Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RAXIBACUMAB


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for raxibacumab

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00639678 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Raxibacumab in Healthy Subjects Completed Emergent BioSolutions Phase 3 2008-03-01 To evaluate the safety and tolerability of raxibacumab in healthy subjects.
NCT00639678 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Raxibacumab in Healthy Subjects Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2008-03-01 To evaluate the safety and tolerability of raxibacumab in healthy subjects.
NCT00639678 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Raxibacumab in Healthy Subjects Completed Human Genome Sciences Inc. Phase 3 2008-03-01 To evaluate the safety and tolerability of raxibacumab in healthy subjects.
NCT00639678 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Raxibacumab in Healthy Subjects Completed Human Genome Sciences Inc., a GSK Company Phase 3 2008-03-01 To evaluate the safety and tolerability of raxibacumab in healthy subjects.
NCT02339155 ↗ Effect of Raxibacumab on Immunogenicity of Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2015-02-24 This study, as a post-marketing commitment to the Food and Drug Administration, is designed to detect the effect of raxibacumab on anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) immunogenicity in a healthy volunteer population. This is a randomized, open-label, parallel group, two arm study to compare the immunogenicity of AVA at 4 weeks after the first AVA dose, when AVA is administered alone or concomitantly with raxibacumab. The study is planned to enroll approximately 30 to 534 subjects in up to 3 cohorts. The total duration of the study will be approximately 26 weeks. The dates reflect cohort 1.
NCT02339155 ↗ Effect of Raxibacumab on Immunogenicity of Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed Completed Emergent BioSolutions Phase 4 2015-02-24 This study, as a post-marketing commitment to the Food and Drug Administration, is designed to detect the effect of raxibacumab on anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) immunogenicity in a healthy volunteer population. This is a randomized, open-label, parallel group, two arm study to compare the immunogenicity of AVA at 4 weeks after the first AVA dose, when AVA is administered alone or concomitantly with raxibacumab. The study is planned to enroll approximately 30 to 534 subjects in up to 3 cohorts. The total duration of the study will be approximately 26 weeks. The dates reflect cohort 1.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for raxibacumab

Condition Name

Condition Name for raxibacumab
Intervention Trials
Healthy 1
Infections, Bacterial 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for raxibacumab
Intervention Trials
Bacterial Infections 1
Anthrax 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for raxibacumab

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for raxibacumab
Location Trials
United States 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for raxibacumab
Location Trials
Tennessee 1
Kansas 1
Florida 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for raxibacumab

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for raxibacumab
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for raxibacumab
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for raxibacumab

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for raxibacumab
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 3
Emergent BioSolutions 2
Human Genome Sciences Inc. 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for raxibacumab
Sponsor Trials
Industry 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Raxibacumab (Abthrax) Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Forward Projections

Last updated: May 6, 2026

What is raxibacumab and what is its current approved market scope?

Raxibacumab (Abthrax; raxibacumab injection) is a monoclonal antibody against Bacillus anthracis protective antigen (PA) used for post-exposure prophylaxis in the context of inhalational anthrax. It is an FDA-approved product in the United States for prevention/treatment of inhalational anthrax scenarios tied to exposure.

Regulatory status (U.S.)

  • FDA approval: Abthrax (raxibacumab) is marketed as a prescription biologic for inhalational anthrax exposure management. [1]

Indication framing

  • Raxibacumab is positioned in biodefense supply chains and public health emergency response planning rather than routine commercial infectious disease care. This materially shapes demand patterns, contracting behavior, and revenue volatility. [1]

What clinical evidence exists for raxibacumab?

Raxibacumab’s pivotal clinical evidence set consists of controlled and supportive studies that assessed safety, immunogenicity, and biological activity using PA-target engagement and functional endpoints. The program includes data supporting efficacy based on neutralization of PA and survival/protective outcomes in nonclinical models, with clinical bridging endpoints reflecting antibody pharmacology and safety.

Trial types and endpoints reported in regulatory materials

  • Safety and tolerability: evaluated across age cohorts suitable for anthrax emergency use.
  • Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD): assessed via serum exposure and PA-binding/functional activity measures.
  • Immunogenicity: assessed for anti-drug antibodies.
  • Biological activity: driven by PA-neutralizing activity and bridging evidence to protection.

Key program publications and regulatory references

  • FDA clinical pharmacology and review documentation for the biologic includes the development package supporting approval. [1]
  • Clinical pharmacology and exposure analyses for raxibacumab were incorporated into FDA review. [2]

What is the current clinical trials activity level?

Raxibacumab’s clinical trial footprint is historically anchored to approval-era studies and is not characterized by a sustained pipeline of large, commercially oriented Phase 2/3 programs.

Practical consequence for 2025 to 2028

  • Expect low incremental clinical-trial visibility in standard registries relative to oncology or chronic disease antibodies.
  • Market impact from future trials is likely to come from label expansions, formulation changes, or stockpiling procurement updates more than from new survival-logic efficacy trials.

(Clinical development activity is consistent with a biodefense product profile reflected in the regulatory evidence base and standard post-approval monitoring approach.) [1]


What is the competitive landscape and how does it affect adoption?

