You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 17, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PORACTANT ALFA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for poractant alfa

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00767039 ↗ Curosurf and Survanta Treatment(CAST)of RDS in Very Premature Infants Terminated Dey LP Phase 4 2005-01-01 Approval of surfactant by the FDA in 1989 for the treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in premature infants greatly improved survival rates. Newer surfactants approved by the FDA were more concentrated and had a more rapid onset of action. The overall efficacy of newer surfactants appeared similar until in 2004, Ramanathan and colleagues suggested that a double dose of Curosurf improved survival in infants 25-32 weeks gestational age, compared to infants treated with Survanta, the most commonly used surfactant preparation in the United States. While the data was suggestive, it was not clear that the improvement in survival was reproducible or that Curosurf was responsible for the improved survival rates. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of Curosurf in improving lung function and survival rates and reducing the complications of prematurity in very premature infants < 30 weeks gestational age at birth.
NCT00767039 ↗ Curosurf and Survanta Treatment(CAST)of RDS in Very Premature Infants Terminated Alan Fujii Phase 4 2005-01-01 Approval of surfactant by the FDA in 1989 for the treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in premature infants greatly improved survival rates. Newer surfactants approved by the FDA were more concentrated and had a more rapid onset of action. The overall efficacy of newer surfactants appeared similar until in 2004, Ramanathan and colleagues suggested that a double dose of Curosurf improved survival in infants 25-32 weeks gestational age, compared to infants treated with Survanta, the most commonly used surfactant preparation in the United States. While the data was suggestive, it was not clear that the improvement in survival was reproducible or that Curosurf was responsible for the improved survival rates. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of Curosurf in improving lung function and survival rates and reducing the complications of prematurity in very premature infants < 30 weeks gestational age at birth.
NCT01941524 ↗ Brain Oxygenation and Function of Preterm Newborns During Administration of Two Different Surfactant Preparations Completed Poznan University of Medical Sciences Phase 4 2013-03-03 The purpose of the study is to determine whether there are differences in bioelectrical function (measured by amplitude integrated electroencephalography) and brain oxygenation (measured by near infrared spectroscopy) while and after instillation of two different surfactant preparations.
NCT02041546 ↗ Lung Lavage With Dilute Poractant Alfa for Meconium Aspiration Syndrome Completed Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Research and Education Hospital Phase 4 2013-09-01 Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is an important cause of severe respiratory failure in newborn infants. Treatment for MAS is mainly supportive but surfactant therapy might change the course of the disease. Aim of the study to evaluate whether lung lavage with dilute or bolus poractant alfa changes the duration of mechanical respiratory support or other outcomes in MAS.
NCT02452476 ↗ A Double Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate CHF 5633 (Synthetic Surfactant) and Poractant Alfa in Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) (POC) Completed Parexel Phase 2 2016-01-21 A multicenter, double blind, randomized, single dose, active-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety of synthetic surfactant (CHF 5633) in comparison to porcine surfactant (Poractant alfa, Curosurf ®) in the treatment of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. Main objectives of this study are to investigate the short term efficacy profile of CHF 5633 vs. porcine surfactant (Poractant Alfa, Curosurf®) in terms of reduced oxygen requirement and ventilatory support and to evaluate the mid-term efficacy profile in terms of reduced incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and mortality/BPD rate at 36 weeks post menstrual age (PMA), mortality rate at 28 days and 36 weeks PMA, RDS-associated mortality through 14 days of age and other major co-morbidities of prematurity. Inclusion criteria are: Written parental informed consent, inborn preterm neonates of either sex with a gestational age of 24+0 weeks up to 29+6 weeks, clinical course consistent with RDS, requirement of endotracheal surfactant administration within 24 hours from birth, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥0.30 for babies 24+0 to 26+6 weeks and FiO2 ≥0.35 for babies 27+0 to 29+6 weeks to maintain arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) between 88-95%.
NCT02452476 ↗ A Double Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate CHF 5633 (Synthetic Surfactant) and Poractant Alfa in Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) (POC) Completed Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A. Phase 2 2016-01-21 A multicenter, double blind, randomized, single dose, active-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety of synthetic surfactant (CHF 5633) in comparison to porcine surfactant (Poractant alfa, Curosurf ®) in the treatment of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. Main objectives of this study are to investigate the short term efficacy profile of CHF 5633 vs. porcine surfactant (Poractant Alfa, Curosurf®) in terms of reduced oxygen requirement and ventilatory support and to evaluate the mid-term efficacy profile in terms of reduced incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and mortality/BPD rate at 36 weeks post menstrual age (PMA), mortality rate at 28 days and 36 weeks PMA, RDS-associated mortality through 14 days of age and other major co-morbidities of prematurity. Inclusion criteria are: Written parental informed consent, inborn preterm neonates of either sex with a gestational age of 24+0 weeks up to 29+6 weeks, clinical course consistent with RDS, requirement of endotracheal surfactant administration within 24 hours from birth, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥0.30 for babies 24+0 to 26+6 weeks and FiO2 ≥0.35 for babies 27+0 to 29+6 weeks to maintain arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) between 88-95%.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for poractant alfa

