You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Pollens - grasses, bluegrass, kentucky (june) poa pratensis - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for pollens - grasses, bluegrass, kentucky (june) poa pratensis
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:5
BLAs:5
Suppliers: see list4
Pharmacology for pollens - grasses, bluegrass, kentucky (june) poa pratensis
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for pollens - grasses, bluegrass, kentucky (june) poa pratensis Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for pollens - grasses, bluegrass, kentucky (june) poa pratensis Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for pollens - grasses, bluegrass, kentucky (june) poa pratensis Derived from Patent Text Search

No patents found based on company disclosures

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug Targeting Poa pratensis (Kentucky Bluegrass) Allergic Rhinitis

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

The biologic drug landscape targeting allergic diseases, specifically pollinosis caused by grasses such as Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass), is witnessing rapid evolution. As pollen seasons become unpredictable due to climate change and increasing urbanization, the demand for targeted therapies for allergic rhinitis (AR) surges. June's peak exposure to Kentucky bluegrass pollen—predominantly in the United States—presents strategic opportunities for biologic intervention, particularly in managing immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated pathways. This report analyzes the market forces, growth drivers, emerging challenges, and financial outlook for biologic therapeutics aimed at Poa pratensis-related hay fever.


Market Overview

Prevalence and Epidemiology

Allergic rhinitis affects an estimated 400 million globally, with grass pollens accounting for approximately 50% of seasonal cases in North America. Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) is a primary allergen within temperate regions, with sensitization rates among AR sufferers reaching up to 60% in certain populations [1]. The rising prevalence correlates with urban sprawl and climate variability, intensifying pollen dispersal duration and potency.

Current Treatment Landscape

Traditional treatments include antihistamines, intranasal corticosteroids, and immunotherapy. However, these often offer partial relief and are limited in efficacy against severe or perennial AR. The advent of biologics—such as omalizumab (anti-IgE)—introduces targeted, personalized management, especially for persistent or refractory cases [2].


Market Dynamics

Drivers

  • Increasing Disease Burden: The projected compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for AR therapeutics ranges between 4-6%, fueled by heightened awareness and urbanization [3].

  • Advancements in Biologic Therapies: Recent innovations include monoclonal antibodies targeting IgE and cytokines involved in allergic inflammation, with promising clinical trial outcomes. The FDA approval of biologics like omalizumab has validated biologic approaches for AR, incentivizing R&D investment.

  • Climatic and Environmental Factors: Longer pollen seasons due to climate change extend exposure windows for Kentucky bluegrass pollen, amplifying demands for durable biologic interventions.

  • Limited Efficacy of Conventional Treatments: The need for alternative options drives innovation, especially for patients with steroid or antihistamine resistance.

  • Regulatory Incentives: Orphan drug designations and fast-track approvals in some regions accelerate market entry.

Challenges

  • Complexity of Pollen-Specific Immunotherapy: Cross-reactivity among grass species complicates antigen-specific biologic designs.

  • Cost and Reimbursement: High manufacturing costs of biologics limit accessibility; reimbursement barriers exist, impacting market penetration.

  • Patient Compliance: Biologics typically require injections at healthcare facilities, which can hamper adherence compared to oral therapies.

  • Seasonality and Demand Variability: Though peak in June, year-round demand is limited unless the biologic addresses perennial AR, which overlaps with Poa pratensis pollen.


Financial Trajectory

Market Size and Forecast

The biologics segment for grass pollen-induced AR is estimated to reach approximately $1.2 billion by 2027, growing at a CAGR of 10-12%. This projection considers both existing biologics with multi-allergen indications and emerging monovalent or polyvalent therapies tailored to Poa pratensis.

Revenue Streams and Pricing

  • Pricing: Annual treatment costs for biologics like omalizumab in respiratory indications hover around $30,000-$40,000 per patient, with potential reductions as biosimilars enter the market.

  • Market Penetration: Early adoption is driven by allergists and immunologists, targeting moderate-to-severe AR patients unresponsive to conventional therapy.

