You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Antihemophilic factor/von willebrand factor complex (human) - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for antihemophilic factor/von willebrand factor complex (human)
Recent Clinical Trials for antihemophilic factor/von willebrand factor complex (human)

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
CSL BehringPhase 4

See all antihemophilic factor/von willebrand factor complex (human) clinical trials

Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for antihemophilic factor/von willebrand factor complex (human) Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for antihemophilic factor/von willebrand factor complex (human) Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for antihemophilic factor/von willebrand factor complex (human) Derived from Patent Text Search

No patents found based on company disclosures

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug: Antihemophilic Factor/Von Willebrand Factor Complex (Human)

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

The biologic therapeutic landscape for bleeding disorders, primarily hemophilia A, hemophilia B, and von Willebrand disease (VWD), has undergone transformative advances over the past decade. Central to these innovations is the antihemophilic factor combined with von Willebrand factor complex (human), a biologic that addresses both clotting deficiency and platelet adhesion issues. The market for these complex biologics exhibits dynamic shifts driven by technological evolution, healthcare policy, and unmet medical needs, shaping a promising financial trajectory.


Market Overview and Key Players

The antihemophilic factor/von Willebrand factor complex (human) draws together recombinant and plasma-derived products designed to restore hemostasis. Notable formulations include Baxter’s Wilate (octocog alfa), and Bio Products Laboratory’s Veyvondi, along with emerging biosimilars.

Major pharmaceutical companies such as CSL Behring, Shire (now part of Takeda), and Bayer dominate this segment, leveraging established manufacturing facilities and clinical expertise. These players continually innovate through enhancements in pharmacokinetics, dosing regimens, and safety profiles—factors critical in maintaining market relevance and capturing new patient segments.


Market Dynamics

Technological Advancements and Innovation

Technological progress remains a primary driver. Latest efforts focus on:

  • Extended half-life products: Modified biologics that reduce infusion frequency improve patient adherence and quality of life, expanding market potential. For example, Bioverativ's Eloctate (recombinant antihemophilic factor VIII Fc fusion protein) exemplifies this trend, although it specifically targets hemophilia A.

  • Enhanced safety profiles: Advances in purification and plasma sourcing minimize pathogen transmission, critical amid heightened safety scrutiny. Biologic quality improvements bolster clinician and patient confidence.

  • Combination therapies: Integrating antihemophilic factors with von Willebrand factor aims to provide more comprehensive hemostatic control, especially in complex cases involving VWD.

Regulatory Environment and Approvals

Regulatory agencies have played pivotal roles. The FDA and EMA’s approval pathways for biosimilars and long-acting biologics have lowered barriers to market entry, fostering competitive pressure and price reductions. For instance, recent approvals of biosimilar formulations have increased accessibility, particularly in emerging markets, while stringent safety standards ensure sustained product legitimacy.

Pricing and Reimbursement Policies

Pricing strategies are intricately linked to healthcare systems. High-cost biologics face reimbursement challenges, especially in cost-conscious markets. Payer policies favor value-based pricing, emphasizing long-term cost savings from reduced infusion frequency and improved health outcomes. Consequently, biologics with extended half-life and improved safety profiles tend to command premium pricing, bolstered by their clinical advantages.

Market Penetration and Patient Adoption

Globally, increased diagnosis rates of bleeding disorders, facilitated by awareness campaigns and improved diagnostic techniques, underpin market growth. Patient preference shifts toward less invasive, more convenient therapies expand demand for stable, long-acting biologics.

Conversely, in resource-limited countries, affordability and infrastructure deficits limit widespread adoption, constraining the market’s full potential. Efforts by international organizations to subsidize or facilitate access are critical to global market expansion.


Financial Trajectory

Current Market Valuation

The global hemophilia therapeutics market, including antihemophilic factor/von Willebrand factor complex biologics, was valued at approximately USD 9 billion in 2022, with projections indicating a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7-9% over the next five years ([2]). This growth is predominantly driven by rising prevalence, product innovation, and expanding indications.

