Last Updated: May 21, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ELOTUZUMAB


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for elotuzumab

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00726869 ↗ A Phase 1/2, Multi-center, Open-label, Dose-escalation Study of Elotuzumab(Humanized Anti-CS1 Monoclonal IgG1 Antibody) and Bortezomib in Subjects With Multiple Myeloma Following One to Three Prior Therapies. Terminated Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 1 2008-05-01 This Phase 1/2, multi-center, open-label, multiple-dose, dose escalation study will evaluate the combination of elotuzumab and bortezomib in subjects with MM following 1 to 3 prior therapies. For the Phase 1 portion, elotuzumab will be administered by intravenous (IV) infusion at up to 4 dose levels ranging from 2.5 mg/kg to 20.0 mg/kg within 30 minutes following the administration of bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m^2 IV bolus. Bortezomib will be given in 21 day cycles (twice weekly for 2 weeks on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 followed by a 10-day rest period). Elotuzumab will be administered as a separate infusion within 30 minutes following bortezomib administration on the same days as the first and last dose of each bortezomib cycle (i.e., Days 1 and 11).
NCT00726869 ↗ A Phase 1/2, Multi-center, Open-label, Dose-escalation Study of Elotuzumab(Humanized Anti-CS1 Monoclonal IgG1 Antibody) and Bortezomib in Subjects With Multiple Myeloma Following One to Three Prior Therapies. Terminated Abbott Phase 1 2008-05-01 This Phase 1/2, multi-center, open-label, multiple-dose, dose escalation study will evaluate the combination of elotuzumab and bortezomib in subjects with MM following 1 to 3 prior therapies. For the Phase 1 portion, elotuzumab will be administered by intravenous (IV) infusion at up to 4 dose levels ranging from 2.5 mg/kg to 20.0 mg/kg within 30 minutes following the administration of bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m^2 IV bolus. Bortezomib will be given in 21 day cycles (twice weekly for 2 weeks on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 followed by a 10-day rest period). Elotuzumab will be administered as a separate infusion within 30 minutes following bortezomib administration on the same days as the first and last dose of each bortezomib cycle (i.e., Days 1 and 11).
NCT00742560 ↗ A Phase 1b/2, Dose-Escalation Study of Elotuzumab (Humanized Anti-CS1 Monoclonal IgG1 Antibody) in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 2 2008-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in subjects with relapsed multiple myeloma.
NCT00742560 ↗ A Phase 1b/2, Dose-Escalation Study of Elotuzumab (Humanized Anti-CS1 Monoclonal IgG1 Antibody) in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Completed AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) Phase 2 2008-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in subjects with relapsed multiple myeloma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for elotuzumab

Condition Name

Condition Name for elotuzumab
Intervention Trials
Multiple Myeloma 49
Multiple Myeloma in Relapse 4
Myeloma 4
Refractory Multiple Myeloma 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for elotuzumab
Intervention Trials
Multiple Myeloma 66
Neoplasms, Plasma Cell 59
Recurrence 5
Hematologic Neoplasms 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for elotuzumab

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for elotuzumab
Location Trials
United States 411
Japan 56
Canada 51
Germany 25
Spain 21
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for elotuzumab
Location Trials
New York 23
California 20
Massachusetts 19
Michigan 18
Missouri 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for elotuzumab

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for elotuzumab
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 2
PHASE1 2
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for elotuzumab
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Active, not recruiting 17
Recruiting 16
Not yet recruiting 12
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for elotuzumab

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for elotuzumab
Sponsor Trials
Bristol-Myers Squibb 39
AbbVie 10
Celgene 10
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for elotuzumab
Sponsor Trials
Industry 83
Other 65
NIH 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Elotuzumab Clinical Trials Update and Market Projection (2026)

Last updated: May 5, 2026

What is elotuzumab’s current clinical and commercial positioning?

Elotuzumab (EMPLICITI; anti-SLAMF7) is an established multiple myeloma monoclonal antibody used in combination regimens. Commercial uptake has shifted toward earlier lines where payer coverage and guideline adoption support use, while clinical activity continues to test combinations that target deeper response, consolidation strategies, and fit-for-all cohorts (including transplant-ineligible and relapsed-refractory populations).

As of the latest publicly reported data available through 2024, the most commercially relevant evidence base remains:

  • Front-line: elotuzumab + lenalidomide + dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible and other front-line contexts (OPTIMISMM-aligned evidence base).
  • Relapsed/refractory: elotuzumab + lenalidomide/dexamethasone and related backbone-driven combinations with sustained label relevance.

The clinical pipeline increasingly emphasizes next-generation combination logic (e.g., pairing with additional immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitor backbones, or monoclonal partner strategies) rather than elotuzumab monotherapy.

What do the latest trial outcomes show (by phase and regimen)?

The clinical program remains organized around combination regimens across earlier and relapsed settings, with endpoints that typically track:

  • ORR and duration of response
  • Progression-free survival (PFS)
  • Overall survival (OS)
  • Minimal residual disease (MRD) and response depth in newer studies
  • Safety and tolerability in combination-heavy schedules

Relapsed/Refractory evidence base (commercially anchored)

The highest-velocity commercial evidence remains derived from pivotal combination trials and the subsequent confirmation in practice. These trials established elotuzumab’s role with lenalidomide/dexamethasone backbones.

Front-line and earlier-line programs (evidence supporting uptake)

Where head-to-head or randomized comparative evidence is available, it typically supports:

  • higher response rates versus comparator doublets
  • improved PFS signals in specific cohorts
  • acceptable safety profile consistent with class backbones

Ongoing trials (what is being tested)

Recent trial activity concentrates on:

  • adding elotuzumab to modern myeloma regimens
  • response-depth optimization (including MRD-aligned endpoints)
  • sequencing strategies that place elotuzumab into consolidation or maintenance-adjacent windows

What is the market size and growth outlook for elotuzumab?

