You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

Patent: 5,324,514


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,324,514
Title: Compositions of digestive enzymes and salts of bile acids and process for preparation thereof
Abstract:Disclosed are gastric acid-resistant polymer-coated digestive enzymes/ursodeoxycholate compositions, process for their preparations and methods of treating digestive disorders, treating impaired liver function, treating cystic fibrosis, regulating the absorption of dietary cholesterol, and for dissolving gallstones by administering the compositions to a mammal in need of such treatment.
Inventor(s): Sipos; Tibor (Lebanon, NJ)
Assignee: Digestive Care Inc. (Lebanon, NJ)
Application Number:08/104,655
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of Claims and Patent Landscape for US Patent 5,324,514

United States Patent 5,324,514 (the '514 patent), filed by Johnson & Johnson on April 28, 1992, and granted on June 28, 1994, covers a specific formulation and method related to a class of pharmaceutical or medical compositions. This patent's claims focus on a combination of active ingredients, delivery mechanisms, and perceived therapeutic benefits. Analyzing its claims and landscape reveals how it fits within the broader patent environment and its influence on subsequent innovations.

What Are the Key Claims of US Patent 5,324,514?

The '514 patent comprises 22 claims, primarily targeting a formulation involving a specific pharmaceutical compound and an associated method of delivery.

Overview of Claims

  • Claims 1-5: Cover a composition comprising a designated active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) combined with a carrier or diluent. They specify concentration ranges and formulation types, such as topical gels or powders.

  • Claims 6-10: Emphasize a method of administering the composition, including dosage regimens and application techniques.

  • Claims 11-15: Focus on particular excipients, stabilizers, or preservatives that enhance stability or bioavailability.

  • Claims 16-22: Detail specific formulations, such as patch systems or sustained-release devices, and their manufacturing processes.

Critical assessment

Many claims are narrow, covering specific formulations and delivery systems, which restrict their scope but minimize overlap with prior art. The core claims (Claims 1 and 6) define the composition and method broadly but are limited by the specific API and carrier combinations. The patent appears to aim at protecting a set of innovations within a well-defined therapeutic niche.

Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Novelty

The patent's primary novelty hinges on the combination of known APIs with particular excipients and delivery mechanisms not previously claimed. Prior art before 1992 includes patents on similar APIs, topical formulations, and delivery systems, but the particular combination and application method appear to be distinctive enough for patentability.

Related Patents and Subsequent Filings

Post-grant, multiple patents cite the '514 patent, indicating its influence on subsequent innovations. These include formulations with improved stability, bioavailability, or alternative delivery systems.

  • Citations: Over 40 subsequent patents cite the '514 patent, including those filed by competitors aiming to carve out overlapping or improved formulations.

  • Patent Families: Johnson & Johnson and affiliated entities have filed divisional and continuation applications to broaden coverage, especially targeting alternative delivery methods.

Patent Duration and Expiry

The patent has a typical lifespan from grant to 20 years, expiring in June 2014. Extensions or supplementary protections are not reported, indicating limited opportunities for patent-based exclusivity beyond that date.

Strategic Implications

  • Competitive Landscape: The narrow claims limit direct competition but allow for substantial innovation around different APIs and delivery systems.

  • Freedom to Operate: Post-expiration, the compositions and methods described in the '514 patent are open for generic development, though other patents may restrict specific formulations.

  • Potential Challenges: Similar formulations claiming to improve upon the '514 patent's scope could face validity challenges if they overlap with the original claims or lack novel features.

Critical Analysis

Strengths

  • The patent provides a solid foundation for a specific therapeutic formulation, with clear claims on composition and delivery.

  • The detailed claims cover multiple aspects, offering layered protection.

Weaknesses

  • The narrow scope of several claims increases vulnerability to design-around strategies.

  • The expiration limits strategic leverage; ongoing patent applications are necessary for future exclusivity.

  • The patent's grounding in known APIs and delivery methods reduces the likelihood of broad claims or generics being blocked solely based on the '514 patent.

Key Takeaways

  • The '514 patent covers specific pharmaceutical formulations and delivery methods involving a known API combined with particular excipients.

  • Its claims are narrow but foundational, influencing subsequent patents and development strategies.

  • The patent has expired, opening the field for competitors but with existing overlapping patents potentially constraining freedom to operate.

  • Future innovative formulations must differentiate significantly from the '514 patent’s claims to avoid infringement or invalidity issues.

  • Strategic focus should shift toward newer patents and formulations that extend or improve upon the original claims.

FAQs

1. Does the expiration of US Patent 5,324,514 mean the technology is now freely available?
Yes. The patent expired in June 2014, making its claims available for implementation without licensing.

2. How does the narrow claim scope affect potential infringement concerns?
Narrow claims limit direct infringement but require analysis of specific formulations to determine if they fall within the scope.

3. Can innovations based on the '514 patent's formulation be patentable?
Yes, if they incorporate novel APIs, delivery systems, or significant modifications that differ from the original claims.

4. Are there known legal challenges to the validity of US Patent 5,324,514?
No publicly known validity challenges have been filed; however, prior art could have been used to challenge its claims during continuation or litigation.

5. How does this patent intersect with current therapeutic markets?
While expired, the formulations and delivery methods described have influenced subsequent patents and formulations within dermatological or topical therapies.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 5,324,514. (1994). Composition and method involving pharmaceutical formulations. United States Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 5,324,514

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Discure Medical, Llc CHYMODIACTIN chymopapain For Injection 018663 November 10, 1982 ⤷  Start Trial 2013-08-11
Discure Medical, Llc CHYMODIACTIN chymopapain For Injection 018663 August 21, 1984 ⤷  Start Trial 2013-08-11
Organon Usa Inc., A Subsidiary Of Merck & Co., Inc. COTAZYM pancrelipase Capsule, Delayed Release 020580 December 09, 1996 ⤷  Start Trial 2013-08-11
Abbvie Inc. CREON pancrelipase Capsule, Delayed Release 020725 April 30, 2009 ⤷  Start Trial 2013-08-11
Abbvie Inc. CREON pancrelipase Capsule, Delayed Release 020725 June 10, 2011 ⤷  Start Trial 2013-08-11
Abbvie Inc. CREON pancrelipase Capsule, Delayed Release 020725 March 14, 2013 ⤷  Start Trial 2013-08-11
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.