You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Pollens - grasses, orchard grass dactylis glomerata - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for pollens - grasses, orchard grass dactylis glomerata
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:5
BLAs:5
Suppliers: see list4
Pharmacology for pollens - grasses, orchard grass dactylis glomerata
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for pollens - grasses, orchard grass dactylis glomerata Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for pollens - grasses, orchard grass dactylis glomerata Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for pollens - grasses, orchard grass dactylis glomerata Derived from Patent Text Search

No patents found based on company disclosures

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug: Pollens - Grasses, Orchard Grass (Dactylis Glomerata)

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

The biologic drug market targeting pollen allergens—specifically grasses and orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata)—is experiencing emergent growth owing to increased prevalence of allergic rhinitis and asthma worldwide. This niche sector leverages biologics’ high specificity and therapeutic efficacy to address allergen-triggered conditions, promising shifts in treatment paradigms.


Market Overview

The expanding incidence of pollen-induced allergies constitutes a primary driver for biologic interventions targeting grasses and orchard grass. According to the World Allergy Organization, allergic rhinitis affects over 400 million individuals globally, with grass pollen allergies comprising approximately 60-80% of cases in regions with temperate climates[1]. This epidemiological trend signals a substantial unmet need for targeted biologic therapies.

Traditional allergy treatments, such as antihistamines and immunotherapy, offer symptom relief but often fall short of long-term disease modification. Biologics, especially monoclonal antibodies designed to inhibit specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) or cytokines involved in allergic pathways (e.g., IL-4, IL-13), are positioned as transformative therapies. Their ability to induce immunological tolerance can substantially alter disease progression.


Current Market Landscape

The nascent biologic allergy therapeutics market is dominated by a few players. Notably, Omalizumab (Xolair), approved for allergic asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria, represents a pioneering biologic targeting IgE. While not pollen-specific, its success underscores the viability of biologic options in allergy management.

More targeted biologics under development or early commercialization aim to specifically address pollen sensitization. For grass and orchard grass allergies, the focus is on subtype-specific monoclonal antibodies or peptide-based vaccines designed to modulate immune response to these pollen proteins.

Market Players and Initiatives:

  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi are developing novel biologics targeting eosinophilic inflammation linked to pollen allergies.
  • AstraZeneca’s biologic pipeline includes agents under investigation targeting cytokines involved in allergic inflammation.
  • Emergent biotech firms are exploring peptide immunotherapy coupled with biologic adjuvants tailored to orchard grass and grasses in general.

The market potential remains partly constrained by the high development costs and regulatory hurdles for allergen-specific biologics but is poised for rapid expansion as clinical data accumulate.


Key Market Drivers

  • Increasing Allergic Disease Prevalence: Urbanization, climate change, and pollution contribute to rising pollen levels and allergic sensitization, expanding the patient base.
  • Limitations of Conventional Therapy: Resistance to antihistamines and side effects from corticosteroids encourage the pursuit of targeted biologic options.
  • Advances in Biotechnology: Recombinant DNA technology facilitates the development of allergy-specific biologics with high efficacy and safety profiles.
  • Regulatory Support: Agencies like FDA and EMA have been increasingly amenable to approving biologics with substantial clinical evidence, reducing time-to-market.

Market Challenges

  • High Cost of Therapy: Biologics typically command premium pricing, which can limit access and adoption.
  • Need for Long-term Data: Demonstrating durable efficacy and safety for pollen-specific biologics requires extensive clinical trials.
  • Patient Stratification: Identifying appropriate candidates via biomarkers or phenotypic analysis remains complex.
  • Regional Variability: Pollen seasons, species prevalence, and climate influence market acceptance and demand patterns.

Financial Trajectory

The financial outlook for biologics targeting grass and orchard grass pollen allergies is cautiously optimistic. While currently in the developmental or early commercialization phase, projections suggest a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 12-15% over the next five years, driven by pipeline progress and unmet clinical needs.

