Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RHO(D) IMMUNE GLOBULIN (HUMAN)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Biosimilar Clinical Trials for rho(d) immune globulin (human)

This table shows clinical trials for biosimilars. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01624805 ↗ Methylprednisolone, Horse Anti-Thymocyte Globulin, Cyclosporine, Filgrastim, and/or Pegfilgrastim or Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar in Treating Patients With Aplastic Anemia or Low or Intermediate-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2012-06-25 This phase II trial studies methylprednisolone, horse anti-thymocyte globulin, cyclosporine, filgrastim, and/or pegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim biosimilar in treating patients with aplastic anemia or low or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Horse anti-thymocyte globulin is made from horse blood and targets immune cells known as T-lymphocytes. Since T-lymphocytes are believed to be involved in causing low blood counts in aplastic anemia and in some cases of myelodysplastic syndromes, killing these cells may help treat the disease. Methylprednisolone and cyclosporine work to suppress immune cells called lymphocytes. This may help to improve low blood counts in aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Filgrastim and pegfilgrastim are designed to cause white blood cells to grow. This may help to fight infections and help improve the white blood cell count. Giving methylprednisolone and horse anti-thymocyte globulin together with cyclosporine, filgrastim, and/or pegfilgrastim may be an effective treatment for patients with aplastic anemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
NCT01624805 ↗ Methylprednisolone, Horse Anti-Thymocyte Globulin, Cyclosporine, Filgrastim, and/or Pegfilgrastim or Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar in Treating Patients With Aplastic Anemia or Low or Intermediate-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Recruiting M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 2 2012-06-25 This phase II trial studies methylprednisolone, horse anti-thymocyte globulin, cyclosporine, filgrastim, and/or pegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim biosimilar in treating patients with aplastic anemia or low or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Horse anti-thymocyte globulin is made from horse blood and targets immune cells known as T-lymphocytes. Since T-lymphocytes are believed to be involved in causing low blood counts in aplastic anemia and in some cases of myelodysplastic syndromes, killing these cells may help treat the disease. Methylprednisolone and cyclosporine work to suppress immune cells called lymphocytes. This may help to improve low blood counts in aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Filgrastim and pegfilgrastim are designed to cause white blood cells to grow. This may help to fight infections and help improve the white blood cell count. Giving methylprednisolone and horse anti-thymocyte globulin together with cyclosporine, filgrastim, and/or pegfilgrastim may be an effective treatment for patients with aplastic anemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for rho(d) immune globulin (human)

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000580 ↗ Interruption of Maternal-to-Infant Transmission of Hepatitis B by Means of Hepatitis B Immune Globulin Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1975-11-01 To evaluate whether hepatitis B immune globulin with a high level of antibody against the hepatitis B antigen would be capable of interrupting maternal-fetal transmission of hepatitis B virus, the single most important route of hepatitis spread in the entire Third World.
NCT00000584 ↗ Transfusion-Transmitted Cytomegalovirus Prevention in Neonates Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1983-07-01 To evaluate the capacity of intravenously administered cytomegalovirus (CMV)-immune globin (CMVIG) to immunize high risk premature infants against CMV infections.
NCT00000751 ↗ A Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study of the Use of Anti-HIV Immune Serum Globulin (HIVIG) for the Prevention of Maternal-Fetal HIV Transmission in Pregnant Women and Newborns Receiving Zidovudine (AZT) Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 To evaluate the effect of anti-HIV immune serum globulin (HIVIG) versus immune globulin (IVIG) administered during pregnancy and to the newborn, in combination with zidovudine (AZT) administered intrapartum and to the newborn, on incidence of HIV infection in infants born to HIV-infected women who received AZT during pregnancy for medical indications. Vertical transmission of HIV from mother to child may occur before, during, or after parturition (via breast-feeding). It is believed that therapy administered both during pregnancy and intrapartum may help prevent vertical transmission. Additionally, adjunctive short-term antiretroviral therapy for the newborn, following the intensive viral exposure presumed to occur at birth, may be necessary.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for rho(d) immune globulin (human)

Condition Name

Condition Name for rho(d) immune globulin (human)
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 54
Lymphoma 36
Myelodysplastic Syndromes 31
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for rho(d) immune globulin (human)
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 73
Myelodysplastic Syndromes 54
Preleukemia 52
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for rho(d) immune globulin (human)

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for rho(d) immune globulin (human)
Location Trials
United States 641
Canada 44
China 26
Germany 21
France 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for rho(d) immune globulin (human)
Location Trials
California 49
Texas 47
New York 45
Ohio 37
Maryland 35
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for rho(d) immune globulin (human)

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for rho(d) immune globulin (human)
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for rho(d) immune globulin (human)
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 151
RECRUITING 46
Terminated 35
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for rho(d) immune globulin (human)

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for rho(d) immune globulin (human)
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 60
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 23
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 20
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for rho(d) immune globulin (human)
Sponsor Trials
Other 319
NIH 113
Industry 87
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Rho(d) immune globulin (human) Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: May 10, 2026

Rho(D) Immune Globulin (Human): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and 2030 Projection

What is rho(D) immune globulin (human) and where is it used clinically?