Raxibacumab competes for biodefense placement against other anthrax countermeasures, including other monoclonal antibodies and multi-agent approaches that may include antibiotics and vaccine stockpiles. Competitive dynamics are driven by:

  • Government procurement cycles
  • Stockpile eligibility
  • Cold-chain and administration logistics
  • Operational readiness and contract language
  • Evolving anthrax response guidance (antibiotics plus immunotherapy/antitoxin-like support)

Competitive positioning

  • Raxibacumab is one of the principal U.S.-approved antibody tools for inhalational anthrax exposure response. [1]
  • Its utilization depends on whether public health authorities and emergency management plans specify it relative to alternatives.

How does the market for raxibacumab work economically?

Demand drivers

  1. Low incidence of natural inhalational anthrax cases in developed markets keeps routine commercial prescribing limited.
  2. Demand is surge-driven: procurement and distribution spike in biodefense readiness contexts.
  3. Tender-based purchasing governs volumes, with multi-year logistics and shelf-life planning rather than continuous retail sales.

Buyer profile

  • Federal and state agencies (stockpiling and emergency preparedness programs)
  • Government-led procurement channels
  • Institutions under emergency response frameworks

Pricing and contracting dynamics

  • Pricing is shaped by procurement and preparedness budgets and may not track typical commercial market expansion models.
  • Shelf-life, storage constraints, and administration protocols influence contract terms and reorder cycles. [1]

Market sizing: what can be projected for raxibacumab through 2028?

Sufficient basis constraint No source in the provided dossier includes a numeric, time-series revenue figure, government procurement volumes, or a quantified forecast model for raxibacumab. Under a strict evidence requirement, a market-sized projection cannot be computed without inventing numbers.

Actionable forward view (directional)

  • Revenue stability bias: With biodefense stockpiling, revenue tends to be lumpy but not structurally declining, assuming continued federal preparedness budgets and ongoing stockpile replacement.
  • High scenario volatility: A major reallocation of biodefense budgets or an updated national response guideline can produce abrupt procurement changes.
  • Moderate downside risk: If competing antibody products or revised protocols displace raxibacumab in procurement specs, volumes may shift even without label changes.

This directional outlook aligns with the product’s regulatory and countermeasure role rather than chronic-market dynamics. [1]


What are the key “leading indicators” to track for forecast updates?

  1. U.S. biodefense contracting announcements tied to anthrax countermeasure stockpiles (renewal and replacement).
  2. Formulation or supply chain changes that alter unit availability or administered dose planning.
  3. Regulatory updates affecting indication scope, administration instructions, or dosing guidance.
  4. Government preparedness plan revisions that specify antibody use patterns alongside antibiotics.

These indicators directly map to where sales actually occur: government preparedness procurement and emergency deployment readiness. [1]


Investment and R&D takeaways: where value can shift

Scenario map for 2026 to 2028

  • Base case: Continued availability in preparedness channel with incremental procurement replenishment aligned with stock turnover.
  • Bull case: Expanded procurement volumes or label-aligned use improvements (administration simplifications or guideline updates) increase unit demand.
  • Bear case: Specification shift toward alternative countermeasures reduces unit allocations even if product remains approved.

Operational levers

  • Capacity planning and supply reliability matter more than incremental clinical efficacy readouts.
  • Regulatory maintenance and lifecycle management (distribution readiness, stability, and replacement timing) often determine financial outcomes in this segment. [1]

Key Takeaways

  • Raxibacumab (Abthrax) is an FDA-approved monoclonal antibody for post-exposure management in inhalational anthrax scenarios, with demand dominated by biodefense stockpiling and emergency preparedness contracting. [1]
  • Clinical development history is anchored to approval-era evidence with endpoints focused on safety, PK/PD, and functional PA neutralization activity, rather than a broad contemporary Phase 2/3 expansion. [1,2]
  • A numeric market forecast through 2028 cannot be produced from the supplied sources without inventing revenue and volume assumptions.
  • Forecast updates will hinge on biodefense procurement cycles, supply readiness, specification language in government contracts, and any regulatory updates affecting dosing or administration.

FAQs

1) Is raxibacumab used in routine anthrax treatment?
No. Its use is tied to inhalational anthrax exposure response under biodefense and emergency preparedness frameworks rather than routine care patterns. [1]

2) What is the mechanism of action for raxibacumab?
It targets Bacillus anthracis protective antigen (PA) to neutralize toxin activity associated with anthrax. [1]

3) What types of clinical endpoints supported approval?
Approval relied on safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biological activity measures consistent with PA neutralization/functional protection bridging. [1,2]

4) What drives revenue for raxibacumab?
Government preparedness procurement and stockpile replacement cycles, not steady commercial prescribing volumes. [1]

5) What signals matter most for future procurement demand?
Contract awards, stockpile replenishment timelines, guideline updates for anthrax countermeasure use, and any label or administration updates. [1]


References (APA)

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Abthrax (raxibacumab) prescribing information / regulatory label information. FDA.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Clinical pharmacology review and supporting documentation for raxibacumab. FDA.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.