Market Valuation Estimates:

  • The global allergy biologics market was valued at approximately $2.5 billion in 2022[2].
  • Segment-specific expansion, focusing ongrass and orchard grass allergens, could reach $4-6 billion by 2030, capturing a larger share following successful trials and approvals.
  • Key economic factors include high R&D expenditure, cost of manufacturing biologics, and reimbursement landscapes in developed regions.

Revenue Streams:

  • Product Sales: Direct through healthcare providers and pharmacies.
  • Partnerships and Licensing: Strategic collaborations facilitate accelerated development, marketing, and distribution.
  • Subscription-based Therapeutic Protocols: Emerging models focusing on personalized, long-term immunomodulation.

Future Trends and Investment Opportunities

  • Personalized Immunotherapy: The integration of biomarker-driven patient stratification allows tailored biologic treatments, boosting efficacy.
  • Oral Biologics and Delivery Platforms: Research into alternative delivery mechanisms aims to improve patient compliance.
  • Gene Editing and Vaccines: Next-generation biologic approaches with prolonged effects and fewer side effects are under exploration.
  • Climate Change Impact: Rising pollen levels due to climate shifts reinforce urgent investment in allergen-specific biologics.

Regulatory and Market Access Considerations

Regulators demand comprehensive safety and efficacy data, which can delay market entry. However, accelerated approval pathways are increasingly available for treatments addressing significant unmet needs. Reimbursement strategies, including health technology assessments, directly influence ROI and market penetration.


Conclusion

The biologic drug landscape targeting pollens—grasses and orchard grass—is set for significant growth, underpinned by increasing disease prevalence, technological advances, and unmet therapeutic needs. While challenges persist, particularly related to costs and clinical validation, the trajectory points toward expanding adoption and substantial revenue generation. Stakeholders must focus on targeted clinical trials, strategic alliances, and cost-effective manufacturing to capitalize on this promising market segment.


Key Takeaways

  • Rising prevalence of pollen-induced allergic diseases creates robust demand for targeted biologics.
  • Innovation in biotechnology fosters development of highly specific, immunomodulatory biologics for grass and orchard grass allergies.
  • Market growth is supported by technological advances, favorable regulatory pathways, and unmet clinical needs.
  • Financial prospects target a CAGR of 12-15%, with revenue potential reaching billions by 2030.
  • Strategic focus on biomarkers, personalized therapy, and cost containment will be vital for market success.

FAQs

1. What are the main biologic approaches for pollen allergy treatment?
Biologics primarily target IgE (e.g., omalizumab) or cytokines like IL-4 and IL-13 involved in allergic inflammation. Emerging therapies are focusing on allergen-specific immune modulation, utilizing monoclonal antibodies, peptide vaccines, or immunomodulatory biologic agents.

2. How does climate change influence the market for pollen-specific biologics?
Climate change prolongs pollen seasons and increases pollen production, exacerbating allergy prevalence. This trend amplifies demand for effective biological therapies and accelerates research and development in this field.

3. What are the main hurdles for commercializing pollen-specific biologics?
High R&D costs, lengthy clinical trials, regulatory approvals, and high drug prices challenge market entry. Additionally, regional variability in pollen exposure complicates demand forecasting.

4. Which regions are leading the biologic allergy therapeutics market?
North America and Europe command the largest market share due to advanced healthcare infrastructure, high prevalence rates, and supportive regulatory environments. Asia-Pacific presents significant growth potential due to rising allergy prevalence and increasing healthcare expenditure.

5. What is the outlook for patient adoption of biologics for grass and orchard grass allergies?
Adoption is expected to increase as more targeted biologics demonstrate efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Patient preferences for disease-modifying therapies over symptomatic relief options will further accelerate market penetration.


References

  1. Bousquet J, et al. (2017). Global Allergy Report 2017. World Allergy Organization.
  2. MarketsandMarkets. (2022). Allergy Biologicals Market Size, Share & Trends.

Note: Data and projections are based on the latest available industry reports and expert analysis as of early 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.