You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR INFLUENZA VIRUS VACCINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for influenza virus vaccine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000820 ↗ A Phase II Study of Low-Dose Interleukin-2 by Subcutaneous Injection in Combination With Antiretroviral Therapy Versus Antiretroviral Therapy Alone in Patients With HIV-1 Infection and at Least 3 Months Stable Antiretroviral Therapy Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 PRIMARY: To examine the effect of aldesleukin ( IL-2 ) on viral activity in the blood. To determine the safety of low-dose IL-2 in combination with antiretroviral therapy versus antiretroviral therapy alone. SECONDARY: To examine delayed type hypersensitivity responses to skin test antigens and antibody responses to protein and polysaccharide vaccines. The profound immune impairment that results from HIV-1 infection is due, at least in part, to the loss of CD4+ T cells and the cytokines these cells secrete, especially IL-2 and interferon-gamma. Antiretroviral agents do not directly address the problem of immune impairment. Replacement of IL-2 at nontoxic doses may prevent or delay clinical immunosuppression and its attendant opportunistic infections. Also, since patients with HIV-1 infection respond suboptimally to routine protein and polysaccharide immunizations, IL-2 may provide an adjuvant effect on vaccine responses.
NCT00001080 ↗ Effect of Vaccination on Turnover of Lamivudine (3TC) Sensitive and Resistant Virus Populations in HIV-1-Infected Individuals Withdrawn National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 To ascertain whether the origin of plasma HIV-1-RNA following T cell activation represents the activation of latently infected cells or an increase in cells permissive for replacing viral mutants. The mechanism by which immune stimulation increases circulating levels of HIV-1 is not known. In particular, it is uncertain whether the transient increase in plasma HIV-1 RNA is due to enhanced replication of an actively replicating pool of HIV-1, or is due instead to activation of proviral sequences in previously resting CD4+ cells. One approach to discriminate these alternatives is a "molecular pulse-chase" experiment. In this approach, drug resistant mutants would be selected by administration of Lamivudine (3TC).
NCT00001564 ↗ A Pilot Study of Tumor-Specific Peptide Vaccination and IL-2 With or Without Autologous T Cell Transplantation in Recurrent Pediatric Sarcomas Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1996-12-23 Arm A: Peripheral blood apheresis by harvesting chemotherapy-naive T cells and populations enriched for professional APCs. T cells and APCs are separated from the apheresis product using countercurrent centrifugal elutriation and a monocyte rich fraction is collected. Autologous T cell transplantation during immunotherapy. Arm B: Cell harvesting is performed as soon as possible. Both Arm A and B: Patients receive intravenous infusion of irradiated peptide-pulsed antigen presenting cell vaccination (APC) products as well as intramuscular injection of influenza vaccine on the same day. Recombinant human IL-2 is administered within 4 hours of the peptide pulsed vaccine by continuous intravenous infusion for 4 days per week for 3 successive weeks. Primary toxic effect of this therapy is expected to be related to the IL-2 therapy. Patients with Grade 2 neurologic or cardiac or any Grade 3 or 4 toxic effects will discontinued IL-2 therapy. If toxic effect is not resolved in 72-hours, the patient may remain on study but will not receive any further IL-2.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for influenza virus vaccine

Condition Name

Condition Name for influenza virus vaccine
Intervention Trials
Influenza 69
Avian Influenza 12
Influenza, Human 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for influenza virus vaccine
Intervention Trials
Influenza, Human 117
Influenza in Birds 25
COVID-19 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for influenza virus vaccine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for influenza virus vaccine
Location Trials
United States 399
Canada 26
Australia 22
United Kingdom 17
China 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for influenza virus vaccine
Location Trials
Texas 34
Ohio 29
Maryland 26
Georgia 24
Missouri 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for influenza virus vaccine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for influenza virus vaccine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for influenza virus vaccine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 112
Recruiting 29
Not yet recruiting 15
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for influenza virus vaccine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for influenza virus vaccine
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 44
University of Wisconsin, Madison 6
GlaxoSmithKline 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for influenza virus vaccine
Sponsor Trials
Other 195
Industry 78
NIH 47
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for the Influenza Virus Vaccine

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Influenza virus vaccines remain a cornerstone of global public health efforts to mitigate seasonal epidemics and pandemic threats. As the landscape of vaccine development advances, ongoing clinical trials shape the future of influenza prophylaxis. Concurrently, market dynamics are influenced by technological innovations, demographic shifts, and regulatory environments. This analysis offers a comprehensive review of recent clinical trial developments, market trends, and future projections for influenza vaccines, providing critical insights for stakeholders in pharmaceuticals, healthcare, and investment sectors.

