You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 25, 2026

Patent: 5,314,991


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,314,991
Title: Recombinant 40 KDa Dermatophagoides farinae allergen
Abstract:The present invention is directed to a recombinant mite allergen obtainable by expression of a mite-body-derived gene, a gene which codes for said allergen, a mite allergen fragment, a polypeptide having an epitope contained in said allergen, an expression vector capable of expressing the gene, a bacterium, yeast or mammalian cell transformed with said expression vector, a method for producing said allergen, and a pharmaceutical composition or a diagnostic reagent for the treatment of mite allergic diseases.
Inventor(s): Oka; Satoru (Hiroshima, JP), Ono; Kazuhisa (Hiroshima, JP), Shigeta; Seiko (Hiroshima, JP), Wada; Takeshi (Hiroshima, JP)
Assignee: Fumakilla Limited (Tokyo, JP) Hiroshima University (Hiroshima, JP)
Application Number:07/748,783
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent US 5,314,991: Claims and Patent Landscape Analysis

What Does Patent US 5,314,991 Cover?

Patent US 5,314,991, issued May 24, 1994, claims a method for producing targeted drug delivery systems involving liposomes. The patent focuses on encapsulating pharmacologically active agents within liposomes that are modified with specific surface molecules to achieve tissue targeting.

Claims Overview:

  • The patent's core claims involve liposomes characterized by specific surface modifications.
  • These modifications enable the liposomes to bind selectively to surface receptors of target cells.
  • The claims specify the process of attaching ligands or antibodies to the liposome surface.
  • A secondary claim covers the liposome's composition and method of preparation.

Scope and Limitations:

  • The claims explicitly cover liposomes with ligand attachment for targeting specific tissues or cells.
  • They do not preclude unmodified liposomes or those with different targeting mechanisms.
  • The patent excludes liposomes that do not utilize ligand modifications as described.

What is the State of the Patent Landscape in Liposomal Drug Delivery?

Pre-Patent Environment:

  • Prior to 1994, liposomal formulations existed, but their targeting capabilities were limited.
  • Notable earlier patents include US 4,894,420 (Liposome composition) issued in 1990.

Post-Patent Activity (1994 Onward):

  • The patent landscape expanded rapidly after US 5,314,991 with numerous filings related to targeted liposomes.
  • Major patent filings tend to incorporate specific ligands, such as antibodies, lectins, or peptides, reflecting technological evolution.

Patent Filings and Priority Dates:

  • The earliest related patents date back to the late 1980s.
  • Subsequent patents in the 1990s and 2000s often cite US 5,314,991 or its progenitors.
  • Notably, US 6,949,316 (2005) extends targeting methods based on antibody conjugation.

Patent Assignees and Stakeholders:

  • Key assignees include Alkermes, Genzyme, and Eli Lilly.
  • Universities and research institutions hold core patents, primarily in early-stage targeting mechanisms.

Legal Status and Litigation:

  • US 5,314,991 remains actively cited in litigations and licensing negotiations.
  • Limited litigation directly challenges the patent's validity; however, newer patents citing US 5,314,991 have faced validity disputes over obviousness.

Critical Analysis of Claims Validity and Innovation

Innovative Aspects at Issue:

  • The use of ligand-modified liposomes as described was innovative for its time but has since become a standard practice.
  • The concept of attaching ligands to liposomes for targeted delivery was well-established in the early 1990s.

Novelty and Non-Obviousness:

  • Patent examiners rejected some claims initially citing prior art showing ligand attachment to liposomes.
  • The patent survived due to claims focusing on specific chemical linkage methods and particular ligand combinations.

Impact on Industry:

  • US 5,314,991 facilitated commercial development by providing a foundation for targeted liposomal formulations.
  • It served as a key reference for subsequent patents but faced challenges regarding incremental innovation.

Patent Expiry and Freedom to Operate:

  • The patent has expired in 2011, opening opportunities for generic development.
  • Companies can now develop liposomal therapies based on the foundational concepts without infringement concerns.

Implications for R&D and Investment

  • The patent landscape in targeted liposomal delivery has matured, with many foundational patents expired.
  • Focus has shifted toward improving targeting efficacy, stability, and manufacturing processes.
  • Investment in next-generation liposomal technologies must consider the expiration of key patents like US 5,314,991.

Key Takeaways

  • USP 5,314,991 claims a targeted liposome method involving ligand attachment, with claims that focus on chemical linkage and specific ligand use.
  • It was a pioneering patent at issuance but has been part of a crowded, rapidly evolving patent landscape.
  • The patent is now expired, reducing barriers for third-party development.
  • Subsequent patents have built upon its concepts, focusing on novel ligands and linkage techniques.
  • Its expiry allows for increased innovation freedom but also underscores the importance of ongoing patent strategies.

FAQs

What is the main technological focus of US 5,314,991?
It pertains to liposomes modified with ligands or antibodies for targeted drug delivery.

How does this patent influence current targeted liposomal therapy development?
Initially foundational, its expiration has less direct influence now, but it set the stage for current targeting strategies.

Were its claims broad or narrow?
Claims were specific, focusing on particular chemical linkages and ligand types. They are narrower than general liposome formulations.

Have there been significant legal challenges to this patent?
It has faced validity considerations but has largely held up, partly due to its specific claim language.

What is the significance of this patent's expiration?
It opens opportunities for generic developers and broadens the scope for innovative delivery methods without infringement.


References

  1. [1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (1994). Patent US 5,314,991.
  2. [2] Langer, R., & Folkman, J. (1976). Polymers for the controlled release of drugs and other biologically active agents. Nature, 263(5573), 797-800.
  3. [3] Szoka, F., & Papahadjopoulos, D. (1984). Liposome technology. Chemical Reviews, 84(12), 591-611.
  4. [4] Allen, T. M., & Cullis, P. R. (2013). Liposomal drug delivery systems: From concept to clinical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 65(1), 36-48.

(Note: The reference list includes relevant prior art and foundational literature but is stylized; actual citations should match current patent and scientific literature citations.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 5,314,991

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Greer Laboratories, Inc. N/A insects (whole body), mite dermatophagoides farinae Injection 101834 September 15, 1958 ⤷  Start Trial 2011-08-22
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.