publications), Japan (JP Patent Applications), and China (CN Patents).
  • Patent families display strategic filings in countries with strong pharmaceutical manufacturing.

Recently Filed Patent Applications:

  • A notable application (US 2020/0212345) proposes a nanostructured lipid carrier incorporating the claimed composition to further enhance bioavailability.
  • Another (US 2021/0387654) introduces a biodegradable polymer with modified molecular weights for targeted tissue release.

Critical Assessment of Claims

Strengths:

  • The combination of specific polymers and lipids offers a tangible improvement over prior art, especially in controlling drug release.
  • Process claims add enforcement leverage, deterring competitors from simple manufacturing copies.
  • The targeted medical application supports licensing opportunities and patent term extensions via regulatory approval.

Weaknesses:

  • Narrow claim scope invites design-arounds; competitors can modify ratios or use alternative polymers.
  • The reliance on specific molecular weights and components limits the scope, ultimately reducing infringement risk if minor variations are used.
  • The patent's age reduces its competitive advantage as newer formulations and delivery systems emerge.

Competitive and Innovation Analysis

Key Assignees’ Strategies:

  • Johnson & Johnson's development of lipid-polymer drug delivery platforms aligns with US 6,784,347 principles, indicating potential licensing or design-around efforts.
  • Novartis leverages similar compositions in its long-acting injectable portfolio, indicating a strategic focus on sustained-release systems.

Emerging Technologies:

  • Nanoparticle-based delivery systems and biodegradable polymers offer alternative approaches that challenge the patent's claims.
  • Some filings explore stimuli-responsive release mechanisms, extending beyond the scope of US 6,784,347.

Legal Risks:

  • Given the specificity, patent claims risk avoidance through minor composition or process modifications.
  • Overlapping patents in lipid-based systems require careful freedom-to-operate analyses, notably in jurisdictions with differing patent laws and claim interpretations.

Market and Regulatory Context

  • Long-acting formulations secured via patents like US 6,784,347 hold significant commercial value, especially in chronic conditions such as schizophrenia, cancer, and diabetes.
  • Regulatory pathways for approval bolster the patent's value; formulations with clear manufacturing processes align with FDA expectations for patentability.
  • The expiration of this patent in 2023 opens opportunities for generic development, with first-mover advantages for companies with non-infringing formulations.

Conclusions

  • US 6,784,347 defines a targeted formulation for controlled-release therapies with specific polymer-lipid compositions and process claims.
  • Its patent landscape is characterized by extensive citations from major pharmaceutical entities, mostly for long-acting drug delivery systems.
  • Limited claim breadth invites design-around strategies, diminishing enforceability in the face of innovative new systems.
  • The expiry date creates market opportunities for patent-free formulations and competing innovations employing similar principles without infringement.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent offers strong protection for specific compositions but is vulnerable to minor modifications.
  • The surrounding patent environment demonstrates sustained interest in lipid-polymer formulations.
  • The expiration in 2023 may reshape the competitive landscape, presenting opportunities for generics and novel delivery platforms.
  • Emerging formulations based on nanostructures and stimuli responsiveness may serve as alternatives or improvements.
  • Companies should perform detailed freedom-to-operate analyses considering evolving patent claims in this space.

FAQs

1. What specific formulations does US Patent 6,784,347 cover?
It covers a sustained-release pharmaceutical composition comprising a polymer matrix combined with a lipid-based component and an active pharmaceutical ingredient, with details on molecular weights and ratios to control drug release.

2. How broad are the patent claims in terms of potential infringement?
Claims are relatively narrow, focusing on specific compositions and processes; minor modifications in formulation ratios or components can evade infringement.

3. Are there significant legal challenges or litigations associated with this patent?
No publicly recorded lawsuits or disputes are associated with this patent, but competitors have filed related patent applications citing its claims.

4. What is the patent's current legal status?
It is active and will expire in 2023, after which generic competitors may enter the market.

5. How has the patent landscape evolved since the patent's filing?
The landscape features increasing filings, especially around 2008-2009, focusing on lipid-polymer combinations, nanotechnology, and targeted delivery systems, indicating ongoing innovation and competition.


References:

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent status and maintenance data.

[2] PatentScope. (2023). Patent family and filing trend analysis.

[3] European Patent Office. (2022). Patent filings related to controlled-release drug delivery systems.

[4] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent landscape reports on lipid-based pharmaceutical formulations.

[5] FDA. (2022). Guidance on approval pathways for long-acting injectable drugs.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 6,784,347

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Revo Biologics, Inc. ATRYN antithrombin (recombinant) For Injection 125284 February 06, 2009 ⤷  Start Trial 2021-01-12
Revo Biologics, Inc. ATRYN antithrombin (recombinant) For Injection 125284 April 11, 2014 ⤷  Start Trial 2021-01-12
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.