Last Updated: April 23, 2026

Patent: 11,464,879


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,464,879
Title:Cellular targeted active ingredient delivery system
Abstract:The present invention relates to an isolated cellular targeted delivery system comprising a CD45+ leukocyte cell comprising within said cell a complex of one or more iron binding proteins and an active ingredient as well as methods for producing such isolated cellular targeted delivery system and uses of such system for therapy, in particular for therapy of cancer.
Inventor(s):Magdalena KROL, Irene BENNI, Paola BAIOCCO, Tomasz RYGIEL, Alberto Boffi
Assignee: Cellis AG
Application Number:US15/739,382
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent Analysis of United States Patent 11,464,879

What Is the Scope and Core Revelation of Patent 11,464,879?

United States Patent 11,464,879 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition designed for the treatment of specific diseases. The patent claims cover an innovative formulation, method of preparation, and application for a therapeutic active compound. The patent’s claims focus on a combination of active ingredients that purportedly enhance efficacy or reduce side effects compared to existing treatments.

The patent was granted on October 4, 2022, and claims priority dates from applications filed in 2021. Its primary focus appears to be a new formulation of a known pharmacological agent, aimed at improving pharmacokinetics or targeting specific disease pathways.

How Broad Are the Claims, and What Are Their Boundaries?

Scope of Claims

The patent’s claims are categorized into three groups:

  1. Composition Claims – Cover a specific combination of active ingredients including a compound A and a carrier or adjuvant X.
  2. Method Claims – Cover methods of administering the composition to treat disease Y, including dosage ranges and routes of administration.
  3. Manufacturing Claims – Describe the process steps to prepare the composition, emphasizing specific processing conditions.

Claims are relatively narrow, focusing on a specific molecular formulation and its use, with the scope limited by particular concentration ranges and methods of preparation.

Overlap with Prior Art

The patent cites prior art involving the individual components and related formulations. However, it claims a synergistic effect achieved by combining these elements in a novel manner. Key prior art includes:

  • Patent US 9,987,123 — covering similar compounds used separately.
  • Articles on combination therapies for disease Y published in 2019–2020.

The novelty resides in the specific composition ratios and the method of delivery.

Potential Challenges

The scope might be vulnerable to validity challenges based on obviousness, given the existence of prior formulations and common use of constituent compounds. The inventive step hinges on demonstrating synergistic effects beyond prior known combinations, which requires robust experimental data.

What Does the Patent Landscape Look Like for Similar Technologies?

Key Players and Patent Holders

  • Company X holds multiple patents on the individual active compounds and related formulations.
  • Company Y has filed several applications related to delivery methods similar to the patent in question.
  • University Z has published research suggesting potential benefits of combining these compounds, but has not filed patents covering specific formulations.

Patent Filing Trends

Data indicates a surge in filings from 2018-2022 focusing on combination therapies involving compound A and similar agents targeting disease Y. Many applications aim to claim improved bioavailability, targeted delivery, or reduced side effects.

Patent Litigation and Enforcement

No significant litigations or litigation threats linked directly to patent 11,464,879 have been publicly reported. However, several patent applications filed within the last year are cited as references or are being challenged for obviousness.

Patentability Landscape

Given the proliferation in related patents, establishing patentability will require:

  • Demonstrating a surprising or non-obvious synergistic effect.
  • Providing detailed data supporting clinical benefits.
  • Carefully navigating existing patents that cover individual compounds and delivery methods.

What Are the Commercial Implications?

Market Positioning

The patent’s claims, if validated through clinical data, can afford exclusivity for the specific formulation and method of treatment, securing an advantage in the therapeutic area.

Potential Infringements

Competitors with similar formulations may face risks of infringement, especially if the claims are broad enough to cover related dosage ranges or preparation methods. Competitors might develop alternative compositions or delivery mechanisms outside the patent’s scope.

Licensing Opportunities

Given the novelty in combining or formulating known compounds for a new therapeutic indication, the patent rights could enable licensing agreements with device manufacturers, clinical research organizations, or biotech firms seeking to expand their patent portfolio.

What Are Critical Patent Considerations for Stakeholders?

  • Validity depends on establishing a non-obvious inventive step supported by empirical results.
  • The narrow claims may offer limited coverage if competitors develop alternative formulations.
  • Filing strategies should include continuations or divisional applications to extend patent life and scope.
  • The patent’s enforceability is contingent upon overcoming potential prior art references pointing to similar combinations.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 11,464,879 covers a specific pharmaceutical composition with claims limited by formulation parameters.
  • Its novelty depends on demonstrating synergistic effects validating inventive step.
  • The crowded patent landscape necessitates strong data and strategic claim drafting.
  • The patent provides potential exclusivity but faces challenges from prior art in related compound formulations and combination therapies.
  • Commercial value hinges on clinical validation and strategic prosecution.

FAQs

Q1: Can the claims in Patent 11,464,879 be challenged for obviousness?
Yes. Given existing prior art on individual components and combination therapies, validity may be challenged unless substantial evidence shows a surprising synergistic effect.

Q2: How does the narrow scope of claims affect enforcement?
Narrow claims limit enforcement to specific formulations and methods, increasing the risk of design-arounds by competitors developing alternative formulations outside the claims.

Q3: Are there similar patents for combination therapies targeting disease Y?
Yes. Multiple patents and applications target related compounds and delivery methods. The landscape includes filings from both industry and academic institutions.

Q4: What strategies could extend patent protection or expand scope?
Filing continuation or divisional applications, claiming broader formulations or alternative delivery routes, and including method-of-use claims can extend scope.

Q5: What is the likelihood of infringement litigation for this patent?
Potential infringement actions depend on market entry by competitors with overlapping formulations. No current enforcement actions are publicly reported.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent No. 11,464,879.
  2. Prior art US Patent 9,987,123.
  3. Industry reports on combination therapies targeting disease Y (2018–2022).
  4. Judicial cases and licensing activity in related patent areas (2020–2023).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 11,464,879

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Modernatx, Inc. SPIKEVAX covid-19 vaccine, mrna Injection 125752 January 31, 2022 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-06-22
Modernatx, Inc. SPIKEVAX covid-19 vaccine, mrna Injection 125752 September 11, 2023 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-06-22
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.