You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Pollens - grasses, redtop agrostis alba - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for pollens - grasses, redtop agrostis alba
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:5
BLAs:5
Suppliers: see list4
Pharmacology for pollens - grasses, redtop agrostis alba
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for pollens - grasses, redtop agrostis alba Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for pollens - grasses, redtop agrostis alba Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for pollens - grasses, redtop agrostis alba Derived from Patent Text Search

No patents found based on company disclosures

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug: Pollens - Grasses, Redtop Agrostis Alba

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

The biologic drug industry targeting allergenic pollens—specifically grasses such as Agrostis alba (commonly known as redtop grass)—has experienced rapid evolution driven by growing prevalence of allergic rhinitis and other allergy-related conditions worldwide. As public health awareness increases and biotechnological advances facilitate the development of targeted immunotherapies, understanding the market dynamics and financial trajectory for these biologic agents becomes vital for stakeholders.

Market Overview and Trends

Rising Incidence of Allergic Diseases

The global prevalence of allergic rhinitis stands at approximately 10-30% among adults and children, with grass pollen allergies being among the most common causes.[1] The increasing urbanization, climate change, and pollution are contributing to longer and more intense pollen seasons, thereby expanding the market for efficacious biologic interventions. Notably, Agrostis alba, a prevalent perennial grass in North America, Europe, and parts of Asia, is recognized for its potent allergenic properties.[2]

Advancements in Allergen Immunotherapy

Traditional allergy treatments such as antihistamines and corticosteroids provide symptomatic relief but do not alter disease progression. Conversely, biologic therapies—particularly monoclonal antibodies targeting IgE, IL-4, and IL-13 pathways—offer disease-modifying potential.[3] The advent of sublingual tablets, extracts, and injectable biologics introduces specific, personalized treatment options with improved safety profiles, prompting increasing adoption.

Regulatory Landscape

Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) are increasingly approving biologics for allergen immunotherapy. For instance, products like Oralair (Stallergenes Greer), targeting multiple grass pollens, including Agrostis alba, have obtained market authorization following rigorous clinical trials demonstrating safety and efficacy.[4]


Market Drivers

1. Growing Patient Population

The expanding prevalence of grass pollen allergies—especially in urbanized regions—fuels demand for targeted biologics. Enhanced diagnostic capabilities and increased awareness contribute to early identification and treatment initiation.

2. Innovations in Biologics

Progress in recombinant DNA technology and allergen-specific immunotherapy formulations enables the production of highly purified and standardized biologic agents. These innovations lead to improved safety, efficacy, and ease of administration, attracting both clinicians and patients.

3. Portfolio Expansion by Pharmaceutical Companies

Major players such as Stallergenes Greer, ALK-Abelló, and HAL Allergie are expanding their portfolios with biologics targeting grass pollens. Strategic acquisitions, licensing agreements, and pipeline investments support ongoing growth.

4. Reimbursement and Access Policies

Government healthcare schemes and private insurers are increasingly covering biologic allergy treatments—a trend that reduces out-of-pocket expenses and accelerates market penetration.


Market Challenges and Restraints

1. High Development and Manufacturing Costs

Biologics involve complex manufacturing processes, strict quality controls, and extensive clinical trials, leading to high R&D expenditures. These costs often translate into premium pricing, potentially limiting accessibility.

2. Market Penetration Barriers

Despite approval, clinician and patient acceptance of biologic-based immunotherapy may lag due to lack of awareness, concerns about safety, and preference for established symptomatic treatments.

3. Competition from Conventional and Emerging Therapies

Allergic immunotherapy via conventional extracts remains prevalent, and emerging approaches like gene therapy and novel small molecules could impact the biologics market share.

4. Pricing and Reimbursement Constraints

Reimbursement policies vary globally, with certain regions facing restrictive coverage for biologics. Price sensitivity remains a significant obstacle in many healthcare systems.


Financial Trajectory and Market Projections

Market Size and Forecast

According to research reports, the global allergy immunotherapy market—including biologic agents—is expected to reach approximately USD 8.5 billion by 2027, growing at a CAGR of around 6% from 2022 to 2027.[5] The biologic sub-segment, specifically targeting pollen allergies, is projected to witness even faster growth due to technological advances and clinical validation.