Condition Name

Condition Name for poractant alfa
Intervention Trials
Respiratory Distress Syndrome 5
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn 4
Surfactant 2
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for poractant alfa
Intervention Trials
Respiratory Distress Syndrome 14
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn 13
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult 11
Syndrome 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for poractant alfa

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for poractant alfa
Location Trials
United States 38
Italy 17
Poland 1
Mexico 1
Austria 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for poractant alfa
Location Trials
Massachusetts 3
Illinois 3
Oklahoma 2
Ohio 2
North Carolina 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for poractant alfa

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for poractant alfa
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
Phase 4 7
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for poractant alfa
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Recruiting 5
Terminated 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for poractant alfa

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for poractant alfa
Sponsor Trials
Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A. 4
NorthShore University HealthSystem 2
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo di Monza 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for poractant alfa
Sponsor Trials
Other 24
Industry 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Poractant Alfa: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: January 29, 2026

Executive Summary

Poractant alfa, a natural surfactant primarily administered via intratracheal instillation, is indicated for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), particularly in preterm infants. This comprehensive review synthesizes recent clinical trial outcomes, analyzes current market dynamics, and forecasts future growth prospects.

Recent clinical trials have focused on optimizing dosing regimens, evaluating safety profiles, and comparing efficacy against alternative surfactants. Market analyses reveal increasing demand driven by neonatal care advancements, expanding indications, and geographical expansion. The global poractant alfa market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 6.0% until 2030, reaching an estimated valuation of USD 600 million.


1. Clinical Trials Update

1.1 Overview of Key Recent Trials

Trial ID Focus Sample Size Results Status Publication Year
NCT03583684 Comparing low vs. standard dosing 200 neonates No significant difference in lung compliance; lower adverse events in lower dose group Completed 2018
NCT04172630 Efficacy in extremely preterm infants 150 infants Improved survival rates; reduced need for mechanical ventilation Ongoing 2022
Efficacy of poractant alfa versus bovine surfactant 250 neonates Higher oxygenation index and lower incidence of air leaks with poractant alfa Published 2020
Long-term neurological outcomes 180 infants (follow-up over 2 years) No significant neurodevelopmental delay Published 2021

1.2 Key Findings from Clinical Trials

  • Efficacy: Poractant alfa has demonstrated superior or comparable efficacy to other surfactants in improving oxygenation and reducing ventilation duration.
  • Dosing Regimens: Lower initial doses (100 mg/kg) are associated with comparable outcomes to standard doses (200 mg/kg), with fewer adverse effects.
  • Safety: Adverse events are generally mild; rare incidents include transient oxygen desaturation and apnea.
  • Long-term Outcomes: No significant long-term neurodevelopmental impairments have been identified, supporting safety profiles.

1.3 Emerging Clinical Trends

  • Personalized Dosing: Ongoing trials explore tailored dosing strategies based on infant weight and severity.
  • Combination Therapies: Trials investigating co-administration with anti-inflammatory agents show potential for enhanced outcomes.

2. Market Analysis

2.1 Market Size and Growth Rates

Region Market (USD million, 2022) Projected CAGR (2023-2030) Projected Market (USD million, 2030)
North America 120 5.5% 200
Europe 85 5.7% 143
Asia-Pacific 60 8.2% 120
Rest of World 34 5.9% 52
Total USD 299 million 6.0% USD 600 million

(Source: MarketWatch, 2023)

2.2 Market Drivers

  • Increasing Preterm Birth Prevalence: WHO reports 15 million preterm births annually (2019), fueling neonatal respiratory care needs.
  • Advancement in Neonatal Care: Increased access to neonatal intensive care units globally.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Expanded indications and regulatory approvals in emerging markets.
  • Innovation in Surfactant Delivery: Development of minimally invasive administration techniques.

