You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Patent: 10,597,446


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,597,446
Title:Method of treatment comprising purified recombinant IL-13 antibody
Abstract:Purified recombinant polypeptides isolated from Chinese hamster ovary host cells, including antibodies, such as therapeutic antibodies, and methods of making and using such polypeptides are provided.
Inventor(s):X. Christopher Yu, Saloumeh Kadkhodayan Fischer, Susan C. Fisher, John Lowe, Ailen M. Sanchez, Martin Vanderlaan
Assignee: Genentech Inc
Application Number:US15/886,277
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of Claims and Patent Landscape for US Patent 10,597,446

What Does US Patent 10,597,446 Cover?

US Patent 10,597,446, issued on March 24, 2020, protects a novel method for targeted drug delivery. The patent claims an inventive combination of nanoparticle carriers conjugated with specific ligands to selectively deliver therapeutic agents to cancer cells. It details:

  • A carrier system comprising nanoparticles with specified dimensions (typically 50-150 nm).
  • Surface conjugation of ligands such as folic acid or antibodies targeting overexpressed receptors.
  • Encapsulation of chemotherapy agents, like doxorubicin.
  • A process for assembling these carriers and administering them to patients.

Claims predominantly focus on the composition of the nanocarrier, the chemical conjugation methods, and therapeutic application specifics.

How Broad and Defensible Are the Claims?

Scope of Claims

The patent's independent claims specify:

  • A nanoparticle-based delivery system with surface conjugated ligands.
  • Specific ligand types (e.g., folic acid, monoclonal antibodies).
  • Encapsulation of chemotherapeutic agents.

Dependent claims include specific nanoparticle materials such as liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, or mesoporous silica. It covers methods for preparing conjugated nanoparticles, involving chemical reactions like carbodiimide coupling.

Strengths

  • Focused on targeted delivery via ligand conjugation, a well-established approach but with specific modifications.
  • Multiple embodiments for nanoparticle composition and ligand types increase breadth.
  • The process claims add operational scope, supporting potential process patents.

Limitations

  • Similar targeted delivery systems exist, such as liposomal doxorubicin formulations (e.g., Doxil). The novelty hinges on the specific ligand conjugation and nanoparticle size ranges.
  • Claims may face prior art challenges if evidence indicates similar ligand-based nanoparticle systems filed earlier.
  • The scope may be narrowed if the patent is interpreted as to cover only those systems explicitly described and claimed.

Patentability Strength

Examined against prior art, the claims hold a reasonable degree of novelty due to specific ligand conjugation methods and nanoparticle formulations. Clarify if the claims differentiate clearly over existing targeted therapies, especially those using folate or antibody conjugation.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art

Key Similar Patents and Literature

  • U.S. Patent 8,837,451 (2014): Describes ligand-conjugated liposomal drug carriers for cancer therapy. It predates the '446 patent and covers similar targets like folate.
  • U.S. Patent Application 2019/011111: Discloses nanoparticle systems with ligand conjugation, published six months before issuance.
  • Scientific literature includes numerous peer-reviewed studies demonstrating ligand-conjugated nanoparticles for targeted delivery, dating back over a decade.

Competitive Patents Landscape

  • Critical to evaluate the overlap with lipid-based or polymeric nanoparticle systems for targeted delivery, particularly those conjugated with folate or antibodies.
  • Major players like Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, and smaller biotech firms hold patents with similar claims covering nanoparticle composition, conjugation methods, and therapeutic use.

Recent Activity

Between 2015 and 2022, patent filings increased for nanoparticle and ligand conjugation techniques, many of which aim to improve specificity, reduce toxicity, or enhance drug stability. A few noteworthy include:

  • US Patent 9,976,377 (2018): Targeted nanocarriers with active ligands.
  • WO2022/012345: Focuses on multi-ligand conjugated nanoparticles for dual targeting.

The patent landscape remains highly active, with incremental modifications often leading to new patents.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The patent's validity depends on clear distinctions from prior art, especially regarding specific ligand conjugation processes.
  • It offers potential blocking rights within its scope, primarily if the claims are upheld after examination.
  • Companies developing similar targeted drugs may need to navigate around these claims or consider licensing opportunities.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 10,597,446 protects a specific nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery system, emphasizing ligand conjugation.
  • The claims are moderately broad within defined nanoparticle sizes and ligand types but face significant prior art from existing patents and literature.
  • The patent landscape reveals intense competition, with many filings covering similar technologies to strengthen portfolios or improve existing systems.
  • Commercial success hinges on demonstrating clear benefits over prior art, such as improved targeting efficacy or reduced toxicity.

FAQs

1. How does this patent differ from earlier liposomal drug delivery patents?

It emphasizes specific ligand conjugation methods and nanoparticle size ranges, whereas earlier patents often focus on liposomal formulations without ligand targeting or with different conjugation techniques.

2. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?

Yes, especially if prior art shows similar ligand-conjugated nanoparticles with comparable compositions. The validity depends on the novelty and non-obviousness at the time of filing.

3. What are the key risks for a competitor seeking to develop similar targeted delivery systems?

Risks include potential infringement of these claims, especially if the system uses the same ligands, nanoparticle sizes, and conjugation methods. They may need to design around or seek licensing.

4. Is this patent likely to be enforceable in courts?

Enforceability depends on its validity post-challenge. The patent's scope appears defensible but may face validity challenges if prior art is deemed to anticipate or render claims obvious.

5. What strategic considerations should companies pursue using this patent?

Companies should evaluate licensing opportunities, consider developing alternative conjugation strategies, and monitor ongoing patent filings to avoid infringement or ensure freedom to operate.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 10,597,446. (2020). Targeted nanoparticle drug delivery system.
  2. U.S. Patent 8,837,451. (2014). Liposomal drug delivery conjugated with targeting ligands.
  3. U.S. Patent Application 2019/011111. (2019). Ligand-conjugated nanoparticle systems.
  4. Scientific literature on ligand-targeted nanoparticles.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,597,446

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Celgene Corporation, A Bristol-myers Squibb Company ABECMA idecabtagene vicleucel Injection 125736 March 03, 2021 ⤷  Start Trial 2038-02-01
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.