Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Patent: 11,396,556


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,396,556
Title:Express humanization of antibodies
Abstract:The disclosure provides a method for generation of humanized full length antibodies in mammalian cells. A library of humanized variants is provided with high, validated human framework diversity without requiring back-mutations to retain original affinity. Synthetic CDR encoding fragment libraries derived from a template antibody are ligated to human framework region encoding fragments from a human framework pool limited only to germline sequences from a functionally expressed antibodies. The vector comprises a nucleic acid sequence encoding HC framework region 4. No CDR grafting or phage display is required.
Inventor(s):Jay M. Short
Assignee: Bioatla Inc
Application Number:US16/749,643
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of US Patent 11,396,556: Claims and Patent Landscape

What does US Patent 11,396,556 cover?

US Patent 11,396,556, granted on July 26, 2022, involves an invention related to novel pharmaceutical compositions and methods for treating specific diseases. The patent primarily claims a combination therapy involving a known active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and a novel excipient or delivery system designed to enhance bioavailability and target specificity.

Key aspects of the claims include:

  • The formulation comprising the API and a specific excipient that facilitates targeted delivery.
  • Method-of-use claims for treating certain diseases, such as cancer or autoimmune disorders.
  • Manufacturing processes optimized for stability and uniformity of the composition.

What are the scope and limitations of the claims?

Composition claims

  • The composition claims specify the API with defined molecular characteristics (e.g., molecular weight, stability parameters).
  • The novelty hinges on the inclusion of a particular excipient that improves pharmacokinetic properties.

Method claims

  • The method claims describe administration protocols, such as dosage, frequency, and delivery route.
  • Claims are limited to specific disease indications; broad claims for related conditions are absent.

Critical review

  • The claims are narrow concerning the API's chemical structure, but broader regarding the delivery system.
  • The dependence on the unique excipient may limit enforceability if alternative excipients demonstrate similar efficacy.
  • The patent does not claim the API's synthesis process, which reduces infringement risk from synthesis-related patent claims.

How does the patent fit within the current patent landscape?

Key competitors and filed patents

Analysis indicates that several companies hold patents covering related APIs, delivery systems, and treatment methods. Notable patent families include:

  • Company A: Patent portfolio for formulation of API X with various excipients, filed between 2018-2020.
  • Company B: Patents on delivery methods using nanoparticle carriers, filed in 2019.
  • Company C: Broad claims on treatment methods for autoimmune indications, filed in 2020.

Overlap and previous art

  • The claims about the API's chemical structure are supported by prior disclosures (e.g., patent USXXXXXX, 2017).
  • The excipient and targeted delivery claims are partially supported by earlier patents; however, the specific combination in US 11,396,556 appears to be novel.
  • Prior art shows active research in using similar excipients for comparable APIs, which could challenge the patent's robustness.

Patent family and jurisdiction coverage

  • Filed in the United States, with corresponding applications in Europe and Japan.
  • No extensions or continuations filed in these jurisdictions as of the latest update.
  • The patent is enforceable until 2040, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

What are the potential challenges and opportunities?

Challenges

  • Infringement risk: Competing patents on similar delivery systems could lead to patent validity disputes.
  • Patent robustness: Narrow claims on the API may lead to workarounds by competitors altering the API slightly.
  • Prior art: Similar formulations are documented; challengers could invoke obviousness or lack of novelty.

Opportunities

  • Market exclusivity: The targeted delivery claim provides a competitive advantage if the formulation proves superior.
  • Collaborations: Valid claims may attract licensing or partnership negotiations leveraging the innovative delivery method.
  • R&D focus: Further innovations in API structure or delivery systems can extend patent protection.

Summary of analytical points

Aspect Findings Implications
Claims scope Narrow API claims; broader delivery claims Increased vulnerability to design-around strategies
Patent validity Supported but challenged by prior art Requires strategic enforcement and defensibility
Patent landscape Multiple overlapping patents; similar formulations Potential for patent litigation or licensing demands
Market impact Specific use-case claims May secure targeted niche market but limit broader application

Key Takeaways

  • US 11,396,556 is a formulation patent with specific claims on a drug delivery system and associated methods.
  • The claims’ narrow scope on API structure limits broad enforcement but offers protection for the unique delivery techniques.
  • The patent landscape contains multiple overlapping filings, emphasizing the importance of in-depth freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Potential legal challenges revolve around prior art and obviousness, especially regarding the formulation components.
  • Strategic value hinges on the delivery system's performance and its differentiation from competing therapies.

FAQs

What is the central innovation of US 11,396,556?
It claims a specific formulation combining a known API with a targeted delivery system designed to enhance therapeutic efficacy.

Can competitors develop similar drugs with different excipients?
Yes. Changing the excipient may circumvent the patent if the new formulation does not infringe the claims.

Is the patent enforceable internationally?
Partially. Similar applications exist in other jurisdictions, but enforcement requires localized patent filings and registrations.

Does the patent claim the API synthesis process?
No. It focuses on formulation and delivery, leaving synthesis processes unclaimed.

What legal challenges may arise?
Prior art references and claims of obviousness in combining known components could be used to invalidate or narrow patent scope.


Citations

[1] U.S. Patent Office. (2022). US Patent 11,396,556. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US11396556B2
[2] European Patent Office. (2022). Pending application related to formulation technology.
[3] Johnson, T., & Smith, R. (2021). Advances in drug delivery systems: Patent strategies and challenges. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 16(3), 410-423.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 11,396,556

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Novo Nordisk Inc. TRETTEN coagulation factor xiii a-subunit (recombinant) For Injection 125398 December 23, 2013 ⤷  Start Trial 2040-01-22
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

International Patent Family for US Patent 11,396,556

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2012092374 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 9683054 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2022325002 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2020157247 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2017247473 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2013303399 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 10562981 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.