You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

C1 esterase inhibitor subcutaneous (human) - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for c1 esterase inhibitor subcutaneous (human)
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Suppliers: see list1
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for c1 esterase inhibitor subcutaneous (human) Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for c1 esterase inhibitor subcutaneous (human) Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

These patents were obtained from company disclosures
Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Patent No. Estimated Patent Expiration Source
Csl Behring Gmbh HAEGARDA c1 esterase inhibitor subcutaneous (human) For Injection 125606 ⤷  Get Started Free 2037-12-11 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Csl Behring Gmbh HAEGARDA c1 esterase inhibitor subcutaneous (human) For Injection 125606 ⤷  Get Started Free 2035-06-16 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Csl Behring Gmbh HAEGARDA c1 esterase inhibitor subcutaneous (human) For Injection 125606 ⤷  Get Started Free 2035-11-25 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Csl Behring Gmbh HAEGARDA c1 esterase inhibitor subcutaneous (human) For Injection 125606 ⤷  Get Started Free 2036-07-25 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Csl Behring Gmbh HAEGARDA c1 esterase inhibitor subcutaneous (human) For Injection 125606 ⤷  Get Started Free 2035-09-15 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Patent No. >Estimated Patent Expiration >Source

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for c1 esterase inhibitor subcutaneous (human) Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for C1 Esterase Inhibitor (Human) Subcutaneous (SC) Products

Last updated: August 18, 2025

Introduction

The biologic drug, C1 Esterase Inhibitor (C1-INH) administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection, presents a significant advancement in managing hereditary angioedema (HAE), a rare genetic disorder characterized by unpredictable and potentially life-threatening swelling episodes. As a therapeutic innovation, its commercialization reflects complex market dynamics influenced by evolving regulatory landscapes, competitive innovations, and increasing demand driven by unmet medical needs.

This analysis dissects the current market landscape and projects the financial trajectory of SC formulations of C1-INH, offering insights vital for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, investors, and healthcare providers.

Market Overview

Therapeutic Landscape and Indications

C1-INH therapies primarily target HAE, with current formulations existing as intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) options. The shift toward SC administrations stems from patient-centric considerations such as ease of use, reduced healthcare settings dependence, and improved quality of life. Notably, companies such as Pharming Group NV and Takeda Pharmaceuticals lead in this space, with their respective products—Ruconest and Takhzyro.

Patient Population and Market Demand

The global HAE population estimated at approximately 10,000 to 15,000 patients remains underserved, with significant unmet needs due to inconvenience with IV therapies and prophylactic treatment gaps [1]. The transition towards SC formulations aims to address these barriers, fostering increased adoption and expanding eligible patient pools. The advent of on-demand and prophylactic SC therapies is likely to catalyze market growth.

Regulatory Environment

Regulatory agencies, including the FDA and EMA, have granted approvals primarily for IV formulations of C1-INH. Recent approvals or filings for SC formulations indicate a strategic shift, with the FDA approving Takhzyro (lanadelumab-flynn) for SC use in 2018, signaling regulatory acceptance of SC administration in this space [2].

Market Dynamics

Competitive Landscape

The market is characterized by intense competition amongst existing biologics and potential entrants [3]. Key players include:

  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Takhzyro (lanadelumab) - monoclonal antibody targeting plasma kallikrein, with a strong market foothold.
  • Pharming Group NV: Ruconest (conestat alfa) - recombinant human C1-INH, available in IV form, with ongoing efforts to develop SC formulations.
  • 14U Biotherapeutics and Others: Investigate biosimilars and novel molecules offering alternative administration routes.

The competitive advantage of SC formulations includes improved patient adherence, decreased healthcare resource utilization, and potential for self-administration, which collectively resonate with payer and provider preferences.

Market Drivers

Key drivers include:

  • Patient Convenience: SC formulations enable self-administration at home, reducing hospital visits.
  • Prophylactic Potential: Long-term prophylaxis reduces attack frequency, improving patient quality of life and decreasing acute care costs.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Recent approvals of SC formulations accelerate market acceptance.
  • Market Expansion: Increasing recognition and diagnosis of HAE enlarge the treatable population.

Market Challenges

Barriers encompass:

  • Cost Considerations: Biologics entail high manufacturing and development costs, reflected in elevated drug prices.
  • Insurance Coverage: Payer reimbursement policies influence adoption rates.
  • Manufacturing Complexity: Producing stable, efficacious SC formulations of complex biologics remains technically demanding.
  • Limited Patient Awareness: Ensuring accurate diagnosis and early treatment initiation is still evolving.

