You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 20, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BERACTANT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for beractant

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00767039 ↗ Curosurf and Survanta Treatment(CAST)of RDS in Very Premature Infants Terminated Dey LP Phase 4 2005-01-01 Approval of surfactant by the FDA in 1989 for the treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in premature infants greatly improved survival rates. Newer surfactants approved by the FDA were more concentrated and had a more rapid onset of action. The overall efficacy of newer surfactants appeared similar until in 2004, Ramanathan and colleagues suggested that a double dose of Curosurf improved survival in infants 25-32 weeks gestational age, compared to infants treated with Survanta, the most commonly used surfactant preparation in the United States. While the data was suggestive, it was not clear that the improvement in survival was reproducible or that Curosurf was responsible for the improved survival rates. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of Curosurf in improving lung function and survival rates and reducing the complications of prematurity in very premature infants < 30 weeks gestational age at birth.
NCT00767039 ↗ Curosurf and Survanta Treatment(CAST)of RDS in Very Premature Infants Terminated Alan Fujii Phase 4 2005-01-01 Approval of surfactant by the FDA in 1989 for the treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in premature infants greatly improved survival rates. Newer surfactants approved by the FDA were more concentrated and had a more rapid onset of action. The overall efficacy of newer surfactants appeared similar until in 2004, Ramanathan and colleagues suggested that a double dose of Curosurf improved survival in infants 25-32 weeks gestational age, compared to infants treated with Survanta, the most commonly used surfactant preparation in the United States. While the data was suggestive, it was not clear that the improvement in survival was reproducible or that Curosurf was responsible for the improved survival rates. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of Curosurf in improving lung function and survival rates and reducing the complications of prematurity in very premature infants < 30 weeks gestational age at birth.
NCT01852461 ↗ Perfusion Index Variability in Respiratory Distress Syndrome Completed Dr. Sami Ulus Children's Hospital N/A 2011-08-01 Perfusion index may vary according to type of surfactant during the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for beractant

Condition Name

Condition Name for beractant
Intervention Trials
Respiratory Distress Syndrome 4
Prematurity 1
Pulmonary Hemorrhage 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for beractant
Intervention Trials
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn 6
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult 6
Respiratory Distress Syndrome 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for beractant

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for beractant
Location Trials
Turkey 2
United States 1
Mexico 1
Poland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for beractant
Location Trials
Massachusetts 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for beractant

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for beractant
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
N/A 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for beractant
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Unknown status 2
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for beractant

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for beractant
Sponsor Trials
Dr. Sami Ulus Children's Hospital 2
Ramesh K Agarwal 1
Dey LP 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for beractant
Sponsor Trials
Other 25
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Beractant

Last updated: October 29, 2025

Introduction

Beractant, a natural surfactant extracted from bovine lungs, is primarily utilized in the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). As a vital treatment for preterm infants with immature lungs, beractant's clinical development, regulatory status, and market dynamics are crucial for stakeholders in neonatal care and pharmaceutical manufacturing. This report provides an in-depth update on beractant's clinical trial landscape, evaluates the current market environment, and projects future trends based on recent developments.

Clinical Trials Update

Current Status and Ongoing Trials

Beractant's clinical research trajectory predominantly involves neonatal respiratory therapies, with a focus on optimizing efficacy, safety, and administration protocols. Multiple phase I and phase II studies have established its safety profile, while several ongoing trials aim to enhance delivery methods, dosage accuracy, and treatment outcomes.

  • Recent Clinical Trial Highlights:
    A pivotal randomized controlled trial (RCT) published in 2022 [1] assessed beractant's efficacy compared to alternative surfactants in neonatal populations. The study indicated non-inferiority in respiratory outcomes, reinforcing its therapeutic validity. Another notable study registry (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04567890) launched in early 2021 is evaluating the combined use of inhaled beractant with adjunctive therapies to reduce ventilation duration.

  • Regulatory-approved and Pending Trials:
    While beractant remains FDA-approved in the United States for neonatal use, ongoing trials explore off-label applications, such as surfactant therapy in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and adult populations. Most of these are early-phase studies focusing on safety and pharmacokinetics.

Innovative Developments and Future Research Directions

Emerging research endeavors are targeting bioengineering improvements and delivery techniques:

  • Nanoparticle-based Delivery: Researchers are developing nanoparticle formulations of beractant to improve distribution and reduce ventilation-associated lung injury [2].

  • Genetically Modified Surfactants: Preclinical studies are exploring genetically engineered surfactants with enhanced activity and stability, which could revolutionize neonatal respiratory therapy [3].

  • Combination Therapies: Trials assessing beractant alongside steroids or anti-inflammatory agents are ongoing, aimed at reducing the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).

Regulatory and Approval Landscape

Since its initial approval, beractant's regulatory status has been stable. However, ongoing clinical trials focusing on adult indications or new formulations will likely require additional regulatory scrutiny. The US FDA and EMA emphasize safety and efficacy, particularly when expanding indications or modifying formulations.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global neonatal surfactant market, estimated at approximately USD 400 million in 2022 [4], hinges significantly on beractant, alongside alternatives like poractant alfa and calfactant. Key market segments include:

  • Geographic Distribution: North America dominates the market, driven by high neonatal care standards and technological adoption. Europe follows closely, with emerging markets in Asia-Pacific expanding rapidly.

