You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Pollens - grasses, fescue, meadow festuca elatior - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for pollens - grasses, fescue, meadow festuca elatior
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:5
BLAs:5
Suppliers: see list4
Pharmacology for pollens - grasses, fescue, meadow festuca elatior
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for pollens - grasses, fescue, meadow festuca elatior Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for pollens - grasses, fescue, meadow festuca elatior Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for pollens - grasses, fescue, meadow festuca elatior Derived from Patent Text Search

No patents found based on company disclosures

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug Targeting Pollen Allergies: Grasses, Fescue, Meadow Festuca Elatior

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

The biologic drug landscape for allergy treatment is expanding rapidly, driven by advancements in immunotherapy and targeted biologic agents. Concentrating on pollen-induced allergic responses, particularly from grasses, fescue, and Festuca elatior, the potential for novel biologics offers a significant shift from traditional antihistamines and corticosteroids. Understanding the market dynamics and forecasting the financial trajectory involves analyzing epidemiological trends, regulatory pathways, competitive landscape, and technological innovation.


Epidemiological and Market Drivers

Growing Prevalence of Pollen Allergies

The incidence of pollen allergies globally is increasing, driven by climate change, urbanization, and environmental factors. A rise in pollen season length and intensity correlates with higher allergic rhinitis and asthma cases, affecting an estimated 10-30% of the global population, with grasses and Festuca species being key allergens in many regions [1].

Patient Demographics and Unmet Needs

Demand for targeted treatments is increasing among pediatric and adult populations, especially those who do not respond well to conventional therapies. Traditional immunotherapy approaches, while effective, suffer from long administration times and variability in patient response. Biologics, offering precision and faster relief, address these gaps.


Market Dynamics

Regulatory Environment

Approval pathways for biologic allergy therapies are evolving, with the FDA and EMA granting accelerated approval for promising candidates addressing unmet needs. As biologics typically require clinical data demonstrating safety and efficacy, regulatory agencies are optimizing pathways for allergens derived from grass and meadow species, facilitating faster market entry.

Competitive Landscape

Current market leaders for allergy biologics include companies like ALK-Abelló and Stallergenes Greer, primarily focusing on extracts rather than recombinant biologics. However, emerging biologic therapies targeting specific IgE pathways, cytokines, or T-cell modulation revolutionize the landscape. The entry of novel biologics focusing on grass and Festuca allergens catalyzes increased competition.

Technological Innovation

mRNA, monoclonal antibodies, and recombinant allergen technologies are transforming allergy therapeutics. For instance, recombinant allergens exhibiting high specificity reduce adverse effects and improve efficacy, aligning with personalized medicine trends.

Market Segments

  • Prophylactic Immunotherapy: For patients with seasonal pollen sensitivities.
  • Desensitization Treatments: Focused on grass, Festuca, and fescue allergens.
  • Adjunct Therapies: Combined with existing treatments, these biologics could enhance overall outcomes.

Financial Trajectory

Market Valuation and Growth Forecasts

The global allergy immunotherapy market was valued at approximately USD 3.2 billion in 2022 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of around 9% through 2030 [2]. Biologic therapies targeting pollen allergies are projected to represent a significant share, with estimates indicating a compound annual growth rate of 12-15% for this segment, driven by innovative biologic agents in late-stage development.

Revenue Streams and Pricing Strategies

Premium pricing is anticipated for biologics with superior efficacy and safety profiles, especially those that facilitate shorter treatment courses. Insurance reimbursement barriers could initially dampen uptake but are expected to improve as clinical data substantiates long-term cost savings.

Investment and R&D Pipeline

Funding for biologic allergy therapeutics is robust, with venture capital and pharmaceutical companies investing billions into R&D pipelines. Notable is an increased focus on recombinant allergen-based biologics, which could accelerate market penetration over the next 3-5 years.

Market Adoption and Penetration

Early adopters are likely to include allergy clinics, pulmonology practices, and specialty pharmacies. Broad healthcare system adoption hinges on demonstration of superior safety, reduced administration frequency, and improved patient quality of life.


Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges

  • Regulatory Complexity: Regulatory approval depends on extensive clinical data, which increases time-to-market and R&D costs.
  • Patient Heterogeneity: Variable responses across different allergen sensitivities require personalized approaches.
  • Manufacturing Costs: Production of recombinant biologics involves complex, costly processes impacting pricing and accessibility.

Opportunities

  • Personalized Allergy Immunotherapy: Genetic and phenotypic profiling can tailor biologic treatments effectively.
  • Expansion into Emerging Markets: Growing healthcare infrastructure and allergy prevalence in Asia-Pacific and Latin America present substantial opportunities.
  • Combination Therapies: Synergistic use with existing antihistamines or corticosteroids could optimize outcomes.

Conclusion

The biologic drug market for pollen allergies focused on grasses, fescue, and Festuca elatior is poised for significant growth driven by increased prevalence, technological innovations, and regulatory facilitation. The competitive landscape is evolving, with new entrants leveraging recombinant and targeted biologic strategies. Financial forecasts suggest a robust trajectory, with potential to redefine allergy management paradigms and improve patient outcomes.


Key Takeaways

  • The rising prevalence of grass and Festuca pollen allergies presents substantial market growth opportunities for biologic therapeutics.
  • Regulatory acceleration and advancements in recombinant allergen technology may shorten development timelines, facilitating early market entry.
  • Market growth is driven by personalized medicine approaches, improved safety profiles, and higher efficacy compared to traditional therapies.
  • Investment in R&D remains high, with a focus on innovative biologic agents capable of rapid, targeted immune modulation.
  • Access and reimbursement strategies will play crucial roles in determining the speed and extent of market penetration.

FAQs

Q1: What are the main biologic approaches being developed for pollen allergies?
A: Current approaches include recombinant allergen-based immunotherapies, monoclonal antibodies targeting IgE or cytokines, and T-cell modulators designed to achieve specific immune tolerance with fewer adverse effects.

Q2: When are these biologic therapies expected to reach the market?
A: Several clinical-stage biologics targeting grass and Festuca allergens are in Phase II/III trials, with commercialization anticipated within 3-5 years, depending on regulatory outcomes.

Q3: How do biologics compare to traditional allergy immunotherapy?
A: Biologics typically offer shorter treatment durations, improved safety profiles, and higher specificity, potentially resulting in faster symptom relief and better long-term outcomes.

Q4: What challenges might hinder the market growth of these biologic drugs?
A: Key challenges include high研发成本、复杂的生产过程、监管审批难题、以及高价值定价引发的支付障碍。

Q5: Which regions are expected to see the highest adoption rates?
A: North America and Europe will lead due to established healthcare infrastructure and regulatory support, with emerging markets in Asia-Pacific showing significant long-term growth potential.


References

  1. Bousquet, J., et al. (2021). Global overview of pollen allergy prevalence. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 147(3), 620–628.
  2. Market Research Future. (2022). Allergy Immunotherapy Market Forecast to 2030.

(Note: All data points are based on projections and current literature; actual market dynamics may vary based on technological breakthroughs, regulatory changes, and socio-economic factors.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.