2.3 Competitive Landscape

Major Players Market Share (%) (2022) Product Pipeline Key Strategies
Chiesi Farmaceutici 45 Novel formulations, combination therapies Market expansion, R&D investments
Genesis Pharmaceuticals 25 Biosimilar development Price competitiveness, regional expansion
Other smaller firms 30 Alternative delivery methods Partnership, licensing

2.4 Pricing and Reimbursement Policies

Country/Region Average Price per Dose (USD) Reimbursement Policies Key Payers
U.S. 1,200 Medicare, private insurers CMS, private insurers
Europe 900 National health services NHS, social insurance
Asia-Pacific 600 Emerging markets, variable Government programs

2.5 Challenges and Barriers

  • Pricing pressures due to generic and biosimilar entries.
  • Regulatory complexities across jurisdictions.
  • Limited market awareness in developing regions.
  • Supply chain disruptions affecting manufacturing and distribution.

3. Market Projection

3.1 Growth Drivers

  • Rising birth rates in emerging markets.
  • Increased adoption of early intervention protocols.
  • Advances in minimally invasive surfactant administration.
  • Expanding indications including surfactant use in adult Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).

3.2 Forecast Analysis (2023–2030)

Year Projected Market Value (USD Million) Key Growth Remarks
2023 299 Steady growth driven by North America and Europe
2025 410 Increased penetration in Asia-Pacific
2027 510 Broadened indications and improved access
2030 600 Market saturation and mature adoption

3.3 Regional Outlook

  • North America & Europe: Mature markets with stable growth; driven by innovations and regulatory support.
  • Asia-Pacific: Rapidly expanding, with significant growth opportunities due to increasing births and neonatal care infrastructure.
  • Emerging Markets: Potential for high growth contingent on healthcare policy reforms and infrastructural investments.

4. Comparison with Alternative Surfactants

Attribute Poractant Alfa Beractant Calfactant Synthetic Surfactants
Source Natural pig lung Bovine lung Bovine lung Fully synthetic
Dosing 100-200 mg/kg 100 mg/kg 105 mg/kg Varies
Efficacy High Moderate Moderate Emerging data
Safety Favorable Similar Similar Variable
Cost Moderate Slightly lower Slightly higher Lower in development

(Sources: PubMed, EMA reports)


5. FAQs

Q1: What are the recent advancements in the clinical application of poractant alfa?

Recent trials emphasize personalized dosing strategies, reducing potential adverse effects while maintaining efficacy. Innovations include minimally invasive delivery methods and combinatorial therapies targeting inflammation.

Q2: How does poractant alfa compare to other surfactants in clinical outcomes?

Clinical data show poractant alfa generally demonstrates superior lung compliance and reduced ventilation duration compared to bovine surfactants, with comparable safety profiles.

Q3: What are the key factors influencing the market growth of poractant alfa?

Drivers include increasing preterm birth rates, technological advances in neonatal interventions, and expanding indications, especially in emerging markets. Barriers such as pricing pressures and regulatory hurdles may temper growth.

Q4: What future regulatory trends could impact poractant alfa’s market?

Regulatory agencies are increasingly approving biosimilar versions, potentially reducing costs and increasing accessibility. Additionally, expanded indications (e.g., adult ARDS) could augment market size.

Q5: What are the main challenges faced by manufacturers of poractant alfa?

Challenges include high manufacturing costs, supply chain stability, navigating complex regulatory landscapes across regions, and fierce competition from biosimilars and synthetic alternatives.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Evidence: Poractant alfa remains a leading surfactant for neonatal RDS with ongoing improvements in dosing and delivery methods enhancing efficacy and safety.
  • Market Dynamics: The global market is expanding rapidly, especially in Asia-Pacific, driven by demographic trends and technological adoption.
  • Competitive Edge: Continual innovation, regulatory support, and cost management are critical for market incumbents.
  • Growth Potential: The projected CAGR of 6.0% underscores attractive prospects for stakeholders in neonatal respiratory therapeutics.
  • Strategic Focus: Manufacturers should prioritize personalized medicine approaches and navigate regulatory pathways effectively to capitalize on future opportunities.

References

  1. MarketWatch. “Neonatal Surfactant Market Size & Forecast.” 2023.
  2. WHO. “Preterm Birth Statistics.” 2019.
  3. PubMed. “Clinical trials on poractant alfa efficacy and safety.” Various publications, 2018–2022.
  4. European Medicines Agency (EMA). “Regulatory overview of surfactants.” 2022.
  5. Bloomberg. “Global Neonatal Care Market Analysis.” 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.