Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SMALLPOX (VACCINIA) VACCINE, LIVE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00005916 ↗ PSA-Based Vaccine and Radiotherapy to Treat Localized Prostate Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2000-06-13 This study will test the ability of an experimental vaccine to increase the number of tumor-fighting immune cells (lymphocytes) in patients with localized prostate cancer and prevent the disease from recurring following radiation therapy. The vaccine is intended to stimulate lymphocytes to target and attack cells containing a protein called prostate specific antigen, or PSA. It is composed of the following parts: - rV-PSA: Vaccinia virus plus human DNA that produces PSA (prostate specific antigen) - rV-B7.1: Vaccinia virus plus human DNA that produces B7.1 (a protein that helps guide immune cells to their targets) - rF-PSA: Fowlpox virus plus human DNA that produces PSA - GM-CSF: Drug that boosts the immune system. - IL-2: Drug that boosts the immune system. Patients 18 years of age and older with prostate cancer confined to the prostate who have received a smallpox vaccine sometime in the past and who do not have a history of allergy to eggs may be eligible for this study. Candidates are screened with a complete medical history and physical examination, blood tests, and skin tests (similar to those for allergies or tuberculosis) to assess immune function. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of the following three treatments: Group 1 - standard radiation therapy plus the experimental vaccine; Group 2 - standard radiation therapy without the vaccine; Group 3 - standard radiation therapy with the vaccine, but with a different dose of IL-2 from Group 1. Patients in the vaccine groups receive injections in the arm or thigh in 28-day treatment cycles, as follows: - GM-CSF: Days 1 through 4 of the first week - IL-2 5: for Group 1, 5 days in the second week of each cycle; for Group 3, 14 days beginning in the second week of each cycle - rV-PSA and rV-B7.1: Day 2 of the first cycle only - rF-PSA (booster shots): Every 28 days, beginning day 2 of the second cycle (i.e., days 30, 58, 86, etc.) Treatment continues for eight cycles unless serious side effects develop, PSA levels rise significantly, or the doctors feel there is no reason to continue therapy. All patients undergo radiation therapy and possibly hormone therapy, if indicated. Blood samples are drawn once a week for the first month and then once every 4 weeks to monitor safety. After treatment ends, patients are followed with examinations and blood tests every 3 months for the first 2 years and then every 6 months until the doctors determine follow-up is no longer needed or the cancer returns. All patients have HLA tissue typing at the beginning of the study. Those who are type HLA-A2 are asked to have additional procedures for studying the immune response that can be done only with this tissue type. This involves collecting blood samples before treatment begins, every 4 weeks during treatment, once after cycle 2, and once 4 months after the eighth vaccine. They also undergo four leukapheresis procedures for collecting white blood cells. For leukapheresis, blood is collected through a needle in an arm vein, similar to donating a unit of blood. The blood flows through a machine that separates it into its components. The white cells are removed, and the red cells, platelets and plasma are returned to the body, either through the same needle or through a needle in the other arm.
NCT00006630 ↗ Vaccinia Immune Globulin in Treating or Preventing Vaccinal Infection Withdrawn National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to follow responses to treatment with vaccinia immune globulin (VIG) for safety and clinical benefit [during HIV vaccine research]. VIG is purified from human blood and used to treat serious infections of the vaccinia (smallpox vaccine) virus or similar viruses. It is the only treatment available for those viruses. The only available supply of VIG has developed a discoloration over time and therefore is considered an investigational new drug by the FDA. This study will allow it to be used for intramuscular injection in a controlled setting for people who may need it [during HIV vaccine research].
NCT00046397 ↗ Phase I Trial of Smallpox Vaccine Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 2002-09-01 This study will test the safety of an experimental vaccine called Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara (MVA) for use against the smallpox virus. It will also investigate how many injections of MVA are needed to produce immunity against vaccinia virus, which is closely related to the smallpox virus. An effective smallpox vaccine exists, but it can cause side effects that, on rare occasions, can be life-threatening. The FDA gave new license approval for Dryvax on 10/25/02, but has not been used in the general population since smallpox was eradicated worldwide. Both the MVA and Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) vaccines are made using the vaccinia virus, however the MVA vaccine contains a more attenuated, or weakened, form of the virus. [http://www.fda.gov/cber/products/smalwye102502.htm] Healthy normal volunteers between 18 and 30 years of age, who have never been vaccinated with a smallpox vaccine, may be eligible for this study. Candidates will be screened with a medical history, physical examination, and blood and urine tests, including an HIV test and a pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential. MVA, placebo and Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) will be administered by different methods. The MVA vaccine and placebo are injected into an arm muscle with a needle and syringe. The Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) vaccine is administered, as it was for many years, with a special forked needle that is poked lightly into the skin of the upper arm, usually 15 times, in a process called scarification. When the vaccine works, a small pus-filled blister forms, followed by a scab and then scarring at the site of the vaccination. The formation of the blister and scab is called a take, indicating that the vaccine is effective and is evidence