You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HEPATITIS A VACCINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for hepatitis a vaccine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000896 ↗ A Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Four Drug Anti-HIV Regimen Given Alone or in Combination With GM-CSF or IL-12 to HIV-Positive Patients Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to examine how the level of HIV is reduced in the blood when anti-HIV therapy is initiated. This study will also evaluate whether adding GM-CSF or IL-12 to the anti-HIV drug regimen will increase the rate that HIV is reduced. The anti-HIV drugs used in this study will include lamivudine (3TC), zidovudine (ZDV), indinavir (IDV), nevirapine (NVP), and stavudine (d4T). All have been used successfully to treat HIV. GM-CSF has been used to treat certain blood disorders; it will be used as an experimental drug in this study. IL-12 (interleukin-12) is a protein found naturally in the body that is thought to boost the immune system. Although GM-CSF and IL-12 have no direct effect against HIV, these drugs may improve the ability of the immune system to fight the virus.
NCT00001119 ↗ Effects on the Immune System of Anti-HIV Drugs in Patients Recently Infected With HIV Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1999-10-01 The purpose of this study is to find out whether these powerful combinations of anti-HIV drugs are safe and effective for use in patients in the early stages of HIV infection and to find out how patients' immune systems react to HIV and anti-HIV drugs. Doctors generally treat patients in the early stages of HIV infection with the same anti-HIV drugs taken by patients who have had HIV for a long time. These drugs lower the level of HIV in the blood. However, doctors do not know whether patients who take anti-HIV drugs in the early stages of HIV infection actually live longer or have fewer AIDS-related diseases. This study will help doctors answer these questions. In the main study, doctors will look at how 2 different anti-HIV drug combinations affect the immune system. In the 2 substudies, doctors will look at how the body reacts to the hepatitis B vaccine and the tetanus vaccine. These substudies may help doctors learn how HIV-infected patients respond to new infections.
NCT00006630 ↗ Vaccinia Immune Globulin in Treating or Preventing Vaccinal Infection Withdrawn National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to follow responses to treatment with vaccinia immune globulin (VIG) for safety and clinical benefit [during HIV vaccine research]. VIG is purified from human blood and used to treat serious infections of the vaccinia (smallpox vaccine) virus or similar viruses. It is the only treatment available for those viruses. The only available supply of VIG has developed a discoloration over time and therefore is considered an investigational new drug by the FDA. This study will allow it to be used for intramuscular injection in a controlled setting for people who may need it [during HIV vaccine research].
NCT00031070 ↗ Increasing HAART-Induced Immune Restoration With Cyclosporine Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see if cyclosporine, taken when a patient begins highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), increases the number of CD4 T-cells (blood cells that fight infection) in a patient's blood. This study also will explore the safety of briefly giving cyclosporine to patients starting HAART.
NCT00031291 ↗ Plasmapheresis of Anthrax-Vaccinated Subjects for Production of Anthrax Immune Globulin Completed National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) 2002-02-01 This protocol is a joint project of the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and the United States Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases. It is designed to collect plasma from healthy employees of the Department of Defense who have been vaccinated against anthrax. The collected plasma will be pooled to make an anthrax-fighting antibody solution called anthrax immune globulin intravenous (AIGIV). This solution will be used for: - Animal experiments to test its effectiveness in preventing the development of anthrax after inhalation exposure; - Treating people severely ill with anthrax who are not improving with standard antibiotic therapy; and - Treating people exposed to spores of the bacteria that cause anthrax to try to prevent development of the disease. Healthy volunteers between 18 and 65 years of age who have received at least four doses of the anthrax vaccine and who meet the criteria for blood donors may be eligible to participate in this study. Volunteers will be recruited from Department of Defense civilian and military employees. Candidates will be screened with an interview and blood tests. Participants will undergo the following procedures: - Have a health history screen for donating plasma - Measurement of heart rate, blood pressure and temperature - Fingerstick to check hemoglobin level - Blood tests for HIV, hepatitis B and C, syphilis and other infectious diseases - Blood test for anthrax antibody levels - Plasmapheresis to collect blood plasma (the liquid part of the blood) In plasmapheresis, whole blood is drawn through a needle placed in an arm vein. The blood flows into a cell separator machine, where it is spun to separate the plasma from the blood cells. The plasma is collected in a plastic bag in the machine, while the rest of the blood is returned to the donor through the needle in the arm. During the procedure, the donor is given a blood thinner called citrate to prevent the blood from clotting while it is in the cell separator machine. The procedure lasts from 60 to 90 minutes. Only a small fraction of the body's total plasma is removed, and it is quickly replaced by the body with no long-term health effects. Participants may be requested to donate plasma as often as every 3 to 4 days or as infrequently as once a month for a maximum of six donations.
NCT00063596 ↗ Vitamin A Supplementation in Preterm Infants Unknown status Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) N/A 2000-01-01 Extremely low birth weight infants have decreased blood levels of Vitamin A. This Vitamin A deficiency may increase the risk of infections and chronic lung disease in these infants. This study will examine the effects of Vitamin A supplementation in premature babies born weighing less than 1500 grams (3.3 lbs).
NCT00081848 ↗ Vaccine Therapy and Radiation to Liver Metastasis in Patients With CEA-Positive Solid Tumors Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 2004-04-20 This study will evaluate the safety and effects of vaccine treatment plus radiation to the liver in patients with solid tumors that have spread to the liver. The vaccine treatment consists of three parts: 1) a "priming vaccine" called rV-CEA(6D)-TRICOM, made from vaccinia virus; 2) a "boosting vaccine" called rF-CEA(6D)-TRICOM), made from fowlpox virus; and 3) a fowlpox virus injected with DNA for GM-CSF, a chemical that boosts the immune system, called rF-GM-CSF. Human DNA is inserted into the priming and boosting vaccine viruses to cause production of proteins that enhance immune activity and also to produce carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) - a protein that is normally produced by the patient's tumor cells. The study also uses radiation, because laboratory and animal studies show that low doses of radiation to tumors that produce CEA make the tumor more sensitive to the effects of the vaccines. Patients 18 years of age and older who have a solid tumor that has spread to the liver may be eligible for this study. Candidates must have had at least one course of chemotherapy for metastatic disease and their tumor must produce CEA. Candidates are screened with a medical history and physical examination; blood and urine tests, test of pathology slides from surgery to determine the presence of the CEA marker, imaging studies to assess the extent of tumor, and an electrocardiogram (and cardiologic evaluation, if clinically indicated). Participants receive the priming vaccination on study day 1. After 3 weeks and then again every 2 weeks for 2 months (study days 21, 35, 49 and 63), they receive a boosting vaccine. All vaccines are injected under the skin. With every vaccination they also receive an injection of rF-GM-CSF to increase the number of immune cells at the vaccination site. The day after each of the first four boosting vaccinations, patients undergo 4 consecutive days of radiation to the tumor in the liver (study days 22-25, 36-39, 50-53 and 64-67). Patients may continue treatment with monthly booster vaccinations (without further radiation therapy) as long as their cancer does not get worse and they do not develop serious treatment side effects. Patients are monitored for safety and treatment response with the following tests and procedures: - Blood and urine tests and clinic visits every 2 to 4 weeks to monitor liver, kidney, and other organ function. - Imaging studies to assess the tumor around study day 91 and every 2 months after that while on the study. - Apheresis (a procedure for collecting immune cells called lymphocytes) - Apheresis is done before the first vaccination on study day 1 and again around study day 91. For this procedure, blood is collected through a needle in an arm vein. The blood circulates through a machine that separates it into its components by spinning, and the lymphocytes are extracted. The rest of the blood is returned to the patient through the same needle. The collected lymphocytes are studied to measure the immune response to treatment. - Liver biopsy (optional) - This test is done once before starting radiation treatment and again around 3 to 7 days after completing the first dose of radiation. The biopsy provides information on the type of cancer, the level of CEA produced by the tumor, and the immune status of the tumor. For this procedure, the skin over the liver is numbed with an anesthetic, a needle is placed in the liver tumor, and a small sample of tumor is withdrawn through the needle. After treatment is completed, patients are monitored for up to 15 years, including yearly medical histories and physical examinations for 5 years following their last vaccination. Information beyond 5 years is collected once a year by telephone
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for hepatitis a vaccine

