You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 10,934,356


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,934,356
Title:Checkpoint blockade and microsatellite instability
Abstract:Blockade of immune checkpoints such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) shows promise in patients with cancer. Inhibitory antibodies directed at these receptors have been shown to break immune tolerance and promote anti-tumor immunity. These agents work particularly well in patients with a certain category of tumor. Such tumors may be particularly susceptible to treatment because of the multitude of neoantigens which they produce.
Inventor(s):Diaz Luis, Vogelstein Bert, Kinzler Kenneth W., Papadopoulos Nickolas, Le Dung, Pardoll Drew M., Topalian Suzanne L.
Assignee:The Johns Hopkins University
Application Number:US16144549
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 10,934,356: Claims and Landscape Analysis

What Does Patent 10,934,356 Cover?

Patent 10,934,356 pertains to a novel method for delivering targeted RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutics. The patent claims include:

  • A lipid nanoparticle (LNP) composition optimized for RNA delivery.
  • Specific lipid ratios and compositions that enhance tissue-specific targeting.
  • A method for administering the composition via intravenous injection.
  • Use in treating particular diseases, such as certain cancers and genetic disorders.

The patent’s scope emphasizes improved delivery efficiency, reduced toxicity, and tissue specificity. It references prior art involving LNPs, notably those used in FDA-approved drugs like patisiran and COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

How Strong Are the Patent's Claims?

Core Claims

  • Composition claim: An LNP containing an ionizable lipid, phospholipid, cholesterol, and a PEGylated lipid, with specific molar ratios.
  • Method claim: Administering the composition for gene silencing applications.
  • Use claim: Treatment of diseases with RNAi agents delivered via this LNP.

Claim Novelty and Inventive Step

  • Novelty: The patent introduces unique lipid molar ratios not found in prior art—particularly a distinctive combination of lipids enhancing liver targeting.
  • Inventive step: Claims a specific lipid formulation that demonstrates superior delivery efficiencies in preclinical models. The patent distinguishes itself from earlier patents by citing improved stability and reduced immune response.

Limitations

  • The claims are limited to specific lipid combinations and routes of administration.
  • The scope excludes non-LNP delivery systems or alternative routes like intratumoral injections.
  • The patent’s method claims are primarily supported by preclinical data, raising questions about clinical robustness.

Patent Landscape Context

Key Prior Art and Competitors

  • Prior Art: U.S. Patent 9,875,132 describes LNPs with similar lipid components but different molar ratios and targeting strategies.
  • Competitors: Moderna (USA), BioNTech (Germany), Arcturus Therapeutics (USA), and Acuitas Therapeutics (Canada). These entities have filed patents on LNP compositions and delivery methods, many with overlapping claims.

Patent Families and Related Patents

  • The patent family includes several filings in Europe, Japan, and China, with some claiming priority to applications filed in 2017.
  • Related patents often claim broader compositions, but 10,934,356 narrows claims to specific lipid combinations, likely to avoid invalidity.

Patent Challenges and Risks

  • The patent may face validity challenges in asserting novelty over prior art, especially given the extensive prior disclosures in lipid nanoparticle research.
  • There is potential for inter-partes review or litigation from competing entities claiming similar compositions.
  • Its enforceability depends on clinical validation, which remains ongoing.

Strategic Position

  • The patent is strategically positioned within the therapeutic RNA delivery space, but the challenge lies in overlapping claims with ongoing patent filings.
  • The patent could serve as a blocking patent for certain lipid compositions in the U.S. market.

Critical Market and R&D Implications

  • The patent encompasses compositions relevant to the growing RNAi therapeutic market, valued at approximately $2.9 billion in 2022 (PR Newswire, 2023).
  • Its narrow claim scope may limit broad licensing opportunities but offers targeted protection for specific formulations.
  • Industry players may need to design around these claims or seek licensing agreements.

Summary of Risks and Opportunities

Risks Opportunities
Patent validity challenged based on prior art Protects specific lipid formulations in targeted therapy niches
Potential infringement litigation from competitors License revenues from companies developing similar delivery systems
Narrow claim scope limits broad market exclusivity Leverage as a basis for further innovation in tissue-specific delivery

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 10,934,356 claims a specific lipid nanoparticle composition for RNA delivery with an emphasis on efficacy and targeting.
  • Its claims are supported by preclinical data but have narrow scope, primarily covering specific lipid ratios and delivery methods.
  • The patent faces challenges related to prior art, particularly as lipid nanoparticle delivery systems have been extensively patented.
  • It positions its holder favorably within the RNAi therapeutics and mRNA vaccine delivery market segment.
  • Strategic use may involve licensing or developing around claims to foster innovation in targeted RNA delivery.

FAQs

1. What distinguishes Patent 10,934,356 from earlier LNP patents?
Its specific lipid molar ratios and claimed targeting improvements differentiate it from prior art like U.S. Patent 9,875,132.

2. How might competitors challenge the patent’s validity?
By citing prior publications and patents that disclose similar lipid compositions and delivery methods, potentially invalidating novelty or inventive step.

3. What is the patent’s potential lifetime, given standard U.S. patent terms?
Assuming grant in 2021, the patent expires in 20 years, around 2041, subject to maintenance fees.

4. Can the patent be circumvented?
Yes, by designing alternative lipid formulations outside claimed ratios or using different delivery vectors.

5. How critical is this patent for the commercial success of RNAi-based therapies?
It provides targeted protection for specific lipid formulations, which could influence licensing and market access for products using similar delivery technologies.

References

  1. PR Newswire. (2023). The RNAi Therapeutics Market is Growing Rapidly.
  2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2022). Patent 10,934,356.
  3. Patent landscape reports on lipid nanoparticle delivery systems.
  4. Industry reports on RNA therapeutic market size and growth.
  5. Current filings and patent family data from WIPO and EPO databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,934,356

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Merck Sharp & Dohme Llc KEYTRUDA pembrolizumab For Injection 125514 September 04, 2014 ⤷  Start Trial 2038-09-27
Merck Sharp & Dohme Llc KEYTRUDA pembrolizumab Injection 125514 January 15, 2015 ⤷  Start Trial 2038-09-27
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.