Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR OFATUMUMAB


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ofatumumab

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00349349 ↗ HuMax-CD20 in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL) Patients Failing Fludarabine and Alemtuzumab Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 2 2006-06-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether HuMax-CD20 (ofatumumab) is effective in the treatment of patients failing both fludarabine and alemtuzumab.
NCT00394836 ↗ HuMax-CD20 i(Ofatumumab) n Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Patients Refractory to Rituximab Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 2 2007-05-01 A Single-Arm, International, Multi-Center Trial of HuMax-CD20 (Ofatumumab), a Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-CD20 Antibody, in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma Who Are Refractory to Rituximab as Monotherapy or in Combination With Chemotherapy
NCT00410163 ↗ Ofatumumab With Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide in B-CLL Patients Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 2 2007-01-01 To investigate the safety and efficacy of two dose regimes of ofatumumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with B-CLL
NCT00494780 ↗ Ofatumumab (Humax-CD20) With CHOP (Cyclophosphamide,Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Predisolone) in Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Patients Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 2 2007-06-01 To investigate the efficacy in two dose regimens of ofatumumab in combination with CHOP (cyclophosphamide,doxorubicin, vincristine,prednisolone) in previously untreated patients with Follicular Lymphoma (FL)
NCT00603525 ↗ Investigating Clinical Efficacy of Ofatumumab in Adult Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Who Had an Inadequate Response to TNF-α Antagonist Therapy Terminated GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2008-01-01 This is a phase III, double-blind, randomized, multicenter, and parallel group trial with a duration of 24 weeks, followed by a 120 week Open-label Period. The primary purpose of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in reducing clinical signs and symptoms in adult RA patients who had an inadequate response to TNF-α antagonist therapy.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ofatumumab

Condition Name

Condition Name for ofatumumab
Intervention Trials
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 25
Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma 13
Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic 10
Leukemia 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ofatumumab
Intervention Trials
Leukemia, Lymphoid 61
Leukemia 61
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell 57
Lymphoma 51
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ofatumumab

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ofatumumab
Location Trials
United States 343
Italy 86
Germany 63
United Kingdom 54
Spain 34
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ofatumumab
Location Trials
Florida 27
Texas 23
California 21
Tennessee 18
New York 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ofatumumab

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ofatumumab
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 26
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ofatumumab
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 64
Terminated 20
Active, not recruiting 15
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ofatumumab

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ofatumumab
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 49
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 22
Novartis 16
[disabled in preview] 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ofatumumab
Sponsor Trials
Industry 125
Other 99
NIH 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ofatumumab (Arzerra): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and 2026–2030 Projection

Last updated: April 24, 2026

What is ofatumumab’s current clinical status?

Ofatumumab is marketed in multiple jurisdictions for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) under Arzerra. The current “active” clinical pipeline is limited versus historical development, with most late-stage work completed years ago and current efforts focused on label maintenance, protocolized sequencing (often in combination frameworks), and postmarketing evidence generation rather than large confirmatory Phase 3 expansion programs.

Key trial programs and outcomes that define the modern evidence base

The development program anchored on two main pillars for CLL: monotherapy and combination regimens.

  • Phase 3 (CLL monotherapy vs ofatumumab + supportive care framework)

    • In CLL, ofatumumab showed clinically meaningful response in treatment-naïve and relapsed settings in pivotal trials that established its regulatory pathway for CLL use.
    • Regulatory decisions were supported by efficacy metrics and safety profiles established across these pivotal studies. (FDA labeling summarizes trial evidence supporting the indication.) [1]
  • Phase 2/3 (Relapsed/refractory CLL and combination strategies)

    • The relapsed/refractory dataset drove much of the clinical positioning versus other anti-CD20 antibodies and later versus BTK-inhibitor strategies.
    • FDA labeling consolidates the trial basis used for dosing, retreatment provisions, and safety monitoring. [1]

What clinical evidence is still “in force” for decision-making?

For business and R&D planning, the most actionable “current” evidence remains the label-protocolized evidence rather than an expanding Phase 3 pipeline.

  • Dosing and retreatment framework are based on the prescribing information.
  • Safety monitoring obligations are label-driven (infusion reactions, infections).
  • Patient selection logic is constrained by the evolving CLL standard of care (BTK inhibitors, BCL2 inhibitors, anti-CD20 combinations).

Bottom line: ofatumumab’s clinical landscape in 2026 is defined less by new pivotal readouts and more by how clinicians use the product within an increasingly BTK-inhibitor-dominant CLL treatment algorithm, with label-confirmed efficacy and safety informing sequencing.


What is the market structure for anti-CD20 CLL therapy and where does ofatumumab fit?

Anti-CD20 therapies compete in the CLL market against obinutuzumab, rituximab biosimilars, and newer targeted regimens that often reduce reliance on anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies after relapse.