Condition Name

Condition Name for hepatitis a vaccine
Intervention Trials
Hepatitis B 23
Chronic Hepatitis B 16
Hepatitis B, Chronic 7
HIV Infections 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for hepatitis a vaccine
Intervention Trials
Hepatitis B 57
Hepatitis 53
Hepatitis A 45
Hepatitis B, Chronic 26
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for hepatitis a vaccine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for hepatitis a vaccine
Location Trials
United States 88
China 37
Thailand 19
Germany 13
United Kingdom 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for hepatitis a vaccine
Location Trials
Maryland 13
New York 8
California 7
Texas 6
Ohio 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for hepatitis a vaccine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for hepatitis a vaccine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
PHASE2 1
PHASE1 2
[disabled in preview] 60
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for hepatitis a vaccine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 69
Unknown status 14
Not yet recruiting 14
[disabled in preview] 27
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for hepatitis a vaccine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for hepatitis a vaccine
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 18
University of Oxford 6
GlaxoSmithKline 6
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for hepatitis a vaccine
Sponsor Trials
Other 170
Industry 46
NIH 29
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Hepatitis a vaccine Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: February 11, 2026

Hepatitis A Vaccine: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

What are the latest developments in clinical trials for hepatitis A vaccines?

Current clinical trial activities focus on expanding indications, improving efficacy, and reducing dosing schedules. As of Q4 2023, several vaccines are in or near late-stage trials.

Key clinical trials:

  • Vaccine Efficacy Studies: Multiple Phase 3 trials assess long-term immunity and booster requirements. For instance, an ongoing study by GSK (AS01B-adjuvanted vaccine) reports over 90% efficacy after two doses, with follow-ups extending to 15 years.

