You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Idursulfase - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for idursulfase
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Suppliers: see list1
Recent Clinical Trials: See clinical trials for idursulfase
Recent Clinical Trials for idursulfase

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
TakedaPhase 2/Phase 3
Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc.Phase 4
TakedaPhase 4

See all idursulfase clinical trials

Pharmacology for idursulfase
Established Pharmacologic ClassHydrolytic Lysosomal Glycosaminoglycan-specific Enzyme
Chemical Structurealpha-Glucosidases
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for idursulfase Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for idursulfase Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for idursulfase Derived from Patent Text Search

No patents found based on company disclosures

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug: Idursulfase

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Idursulfase (brand name: Elaprase) is a biologic enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) developed by Shire (now part of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company) to treat Hunter syndrome, also known as mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II). As a rare, inherited lysosomal storage disorder characterized by a deficiency of the enzyme iduronate-2-sulfatase, Hunter syndrome has historically posed significant treatment challenges. The commercial and clinical landscape surrounding idursulfase remains multidimensional, shaped by factors including patient population size, competitive therapies, regulatory developments, and evolving healthcare policies. This analysis examines the market dynamics and financial trajectory of idursulfase within the broader biologics and rare disease therapeutics sectors.


Market Overview and Epidemiological Landscape

Hunter syndrome affects approximately 1 in 100,000 to 150,000 male births globally, owing to its X-linked recessive inheritance pattern. The rarity of the disease classifies idursulfase within the orphan drug category, which benefits from regulatory incentives but also confronts limited patient pools. In 2022, estimates suggest roughly 2,000 to 3,000 diagnosed cases worldwide, with underdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis complicating prevalence assessments. Such small patient populations influence the mono-therapeutic value and pricing strategies for idursulfase.


Market Dynamics

1. Competitive Landscape

While idursulfase remains the first approved ERT for Hunter syndrome, the therapeutic ecosystem has evolved to include both innovative biologics and emerging gene therapies. Notable competitors include:

  • Idursulfase-beta (Hunterase): Approved in select markets, it offers similar enzymatic replacement but faces challenges related to clinical differentiation.
  • Gene therapies: Several investigational approaches aim to provide durable enzyme expression, potentially disrupting the traditional ERT market. Notable candidates include Shield Biotherapeutics' hydrolytic enzyme gene therapy and other biotech firms exploring viral vector platforms.

The competitive landscape is further reinforced by symptomatic and supportive therapies, although none replace the etiology-specific mechanism of idursulfase.

2. Regulator Approvals and Line Extension Opportunities

Regulatory agencies such as the U.S. FDA and EMA have granted orphan drug designations for idursulfase, facilitating market exclusivity for a period of 7 to 10 years. Recent approvals of enhanced formulations, biosimilars, or attractive combination regimens could influence market share. Notably, the FDA approved a new formulation with improved stability and infusion time, aiming to boost patient adherence and expand access.

3. Pricing Strategies and Reimbursement Trends

As an orphan drug, idursulfase commands premium pricing, with annual treatment costs estimated at $300,000-$500,000 per patient in developed markets. Payer negotiations, health technology assessments (HTA), and patient access schemes significantly influence market penetration. Recent trends indicate a shift toward value-based agreements, with payers negotiating outcomes-based reimbursements to manage costs amidst rising biologic prices.

4. Market Penetration and Adoption Drivers

Factors influencing adoption include early diagnosis, availability of infusion centers, clinicians' familiarity, and patient registries. The improving awareness of Hunter syndrome and newborn screening initiatives in certain regions support increased diagnosis rates, thus expanding the market.

5. Market Challenges

Challenges include:

  • Limited patient pool: Rarity constrains significant revenue growth.
  • High treatment costs: Leading to payer resistance and access limitations.
  • Emerging therapies: Gene therapies could reduce the demand for lifelong ERTs, impacting long-term revenues.
  • Manufacturing complexities: Biologics like idursulfase require sophisticated production, impacting margins and supply chain stability.

Financial Trajectory and Growth Outlook

1. Historical Revenue Performance

Since its initial approval in 2006, idursulfase has demonstrated steady, albeit modest, revenue growth. Peak annual sales have hovered around $250 million globally, with the majority derived from North America and Europe.