of the development of immunity. The development of a take suggests that an individual will be protected against smallpox for at least a few years. If scarification does not take, it can either mean that the person already has immunity or that the vaccine did not work. Participants will be assigned to groups, as well as, product randomly. For instance, the first study participant could be enrolled into group 3. The Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) dose is given as a challenge to see if the person has a take. A reduced take response or no take, could suggest that MVA is able to produce an immune response. The dosing schedules vary from 12 to 24 weeks and volunteers are in the study a total of 24 to 36 weeks, depending on the number of injections. Participants will be observed for at least 1 hour after each injection. They will come to the clinic a week after MVA or placebo injections and at least twice a week after Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) for about 21 days to have the injection site evaluated and photographed. At each visit, participants will be asked about how they are feeling and if they are taking any medications. Blood and urine tests will be done on injection days and at follow up visits scheduled 1 and 4 weeks after each immunization as well as 12 weeks after the Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) challenge dose. Additional tests may be done between visits if medically necessary.
NCT00053742 ↗ Phase I/II Trial of Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara (MVA) Vaccine Against Smallpox Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 2003-02-01 This study will test the safety of an experimental vaccine called modified vaccinia virus ankara (MVA) and determine if it confers protection against the smallpox virus (variola). There is an existing vaccine, called Dryvax® (Registered Trademark), which is effective against smallpox; however, this vaccine can cause various side effects, including some that, on rare occasions, can be life-threatening. Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) has not been used in the United States since childhood vaccination was stopped in 1971, and though it is given to certain healthcare and laboratory workers, and some people in the armed forces, it is not recommended for the general population. Both the MVA and Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) vaccines are made using the vaccinia virus, which is closely related to variola. Healthy normal volunteers between 31 and 60 years of age who have been vaccinated with a smallpox vaccine more than 10 years before entering the study may be eligible for this protocol. Candidates will be screened with a medical history, physical examination, and blood and urine tests, including an HIV test and a pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential. Participants will receive MVA vaccine or placebo, followed by a dose of Dryvax® (Registered Trademark). The MVA vaccine and placebo are injected into an arm muscle with a needle and syringe. The Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) vaccine is administered with a special forked needle that is poked lightly into the skin of the upper arm, usually 15 times, in a process called scarification. When the vaccine works, a small pus-filled blister forms, followed by a scab and then scarring at the site of the vaccination. The formation of the blister and scab is called a take, indicating that the vaccine is effective and will protect against smallpox for at least a few years. If scarification does not take, it can either mean that the person already has immunity or that the vaccine did not work. Study participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following dosing groups: 1) one injection of MVA; 2) one injection of placebo; 3) two injections of MVA 4 weeks apart; or 4) two injections of placebo 4 weeks apart. All participants will receive a challenge dose of Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) 12 weeks after their last injection of MVA or placebo to determine if the MVA vaccine has conferred immunity. A take, that occurs in response to the Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) dose indicates lack of prior immunity, and thus tells whether one or two doses of MVA is needed to produce an immune response. Participants will be observed for at least 1 hour after each injection. They will come to the clinic at least once a week after MVA or placebo injections and at least twice a week after Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) to have the injection site evaluated and photographed. At each visit, participants will be asked how they are feeling and what medications, if any, they are taking. Blood and urine tests will be done according to the following schedule: - Before each injection; - 1 week after each injection; - 4 weeks after the MVA or placebo injections are finished; - At the time of the Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) dose; - 4 weeks after the Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) dose; - 12 weeks after the Dryvax® (Registered Trademark) dose. Additional laboratory tests may be done between visits if medically necessary.
NCT00437021 ↗ MVA Post-Event: Administration Timing and Boost Study Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1/Phase 2 2007-04-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate an investigational smallpox vaccine, called IMVAMUNE®, with respect to safety and immune (body's defense system) response. Participants will include healthy adults, age 18 or older born after 1971, who have not had smallpox vaccine before. Volunteers were originally assigned to 1 of 5 groups. In July 2007, a hold was placed on the Dryvax® groups and the study was modified. Volunteers, numbering 197, will be assigned by chance to one of 3 groups to be vaccinated twice with IMVAMUNE® vaccine or placebo (inactive substance) in Groups A and B, or to receive a single vaccination with IMVAMUNE® or placebo in Group F. Volunteers will complete a memory aid (diary) for 15 days following vaccination. Blood samples will be collected. Volunteers may participate for up to 425 days.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live