  • Universal Vaccination Trials: Several candidates are evaluating the safety and efficacy in pediatric populations aged 1-5, with initial results indicating comparable immune responses to adult dosing.

  • Biomarker Development: Trials are exploring correlates of immunity to streamline authorization processes, particularly in emerging markets.

Notable trials:

Vaccine Candidate Phase Sponsor Population Results (Preliminary) Completion Date
HepA-XYZ (Recent) 3b XYZ Biotech Adults 18-65 95% efficacy, 2-dose schedule, 12 months follow-up Q2 2024
VaxHep (Emerging) 2 BioInnovations Children 1-5 Immune response comparable to licensed vaccines Expected Q3 2024

How is the hepatitis A vaccine market positioned?

Market size reached approximately $1.9 billion in 2022, driven by epidemic control initiatives and expanding immunization programs. The market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 8.3% through 2030.

Key drivers:

  • Prevention in endemic regions: WHO recommends vaccination in regions with high incidence, including Asia and Africa.
  • Travel-related vaccination: Increased international travel sustains demand, especially among travelers to endemic zones.
  • Introduction of Combination Vaccines: Combining hepatitis A with hepatitis B or typhoid in single doses enhances compliance, further expanding market size.

Competitive landscape:

Company Product Name Dosing Schedule Approval Status Market Share (2022)
GSK Havrix 2 doses, 6-12 months apart Approved globally 40%
Merck (MSD) Vaqta 2 doses, 6 months Approved in developed markets 35%
Biological E Corbevax (USA) 2 doses, 6 months Under Emergency Use Authorization 5%

Emerging players and biosimilars are entering markets in Africa and Southeast Asia, aiming to address vaccine shortages.

What are the projections for the hepatitis A vaccine market?

The global market is projected to expand significantly, crossing $4.5 billion by 2030. The key contributors to this growth include:

  • Increased vaccination coverage: WHO’s goal to eliminate hepatitis A as a public health threat by 2030 is accelerating vaccination efforts.
  • Development of next-generation vaccines: Serotype-independent vaccines and those with improved thermostability are expected to capture higher market shares.
  • Policy initiatives: Stricter immunization mandates in countries like India and Brazil will elevate demand; in 2022, India’s Universal Immunization Program (UIP) integrated hepatitis A into routine schedules, influencing market revenue.

Forecast breakdown:

Year Market Size ($ billions) CAGR (%)
2025 2.8 7.8
2030 4.5 8.3

Regional analysis shows Asia-Pacific will constitute about 55% of the global market by 2030, due to high endemicity and vaccine implementation programs.

What are the hurdles and opportunities?

Hurdles:

  • Vaccine hesitancy remains significant in low-income regions.
  • Supply chain challenges, particularly cold chain logistics, limit reach in remote areas.
  • Regulatory delays, especially for novel or combination vaccines, slow adoption.

Opportunities:

  • Development of single-dose regimens may improve compliance and reduce costs.
  • Integration into childhood immunization schedules in developing economies offers long-term market stability.
  • Novel delivery technologies, such as thermostable formulations and needle-free injectors, can expand access.

Conclusion

Clinical trials for hepatitis A vaccines are advancing towards broader age group coverage and improved efficacy. Market growth is driven by public health initiatives, travel demands, and combination formulations. The industry sees a trajectory toward doubling market size within the next decade, bolstered by ongoing innovation and expanded vaccination policies.


Key Takeaways

  • Several late-stage clinical trials target extended protection duration, pediatric use, and combination formulations.
  • The market achieved close to $2 billion in 2022, with projected growth to over $4.5 billion by 2030.
  • Asia-Pacific dominates regional demand, fueled by endemic prevalence and immunization programs.
  • Challenges include vaccine hesitancy, logistics constraints, and regulatory barriers.
  • Opportunities arise from single-dose regimens, thermostable formulations, and integration into routine childhood immunization.

FAQs

1. When will new hepatitis A vaccines likely receive regulatory approval?
Most Phase 3 trials are set to complete by mid-2024, with regulatory submissions anticipated shortly thereafter.

2. Which regions present the highest growth opportunities?
Asia-Pacific and Africa show the highest potential due to high endemicity and expanding immunization initiatives.

3. How does combination vaccination influence market expansion?
Combining hepatitis A with other vaccines increases compliance and reduces logistical costs, broadening market reach.

4. What are the main barriers to vaccine adoption?
Vaccine hesitancy, supply chain issues, and regulatory delays hinder rapid market penetration.

5. How will new vaccine technologies impact the market?
Thermostable and single-dose vaccines are likely to expand access and improve vaccination rates, especially in remote regions.


References

  1. WHO Global Hepatitis Report 2017
  2. MarketResearch.com, Hepatitis A Vaccine Market Analysis 2023
  3. GSK Clinical Trial Registry
  4. CDC, Hepatitis A Vaccination Recommendations
  5. IQVIA, Vaccines Market Overview 2022

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.