Key Regional Markets

  • North America: The dominant market, driven by high awareness, robust healthcare infrastructure, and favorable reimbursement policies.[6]
  • Europe: Substantial growth supported by regulatory approvals and increasing patient population, with attention to conditions like Agrostis alba allergy.
  • Asia-Pacific: Emerging market with expanding allergy prevalence and increasing adoption of biological therapies, projected to exhibit the highest CAGR.

Revenue Streams and Investment Outlook

Biologic allergen products generate revenue not only through medication sales but also via associated diagnostics (e.g., allergy testing kits), patient monitoring services, and companion diagnostics. The pipeline of biologic candidates is robust, with several phase III trials underway for grass pollen-specific immunotherapy, indicating a positive long-term financial outlook.[7]

Strategic Market Opportunities

  • Personalized Immunotherapy: Tailoring biologic treatments to individual allergen sensitivities enhances efficacy and reduces adverse effects, promising higher market penetration.
  • Combination Therapies: Combining biologics with conventional treatments could improve outcomes and foster new revenue streams.
  • Biomarker Development: Identifying predictive biomarkers for response could optimize patient selection, enhancing market differentiation.

Conclusion

The biologic drug market targeting grasses like Agrostis alba reflects a dynamic landscape driven by rising allergy prevalence, technological innovations, and supportive regulatory environments. While challenges persist—particularly around costs and market acceptance—the overall financial trajectory remains positive, supported by expanding patient populations and product pipelines.


Key Takeaways

  • The global allergy immunotherapy market, especially biologics targeting grass pollens such as Agrostis alba, is poised for sustained growth, with projected revenues reaching USD 8.5 billion by 2027.
  • Rising prevalence rates, technological advancements, and regulatory approvals are primary drivers fueling market expansion.
  • High development costs and reimbursement barriers remain significant challenges; however, strategic innovations and regional market opportunities provide avenues for growth.
  • North America and Europe currently dominate, yet rapid growth is anticipated in Asia-Pacific, driven by increasing allergy awareness and healthcare infrastructure development.
  • Investment in personalized biologic therapies and biomarker research can further enhance market valuation and improve patient outcomes.

FAQs

1. What are the primary biologic treatments for grass pollen allergies like Agrostis alba?
Biologic treatments include monoclonal antibody therapies targeting IgE (e.g., omalizumab) and allergen-specific immunotherapy formulations such as sublingual tablets and injectable extracts designed to desensitize patients to Agrostis alba pollen.

2. How do regulatory agencies influence the market expansion of biologic allergen treatments?
Regulatory approvals from bodies like the FDA and EMA validate safety and efficacy, enabling market entry and reimbursement coverage, which in turn accelerates adoption and income generation.

3. What challenges hinder the widespread adoption of biologic allergy treatments?
High costs, lengthy development timelines, clinician and patient acceptance issues, and variable reimbursement policies pose significant barriers to widespread adoption.

4. Which regions are expected to lead the growth of biologic grass pollen allergy therapies?
North America and Europe currently lead due to established healthcare infrastructure, but Asia-Pacific regions are emerging as significant growth markets owing to increasing allergy prevalence and improved healthcare access.

5. What future innovations could reshape this market?
Advances in personalized medicine, biomarker-driven therapies, combination regimens, and novel delivery methods like nanotechnology could significantly influence the trajectory of biologic allergy treatments.


References

[1] Bousquet J, et al. "Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA): Outcomes and Challenges," Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 2020.
[2] D'Amato G, et al. "Climate Change, Air Pollution, and Allergic Respiratory Diseases," Clin Exp Allergy, 2018.
[3] Krishnamoorthy N, et al. "Biological Strategies for Allergen Immunotherapy," Curr Treat Options Allergy, 2021.
[4] Stallergenes Greer. "Product Information for Oralair," 2023.
[5] MarketsandMarkets. "Allergy Immunotherapy Market by allergen (pollen, dust mite, mold), Product, and Region," 2022.
[6] Grand View Research. "Global Allergy Immunotherapy Market," 2022.
[7] Fierce Pharma. "Biologic pipelines targeting pollen allergy," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.