Condition Name

Condition Name for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live
Intervention Trials
Healthy 3
Smallpox 3
Variola Major (Smallpox) 2
Communicable Diseases 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live
Intervention Trials
Smallpox 7
Vaccinia 3
Yellow Fever 2
Dermatitis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live
Location Trials
United States 18
Korea, Republic of 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live
Location Trials
Maryland 4
Missouri 3
Iowa 3
Oregon 1
Colorado 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 3
Phase 1/Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 10
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 8
Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company 1
CJ HealthCare Corporation 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live
Sponsor Trials
NIH 9
Industry 3
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection: Smallpox (Vaccinia) Vaccine, Live

Last updated: May 11, 2026

What is the commercial and clinical status of live smallpox (vaccinia) vaccines?

Live smallpox (vaccinia) vaccines remain the core countermeasure class for routine biodefense preparedness against orthopoxviruses, with procurement driven by national stockpiles, outbreak response planning, and the need for dosing shelf-life and readiness rather than peak commercial pharmacy sales. Clinical activity today is dominated by label-maintenance studies, lot comparability, immunogenicity bridging in target populations, and readiness exercises rather than classic large phase 3 efficacy trials.

The modern commercial landscape is shaped by:

  • Stockpile and procurement cycles (governments, prime contractors, and distributors).
  • Post-licensure evidence requirements (immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and lot consistency).
  • Switch-over constraints (manufacturing capacity, fill-finish scale, and regulatory acceptance of process changes).

Key product anchors used for market framing:

  • ACAM2000 (live vaccinia vaccine, Wyeth/Bavarian Nordic legacy ownership structure; Janssen marketed in many jurisdictions historically): single-dose administration, replication-competent vaccine, with defined contraindications and required precautions.
  • Imvamune/Imvanex (live attenuated vaccinia vaccine MVA-BN) is a distinct live vector platform but is often used as the closest commercial benchmark for demand pull and procurement comparisons. It is not “smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live” in the replication-competent sense, but it is relevant for market substitution analysis.

Which clinical trials and regulatory activities drive the current pipeline?

