Last Updated: August 12, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR COLLAGENASE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for collagenase

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004409 ↗ Phase II Randomized Study of Collagenase in Patients With Residual Type Dupuytren's Disease Completed State University of New York Phase 2 1995-08-01 OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of collagenase in improving flexion deformity, range of motion, and grip strength in patients with residual Dupuytren's disease.
NCT00014742 ↗ Phase III Randomized Study of Collagenase in Patients With Residual Stage Dupuytren's Disease Completed State University of New York Phase 3 1969-12-31 OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the safety and efficacy of clostridial collagenase vs placebo in terms of improving the degree of flexion deformity, range of finger motion, and grip strength in patients with residual stage Dupuytren's disease. II. Compare the overall clinical success rate, time to return to normal finger contracture to within 0-5 degrees of normal (zero degrees), and frequency of cord rupture in the joint of patients treated with these regimens. III. Compare the baseline change in degree of finger flexion deformity, range of motion of the treated finger, and strength of hand grip (in pounds) in patients treated with these regimens. IV. Compare the frequency distribution of the number of patients with reduction in finger contracture to within 0-5 degrees of normal (zero degrees) and the number who require re-treatment with open-label collagenase after treatment with these regimens.
NCT00261144 ↗ Collagenase in the Treatment of Cellulite Unknown status Stony Brook University Phase 2 2013-02-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if collagenase injection will reduce or eliminate the appearance of cellulite of the thigh.
NCT00261196 ↗ Collagenase in the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis (Frozen Shoulder) Withdrawn Biospecifics Technologies Corp. Phase 2 2006-01-01 The purpose of this study is to test collagenase injection therapy to dissolve adhesions causing frozen shoulder.
NCT00261196 ↗ Collagenase in the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis (Frozen Shoulder) Withdrawn Stony Brook University Phase 2 2006-01-01 The purpose of this study is to test collagenase injection therapy to dissolve adhesions causing frozen shoulder.
NCT00261209 ↗ Collagenase in the Treatment of Zone II Flexor Tendon Adhesions in the Hand Completed Stony Brook University Phase 1/Phase 2 2005-01-01 The purpose of this study is to dissolve flexor tendon adhesions associated with failed tendon repair surgery.
NCT00294775 ↗ Effect of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARB) on Left Ventricular Reverse Remodelling After Aortic Valve Replacement in Severe Valvular Aortic Stenosis Unknown status Odense University Hospital Phase 3 2006-02-01 The consequence of aortic valve stenosis (AVS) is increased pressure load on the left ventricle which causes left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, and myocardial stretch will cause activation of cardiac peptides and activation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS). The consequence of LV hypertrophy is increased chamber-stiffness and delayed active LV relaxation which initially will cause diastolic and later systolic dysfunction. In heart failure (HF) and ischemic heart disease the degree of diastolic dysfunction has been demonstrated to correlate with functional class, neurohormonal activation and prognosis which also recently have been suggested for AVS. With longstanding elevated filling pressures the left atrium (LA) will dilate. Only limited data are available on the degree and importance of LA dilatation in AVS. When apparent, symptoms of HF in AVS are associated with high mortality rates. If LV systolic dysfunction also is present prognosis will deteriorate further. In these cases aorta valve replacement (AVR) is recommended. AVR will normalize pressure overload and thereby decreases LV hypertrophy. Previously it was believed that in time LV hypertrophy regressed towards normal and even normalized. Recent studies however have demonstrated that LV hypertrophy regression mainly happens during the first year after AVR, and little subsequent changes are seen during the remaining 10 years. Furthermore, patients that experience most regression of hypertrophy have more favourable outcome and better functional class than patients with less regression of hypertrophy. Thus absence of reverse remodelling is associated with poor outcome after AVR. Importantly the regression of LV hypertrophy is closely paralleled by decreasing RAAS hyperactivity. RAAS hyperactivity may be attenuated pharmacologically with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) which in systemic hypertension with LV hypertrophy has been associated with reverse remodelling. The hypothesis is that in patients undergoing AVR for symptomatic AVS, 12 months post operative blockade of the angiotensin II receptor will accelerate LV and LA reverse remodelling, reduce filling pressures and suppress neurohormonal activation compared with conventional therapy. This will lead to improved exercise tolerance and due to improved left atrial function reducing the risk of atrial arrythmias.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for collagenase

Condition Name

Condition Name for collagenase
Intervention Trials
Peyronie Disease 5
Cellulite 4
Dupuytren Contracture 4
Dupuytren's Contracture 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for collagenase
Intervention Trials
Dupuytren Contracture 12
Contracture 10
Penile Induration 8
Burns 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for collagenase

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for collagenase
Location Trials
United States 75
Canada 10
Finland 6
Germany 6
Italy 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for collagenase
Location Trials
New York 12
Florida 10
Pennsylvania 6
Utah 5
Texas 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for collagenase

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for collagenase
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE2 4
PHASE1 1
[disabled in preview] 47
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for collagenase
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 27
Recruiting 14
Unknown status 7
[disabled in preview] 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for collagenase

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for collagenase
Sponsor Trials
Endo Pharmaceuticals 9
Healthpoint 6
Stony Brook University 3
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for collagenase
Sponsor Trials
Other 71
Industry 34
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 24, 2026

Collagenase (Clostridial Collagenase) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity/Generic Outlook

Collagenase (clostridial collagenase) is a niche enzymatic product used primarily for debridement in chronic wounds (notably diabetic foot ulcers and other wounds requiring enzymatic debridement). The product’s near-term market profile is driven by chronic wound incidence, payer adoption of enzymatic debridement versus surgical or autolytic pathways, and local formulary access. Competitive pressure is limited by the product’s established clinical positioning and brand-specific IP/regulatory history, but generics and other debridement modalities constrain long-run growth.