Projected Growth Drivers

  • Growing prevalence: An estimated 1 in 5,000 male births for hemophilia A and B, with VWD affecting approximately 1% of the global population ([1]], [3]). Improved diagnosis and screening will continue to inflate diagnosed cases, expanding patient pools.

  • Product pipeline expansion: The industry’s R&D pipeline boasts over 100 biologics, including next-generation long-acting products, gene therapy prospects, and combined factor-VWF therapies. These innovations possess significant revenue-generating potential.

  • Pricing and reimbursement: Premium pricing for advanced formulations ensures sustained high margins. As biosimilars enter the market, price competition might moderate growth, but innovation-driven value propositions will preserve market profitability.

  • Market globalization: Developing economies are anticipated to account for >30% of growth by 2030, driven by improved healthcare access and increased awareness.

Long-Term Outlook

The introduction of gene therapy, with the potential for one-time cures, presents a disruptive yet complementary force, possibly curbing demand for traditional biologics. However, at present, biologics like the antihemophilic factor/VWF complex are expected to sustain a significant revenue share, particularly in moderate-to-severe cases where gene therapy is still under clinical trial phases.

By 2030, projected revenues for these biologics could reach USD 15-20 billion globally, assuming steady adoption, innovation, and healthcare policy environments conducive to continued investment ([4]).


Challenges and Market Risks

  • High manufacturing costs and pricing pressures threaten profit margins.
  • Safety concerns, particularly post-transfusion pathogen transmission, necessitate ongoing vigilance.
  • Emerging gene therapies could diminish long-term biologic sales, prompting companies to diversify portfolios.
  • Regulatory hurdles in emerging markets might delay approval timelines and market access.
  • Economic downturns could limit healthcare spending and access.

Strategic Outlook

Companies must invest in innovative biologic formulations, streamline manufacturing processes, and foster strategic collaborations. Emphasizing personalized medicine approaches and expanding access in emerging markets will be crucial to maintaining growth trajectories. The integration of digital health monitoring and pharmacovigilance can further enhance safety and patient adherence, fostering market trust.


Key Takeaways

  • The antihemophilic factor/von Willebrand factor complex (human) biologic market exhibits strong growth driven by technological advancements, rising patient diagnosis, and expanding global access.
  • Extended half-life and safety features are premium differentiators, allowing for higher pricing and reimbursement rates.
  • Market growth is resilient but faces challenges from biosimilars, gene therapy, and economic constraints.
  • Strategic investments in innovation, global expansion, and safety will define industry leaders’ success over the next decade.
  • The impending advent of gene therapy introduces a transformative shift, potentially impacting long-term biologic revenues but also opening new therapeutic horizons.

FAQs

1. How does the antihemophilic factor/von Willebrand factor complex biologic differ from monotherapy products?
It combines coagulation factor VIII with von Willebrand factor, providing more comprehensive treatment for VWD and hemophilia A, especially in cases where combined pathology exists, leading to improved efficacy and safety.

2. What impact will biosimilars have on the market for these biologics?
Biosimilars are expected to increase market competition, reduce prices, and expand global access, though high manufacturing and regulatory standards will shape their adoption rates.

3. How close are gene therapies to replacing biologic treatments in bleeding disorders?
Gene therapies are in advanced clinical trials with promising preliminary results, but widespread adoption may take several years due to regulatory, safety, and manufacturing considerations.

4. What are the main regulatory challenges for antihemophilic biologics?
Ensuring safety, efficacy, and manufacturing consistency pose key regulatory hurdles, especially when entering emerging markets with less established frameworks.

5. How can companies mitigate pricing and reimbursement risks?
By demonstrating substantial clinical benefits, long-term cost savings, and investing in patient-centric care models, companies can strengthen reimbursement prospects and market share.


References

[1] World Federation of Hemophilia. (2022). Annual Global Survey.
[2] Grand View Research. (2023). Hemophilia Therapeutics Market Size & Trends.
[3] National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2021). Bleeding Disorders Overview.
[4] MarketsandMarkets. (2022). Biologics Market Forecast.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.