Live replication-competent vaccinia vaccine development is largely focused on:

  • Immunogenicity bridging (serology endpoints and functional neutralization proxies).
  • Safety and reactogenicity characterization across age and risk groups.
  • Formulation and manufacturing comparability (including process changes at scale).
  • Lot-to-lot consistency and stability to support long-dated stockpiles.

Publicly indexed trial activity for classic ACAM2000-type products is comparatively sparse versus platform-wide immunogenicity studies, because:

  • Orthopox efficacy trials are rarely feasible for ethical and design reasons.
  • Regulatory evidence tends to rely on immunologic correlates rather than case-based endpoints.

Clinical evidence used in regulatory decision-making remains dominated by prior established datasets plus controlled immunogenicity and safety studies needed for lifecycle changes (site changes, scale-up, analytic method updates, and container closure changes).

What is the current market structure for live smallpox (vaccinia) vaccines?

1) Demand drivers

  • Biodefense preparedness: governments maintain stockpiles and refresh them based on stability and shelf-life risk management.
  • Geopolitical procurement: budget and emergency planning decisions influence annual contract flow more than seasonal demand.
  • Exclusivity and continuity: replication-competent vaccines with long procurement history often maintain preferred status unless a lower-reactogenicity alternative is substituted.

2) Commercial channels

  • Government and prime contracting: primary route for forecastable volume.
  • Emergency distribution agreements: supplementary channel during national readiness events and surge planning.
  • Limited commercial retail presence: minimal routine demand outside contingency use.

3) Pricing mechanics

  • Contract pricing dominates:
    • price per dose,
    • volume discounts by tranche,
    • logistics and warranty terms for stability,
    • and lot-specific acceptance criteria.
  • Public price disclosure is limited; forecasts therefore rely on procurement proxy logic tied to stockpile refresh cycles and national preparedness budgets.

How does Imvamune/Imvanex (MVA-BN) affect projections for replication-competent live vaccinia products?

In market terms, MVA-BN has influenced live replication-competent vaccine demand through risk stratification and substitution:

  • MVA-BN is generally positioned to reduce contraindication burden for certain populations relative to replication-competent vaccinia products.
  • In many procurement plans, governments carry both:
    • a replication-competent option for broader immunogenic breadth and stockpile resilience, and
    • an attenuated option to cover lower-risk administration contexts.

This does not eliminate replication-competent vaccine demand; it changes the mix and reduces incremental add-on doses in some tenders.

What is the market projection framework for live vaccinia (smallpox) vaccines?

A practical projection for live vaccinia vaccines should be built from:

  1. Base stockpile refresh (replacement of expiring lots).
  2. Preparedness expansion (additional doses purchased during threat escalations).
  3. Substitution factor (share shift to attenuated vaccines and other orthopox tools).
  4. Manufacturing and supply constraints (capacity and lot release timing).

Given the nature of the asset class, projections are more sensitive to procurement policy and timing than to clinical trial outcomes in the short term.

Market sizing and scenario ranges (projection)

Because live vaccinia vaccine markets are procurement-led and public disclosures are fragmented, projection must be expressed as scenario ranges based on stockpile refresh behavior and procurement escalation assumptions.

Base case (annual steady refresh, moderate escalation)

  • Demand composition: replication-competent vaccine doses remain a minority-to-majority share depending on national policy.
  • Volume growth: low single-digit percent compound annual growth driven by refresh cycles and minor expansions.
  • Pricing: contract pricing holds with some downward pressure from competitive tenders and mix shift to MVA-BN.

Bull case (accelerated biodefense procurement, reduced substitution)

  • Volume growth: high single-digit to low double-digit CAGR as governments add doses for surge capacity.
  • Pricing: contract premiums possible when production slots tighten.
  • Mix shift: slower than base case, preserving a larger role for replication-competent vaccine.

Bear case (faster substitution to attenuated platforms, constrained refresh budgets)

  • Volume growth: flat to low negative CAGR as MVA-BN takes a larger portion of new procurements.
  • Pricing: downward pressure from competitive tendering and reduced order sizes.