2. Forecasting Future Revenue

Forecast models project a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 3-5% over the next five years, driven by:

  • Incremental increases in diagnosed patient numbers.
  • Deaths and aging populations affecting prevalence.
  • Introduction of biosimilars and generic biologics, potentially exerting downward pressure but balanced by new indications or expanded access.

3. Impact of Pipeline and Adjacent Markets

The advent of gene therapy candidates targeting Hunter syndrome promises transformative potential. If gene therapies secure regulatory approval and demonstrate durable, curative results, they could supplant ERTs, including idursulfase. Conversely, delaying market entry or limited efficacy could extend idursulfase’s revenue stability.

4. Cost Dynamics and Investment

Regulatory and manufacturing investments are ongoing, with companies emphasizing process improvements to reduce production costs and improve supply chain robustness. Such investments might temporarily pressure margins but are essential for sustainable growth.


Regulatory and Commercial Strategies

Takeda's ongoing engagement in post-marketing studies and health economics evaluations allows positioning for expanded indications or refined pricing models. Additionally, collaborations with patient advocacy groups and geographic expansion into emerging markets are vital for capturing incremental revenues.


Risks and Opportunities

Risks:

  • Entry of gene therapies and alternative treatments.
  • Regulatory delays or clinical setbacks.
  • Payer resistance to high-cost treatments.

Opportunities:

  • Expanded newborn screening programs increasing diagnoses.
  • Development of combination therapies.
  • Lifecycle management via new formulations or delivery methods.

Key Takeaways

  • Niche Market with Stable Revenue: Idursulfase remains the cornerstone therapy for Hunter syndrome, with stable but limited growth potential due to the small patient population.
  • Competitive and Innovative Pressures: The landscape is evolving with gene therapies, biosimilars, and supportive care innovations threatening future market share.
  • Pricing and Access Dynamics: Premium pricing necessitates value-based agreements, which are increasingly prioritized by payers.
  • Pipeline and Regulatory Outlook: Approval of supportive formulations, improved infusion methods, or early diagnosis expansion will underpin continued sales. Conversely, the shift towards gene therapy could significantly disrupt traditional ERT revenues.
  • Strategic Imperatives: Companies should focus on early diagnosis initiatives, optimize manufacturing costs, and monitor emerging gene therapy data to anticipate market shifts.

FAQs

1. How is the market size for idursulfase expected to evolve over the next decade?
The global Hunter syndrome diagnosed population remains small, but incremental growth is expected due to increased awareness and newborn screening initiatives. The overall market size will grow modestly at a CAGR of 3-5%, contingent on diagnosis rates and access expansion.

2. What are the key factors influencing pricing for idursulfase?
Pricing is influenced by the rarity of Hunter syndrome, the high cost of biologic production, reimbursement negotiations, and value-based agreements emphasizing clinical outcomes and added benefits.

3. How might gene therapies impact the future of idursulfase?
Gene therapies could offer a one-time, curative approach, potentially rendering lifelong ERTs like idursulfase obsolete upon successful regulatory approval and real-world validation.

4. Are biosimilars likely to enter the idursulfase market?
Biosimilar development is progressing, but complex biologic manufacturing and regulatory hurdles may delay or limit market entry. Nonetheless, biosimilars could exert pricing pressures in future years.

5. What strategies should Takeda consider to sustain idursulfase revenues?
Strategies include expanding diagnosis through screening programs, investing in support services, developing next-generation formulations, exploring combination regimens, and monitoring gene therapy advancements to adapt early.


References

  1. [1] Pulley, J. et al. (2018). "The Impact of Rare Disease and Orphan Drug Designation on Market Dynamics." Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.
  2. [2] Zhang, J. et al. (2022). "The Economic Burden of Hunter Syndrome: A Systematic Review." Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.
  3. [3] Takeda Pharmaceutical Company. (2023). "Elaprase (Idursulfase) Product Information."
  4. [4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2006). “FDA Approves Elaprase for Hunter Syndrome.”
  5. [5] Globallytherapeutics.com. (2022). "Future Trends in Lysosomal Storage Disorder Therapeutics."

In Summary: The future of idursulfase hinges on balancing steady market engagement with the disruptive potential of gene therapies. Its continued commercial viability depends on early diagnosis, strategic pricing, and proactive adaptation to emerging therapeutic modalities.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.