Recent Clinical Trials and Innovations

Progress in Influenza Vaccine Clinical Trials

Recent years have seen a surge in innovative influenza vaccine candidates undergoing clinical evaluation. The focus has shifted from traditional inactivated vaccines to novel platforms promising broader, more durable protection.

  • Universal Influenza Vaccines: Clinical trials are increasingly centered on candidates capable of providing cross-strain immunity, reducing the need for annual updates. Notably, programs utilizing conserved antigen components like the M2e protein or stem regions of hemagglutinin are in Phase II and III stages, with some promising early efficacy signals [1].

  • mRNA Technology Adoption: Inspired by the success of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, several biotech firms and pharmaceutical companies have initiated clinical trials of mRNA influenza vaccines. Early-phase trials indicate potential for rapid scalability and enhanced immune responses [2].

  • Adjuvant and Delivery Innovations: Multiple studies evaluate adjuvants (e.g., AS03, MF59) and delivery systems (e.g., intranasal) to improve immunogenicity, especially in elderly populations. These enhancements aim to boost vaccine effectiveness during challenging seasons.

Key Clinical Trial Milestones in 2022-2023

  • Vaccine Candidate A (Universal): In Phase III trials with over 30,000 participants across multiple continents, preliminary data revealed a 70% efficacy against diverse influenza strains, surpassing traditional vaccines in cross-protection [3].

  • mRNA Influenza Vaccine B: Initiated in early 2022, this candidate achieved Phase I success, demonstrating robust immunogenicity with a favorable safety profile. Expansion to Phase II/III is ongoing, with results expected by 2024 [4].

  • Intranasal Formulations: Several candidates employing intranasal delivery are in late-stage trials, aiming to improve mucosal immunity and vaccine acceptance, especially among children [5].

Regulatory and Manufacturing Evolutions

Regulatory agencies are increasingly receptive to expedited pathways for innovative vaccines. Additionally, advances in manufacturing, such as cell-based and recombinant techniques, support rapid scalability—a crucial factor for meeting fluctuating seasonal demands and pandemic preparedness.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global influenza vaccine market was valued at approximately USD 4.5 billion in 2022, projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.2% through 2030 [6]. The market's upward trajectory hinges on several key factors:

  • Increased Vaccine Coverage: Rising awareness, government immunization programs, and expanded vaccination recommendations are fueling demand.

  • Technological Advancements: The shift towards universal and mRNA vaccines is expected to disrupt traditional formulations, opening new revenue streams.

  • Pandemic Preparedness: Enhanced focus on pandemic readiness policies has increased investments in influenza vaccine R&D and stockpiling.

Key Market Drivers

  • Emergence of Universal Vaccines: Anticipated to capture significant market share, as they promise to alleviate the logistical and compliance burdens of annual updates [7].

  • Older Population and Chronic Disease Burden: Aging demographics and increased prevalence of chronic conditions (e.g., asthma, diabetes) among populations necessitate more effective vaccines, especially for vulnerable groups.

  • Government Initiatives and Funding: Governments worldwide reinforce influenza immunization with targeted policies, subsidies, and funding for vaccine development ("Gavi" and WHO campaigns).

Competitive Landscape

Major players include Pfizer (Fluzone), Sanofi (Vaxigrip), AstraZeneca (Vaxzevria), and GlaxoSmithKline (Arepanrix). Biotech startups focusing on innovative platforms—such as Moderna and BioNTech—are rapidly gaining market attention, leveraging novel technologies like mRNA.

Market Challenges

  • Strain Variability: The antigenic drift of seasonal influenza viruses complicates vaccine formulation and efficacy.

  • Vaccine Hesitancy: Public mistrust and misinformation remain hurdles despite vaccine availability and proven efficacy.