Elotuzumab faces a market environment characterized by:

  • rapid innovation in relapsed and front-line myeloma
  • competitive intensity from other anti-CD38 agents, other SLAMF7 and immune engagers, and next-gen immunotherapies
  • payer preference shifts driven by overall survival (OS) value, treatment convenience, and response depth

Base-case commercial projection (2026-2031)

A grounded projection requires anchoring to (1) current label scope, (2) penetration into relapsed/refractory and earlier-line settings, (3) competitive erosion and regimen substitution, and (4) any label expansions tied to new trial readouts.

Base-case projection framework (directional, label-driven):

  • Uptake growth is likely to be moderate, not exponential, because elotuzumab is already established and the market is crowded.
  • Growth depends on maintaining a favorable value perception in combination therapy and preserving use in line-of-therapy slots where alternative regimens do not fully displace it.
  • Expect steady-to-slow deceleration in mature markets, with pockets of incremental growth in settings where regimen sequencing favors elotuzumab.

Commercial trajectory (2026-2031):

  • 2026: stable to modest growth as treatment protocols normalize and combinations remain in use.
  • 2027-2028: gradual maturation; incremental growth depends on new combination readouts and guideline retention.
  • 2029-2031: competitive substitution risk increases; unless new Phase 3 data expands label scope or improves comparative outcomes, revenue growth becomes flatter.

How does the competitive landscape affect elotuzumab share?

Elotuzumab competes within the multiple myeloma antibody and immunotherapy ecosystem, where:

  • anti-CD38 antibodies dominate many relapsed settings
  • bispecifics and other immune engagers increasingly take share in deeper relapsed lines
  • CAR-T and other cellular modalities create additional substitution dynamics for patients eligible for those pathways

In that environment, elotuzumab’s path to growth is most plausible through:

  • maintaining relevance in combination regimens where it meaningfully improves response rate and PFS
  • retaining guideline positioning in combination frameworks
  • minimizing total regimen burden relative to alternatives

What are the key clinical and regulatory drivers to watch?

The near-to-mid-term levers for continued market relevance are:

  1. Demonstrated incremental benefit over backbone comparators (PFS and response depth).
  2. Safety consistency in regimen-heavy combinations (especially tolerability manageability).
  3. Label-expansion triggers tied to positive Phase 2/3 outcomes in broader or earlier-line populations.
  4. Sequencing evidence that makes elotuzumab a rational component of treatment pathways, not a late-line option only.

What is the risk-adjusted outlook?

Primary downside risks

  • Rapid displacement by newer immune engagers and treatment pathways with superior response depth and operational convenience.
  • If comparative trials fail to show clinically meaningful superiority over newer standard regimens, prescribers shift toward more differentiated regimens.
  • Payer controls tighten around incremental benefit, especially if OS advantage is not established.

Primary upside risks

  • Positive readouts that translate into guideline recommendation strength.
  • Label expansions into broader earlier-line subsets.
  • Evidence that elotuzumab improves MRD-negative conversion or deep response durability in combination contexts.

What should investors and R&D teams treat as “signal” in upcoming readouts?

Treat these as decision-quality signal thresholds:

  • PFS with a clean hazard ratio signal across relevant subgroups
  • MRD-related endpoints with durability follow-through
  • Comparative safety without excess discontinuation rates in real-world-like cohorts
  • Any evidence that supports new sequencing or combination partnerships that expand the addressable population

Key Takeaways

  • Elotuzumab (EMPLICITI) remains an established multiple myeloma therapy anchored in combination regimens, with ongoing work focused on optimizing response depth and sequencing.
  • Market growth is likely to be moderate and driven by guideline retention, line-of-therapy placement, and payer value perception rather than major step-change expansion.
  • Competitive pressure from anti-CD38, bispecifics, and other immune approaches increases substitution risk, making comparative advantage and sequencing evidence the main determinants of durable share.
  • The most consequential future drivers are label-expansion-grade trial results (PFS durability, response depth, MRD durability) and manageable safety in combination regimens.

FAQs

  1. Is elotuzumab used as monotherapy in multiple myeloma?
    No. Its established use is in combination regimens, most notably with lenalidomide and dexamethasone backbones.

  2. Which patient settings matter most commercially for elotuzumab?
    Relapsed/refractory and front-line (transplant-ineligible or earlier-line contexts) where combination therapy is supported by evidence and payer coverage.

  3. What endpoints most influence adoption for elotuzumab combinations?
    PFS, depth of response (including MRD-related endpoints in newer studies), and safety outcomes that affect adherence and discontinuation.

  4. How does competition impact expected elotuzumab revenue growth?
    Substitution by newer immune engagers and regimen upgrades can slow uptake; comparative advantage and sequencing relevance determine whether elotuzumab gains or holds share.

  5. What type of clinical outcome would expand elotuzumab’s market?
    Positive Phase 3-grade evidence showing clinically meaningful benefit in broader or earlier-line populations with durable benefit and acceptable tolerability.


References

[1] FDA. (2015). FDA approves Empliciti (elotuzumab) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/
[2] Lonial, S., et al. (2015). Elotuzumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: results from a randomized phase 3 study. Lancet Oncology.
[3] NCCN. (2024). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Multiple Myeloma. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. https://www.nccn.org/
[4] EMA. (2024). EPAR for Empliciti (elotuzumab). European Medicines Agency. https://www.ema.europa.eu/
[5] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2024). Search results for elotuzumab. U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.