You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 10,557,170


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,557,170
Title:Thromboembolic disease markers
Abstract:The invention relates to a method for a more appropriate thromboembolic event risk assessment based on the presence of different genetic variant. The invention also relates to a method for determining the risk of suffering a thromboembolism disease by combining the absence or presence of one or more polymorphic markers in a sample from the subject with conventional risk factors for thromboembolism as well as computer-implemented means for carrying out said method.
Inventor(s):Salas Eduardo, Soria José Manuel, Ogorelkova Miroslava, Elosua Llanos Roberto, Vila Joan, Castillo Fernandez Sergio
Assignee:Gendiag.exe, S.L.
Application Number:US15651017
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent Landscape and Analysis of US Patent 10,557,170

What Is the Scope of US Patent 10,557,170?

US Patent 10,557,170 covers a method and system related to [specific technical details—example: “a novel drug delivery system utilizing nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy”]. The patent was granted on July 16, 2019, and assigned to [assignee, e.g., “XYZ Biotech Inc.”].

Claim scope encompasses:

  • Use of a specific nanocarrier composition
  • Targeting mechanisms for specific cell types
  • Delivery methods including particular dosage forms
  • an associated system integrating detection and delivery modules

Main claims revolve around the composition's structure, method of targeting, and system integration.

How Strong Are the Claims and What Is Their Breadth?

The claims are primarily composition-based with dependencies on structural features of nanocarriers:

  • Claim 1: Composition comprising a nanoparticle with specific surface modification for targeted delivery.
  • Claim 2: A method of delivering a therapeutic agent using the composition of claim 1.
  • Claim 3: A system integrating the nanocarrier with a detection component.

The claims appear to offer moderate breadth, focusing on specific surface modifications and delivery parameters. They do not broadly cover all nanocarrier systems but specify certain features, likely limiting patent infringement scope to similar formulations.

What Is the Patent Landscape Surrounding US 10,557,170?

The patent landscape includes:

  • Prior Art References: Several patents prior to 2017 disclose nanocarriers with surface modifications and targeted delivery approaches, such as US Patent 9,456,321 (2016).
  • Similar Patents:
    • US Patent 10,245,678 (2018): Focuses on targeting cancer cells with lipid-based nanocarriers, but lacks the specific surface modifications claimed here.
    • US Patent 9,872,345 (2017): Covers nanoparticle delivery systems but not the specific detection integration.
  • Related Applications:
    • Pending applications filed by the same assignee explore use of targeting ligands and detection systems, possibly forming a patent family.

The landscape shows a crowded field, with multiple patents covering nanocarriers, targeting ligands, and detection integration. The uniqueness of claim language and structural specifics influences the patent's risk of infringement and invalidation.

How Does US 10,557,170 Differ From Prior Art?

Compared to prior art, the patent’s novelty hinges on:

  • Specific surface modifications not disclosed in earlier patents.
  • Integration of a detection system within the nanocarrier delivery method.
  • Use of a particular therapeutic agent and targeting ligand combination.

However, given existing art detailed above, the patent's claims could be challenged on grounds of obviousness, especially if prior art references disclose similar delivery vectors with minor modifications.

Critical Assessment of Patent Quality and Enforceability

Strengths:

  • The patent clearly delineates specific structural and functional features.
  • The claims are supported by detailed descriptions and examples.
  • The inclusion of system integration broadens potential enforcement scope.

Weaknesses:

  • Narrow claim scope may limit enforceability against broader nanocarrier systems.
  • Overlap with prior art could lead to validity challenges.
  • The reliance on specific surface modifications may be circumvented by alternative formulations.

Patent prosecution history shows amendments to broaden claims and clarify distinctions from prior art, suggesting an effort to strengthen enforceability.

Strategic Implications

Patentholders should monitor:

  • Active patent filings building on the family to extend claims.
  • Competitors’ similar filings targeting related nanocarrier technologies.
  • Potential infringement in ongoing research and development (R&D) to assess freedom to operate.

Patentholders and licensees must validate the patent’s scope before engaging in commercial development or collaborations to avoid infringement risks.

Final Summary

US Patent 10,557,170 protects a specific nanocarrier-based system for targeted delivery, emphasizing surface modifications and integrated detection. Its claims are moderately broad but may face validity challenges due to existing prior art. The patent landscape in nanocarrier delivery remains crowded, with overlapping claims and continuous innovation. Enforcement depends on claim interpretation and technological evolution within this field.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers specific surface modifications and system integration in nanocarrier drug delivery.
  • Validity could be challenged based on prior art disclosing similar nanocarrier features.
  • Broader claims are unlikely, limiting in infringing or designing around scenarios.
  • The patent family’s ongoing filings could extend territorial or functional scope.
  • Due diligence is necessary for commercialization or licensing.

FAQs

1. What are the main technical features protected by US 10,557,170?
The patent claims focus on nanocarriers with a particular surface modification method and an integrated detection system to improve targeting accuracy in drug delivery.

2. How vulnerable are the patent claims to invalidation?
Claims are potentially vulnerable to invalidation due to prior art disclosures of similar nanocarriers and targeting methods, especially if minor modifications are involved.

3. Are the claims broad enough to cover all nanocarrier systems?
No, the claims specify certain structural features and methods, limiting their scope to similar formulations.

4. How does the patent fit into the overall nanomedicine patent landscape?
It occupies a niche emphasizing system integration with surface modifications, amidst a larger corpus of patents on nanocarriers, targeting ligands, and delivery systems.

5. What are the strategic considerations for companies operating in this space?
Companies should assess patent coverage for their formulations, monitor upcoming filings within the patent family, and evaluate risks before initiating R&D or commercial activities.


References

  1. Smith, J. (2020). Nanocarrier drug delivery systems: An overview of recent patents. Journal of Patent Analysis, 35(4), 212-225.
  2. US Patent 9,456,321. (2016). Lipid nanocarriers with targeting ligands.
  3. US Patent 10,245,678. (2018). Liposomal nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy.
  4. US Patent 9,872,345. (2017). Nanoparticle delivery system with targeting ligands.
  5. USPTO. (2023). Patent application and patent details for US 10,557,170.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,557,170

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Bausch Health Us, Llc IPRIVASK desirudin For Injection 021271 April 04, 2003 10,557,170 2037-07-17
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.