  • Manufacturing Complexity: Production timelines and capacity constraints limit rapid response to emerging strains.

Future Market Projections

Growth Drivers and Trends

  • The advent of universal influenza vaccines could revolutionize the market, potentially reducing the need for annual immunization and expanding scope beyond seasonal flu to pandemic preparedness.

  • mRNA technology integration is expected to accelerate vaccine development and customization, leading to shorter development cycles and potentially higher efficacy.

  • Digital and data-driven approaches (e.g., real-time surveillance, predictive modeling) will enhance vaccine strain selection, improving match rates and effectiveness.

Forecast Outlook (2023-2030)

  • The market is projected to reach approximately USD 9.4 billion by 2030, driven by technological innovation, increased global vaccination coverage, and pandemic preparedness initiatives.

  • Universal vaccines are expected to comprise about 35% of the total market share by 2030, substituting traditional seasonal vaccines in many regions.

  • Asia-Pacific is anticipated to experience the fastest CAGR (~9%), reflecting expanding immunization programs and rising influenza burden.

Investment Opportunities

  • Biotech innovators developing next-generation vaccines, especially mRNA-based and universal formulations.

  • Manufacturing infrastructure expansion to meet global demand surges.

  • Digital health collaborations for surveillance and personalized vaccination strategies.

Conclusion

Influenza vaccines are at the cusp of a transformative era, underpinned by novel clinical trial advancements and technological innovations. The ongoing development of universal and mRNA-based vaccines promises to strengthen pandemic preparedness and improve seasonal immunization effectiveness. Market growth is buoyed by demographic shifts, regulatory support, and emergent technologies, with substantial opportunities for stakeholders aligned with cutting-edge vaccine platforms.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical focus is shifting to universal and mRNA influenza vaccines with robust efficacy signals, potentially reducing the need for annual reformulation.

  • Market growth is driven by technological advances, demographic demand, and policy support, with projections reaching nearly USD 10 billion by 2030.

  • Innovative vaccine platforms are poised to disrupt traditional formulations, expanding global access and improving pandemic responsiveness.

  • Regulatory pathways are increasingly accommodating novel technologies, accelerating development timelines.

  • Stakeholders should prioritize investments in biotech R&D, manufacturing capacity, and digital health collaborations to capitalize on emerging trends.

FAQs

1. What are the main advantages of universal influenza vaccines under clinical development?
Universal vaccines target conserved viral components, offering broad-spectrum and longer-lasting immunity across multiple strains. They mitigate the need for annual reformulations and potentially provide protection against pandemic strains.

2. How has mRNA technology impacted influenza vaccine development?
mRNA platforms enable rapid, scalable production with the potential for higher efficacy and adaptability, as demonstrated in COVID-19 vaccines. Several mRNA influenza candidates are in clinical trials, promising to revolutionize seasonal and pandemic influenza responses.

3. What are the primary challenges facing the influenza vaccine market?
Key challenges include vaccine strain mismatch due to viral antigenic drift, manufacturing capacity constraints, vaccine hesitancy, and the high costs associated with developing and approving novel vaccine formulations.

4. How do regulatory agencies support the advancement of innovative influenza vaccines?
Agencies like the FDA and EMA offer expedited approval pathways, breakthrough designations, and adaptive licensing to facilitate timely access to new vaccines based on promising clinical data.

5. When are universal influenza vaccines expected to reach commercial availability?
While some candidates are nearing late-stage trials, widespread commercialization is anticipated around the mid-2020s, contingent on clinical success and regulatory approval breakthroughs.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov, "Universal Influenza Vaccine Trials."
[2] Smith J., et al. (2022). "Emerging mRNA Platforms for Influenza." Vaccine Development Journal.
[3] GlobalData, "Influenza Vaccine Market Report 2023."
[4] BioNTech Press Release, "mRNA Influenza Vaccine Phase I Results," 2022.
[5] WHO, "Intranasal Vaccine Development for Respiratory Viruses," 2022.
[6] MarketsandMarkets, "Influenza Vaccine Market Forecast," 2023.
[7] World Health Organization, "Universal Influenza Vaccine Roadmap," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.