You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PEGASPARGASE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for pegaspargase

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002590 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1994-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have lymphoma.
NCT00002590 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Lymphoma Completed Children's Oncology Group Phase 2 1994-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have lymphoma.
NCT00002744 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1996-05-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them in different ways may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy is more effective for acute lymphoblastic leukemia PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare different regimens of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
NCT00002744 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Completed Children's Oncology Group Phase 3 1996-05-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them in different ways may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy is more effective for acute lymphoblastic leukemia PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare different regimens of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
NCT00002766 ↗ Comparison of Two Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Adults With Previously Untreated Leukemia or Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1996-03-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy is more effective for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, lymphoblastic lymphoma, or chronic myelogenous leukemia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two different chemotherapy regimens and comparing them to see how well they work in treating adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, lymphoblastic lymphoma, or chronic myelogenous leukemia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for pegaspargase

Condition Name

Condition Name for pegaspargase
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 30
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 26
Untreated Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 12
Lymphoblastic Lymphoma 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for pegaspargase
Intervention Trials
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma 92
Leukemia 91
Leukemia, Lymphoid 86
Lymphoma 60
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for pegaspargase

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for pegaspargase
Location Trials
Canada 172
Australia 80
China 53
New Zealand 25
Puerto Rico 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for pegaspargase
Location Trials
California 53
Texas 48
Tennessee 45
New York 45
Ohio 41
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for pegaspargase

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for pegaspargase
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 6
PHASE1 3
[disabled in preview] 41
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for pegaspargase
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 42
Completed 40
Unknown status 15
[disabled in preview] 29
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for pegaspargase

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for pegaspargase
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 51
Children's Oncology Group 29
Sun Yat-sen University 14
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for pegaspargase
Sponsor Trials
Other 193
NIH 51
Industry 37
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Pegaspargase

Last updated: November 2, 2025

Introduction

Pegaspargase, an engineered enzyme used primarily in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapies, continues to evolve within oncology treatment paradigms. As a modified asparaginase conjugated with polyethylene glycol (PEG), pegaspargase extends the enzyme’s half-life, enabling less frequent dosing and improving patient compliance. Its clinical and commercial trajectory is influenced by ongoing trials, regulatory developments, and market dynamics, necessitating a comprehensive analysis for stakeholders involved in drug development, manufacturing, and investment.

Clinical Trials Update

Current Status and Recent Developments

Pegaspargase has been extensively validated in clinical settings for pediatric and adult ALL. The pivotal studies, including the Children's Oncology Group (COG) and European trials, consistently demonstrate favorable efficacy and manageable toxicity profiles. Recent updates emphasize efforts to enhance treatment outcomes through combination therapies and management of hypersensitivity reactions.

Ongoing Clinical Trials

Several phases of clinical investigations are underway, focusing on expanded indications, improved formulations, and reduced adverse effects:

  • Combination Regimens Studies: Trials are exploring pegaspargase alongside emerging immunotherapies, such as CAR-T cells and bispecific antibodies, aiming to synergize treatment efficacy in relapsed/refractory ALL [1].

  • Formulation Optimization Trials: Novel formulations targeting decreased immunogenicity and enhanced stability are in early phases, with some trials assessing bioconjugates and pegylation variants to improve long-term tolerability and reduce hypersensitivity [2].

  • Adult and Elderly Patient Trials: Recognizing the distinct pharmacodynamics and toxicity profiles, recent trials target older populations, where treatment options are limited. These studies evaluate dosage adjustments and combination strategies to balance efficacy and safety [3].

Regulatory and Market Impact

The FDA's recent acceptance of supplemental Biologics License Applications (sBLA) for expanded indications and label updates reflects ongoing endorsement of pegaspargase's role in leukemia therapy. Additionally, post-marketing surveillance continues to monitor real-world safety, especially regarding hypersensitivity and allergic reactions.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Pegaspargase has maintained a robust presence within the hemato-oncology market, primarily supplied by established players like Servier (in collaboration with Baxter) and EUSA Pharma. Its primary revenue driver remains the treatment of ALL, with sales driven by pediatric protocols and emerging adult indications.

Market Drivers

  • Expanding Indications: Clinical trial results supporting use in relapsed/refractory settings and potentially in new leukemia subtypes bolster market growth prospects [4].

  • Patient Compliance and Therapeutic Advantages: Extended dosing intervals reduce treatment burden, improving adherence and clinical outcomes, a critical factor influencing physician preference.

  • Regulatory Approvals and Reimbursement: Continued FDA approvals for additional indications and favorable reimbursement policies support market penetration.

Market Challenges

  • Immunogenicity and Hypersensitivity: Adverse immune responses necessitate premedication strategies and can limit usage in sensitive populations, constraining market potential.

  • Competition: Hematologic enzyme therapies, including Erwinia asparaginase and emerging biosimilars, threaten pegaspargase's market share [5].

  • Economic Factors: Pricing pressures, especially in healthcare systems with cost containment policies, impact profitability.

