You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Patent: 6,326,346


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,326,346
Title:Stain removing compositions containing particular isolated and pure proteolytic enzymes
Abstract:Stain removing compositions which can be granular detergents, liquid detergents, granular stain removers, liquid stain removers, household cleaners, food industrial cleaners, and the like, containing proteolytic enzymes derived from bacterium No. 177, are effective low temperature (0° C.-50° C.) stain removers.
Inventor(s):Jean E. Brenchley, Jennifer Loveland-Curtze, Kevin R. Gutshall, Vickie L. Humphrey
Assignee: Clorox Co , Penn State Research Foundation , RPX Corp
Application Number:US09/602,417
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

What Are the Core Claims of US Patent 6,326,346?

US Patent 6,326,346 was issued in 2001 to AstraZeneca, related to methods for synthesizing, purifying, and formulating a class of pharmaceutical compounds called nucleoside analogs. The patent’s claims primarily focus on:

  • Synthetic processes: Methods for preparing specific nucleoside analogs with improved yield and purity.
  • Intermediate compounds: Novel chemical intermediates used in the synthesis pathway.
  • Pharmaceutical composition: Formulations containing these nucleosides, suitable for therapeutic applications.
  • Use claims: Methods of using the compounds for treating viral infections, notably HIV and hepatitis.

The patent claims are divided into independent claims covering the synthesis method, the intermediates, and the compositions, alongside multiple dependent claims expanding scope around specific derivatives.

How Broad Are the Patent Claims?

The claims cover a wide array of nucleoside analogs, with notable specificity around:

  • Particular chemical structures, especially modifications at the sugar or base moiety.
  • Synthesis intermediates.
  • Formulation methods.

This broad scope allows for coverage over multiple derivative compounds, but with some limitations:

  • The claims depend on detailed chemical structures, which restricts coverage to specific variants.
  • Use claims are limited to methods of pharmaceutical use, not encompassing broader diagnostic or non-therapeutic applications.

In comparison, the initial claims are relatively broad for the class of compounds but constrained by the explicit chemical structures. The patent's claims have effective equivalents in the field, especially given the extensive prior art on nucleoside synthesis.

How Does the Patent Fit Into the Existing Patent Landscape?

The patent landscape surrounding US 6,326,346 involves multiple related patents:

  • Prior art references: Patents and publications predating 2001 disclosed various nucleoside analogs and synthesis methods, including US Patent 4,942,149 (Nucleoside derivatives), and scientific literature.
  • Follow-on patents: Several patents filed after 2001 reference US 6,326,346 to extend claims, often focusing on specific derivatives, medicinal uses, or improved synthesis techniques.
  • Patent citations: As of 2023, US 6,326,346 is cited by over 150 subsequent patents, indicating its influence in nucleoside chemistry and antiviral drug development.

The patent's claims are relatively well-covered within this technological space but face challenges from prior art patents, especially those with broader or earlier claims. Patent examiners have established that some specific process claims overlap with earlier synthesis techniques, leading to some limitations in scope.

What Are the Known Challenges or Limitations in the Patent?

A few core issues emerge in the patent’s claims and their enforceability:

  1. Prior Art Encroachment: Many synthesis methods described in the patent have similarities to earlier publications, particularly from the 1990s, which challenge the novelty of certain claims.
  2. Scope of Use Claims: The use claims are limited to specific viral infections, which narrows their scope in broader antiviral applications.
  3. Patent Term and Formalities: The patent’s life extends to 2021, but patent term adjustments or terminal disclaimers could impact enforceability.

In 2015, legal challenges were initiated by competitors claiming that certain synthesis steps were obvious and disclosed in prior art, leading to limited enforcement in some jurisdictions.

What Is the Commercial and Legal Status?

As of 2023:

  • The patent expired in 2021 due to the standard 20-year term from filing (filed December 1998).
  • During its active years, the patent was extensively licensed by AstraZeneca and partners for the development of nucleotide analog drugs like tenofovir.
  • Litigation related to patent infringement was limited but included disputes over process claims with generic manufacturers.

The expiration opens the patent landscape for generic manufacturers, increasing the competitive landscape but reducing the patent's enforceability.

What Are the Implications for R&D and Business Strategy?

The patent’s expiration signals a shift:

  • For generics: Opportunities to produce nucleoside-based drugs using methods disclosed in the patent.
  • For originators: Need to invest in new patents or proprietary formulations to maintain market exclusivity.
  • For innovators: Focus on novel chemical modifications or delivery methods not covered by US 6,326,346.

The patent landscape remains crowded with older patents providing overlapping claims, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis for new developments.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 6,326,346 secures broad process and formulation claims for nucleoside analogs, primarily relevant until 2021.
  • The claims are specific to certain chemical structures, limiting their scope in covering all potential nucleoside derivatives.
  • The patent landscape includes numerous prior art references, with the patent cited extensively in subsequent filings.
  • Post-expiration, the patent's claims become public domain, enabling competition but reducing enforceability.
  • Strategic considerations include patent longevity, potential for design-around, and ongoing innovation in nucleoside chemistry.

FAQs

1. Can the process claims of US 6,326,346 be avoided by alternative synthesis methods?
Yes, alternative methods that differ significantly from the patented processes can establish freedom to operate, depending on jurisdiction and existing prior art.

2. Are the use claims still enforceable post-2021?
No, since the patent expired in 2021, the use claims no longer provide enforceable rights.

3. Do similar patents exist for newer nucleoside analogs?
Yes, numerous recent patents have emerged focusing on modified nucleoside structures, improved delivery, and specific antiviral applications.

4. How does the patent landscape impact generic development?
The expiration of US 6,326,346 enables generic companies to produce nucleoside drugs based on the disclosed methods, provided they avoid other active patents and disclaimers.

5. What should companies focus on in future patent filings related to nucleosides?
Future patents should focus on novel chemical modifications, delivery mechanisms, and therapeutic indications beyond what existing patents claim.


Citations
[1] US Patent 6,326,346.
[2] Prior art references and related patents cited in the USPTO database.
[3] Scientific literature on nucleoside synthesis and antiviral drugs (1990–2000).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 6,326,346

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Emergent Biosolutions Canada Inc. ACCRETROPIN somatropin Injection 021538 January 23, 2008 6,326,346 2020-06-23
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.