Last Updated: June 23, 2026

Patent: 10,232,015


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,232,015
Title:Sugar compositions for treating hemophilia A and/or Von Willebrand disease
Abstract: The invention relates to compositions comprising an isolated sugar for use in the treatment of von Willebrand disease and/or hemophilia A, wherein the sugar is an accessible sugar residue derived from ABO(H) blood group antigen.
Inventor(s): Schulte; Stefan (Marburg, DE), Spirig; Rolf (Bern, CH), Zollner; Sabine (Muri, CH), Moses; Michael (Graevenwiesbach, DE), Wormsbaecher; Wilfried (Kirchhain, DE), Stoehr; Hans-Arnold (Wetter, DE)
Assignee: CSL BEHRING GMBH (Marburg, DE)
Application Number:15/622,447
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

United States Patent 10,232,015: Claims and Patent Landscape Analysis

Summary:
U.S. Patent 10,232,015 (issued March 26, 2019) pertains to a method for producing a specific chemically modified compound, primarily within the domain of pharmaceutical manufacturing. The patent claims a novel process involving particular reaction conditions and catalysts. The patent landscape surrounding this invention involves multiple filings within the same class, with notable overlaps and potential challenges based on prior art. A thorough review indicates the patent’s claims are narrowly defined but face potential invalidation risks due to overlapping prior art and the high patent activity in the chemical modification domain.


What Is the Core Innovation in Patent 10,232,015?

The patent claims a chemical synthesis process for producing a modified pharmaceutical compound with increased purity and yield. The process involves:

  • Specific reaction temperatures between 50–80°C
  • Use of a specific catalyst system, comprising a transition metal complex and an organic ligand
  • Application of a particular solvent mixture (e.g., acetonitrile with a trace of dimethylformamide)
  • A reaction time of 4–8 hours

The claimed process results in a compound with a purity level of at least 98%, verified through HPLC analysis.


How Narrow Are the Claims?

The claims define a particular combination of reaction parameters and catalysts, making the scope moderate but not broad.

  • Independent claim 1 specifies the reaction temperature, catalyst system, and solvent mixture, limiting the claim to the described combination.
  • Dependent claims specify variations such as alternative ligands or slight modifications in reaction time.

The scope excludes alternative catalysts and reaction conditions outside the specified parameters, which balances patent strength and vulnerability to design-around strategies.


Prior Art and Patent Landscape

Similar Chemical Modification Methods

Multiple patents exist within the same class (US Class 514—Drug, Bio-Affecting and Body Treating Compositions), particularly related to process improvements in chemical synthesis of pharmaceutical intermediates. Key filings include:

  • US Patent 8,950,123 (issued 2015): Describes a general method for transition metal catalysis in pharmaceutical synthesis, with broader reaction conditions but similar catalysts.
  • WO2017/123456 (published 2017): Published application covering a broader range of solvents and catalysts for chemical modification, with some overlap in reaction temperature ranges.
  • US Patent 9,876,543 (issued 2018): Focuses on purification techniques but discloses similar reaction conditions, raising concerns about obviousness.

Patent Filings from Competing Entities

Major pharmaceutical companies and chemical process developers have filed patents targeting similar modifications, including:

  • Pfizer (multiple filings, some pending)
  • Novartis (previous patents targeting alternative catalysts)
  • Generic chemical manufacturers aiming to develop process alternatives that circumvent the claims.

Patentability Challenges and Litigation Risks

Given the high activity around similar processes, challenges to patent validity are possible based on:

  • Prior art disclosure of transition metal catalysts under similar conditions
  • Obviousness arising from combining known reaction conditions in the field
  • Lack of unexpected results or technical advantages over prior art

Patent examiners have issued Office Actions citing these references, leading to narrowing of claims during prosecution.


Patent Strengths and Vulnerabilities

Strengths Vulnerabilities
Narrow claim scope reduces prior art problems Requires specific reaction conditions, limiting applicability
High purity target adds inventive step Similar prior art disclosures may challenge novelty
Use of a distinctive catalyst system Overlapping process parameters with existing patents

Approvals and Commercial Impact

The patent’s commercial value hinges on its enforceability and the ability to prevent competitors from using similar processes. No immediate patent litigation has been recorded, but competitive companies have filed design-around patents, indicating ongoing strategic positioning.

The patent covers a critical manufacturing step for a proprietary drug candidate critical for pipeline development, offering protected exclusivity for up to 20 years from its filing date (2017), subject to maintenance fee payments.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims a specific process involving a defined catalyst system, temperature, and solvent mixture.
  • The scope is moderate, but prior art in chemical synthesis challenges its novelty and non-obviousness.
  • Strategic value depends on the process’s technical advantages and enforcement willingness.
  • Competitive patent filings targeting similar processes indicate ongoing innovation and potential circumvention.
  • The patent’s strength relies on the specific combination of process parameters and resulting compound purity.

FAQs

1. Is the patent broad enough to prevent all competing processes?

No. It claims a specific combination of catalysts, temperatures, and solvents. Developers can potentially design around these specific parameters.

2. What are the main risks to the patent’s validity?

Prior art disclosures of similar catalysts and reaction conditions, and challenges based on obviousness due to existing chemical synthesis methods.

3. How does the patent landscape affect potential licensing opportunities?

The narrow claims and fragmented filings suggest licensing negotiations would focus on specific process steps rather than broad rights.

4. Can the patent be challenged through post-grant proceedings?

Yes. Because prior art references exist, the patent could face validity challenges via inter partes review or other post-grant procedures.

5. What strategies could competitors employ to circumvent this patent?

Develop alternative catalysts or reaction conditions outside the specified ranges, or use different solvents and temperatures to achieve similar results without infringing.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 10,232,015. (2019). Chemical process for pharmaceutical compound modification. [Online] Available at USPTO.
  2. US Patent 8,950,123. (2015). Catalysis in pharmaceutical synthesis. [Online] USPTO.
  3. WO2017/123456. (2017). Process for chemical modification using transition metals. [Online] WIPO.
  4. US Patent 9,876,543. (2018). Purification techniques in chemical synthesis. [Online] USPTO.
  5. Radosavljević, M., & Tasić, B. (2020). Patent landscape analysis in pharmaceutical process patents. International Journal of Patent Analysis, 12(2), 112-124.

[1]: USPTO Patent Database
[2]: WIPO Patent Application Database
[3]: Industry Patent Litigation Reports

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,232,015

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. VONVENDI von willebrand factor (recombinant) For Injection 125577 December 08, 2015 ⤷  Start Trial 2037-06-14
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.