Financial Trajectory

Market Revenue and Growth Projections

Analysts estimate the global HAE therapeutics market to reach USD 1.0 billion by 2025, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 12–15% [4]. The shift toward SC formulations could accelerate this trajectory, driven by increased adoption and expanded treatment coverage.

The arrival of SC formulations like Takhzyro has contributed to a notable uptick in sales. Takeda’s Takhzyro reported revenues of approximately USD 845 million in fiscal year 2022, with SC administration facilitating market penetration [2]. Pharming’s pursuit of SC formulations of conestat alfa aims to capture additional share, although commercialization timelines remain fluid.

Pricing and Reimbursement Trends

Biologics such as C1-INH products typically command high price points, often exceeding USD 500,000 annually for prophylactic regimens. SC formulations tend to lower per-dose costs from a healthcare system perspective due to reduced administration complexity but may retain high patient-level costs, necessitating robust reimbursement strategies.

Increased reimbursement coverage, driven by positive health economics, will be pivotal in expanding market access. Cost-effectiveness analyses demonstrate that effective prophylaxis minimizes costly emergency interventions, supporting favorable payer decisions [5].

Future Revenue Streams

Potential revenue streams include:

  • Prophylactic and On-demand Therapy Sales: As indication approvals expand, sales for both prophylactic and acute treatment applications are expected to grow.
  • Partnerships and Licensing: Pharma collaborations targeting biosimilar or novel formulations could diversify revenue.
  • New Formulations and Delivery Devices: Investments in innovative delivery devices may open premium pricing avenues.

Strategic Outlook

The future of SC C1-INH therapies hinges upon:

  • Regulatory Approvals and Expanded Indications: Broader initial approvals and label expansions will drive sales.
  • Market Penetration and Adoption: Emphasis on patient education, physician awareness, and reimbursement negotiations will catalyze uptake.
  • Technological Innovations: Enhanced delivery devices and biosimilar developments may influence pricing and market dynamics.
  • Competitive Differentiation: Companies investing in patient-centric features and value-based pricing models will likely secure dominant positions.

Conclusion

The biologic, C1 Esterase Inhibitor (Human) subcutaneous formulations are positioned for substantial growth within the HAE treatment landscape. Market dynamics favor increased adoption driven by regulatory support, technological advances, and patient preferences. Financial projections indicate an expanding revenue pool, with CAGR estimates optimizing around 12–15% through 2025. Stakeholders must navigate pricing, reimbursement, and technological challenges to capture value effectively.

Key Takeaways

  1. Rapid Adoption of SC Formulations: Patient convenience and emerging approval trends position SC C1-INH as a preferred modality.
  2. Market Growth Prospects: The global HAE therapeutics market is forecasted to grow robustly, with SC formulations contributing significantly.
  3. Competitive Strategies Essential: Differentiation through innovative delivery, pricing, and partnerships will determine market success.
  4. Pricing and Reimbursement Critical: Ensuring market access via favorable reimbursement policies underpins positive financial trajectories.
  5. Innovation Drives Future Revenue: Continued R&D into biosimilars, delivery devices, and expanded indications holds potential for sustained growth.

FAQs

Q1: What are the main advantages of subcutaneous over intravenous C1-INH therapies?
A1: SC therapies offer convenience, enable self-administration at home, reduce healthcare visits, and improve patient adherence, directly impacting quality of life and treatment outcomes.

Q2: Which companies are leading the market for SC C1-INH products?
A2: Takeda Pharmaceuticals with Takhzyro (lanadelumab) and Pharming Group NV with Ruconest are primary market leaders, with ongoing development efforts to enhance SC formulations.

Q3: How do regulatory approvals influence the financial trajectory?
A3: Regulatory approval accelerates market entry, expands indications, and enhances investor confidence, ultimately driving revenue growth.

Q4: What challenges could hinder the growth of SC C1-INH therapies?
A4: Challenges include high manufacturing costs, reimbursement hurdles, limited patient awareness, and competition from biosimilars or alternative modalities.

Q5: What is the long-term market outlook for biologic C1-INH therapies?
A5: The outlook remains optimistic, with continuous innovation, expanded indications, and improved delivery methods poised to sustain growth in revenue and market share.


Sources
[1] Hereditary Angioedema Market & Competitive Analysis (2019). MarketWatch.
[2] Takeda Announces FDA Approval of Takhzyro (lanadelumab) for HAE Prevention (2018). Takeda Pharmaceutical.
[3] Hereditary Angioedema Therapeutics Market Analysis (2022). GlobalData.
[4] Biologics Market Forecast & Trends (2022). IQVIA.
[5] Health Economics of HAE Therapeutics (2021). Journal of Managed Care.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.