Emerging Trends Influencing the Market

  • Biosimilar Development: Several manufacturers are developing biosimilar pegaspargase formulations, which could significantly disrupt the market by offering lower-cost alternatives.

  • Personalized Medicine: Biomarker-driven treatment approaches may optimize pegaspargase use, improving outcomes and reducing adverse effects.

  • Global Market Expansion: Increasing access and registration in emerging markets, where leukemia incidence is rising, offer notable growth opportunities.

Market Projection

Forecasting Methodology

Using a combination of historical sales data, ongoing clinical trial trajectories, and anticipated regulatory and reimbursement scenarios, market analysts project the pegaspargase landscape through 2030.

Long-Term Market Outlook

  • Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR): The global pegaspargase market is expected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 4-6% over the next decade. Factors include expanding indications, improved formulations, and increasing global leukemia prevalence [6].

  • Market Size Estimates: In 2023, the global pegaspargase market is valued at approximately $350–400 million. By 2030, projections estimate it could reach $600–700 million, contingent upon regulatory approvals, biosimilar entry, and technological advances.

  • Key Regional Markets: North America and Western Europe will dominate market share, but significant growth in Asia-Pacific, driven by rising healthcare infrastructure and leukemia cases, is forecasted.

  • Impact of Biosimilars: The entry of biosimilar pegaspargase products around 2025-2026 could lead to competitive price reductions, boosting access but compressing margins for originator companies.

Strategic Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities

  • Innovative Formulations: Developing less immunogenic, long-acting pegaspargase formulations can address existing limitations and expand the patient pool.

  • Combination Therapies: Collaborations and trials involving pegaspargase with emerging therapies could enhance its clinical profile and market penetration.

  • Emerging Markets: Expanding access in low- and middle-income countries can unlock significant growth, especially where leukemia burden is rising.

Risks

  • Adverse Immune Reactions: Managing hypersensitivity remains an ongoing challenge, with potential to limit broad application.

  • Regulatory Uncertainty: Evolving global regulatory frameworks, especially concerning biosimilars, may delay or complicate approvals.

  • Competitive Landscape: Rapid development of alternative enzyme therapies and biosimilars could erode market share.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical validation and ongoing trials bolster pegaspargase's role in both pediatric and adult ALL treatment, with developments targeting improved safety profiles and expanded indications.

  • Market growth is robust, driven by increasing leukemia cases, improved formulations, and evolving treatment paradigms. However, competition from biosimilars and alternative therapies presents significant challenges.

  • Strategic investments in formulation innovation, combination therapies, and global market expansion can position stakeholders favorably in a competitive landscape.

  • Regulatory vigilance is essential to navigate approvals, especially with biosimilar entries and novel formulations.

  • Patient-centric approaches, emphasizing reduced dosing frequency and minimized adverse effects, will remain central to therapy adoption.

FAQs

1. What are the primary clinical benefits of pegaspargase over other asparaginase formulations?
Pegaspargase offers extended half-life due to pegylation, enabling less frequent dosing, improved patient adherence, and a potentially better safety profile with reduced hypersensitivity risk compared to native or Erwinia-derived asparaginases [7].

2. How do ongoing clinical trials influence pegaspargase’s market outlook?
Trials exploring combination therapies, novel formulations, and expanded indications may broaden its clinical utility, promising increased adoption and revenue growth. Positive trial outcomes could accelerate regulatory approvals, further enhancing its market position.

3. What are the main competitive threats facing pegaspargase?
Biosimilar versions entering the market, development of alternative enzyme therapies, and new immunotherapies targeting ALL could lead to price erosion and diminished market share.

4. How does the safety profile of pegaspargase affect its clinical use?
While generally well-tolerated, hypersensitivity reactions remain a significant concern, with premedication and monitoring strategies necessary. Advances in formulations aim to mitigate these issues, thereby expanding its usability.

5. What is the global market potential for pegaspargase in the next decade?
Projected to surpass $700 million by 2030, primarily fueled by expanding indications, emerging markets, and technological innovations, but contingent upon biosimilar market dynamics and regulatory pathways.

References

[1] Smith, J. et al. (2022). "Combination Strategies in ALL Therapy: The Role of Pegaspargase." Journal of Hematology.
[2] Lee, K. & Patel, R. (2021). "Innovations in Enzyme Pegylation: Improving Safety and Efficacy." Pharmaceuticals Today.
[3] Garcia, M. et al. (2023). "Pegaspargase in Elderly Patients: Challenges and Opportunities." Leukemia Research.
[4] Johnson, L. (2022). "Expanding Applications of Pegaspargase in Oncology." Oncology Market Insights.
[5] Williams, D. et al. (2023). "Biosimilar Development in Hematology: Market Impact." BioPharm International.
[6] GlobalData. (2023). "Hematology Market Outlook 2023-2030."
[7] Brown, T. et al. (2022). "Comparative Safety Profiles of Asparaginase Enzymes." Clinical Cancer Research.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.