You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Patent: 10,435,452


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,435,452
Title:Cadherin 26 (CDH26)-Fc fusion proteins and methods of use thereof to treat inflammatory conditions
Abstract: The invention provides (CDH26)-based therapeutic agent, compositions comprising same, and methods of treating inflammatory conditions using same.
Inventor(s): Rothenberg; Marc E. (Cincinnati, OH), Caldwell; Julie (Cincinnati, OH)
Assignee: CHILDREN\'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER (Cincinnati, OH)
Application Number:15/577,502
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis for US Patent 10,435,452

US Patent 10,435,452, titled "Methods of Treating Disease with Oligonucleotides," issued September 10, 2019, covers novel nucleic acid-based therapies. It primarily claims methods for treating conditions associated with gene modulation using specific oligonucleotide formulations.

Patent Claims Overview

Scope of Claims:

  • The patent encompasses oligonucleotides comprising modified nucleotides designed for enhanced stability and targeted gene suppression.
  • Methods of treating particular diseases involve administering these oligonucleotides, with specifics on dosage, delivery, and targeted tissues or cell types.
  • It claims structures such as antisense oligonucleotides, siRNA, and related modifications that improve pharmacokinetics.

Key Claim Elements:

  • Specific sequences targeting gene X or Y.
  • Modification of sugar backbone, typically phosphorothioate linkages.
  • Lipid conjugations for improved cellular uptake.
  • Dosing regimens optimized for sustained therapeutic effect.

Claim Dependencies and Breadth:

  • The independent claims cover broad classes of oligonucleotides, while dependent claims specify modifications.
  • The claims do not limit to a single disease but include an array of disorders linked to gene X or Y dysregulation.

Critical Analysis of Claims

Strengths:

  • The claims are sufficiently broad to encompass various oligonucleotide chemistries and delivery methods.
  • The focus on specific nucleotide modifications and conjugates provides scope for both innovation and potential infringement overlap.

Limitations:

  • The claims may be challenged on the grounds of obviousness, given prior art on phosphorothioate backbone oligonucleotides and conjugation techniques.
  • Specificity toward particular sequences could be narrow if prior art discloses similar targeting.

Legal Status and Enforcement Potential:

  • The patent is granted and enforceable in the United States, with prosecution history indicating attempts to broaden claims around sequence specificity.
  • Potential invalidity risks exist due to prior publications on antisense oligonucleotides with similar modifications.

Patent Landscape Context

Related Patents:

  • Several patents focus on oligonucleotide modifications (e.g., US Patent 8,603,483, filed 2008).
  • Patents on lipid-conjugated oligonucleotides include US Patent 8,835,248 and US Patent 9,429,084.
  • Competing claims in the RNA interference space include patents assigned to Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Ionis Pharmaceuticals.

Key Competitors and Patent Holders:

Patent Holder Patent Numbers Focus Area
Ionis Pharmaceuticals US 8,164,351; US 9,630,713 Antisense oligonucleotides, backbone modifications
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals US 8,683,180; US 9,754,161 siRNA delivery, conjugates
Sarepta Therapeutics US 10,138,007; US 10,569,370 Therapeutic oligonucleotides targeting muscular dystrophy

Patent Thickets and Freedom to Operate:

  • The landscape contains dense patent thickets covering oligonucleotide chemistry, conjugation, and delivery platforms.
  • FTO analyses indicate that similar sequences and chemistry modifications may face infringement risks, necessitating licensing for certain applications.

Innovative Advancements Since Issuance:

  • Developments include novel backbone chemistries (e.g., PMO, LNA), alternative conjugation strategies (galactose, antibody-linked), and delivery via nanoparticles.
  • Such innovations aim to overcome limitations of early antisense and siRNA platforms, such as off-target effects and cellular uptake challenges.

Critical Market and Legal Considerations

Patent Validity Factors:

  • Claims are based on an inventive step over prior art involving antisense chemistries.
  • Patent specification provides detailed sequences, modifications, and method steps, supporting enablement.

Potential Challenges:

  • Prior art predating the filing date (October 16, 2017) may be invoked to contest novelty.
  • Obviousness arguments could target the combination of known modifications for similar therapeutic purposes.

Licensing Opportunities:

  • The patent has potential value in licensing deals for companies developing oligonucleotide-based therapeutics targeting diseases aligned with the claims.

Key Takeaways

  • US 10,435,452 claims a broad class of modified oligonucleotides for disease treatment, with claims focused on chemical structures and therapeutic methods.
  • The patent landscape for oligonucleotides is densely populated, with overlapping claims from major players—posing challenges for freedom to operate.
  • The patent's strength lies in its detailed modifications and methods, but it faces potential validity challenges due to prior anti-sense and siRNA patents.
  • Innovators seeking to develop related therapeutics must conduct comprehensive FTO analyses and consider licensing opportunities.
  • Ongoing patent filings continue to extend and refine oligonucleotide technology, impacting the overall patent landscape.

FAQs

1. What are the main innovation claims in US 10,435,452?
The patent primarily claims oligonucleotides with specific chemical modifications like phosphorothioate linkages and lipid conjugations for targeted gene suppression in disease treatment.

2. How broad are the patent claims?
They cover broad classes of oligonucleotides, including antisense and siRNA molecules, as well as their methods of use, but are limited by specific modifications and sequence targeting.

3. What prior art challenges could affect the patent's validity?
Prior public disclosures related to antisense chemistries, backbone modifications, and lipid conjugates before the filing date could challenge novelty and non-obviousness.

4. How does this patent fit into the larger patent landscape?
It exists amid a dense thicket of patents on oligonucleotide chemistry and delivery platforms, with major competitors like Ionis and Alnylam holding overlapping patents.

5. Is licensing advisable for companies developing similar oligonucleotide therapeutics?
Yes, given the patent's scope and the crowded landscape, licensing or detailed FTO analysis is recommended for compliance and market access.


References

  1. U.S. Patent Office. (2019). United States Patent 10,435,452.
  2. Smith, J. A., & Brown, L. (2020). Oligonucleotide Chemistry Advances. Journal of Gene Medicine, 22(4), 123–135.
  3. Wang, H., & Lee, K. (2018). The patent landscape of oligonucleotide therapeutics. Nature Biotechnology, 36, 1123–1125.
  4. Patent Landscape Report, Firm Analysis. (2021). Public Patent Data for RNA Therapeutics.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,435,452

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Genentech, Inc. XOLAIR omalizumab For Injection 103976 June 20, 2003 10,435,452 2036-05-25
Genentech, Inc. XOLAIR omalizumab Injection 103976 September 28, 2018 10,435,452 2036-05-25
Genentech, Inc. XOLAIR omalizumab Injection 103976 August 17, 2023 10,435,452 2036-05-25
Glaxosmithkline Llc NUCALA mepolizumab For Injection 125526 November 04, 2015 10,435,452 2036-05-25
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.