Where do clinical trial updates most likely change the commercial curve?

For live replication-competent vaccinia vaccine, clinical updates change commercial outcomes mainly through:

  • Regulatory acceptance of manufacturability changes (enabling uninterrupted supply).
  • Expanded eligibility clarity (reducing procurement hesitation).
  • Lot comparability data (allowing faster replacement cycles).

Trials that do not materially update contraindication or eligibility thresholds typically do not produce immediate market expansion, because the market is not built on new routine clinical use.

What competitive dynamics should be assumed for live vaccinia vaccine suppliers?

Key competitive levers:

  • Manufacturing scale and fill-finish reliability (ability to deliver timely lots).
  • Shelf-life extension and stability performance (stockpile economics).
  • Regulatory agility (speed of lot release and comparability approvals).
  • Portfolio bundling: supplying both replication-competent and attenuated options under national preparedness frameworks.

In procurement markets, these levers matter as much as immunogenicity in near-term contract decisions.

What investment and R&D implications follow from the current evidence posture?

For businesses evaluating “smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine, live” programs, the near-term value is more linked to:

  • process validation timelines and regulatory acceptance,
  • supply continuity and lot release throughput,
  • contract wins and renewal probability under government procurement schedules,
  • and platform differentiation versus substitution pressure from attenuated vaccines.

Key Takeaways

  • Live smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine demand is procurement-led and driven by stockpile refresh and biodefense readiness rather than routine commercial uptake.
  • Current clinical activity is largely post-licensure lifecycle evidence: immunogenicity bridging, lot comparability, safety/reactogenicity characterization, and manufacturing changes.
  • Imvamune/Imvanex (MVA-BN) materially affects mix and substitution strategy, but it does not eliminate replication-competent vaccine demand; it shifts tender share and patient eligibility considerations.
  • Market projections should be built from stockpile refresh cadence, procurement escalation scenarios, and substitution mix. Clinical trial updates impact forecasts mainly when they enable supply continuity or broaden eligibility clarity.
  • Competitive advantage centers on manufacturing reliability, lot release speed, stability performance, and regulatory execution.

FAQs

  1. Why are phase 3 efficacy trials uncommon for live smallpox (vaccinia) vaccines today?
    Orthopox efficacy endpoints are difficult to test ethically and practically; regulatory pathways rely heavily on immunogenicity correlates and historical efficacy evidence plus lifecycle comparability.

  2. What evidence most influences repeat stockpile procurement for live vaccinia vaccines?
    Lot comparability, stability, safety/reactogenicity consistency, and regulatory acceptance of manufacturing changes that preserve immunologic performance.

  3. How does MVA-BN substitution change procurement strategy?
    Governments often reserve replication-competent vaccinia for broader coverage while using MVA-BN to reduce contraindication barriers in lower-risk contexts, changing dose mix in new buys.

  4. What are the biggest forecast sensitivities for this vaccine class?
    Timing of government tenders, stockpile refresh schedules, shelf-life/stability outcomes, and whether new procurement is driven by escalation or constrained budgets.

  5. Do clinical immunogenicity updates directly translate into market growth?
    Not usually in the near term unless the updates expand eligible use, reduce operational barriers, or enable faster uninterrupted supply under existing regulatory frameworks.


References

[1] World Health Organization. Smallpox (vaccinia) vaccines and immunization guidance (orthopox vaccine background and preparedness principles).
[2] U.S. FDA. Product labeling and prescribing information for live vaccinia vaccines (e.g., contraindications, precautions, and immunologic endpoints used in regulatory review).
[3] European Medicines Agency. Assessment reports and product information for smallpox/orthopox vaccines (immunogenicity, safety, and post-authorization evidence expectations).
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. Interventional and observational studies for live vaccinia/orthopox vaccines (immunogenicity, safety, lot comparability, and lifecycle studies).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.