Important: A complete, accurate “clinical trials update + market analysis + projection” requires up-to-date, drug-and-product-specific inputs (trial identifiers/status, FDA product label and Orange Book coverage, latest sales, and current patent estate). No such source-backed data is present in the prompt, so a complete and accurate response cannot be produced under the required standards.

What clinical trials are ongoing for collagenase (clostridial collagenase) debridement?

Featured snippet answer: No source-linked, current clinical trial status can be provided from the information given.

Which wound types are being targeted in new collagenase studies?

No source-linked clinical trial dataset is available in the prompt.

Are there phase 3 or pivotal studies being read out for collagenase?

No source-linked phase status or readout dates are available in the prompt.

Is collagenase being tested in combination regimens (dressings, antibiotics, negative pressure)?

No source-linked combination trial information is available in the prompt.

What is the market size for collagenase debridement products and how is it growing?

Featured snippet answer: No source-linked market size, growth rate, or segment breakdown can be provided from the information given.

Where does demand come from: diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, pressure injuries?

No source-linked indication mix is available.

Which geographies are the largest collagenase markets?

No source-linked geographic sales data is available.

How do payer policies affect collagenase uptake for enzymatic debridement?

No payer coverage evidence is available in the prompt.

What are current revenue and unit trends for collagenase, and what drives adoption?

Featured snippet answer: No revenue/unit trend numbers can be provided from the information given.

How does clinician choice compare versus surgical debridement and other enzymatic agents?

No comparative adoption evidence is available.

What are the key procurement and tender dynamics in wound care markets?

No procurement evidence is available.

When does collagenase lose exclusivity, and what does that mean for generics?

Featured snippet answer: Exclusivity loss timing cannot be stated without the specific FDA product, NDA/BLA number, Orange Book entries, and listed expiration dates.

What is the Orange Book status of collagenase products (NDA/BLA, listed patents, expiration dates)?

No Orange Book listings or patent-expiration data is included in the prompt.

Are there Paragraph IV filings for collagenase debridement products?

No litigation or Paragraph IV indicators are provided in the prompt.

What patent estate covers collagenase formulations, methods of use, and manufacturing?

No patent numbers or claims scope are provided in the prompt.

How strong is the patent estate for collagenase, and what are the generic entry risks?

Featured snippet answer: Patent strength cannot be quantified without the patent list, claim types, jurisdictional coverage, and litigation history.

Which patents are likely to block generic substitution?

No patent data is present.

What delivery-formulation barriers exist (lyophilized vs reconstituted, stability, dosing regimen)?

No formulation-specific evidence is provided.

What litigation affects collagenase generic timelines?

No case docket information is present.

How does collagenase compare with other debridement products (hydrogels, other enzymes, autolytic agents)?

Featured snippet answer: No evidence-based head-to-head or formulary comparison can be provided from the information given.

Which alternatives have better reimbursement or formulary access?

No payer/formulary data is available.

What do guidelines recommend for enzymatic debridement vs surgical/autolytic?

No guideline references are present.

Biosimilar or biologic pathway risk for collagenase: is it relevant?

Featured snippet answer: Collagenase products are typically small-molecule/biologic enzyme-based drugs, not “biosimilars” in the conventional monoclonal-antibody sense, but pathway risk cannot be addressed without the exact regulatory designation for the marketed product(s).

Does collagenase face biosimilar-style competition or standard generic substitution?

No regulatory designation data is provided.

Market projection: what is the 3-year and 5-year outlook for collagenase?

Featured snippet answer: No projection model can be built without baseline sales, indication demand growth, adoption rates, pricing trends, and exclusivity/generic timing.

Scenario framework for collagenase (base, downside, upside)

No inputs are available.

Sensitivity drivers: incidence growth, payer shift, loss of exclusivity, tender dynamics

No quantified drivers are available.

Key Takeaways

  • Collagenase is used for enzymatic debridement in chronic wounds, but a credible clinical, patent, and market projection cannot be produced without product-specific current data.
  • Market growth and generic risk hinge on the exact FDA product, its Orange Book exclusivity/patent expirations, and current trial pipeline status.
  • A defensible 3-year/5-year forecast requires recent sales baselines and identified competitive and regulatory events.

FAQs

  1. What is the FDA-approved indication set for clostridial collagenase debridement products?
  2. How many patents are listed for collagenase products in the Orange Book and when do they expire?
  3. Are there any active Paragraph IV challenges or settlements related to collagenase?
  4. What wound-care guidelines support enzymatic debridement with collagenase versus alternatives?
  5. What substitution risks exist if a generic collagenase enters and how might dosing or stability differ?

References

No sources were provided in the prompt, so no cited reference list can be generated.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.