Indication footprint and label constraint

Ofatumumab is a focused CLL antibody with a dosing scheme that historically supported outpatient administration but faces headwinds as CLL care increasingly centers on:

  • BTK inhibitors (frontline and relapse),
  • BCL2 inhibitors (frontline in selected patients, including venetoclax-based combinations),
  • chemoimmunotherapy de-escalation away from older pathways.

The product’s current market role is most pronounced where anti-CD20 use remains part of standard sequencing and where payer dynamics or patient factors drive selection.

Source anchor: FDA prescribing information for Arzerra defines the CLL indication and supports dosing and safety obligations used in utilization. [1]

Commercial reality check: why anti-CD20 incumbents are under pressure

Across CLL, anti-CD20 monoclonals are used less frequently than they were at launch because:

  • Targeted oral therapies deliver high response with convenient administration,
  • Treatment regimens emphasize fixed-duration strategies (in many settings) where antibody selection depends on local practice and tolerability,
  • Relative efficacy and safety comparisons shift as BTK and BCL2 therapies become first-line staples.

As a result, ofatumumab competes in a market where:

  • growth is limited,
  • utilization is sensitive to guideline preference, payer coverage, and prescriber habits,
  • competition intensifies from lower-cost biosimilars where anti-CD20 remains used.

What does the pricing and payer environment imply for near-term demand?

Pricing pressure is structural in mature oncology antibodies, and CLL is no exception. While ofatumumab historically carried a premium versus older rituximab-based options, current payer behavior favors:

  • lower acquisition cost biosimilars (rituximab),
  • branded, guideline-supported alternatives (obinutuzumab),
  • targeted oral regimens that may reduce regimen complexity.

Ofatumumab’s label-driven dosing and administration schedule also makes it more vulnerable to substitution when oral targeted therapies are covered broadly.

Source anchor: utilization logic is consistent with the product’s labeling parameters that drive administration and patient monitoring. [1]


What is the 2026–2030 market projection for ofatumumab in CLL?

A defensible projection requires explicit baseline revenue and unit data, which are not provided in the available record here. Under the operating constraints, only projections tied to cited source material can be stated. No such quantified baseline is included in the sources available in this response.

Therefore, what can be projected from cited information alone?

Only qualitative directional forecasts can be produced from label-based evidence and market structure. Quantitative numerical forecasts for revenue, prescriptions, or treated patient counts cannot be produced from the cited record here.

Directionality (no numeric forecast):

  • Incumbent decline / stagnation: mature monoclonal antibody share erodes as targeted therapies expand.
  • Niche persistence: ofatumumab persists in subsegments where anti-CD20 selection or sequencing favors it, supported by FDA label guidance. [1]
  • Volatility by payer and guideline: utilization will track reimbursement and guideline updates more than it tracks new clinical breakthroughs.

What is the most important regulatory anchor for market durability?

Regulatory durability is driven by continued compliance with label requirements, dosing, and safety communications. The FDA prescribing information for Arzerra (ofatumumab) provides the authoritative framework for:

  • indication,
  • dosing and infusion reaction prevention and management,
  • contraindications and warnings,
  • clinical trial support for efficacy and safety.

This label stays the central commercial asset because it governs prescribing behavior and payer policies tied to on-label use. [1]


Key Takeaways

  • Ofatumumab’s clinical posture is dominated by the existing label evidence for CLL rather than a large, newly expanding Phase 3 pipeline.
  • The CLL market is structurally shifting toward oral targeted regimens, which reduces incremental demand growth for anti-CD20 monoclonals.
  • Without an explicit baseline dataset in the cited record here, quantified 2026–2030 revenue or unit projections cannot be produced.
  • The product’s continued market presence is anchored to the FDA-labeled dosing and safety framework. [1]

FAQs

1) What is ofatumumab’s approved use?

Ofatumumab (Arzerra) is approved for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) per FDA prescribing information. [1]

2) Does ofatumumab have an active late-stage Phase 3 program driving new indications?

No new, newly confirmed late-stage indication expansion can be stated from the cited record in this response. The current decision framework is label-driven. [1]

3) What limits ofatumumab demand versus newer CLL therapies?

The shift toward BTK and BCL2-based regimens reduces reliance on anti-CD20 monoclonals, pushing ofatumumab into more niche sequencing use. (Consistent with market structure and prescribing logic referenced by label-based administration and safety.) [1]

4) What is the primary regulatory document underpinning use and reimbursement?

The FDA prescribing information for Arzerra defines indication, dosing, safety monitoring, and clinical evidence basis. [1]

5) Can a numeric 2026–2030 market projection be made here?

Not from the cited source material provided in this response; the record does not include baseline unit or revenue data needed for a quantified forecast.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Arzerra (ofatumumab) prescribing information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/ (FDA label page accessed via FDA prescribing information repository)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.