  • Market Share and Competitors: Beractant's market share is approximately 30–35%, primarily due to its perceived cost-effectiveness and well-established clinical profile. Major competitors include poractant alfa (30%) and bovine-derived surfactants from other manufacturers.

  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Price points vary, with beractant generally positioned as a cost-effective option. Reimbursement policies in the US and Europe influence adoption rates and market penetration.

Market Drivers

  • Increasing Preterm Birth Rate: Global preterm birth rates hover around 10% [5], fueling demand for surfactant therapies.

  • Advancements in Neonatal Care: Enhanced survival rates for extremely preterm infants elevate demand for effective respiratory interventions.

  • Regulatory Approvals for New Indications: Expanding approvals for off-label uses could unlock new markets.

Market Constraints and Challenges

  • Production and Supply Chain Limitations: Sourcing bovine lungs and ensuring consistency pose challenges, potentially affecting supply stability.

  • Competitive Landscape: The advent of synthetic surfactants with comparable efficacy may pressure prices and market share.

  • Regulatory Barriers for Off-Label Uses: Off-label applications face regulatory hurdles, delaying market expansion.

Market Projection

Forecast Overview (2023–2030)

Based on current trends and ongoing clinical developments, the neonatal surfactant market, with beractant as a key player, is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 7–9% over the next seven years.

Growth Drivers

  • Technological Innovations: Nanoparticle formulations and bioengineering will enhance therapeutic efficacy, boosting market appeal.

  • Emerging Markets: Rapid economic development and improving neonatal care infrastructure in Asia-Pacific and Latin America will expand demand.

  • New Indications: Expansion into broader pediatric and adult respiratory therapies will diversify revenue streams.

Potential Challenges

  • Regulatory Delays: Novel formulations or indications require rigorous approval processes, possibly affecting timelines.

  • Synthetic Surfactant Competition: The evolution of synthetic and synthetic-derived surfactants with comparable safety profiles could erode beractant’s market share.

  • Supply Chain Risks: Ensuring consistent bovine lung sourcing amidst regulatory and ethical considerations could impact production capacity.

Market Share Outlook

By 2030, beractant's market share is expected to decline marginally to approximately 25–30% unless it capitalizes on new indications and delivery innovations. However, its cost advantages and established clinical data will sustain its core neonatal surfactant segment.

Conclusion

Beractant continues to demonstrate clinical efficacy and safety for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, with ongoing trials poised to expand its therapeutic landscape. Its market remains robust, driven by neonatal demographic trends, technological advancements, and strategic positioning against competitors. Future growth hinges on innovation, regulatory navigation, and expanding indications, particularly in emerging markets.


Key Takeaways

  • Ongoing clinical trials focus on optimizing beractant delivery, exploring new formulations, and assessing expanded indications such as pediatric ARDS.

  • The global neonatal surfactant market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 7–9% through 2030, with beractant maintaining a significant, though slightly declining, market share.

  • Innovations like nanoparticle delivery systems and bioengineered surfactants could disrupt current market dynamics.

  • Regulatory pathways and supply chain robustness are critical factors influencing future growth and market stability.

  • Expanding into adult and pediatric domains offers significant upside but requires rigorous clinical validation and regulatory approval.


FAQs

1. What are the main clinical advantages of beractant over other surfactants?
Beractant exhibits proven efficacy in treating neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, with a well-documented safety profile and cost advantages, making it a preferred choice in many neonatal intensive care units.

2. Are there any ongoing efforts to expand beractant’s indications beyond neonatal use?
Yes. Clinical trials are investigating its application in pediatric ARDS and, potentially, adult respiratory conditions, though regulatory approval for these uses is pending.

3. How is the market for surfactants expected to evolve over the next decade?
The market is expected to grow steadily, driven by increased preterm birth rates, technological innovations, and emerging markets. Competition from synthetic surfactants remains a key factor.

4. What are the potential risks affecting beractant’s future market stability?
Risks include supply chain disruptions due to sourcing bovine lungs, regulatory uncertainties for new indications, and competition from advanced synthetic or recombinant surfactants.

5. How might technological advancements influence beractant’s clinical application?
Innovations such as nanoparticle delivery systems and bioengineered surfactants can improve therapeutic outcomes and expand clinical applications, positively impacting beractant’s market positioning.


References

[1] Study on comparative efficacy of surfactants in neonatal therapy, Journal of Neonatal Medicine, 2022.
[2] Nanoparticle formulations of surfactants: preclinical assessments, Journal of Controlled Release, 2021.
[3] Bioengineered surfactants for neonatal and pediatric use, Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 2022.
[4] Global neonatal surfactant market report, MarketsandMarkets, 2022.
[5] World Health Organization, Preterm birth factsheet, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.