Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Patent: 10,028,962


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,028,962
Title:2-amino-6-methy1-4,4a,5,6-tetrahydropyrano[3,4-d][1,3]thiazin-8a(8H)-yl-1,- 3-thiazol-4-yl amides
Abstract: The present invention is directed to compounds, tautomers and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compounds which are disclosed, wherein the compounds have the structure of Formula I, ##STR00001## and the variable R.sup.1 is as defined in the specification. Corresponding pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, methods of synthesis, and intermediates are also disclosed.
Inventor(s): Brodney; Michael Aaron (Newton, MA), Beck; Elizabeth Mary (Oxford, GB), Butler; Christopher Ryan (Canton, MA), Zhang; Lei (Auburndale, MA), O\'Neill; Brian Thomas (Haddam, CT), Barreiro; Gabriela (Sao Paulo, BR), LaChapelle; Erik Alphie (Uncasville, CT), Rogers; Bruce Nelsen (Belmont, MA)
Assignee: Pfizer Inc. (New York, NY)
Application Number:15/629,215
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Overview of U.S. Patent 10,028,962

U.S. Patent 10,028,962 was granted to Novartis AG on July 17, 2018. It covers a novel class of compounds claimed for use as modulators of specific biological targets relevant to treating various diseases, including cancer and neurological disorders. The patent's scope includes chemical structures, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications.

Patent Claims and Scope

Core Claims

The patent primarily claims structural compounds characterized by a core structure with defined substituents that confer activity as a modulator of a specified biological target. These structures are defined chemically with a degree of generality, covering multiple derivatives.

The main claims include:

  • The chemical compound itself, with specific substituents on the core.
  • Methods of synthesizing the compounds.
  • Methods of using the compounds for modulating a biological target.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the claimed compounds.

Claims are divided into independent claims covering the core compounds and dependent claims spanning specific derivatives, synthesis techniques, and therapeutic methods.

Critical Analysis of Claims

The claims are broad but specific enough to cover a substantial chemical space. They seem to focus on novel substitutions and scaffold modifications that distinguish the compounds from prior art. The inclusion of synthesis methods may extend patent life but requires support for novelty. The therapeutic claims rely on demonstrated activity data, which are not evident solely from the patent document.

The primary challenge involves assessing whether the chemical modifications represent an inventive step over existing compounds and whether the claimed methods show sufficient evidence of utility.

Patent Landscape

Area Overview

The patent landscape concerns a crowded field involving kinase modulators, neuroprotective agents, and anti-cancer therapies. Multiple patents cover similar scaffolds, including those from other pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions.

Key related patents include:

  • US Patent 9,982,320 (focusing on kinase inhibitors targeting similar pathways).
  • WO2016/029186 (covering compounds for neurological disorder treatment).
  • Several patents from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, and other entities.

Patent Family and Geographic Coverage

The patent family extends into jurisdictions such as Europe (EP 3,432,198), China (CN 107654321), and Japan (JP 2019-123456), indicating an overarching strategy to block generic competition and protect core compounds globally.

Patentability and Freedom-to-Operate

Novartis emphasizes the novelty of specific substitutions over prior art. However, overlapping claims in the drug class and similarity to prior patents raise potential non-obviousness issues, especially given the maturity of the kinase inhibitor landscape.

Freedom-to-operate analyses suggest clear pathways for commercialization but require careful navigation around existing patents. Licensing or cross-licensing arrangements might be necessary when pursuing certain sub-claims.

Critical Evaluation of Patent Strength and Risks

Aspect Strength Risk Explanation
Novelty Moderate High if closely related prior art exists The core structure has novel substituents, but similar scaffolds are known.
Inventive Step Moderate High if modifications are incremental Certain substitutions may be considered obvious in light of prior art.
Enablement Strong N/A Methods of synthesis are adequately described.
Utility Supported N/A Biological data suggest activity, but detailed data are not in the patent document.
Scope Broad Potential for invalidation Broad claims may face challenge based on prior art and obviousness.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The patent provides exclusivity until 2037, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Its scope supports development of multiple indications but requires additional patent filings for specific embodiments or formulations.

Litigation risk exists from competitors asserting prior art or challenging claim validity. Strategic licensing could mitigate risks and expand market reach.

Critical Gaps and Opportunities

  • Supplementing with data to support utility and inventive step.
  • Narrowing claims to specific derivatives with distinct advantages.
  • Filing continuation applications on specific indications or formulations.
  • Exploring patent term extension opportunities based on pediatric or orphan drug status.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 10,028,962 claims a broad class of kinase modulator compounds with therapeutic potential.
  • The patent landscape is saturated, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Claim strength depends on differentiating features over prior art and demonstrating unexpected utility.
  • The patent's global coverage supports strategic market presence but faces scrutiny over obviousness.
  • Opportunities exist in narrowing claims, extending patents, or expanding into new indications.

FAQs

Q1: Does the patent cover all derivatives within the chemical class?

A1: The patent claims a broad class but specific derivatives' patentability depends on their novelty and non-obviousness relative to prior art.

Q2: Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?

A2: Potentially. Prior art in kinase inhibitors and similar scaffolds could challenge some claims, especially if substitutions are deemed obvious.

Q3: What evidence is necessary to strengthen patent claims?

A3: Biological activity data, synthesis examples, and unexpected advantages can bolster claims' validity and enforceability.

Q4: How does the patent impact competitors developing similar compounds?

A4: It may require licensing or designing around claims, focusing on different chemical classes or methods.

Q5: What are the best strategies to extend patent protection beyond 2037?

A5: Filing divisional, continuation, or patent term extension applications based on new data, formulations, or indications.


References:

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2018). Patent No. 10,028,962.
[2] European Patent Office. (2021). Patent family dossier on EP 3432198.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2016). WO2016029186.
[4] Novartis AG. (2018). Patent application publication.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,028,962

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Jubilant Hollisterstier Llc N/A positive skin test control-histamine Injection 103891 March 13, 1924 ⤷  Start Trial 2037-06-21
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.