Rho(D) immune globulin (human) is an antibody product used to prevent RhD alloimmunization in RhD-negative individuals exposed to RhD-positive red blood cells. It is used in settings including obstetrics (prenatal prophylaxis and postpartum prophylaxis after fetomaternal hemorrhage), miscarriage or termination of pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, abdominal trauma, and other sensitizing events.

In most markets, product demand correlates with:

  • Number of pregnancies and live births
  • Coverage and compliance for prophylaxis
  • Rates of sensitizing events treated with RhIG
  • Pricing and payer reimbursement dynamics
  • Concentration, dosing schedules, and formulation mix (liquid vs lyophilized where relevant)

What is the current clinical trials update for rho(D) immune globulin (human)?

A complete, trial-by-trial clinical update requires an authoritative registry pull (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, EU CTR) by product name and manufacturer. That registry-level sourcing is not available in the provided context. With no trial-level inputs, the update cannot be stated accurately.

Clinical trials update status in this report: No registry-verified, trial-specific update can be produced from the supplied information.


Who holds the commercial supply and how is the market structured?

The RhIG market is characterized by:

  • Multiple brands across the US, EU, UK, Canada, Australia, and Latin America
  • Competition based on availability, package size, dosing convenience, and contracting with maternal care providers
  • Procurement through hospital tenders and payer contracts
  • Significant sensitivity to manufacturing continuity, lot release timelines, and plasma fractionation capacity

Market structure (high level):

  • Developed markets: concentrated, with brand switching driven by contracting and supply
  • Emerging markets: driven by access and reimbursement constraints, with higher variability in uptake

What does historical demand look like and what drives growth?

RhIG is mature and generally demand is volume-led (pregnancy-related prophylaxis). Growth tends to come from:

  • Population growth and birth rates
  • Increased adoption of prophylaxis protocols (where underuse exists)
  • Better identification of sensitizing events
  • Pricing changes and payer coverage expansion

Primary downside risks:

  • Guideline changes that reduce prophylaxis intensity (rare, but policy-dependent)
  • Substitution by alternative dosing strategies or competing biologics if they gain coverage
  • Supply constraints that create temporary shortages and force stockpiling behavior

How big is the market and what is the base-case projection to 2030?

A market projection requires (1) a verified current market size, (2) historical shipment volumes or patient counts, (3) penetration/coverage assumptions by region, and (4) pricing assumptions. None of these inputs are provided.

2030 projection status in this report: No defensible market sizing or CAGR forecast can be produced from the supplied information.


What are the product- and lifecycle-related patent and competition considerations?

RhIG is a biologic, and product-level exclusivity typically depends on:

  • Primary patent coverage (formulation, manufacturing process, dosage regimen)
  • Second-generation patents (stability, packaging, concentration, purification process)
  • Regulatory exclusivity and data protection frameworks by jurisdiction
  • Biosimilar or follow-on biologic pathways (where available) and interchangeability/clinical equivalence requirements

Without a jurisdiction-specific patent landscape and expiry dates, no actionable infringement-risk or launch-timing analysis can be stated.

Patent and competition status in this report: No jurisdiction-grade patent expiry or competitor schedule can be produced from the supplied information.


Market and R&D Decision Points (Actionable but Non-Quantitative)

Where do manufacturers win in this category?

  • Contracting reliability: sustained supply and lot release performance
  • Formulation and administration fit: dosing convenience and package availability
  • Regional tender alignment: price and distribution alignment with hospital purchasing cycles
  • Protocol fit: evidence positioning for prophylaxis across pregnancy and sensitizing event scenarios

Where do R&D teams focus next?

For RhIG, near-term R&D in practice usually targets:

  • Improved manufacturing yield and product consistency
  • Stability and shelf-life improvements
  • Delivery/administration convenience (without changing clinical intent)
  • Population and regimen refinement to improve adherence and reduce variability in administration

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials update: cannot be provided as a registry-verified, trial-specific summary with the information available in this input.
  • Market analysis and 2030 projection: cannot be quantified without baseline market size, regional volume inputs, and pricing assumptions.
  • Actionable insights remain operational: winning levers are supply reliability, contracting execution, and protocol-aligned product positioning.
  • Patent and competitive timing: cannot be assessed without jurisdiction-specific patent and exclusivity data.

FAQs

  1. Is rho(D) immune globulin (human) considered a mature biologic class?
    Yes. It is a standard-of-care prophylactic antibody product used across pregnancy-related and sensitizing event settings.

  2. What drives demand more: price or utilization?
    Utilization typically drives demand in RhIG because use is tied to pregnancy and clinical protocols; pricing affects revenue per unit once coverage is established.

  3. Do new clinical outcomes often change RhIG usage?
    Changes usually come from guideline updates and practical protocol adoption rather than from major new efficacy paradigms.

  4. How does supply constraint affect the market?
    Supply constraints can drive short-term procurement behavior (stockpiling and tender rescheduling) and shift share toward reliable suppliers.

  5. Can biosimilar or follow-on products materially change this market?
    They can, but impact depends on regulatory pathway, interchangeability, clinical acceptance, and payer tender behavior.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. Database of privately and publicly funded clinical studies. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
  2. European Clinical Trials Register (EU CTR). https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/
  3. EMA. European public assessment reports and product information for biologicals. https://www.ema.europa.eu/
  4. FDA. Biological product information and related regulatory materials. https://www.fda.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.