You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Dornase alfa - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for dornase alfa
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Suppliers: see list1
Recent Clinical Trials: See clinical trials for dornase alfa
Recent Clinical Trials for dornase alfa

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
National Cancer Institute, SlovakiaPHASE2
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildPHASE2
University of MelbournePhase 2

See all dornase alfa clinical trials

Pharmacology for dornase alfa
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for dornase alfa Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for dornase alfa Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for dornase alfa Derived from Patent Text Search

No patents found based on company disclosures

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Dornase Alfa: A Comprehensive Analysis

Last updated: December 27, 2025

Summary

Dornase alfa, recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I (rhDNase I), is a biologic drug primarily used to manage cystic fibrosis (CF) by reducing mucus viscosity. The drug has demonstrated clinical efficacy and safety, establishing it as a cornerstone therapy within CF management. This report explores the evolving market landscape, including demand drivers, competitive positioning, regulatory environment, and financial outlook. It synthesizes market data, sales performance, pipeline developments, and key policy influences, providing actionable insights for stakeholders.


What Are the Key Market Drivers for Dornase Alfa?

1. Rising Prevalence of Cystic Fibrosis

  • Global CF Incidence: Estimated at approximately 1 in 2,500 to 3,500 live births in Caucasian populations and lower in others.
  • Patient Demographics: Over 70,000 individuals worldwide, with higher concentrations in North America (about 35%) and Europe.
  • Impact: Growth in diagnosed CF patients correlates with increased Dornase alfa demand.

2. Advances in CF Management and Awareness

  • Early Diagnosis: Newborn screening programs enhance early intervention.
  • Multimodal Therapies: Dornase alfa is often combined with other CF treatments, fostering sustained market growth.
  • Patient Compliance: Ease of administration boosts adherence, positively influencing sales.

3. Regulatory Approvals and Guidelines

  • Approval Milestones: Clarified indications for CF management by agencies like the FDA (1993) and EMA (1994).
  • Clinical Guidelines: Inclusion in standards of care by organizations like the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and the European CF Society.

4. Competitive Dynamics and Market Penetration

  • Limited Direct Competition: Few approved biologics targeting mucus viscosity directly.
  • Emerging Alternatives: Novel mucolytics or gene therapies under development may pose long-term competition but currently have limited market penetration.

5. Manufacturing and Pricing Policies

  • Pricing Strategies: Premium pricing maintained due to clinical efficacy.
  • Manufacturing Challenges: Complexity in biosimilar development and production costs influence market supply and pricing structures.

What Is the Current Market Size and Sales Performance?

Parameter Details/Numbers Sources
Global Dornase alfa sales (2022) ~$900 million [1]
Market Growth Rate (CAGR 2021-2028) ~5.2% [2]
Major Markets North America (~50%), Europe (~30%), Rest of World (~20%) [3]
Leading Manufacturers Genentech/Roche (Pulmozyme), Chiesi, Mylan/Byowa [4]

Sales Breakdown by Region (2022)

Region Sales (USD millions) Market Share
North America 450 50%
Europe 270 30%
Rest of World 180 20%

Historical Trends

  • Post-Initial Launch (1994): Steady increase as CF diagnosis and awareness expanded.
  • 2020-2022: Slight deceleration due to market maturity, but sustained revenue from expanding patient base and combination therapy adoption.

What Are the Regulatory and Policy Factors Influencing Market Trajectory?

Regulatory Landscape

Jurisdiction Key Regulatory Actions Impact
FDA (2020s) COVID-19 Flexibilities; Fast Track designations for gene therapy pipeline Facilitates new formulations and pipeline development
EMA Continued approval extensions; support for biosimilars Promotes market competition and accessibility

Pricing and Reimbursement Policies

Region Status Implication
US Medicare and private insurers cover Pulmozyme predominantly Sustains revenue, with some pressure for biosimilar inclusion
EU Reimbursement in member states with national variations Stable demand, but nested in national healthcare budgets
Other Markets Emerging price controls Potential impact on margins

Key Policy Trends

  • Shift towards biosimilars: Pending patents expiry may introduce biosimilar competition; Roche’s patent cliff approaching (~2024–2025).
  • Reimbursement reforms: Emphasis on cost-effectiveness evaluations influencing formulary placements.

What Is the Competitive Landscape and Innovation Pipeline?