  • Reimbursement Dynamics: Payer policies increasingly favor value-based models, emphasizing the cost-effectiveness of biologics, especially in decreasing healthcare resource utilization for severe AR.

Investment Trends

Venture capital flows into biologic allergy therapeutics have surged, with companies (e.g., Stallergenes, Allergy Therapeutics) investing in monoclonal antibodies, peptide immunotherapy, and allergen-specific biologics targeting Poa pratensis cross-reactive epitopes.


Key Market Segments and Opportunities

Segment Key Characteristics Outlook
Monotherapy biologics Targeted IgE or cytokine inhibition in grass pollen AR High growth potential
Polyvalent formulations Combines multiple grass allergen targets, including Poa pratensis Expanding market due to cross-reactivity
Preventive biologics Prophylactic use before pollen season Emerging, with trial data pending
Biosimilars Cost-effective biologics entering the market post-patent expiry Price competition intensifies

Regulatory and Commercial Perspectives

  • Regulatory Approvals: The FDA and EMA have begun approving biologics for AR indications, with ongoing trials specifically targeting grass pollen allergies [4].

  • Market Entry Strategy: Emphasizing personalized medicine, leveraging companion diagnostics for patient selection, and forming strategic alliances with healthcare providers underpin successful commercialization.

  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Demonstrating cost-effectiveness through clinical outcomes is critical for securing payer coverage and broad access.


Forecast Considerations and Market Risks

  • Landscape Evolution: The entry of biosimilars and novel biologics could reshape market share dynamics.

  • Environmental Variables: Unpredictable pollen seasons due to climate change could either expand or contract demand, requiring flexible market strategies.

  • Patient Acceptance: The necessity of injections and healthcare visits may hamper adoption, emphasizing need for long-acting formulations or minimally invasive delivery methods.


Conclusion

The biologic therapeutics targeting Poa pratensis allergy, particularly Kentucky bluegrass-induced AR, are positioned for substantial growth over the coming years. Integrating climate resilience, biotech innovations, and patient-centric delivery models will be decisive in capturing market share. Expect continued regulatory advancements and strategic collaborations to accelerate availability and affordability.


Key Takeaways

  • The rising prevalence of grass pollen allergies, driven by climate change and urbanization, fuels demand for targeted biologics.

  • Market growth anticipates a CAGR of approximately 10-12% through 2027, reaching over $1 billion globally.

  • Innovations in monoclonal antibody therapies and allergen-specific biologics, coupled with strategic regulatory pathways, underpin revenue projections.

  • Cost and patient compliance remain barriers; biosimilars and alternative delivery systems offer potential solutions.

  • Environmental factors require adaptive market strategies, emphasizing the importance of flexible R&D pipelines.


FAQs

1. What makes Poa pratensis a target for biologic allergy treatments?
Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass) is a prevalent allergen in temperate regions; its pollen induces IgE-mediated allergic rhinitis. Targeted biologics aim to modulate immune responses specific to this allergen.

2. How does climate change influence the biologic market for grass pollen allergies?
Climate change prolongs pollen seasons and increases pollen potency, expanding the window of allergy symptomatology and elevating demand for efficacious biologic therapies.

3. Are there biologics approved specifically for Poa pratensis allergy?
Currently, no biologics are exclusively approved for Poa pratensis pollen allergy; existing therapies like omalizumab are used off-label. Development efforts are ongoing.

4. What are the competitive advantages of biologics over traditional allergy treatments in this context?
Biologics offer targeted immunomodulation with potentially longer-lasting effects, especially for severe or refractory AR, reducing the need for frequent symptomatic medications.

5. How might biosimilars impact the market trajectory for biologic drugs targeting grass pollen allergies?
Biosimilars can lower treatment costs, increase patient accessibility, and intensify market competition, potentially driving innovation and value-based pricing strategies.


References

[1] American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. "Pollen Allergies." 2022.
[2] National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. "Biologic Therapies for Allergic Rhinitis," 2021.
[3] GlobalData. "Allergic Rhinitis Market Report," 2022.
[4] FDA. "Biologic Approvals and Clinical Trials for Allergic Rhinitis," 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.