Participants Product(s) Stage Market Position Notes
Roche/Genentech Pulmozyme (dornase alfa) Established Market leader Patent expiry around 2024
Chiesi Biosimilar versions (pending approval) Under review Potential market entrant Cost advantage, price competition
Pipeline Gene editing, inhaled mucolytics, anti-inflammatory biologics Clinical/Preclinical Future competitors? Long-term threat

Pipeline Overview

  • Gene therapies: Promising for curative potential; early-stage trials.
  • Other biologics: Focused on airway inflammation, mucus clearance adjuncts.

What Are the Financial Outlook and Potential Growth Opportunities?

Forecasting Future Revenue

Parameter 2022 2025 (Projected) 2028 (Projected) Comments
Global Sales (USD) 900 million 1.2 billion 1.5 billion Assuming CAGR of 5.2%
Market Penetration ~70% in diagnosed CF patients Increased adoption in emerging markets Expansion via pipeline products Growth driven by expanding patient base & combination therapies

Key Growth Drivers

  • Expanding diagnosed population: Early screening programs increase eligible patients.
  • Pipeline successes: Replacement or adjunct therapies could disrupt revenue structure.
  • Biosimilar entry: Potential to reduce prices, expanding access but impacting margins.
  • Geographic expansion: Developing markets with high unmet needs.

Risks and Challenges

Risk Factors Impact Mitigation Strategies
Patent expiry Market share erosion Accelerate pipeline, develop next-generation biologics
Biosimilar competition Price pressure Differentiation through formulation, delivery, or combination therapy
Regulatory hurdles Delays in new approvals Engage early with agencies, invest in clinical trials

How Does Dornase Alfa Compare to Emerging Therapies?

Therapy Type Mechanism Stage of Development Potential Impact Key Players
Gene Therapy Corrects cfTR mutations Phase 2-3 Curative, long-term Vertex, Editas, CRISPR Therapeutics
Mucolytics Breaks mucus chemically Early-stage Adjunct or alternative Mucolytic compounds under trial
Anti-inflammatories Reduces airway inflammation Various phases Supports symptom management Several biologics and small molecules

What Are the Market and Financial Implications of Biosimilar Entry?

Impact Details Timing Strategy
Price erosion Potential 20-30% reduction in prices Post-patent expiry (~2024) Invest in pipeline, brand differentiation
Market share redistribution Biosimilars may take 30-50% 2-3 years post-approval Diversify portfolio, geographic expansion
Cost savings Enables access in price-sensitive markets Immediate upon biosimilar launch Collaborate with payers, optimize cost-efficiency

Key Takeaways

  • Dornase alfa remains a vital CF therapy with a stable market, driven by growing global diagnosis rates and clinical guideline inclusion.
  • The market is mature but poised for modest growth (~5% CAGR), with potential acceleration from pipeline innovations and geographic expansion.
  • Patent expiration (~2024) heralds biosimilar competition, emphasizing the need for strategic pipeline investments.
  • Regulatory frameworks and reimbursement policies greatly influence access and profitability, especially in emerging markets.
  • Emerging gene therapies and novel biologics pose future competitive threats but require significant clinical validation.

FAQs

1. When will biosimilars for Dornase alfa enter the market, and what will be their impact?
Predicted around 2024–2025, biosimilars could reduce prices by 20–30%, potentially eroding Roche’s market share but increasing overall treatment access globally.

2. What are the key regulatory hurdles for new biologic entrants in this space?
Regulatory approval requires demonstrating biosimilarity, safety, and efficacy. Cross-national approval depends on local agencies' standards, with expedited pathways available for significant unmet needs.

3. How will new CF therapies affect the demand for Dornase alfa?
Gene therapies and pipeline biologics may supplement or replace current therapies in the long term. However, until their widespread availability, Dornase alfa’s demand is expected to remain stable.

4. What role will personalized medicine play in the future market for Dornase alfa?
While personalized approaches are refining CF management, the role of Dornase alfa as a broadly applicable therapy remains central, especially given its longstanding safety profile.

5. How do pricing policies in emerging markets influence the global revenue of Dornase alfa?
Price negotiations and reimbursement caps can constrain revenues, but market expansion in Asia, Latin America, and Africa offers growth opportunities, especially with biosimilars providing cost advantages.


References

  1. Pharma Intelligence
  2. MarketWatch, “Global CF Drugs Market Outlook 2022-2028,” 2022
  3. Global Data, “Cystic Fibrosis Market Report,” 2023
  4. Roche Annual Report, 2022

Disclaimer: This report synthesizes publicly available data and expert analysis to provide strategic insights. It does not constitute investment advice.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.