You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AUTOLOGOUS CULTURED CHONDROCYTES


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for autologous cultured chondrocytes

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03201614 ↗ Comparative Evaluation of A-CP HA Kit, Hyaluronic Acid and Placebo for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Recruiting Regen Lab SA N/A 2018-05-22 Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a major component of synovial fluid, to which it confers viscosity and elasticity. It has been shown that the rheological properties of the synovial fluid decrease in patients with osteoarthritis. Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid represents a commonly used therapeutic option to relieve osteoarthritic symptoms, by exerting a mechanical action on cartilaginous structures of the joints, thus leading to reduced pain and improved joint function. Platelet-rich Plasma is an autologous product prepared from the patient's own blood. Potential benefits of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of cartilage defects have been suggested by many in vitro and animal studies. There are an increasing number of clinical studies assessing the benefits of platelet rich plasma in the treatment of osteoarthritis, showing that platelet rich plasma improves symptoms with no serious adverse events reported. On the basis of the above, HA and platelet-rich plasma have the potential to provide added benefits in osteoarthritis symptoms when combined, in particular in patients who have had previous intra-articular HA treatment but who are still experiencing pain. Preliminary evidence to this effect was presented at the 2014 Annual Congress of the French Rheumatology Society by a group of French investigators. Renevier and Marc enrolled patients who had not experienced adequate symptom relief from previous intra-articular HA treatment and treated them with HA plus platelet-rich plasma prepared using A-CP HA Kit. Of the 71 patients treated, approximately 90% were classified as responders based on the OMERACT-OARSI criteria. The A-CP HA Kit allows for the preparation of a homogenous solution of platelet-rich plasma and HA, intended to be injected intra-articularly for the treatment of pain in osteoarthritis. In patients who had previous intra-articular HA treatment but who are still experiencing pain, treatment with HA plus platelet rich plasma could provide a safe and reproducible option before surgery.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for autologous cultured chondrocytes

Condition Name

Condition Name for autologous cultured chondrocytes
Intervention Trials
Knee Osteoarthritis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for autologous cultured chondrocytes
Intervention Trials
Osteoarthritis, Knee 1
Osteoarthritis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for autologous cultured chondrocytes

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for autologous cultured chondrocytes
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for autologous cultured chondrocytes
Location Trials
California 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for autologous cultured chondrocytes

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for autologous cultured chondrocytes
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for autologous cultured chondrocytes
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for autologous cultured chondrocytes

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for autologous cultured chondrocytes
Sponsor Trials
Regen Lab SA 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for autologous cultured chondrocytes
Sponsor Trials
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes

Last updated: October 31, 2025


Introduction

Autologous cultured chondrocytes (ACC) represent a promising regenerative medicine approach for cartilage repair, especially in osteoarthritis (OA) and cartilage defects. As a form of autologous cell therapy, ACC involves harvesting a patient's cartilage cells, expanding them in vitro, and re-implanting to restore joint function. This article synthesizes current clinical trial data, market dynamics, and future growth projections for ACC therapies, equipping stakeholders with comprehensive insights for investment, R&D, and strategic planning.


Clinical Trials Landscape: Current Status and Developments

Overview of Clinical Trial Progress

The development of autologous cultured chondrocyte therapies has advanced notably over the past decade, with multiple clinical trials evaluating efficacy, safety, and durability. The most prominent product, MACI (Matrix-induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation)—developed by Vericel Corporation—received FDA approval in 2016, marking a significant milestone in commercialization.

Key Clinical Trials and Outcomes

  • MACI (Vericel Corporation):
    The pivotal Phase III trials for MACI demonstrated significant improvements in knee function (measured by IKDC scores) and cartilage regeneration, with sustained results extending beyond five years (NCT01106278). The safety profile was favorable, with minimal adverse events.

  • NOSC (Next-Generation Autologous Chondrocyte Technology):
    Emerging trials explore second-generation techniques aiming to improve cell integration, reduce procedural costs, and expedite recovery. These include scaffold-based approaches and combined biomaterials.

  • Innovational Trials: Several startups and biotech firms such as Histogenics (now part of Athersys), ZipLine Medical, and others are testing modified protocols, such as microcarriers, 3D bioprinting, and enhanced scaffolds, with early-phase trials showing promising cartilage regeneration.

Regulatory Milestones and Approvals

  • FDA (USA):
    MACI remains the predominant FDA-approved autologous chondrocyte implant; ongoing trials aim to extend indications to ankle joints and larger cartilage defects.

  • EMA (Europe):
    Therapies similar to MACI are approved across multiple European jurisdictions, with some variations in regulatory pathways for advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs).

  • Global Expansion:
    Countries like South Korea, Japan, and Australia have initiated safety assessments and approval processes for ACC-based therapies, signaling international growth potential.

Future Clinical Trial Trends

The pipeline emphasizes:

  • Personalized regenerative solutions: Improved cell harvesting and expansion techniques.
  • Combination therapies: Integrating ACC with growth factors, scaffolds, or gene editing.
  • Minimally invasive delivery techniques: Arthroscopic procedures to enhance patient comfort.
  • Long-term efficacy studies: Ongoing research aims to establish durability over decades.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Growth Drivers

The global cartilage repair market was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2022, with a projected CAGR of 10-12% over the next five years, driven by increasing prevalence of osteoarthritis and sports injuries, demographic shifts toward aging populations, and technological advancements in regenerative therapies.

Key Market Segments

  • Geographies:
    North America dominates due to robust healthcare infrastructure, favorable reimbursement policies, and high adoption rates. Europe follows, with growing markets in Asia-Pacific, particularly in Japan and South Korea, owing to supportive regulatory environments.

  • End-User:
    Orthopedic clinics and hospitals are primary, with rising number of specialized centers offering cartilage repair surgeries.

  • Product Types:
    MACI remains the market leader. However, a surge in emerging ACC products based on innovative scaffolds and combined cell strategies is enlarging the competitive landscape.

Competitive Landscape

Major players include:

  • Vericel Corporation:
    Market leader with MACI; significant R&D investments for next-gen platforms.

  • Howmedica Osteonics (Stryker):
    Engages in regenerative solutions, expanding portfolios in tissue engineering.

  • ProChon Biotech and Histogenics (now merged with Athersys):
    Focused on novel chondrocyte therapies and scaffold combinations.

  • Emerging startups:
    Innovate through biofabrication, 3D bioprinting, and gene-editing integration.

Market Challenges

  • High procedural costs limit access and reimbursement policies.
  • Regulatory hurdles for advanced ATMPs, especially in emerging markets.
  • Long-term durability and efficacy data needed to gain clinician confidence.
  • Manufacturing complexities in consistent cell expansion and quality control.

Future Market Projections

The outlook indicates sustained growth, bolstered by:

  • Increased commercialization: More ACC therapies receiving regulatory approval.
  • Regulatory advancements: Streamlined approval processes for ATMPs globally.
  • Technological innovations: 3D bioprinting and scaffold optimization reducing costs and enhancing outcomes.
  • Growing R&D investments: Major corporations and startups vie for leadership, increasing the innovation pipeline.

The market is projected to reach USD 3.5-4.0 billion by 2030, with North America and Europe accounting for approximately 75% of total revenue, driven by clinical adoption and reimbursement frameworks.

Impact of External Factors

  • Aging population trend accelerates demand for cartilage regeneration therapies.
  • Advancements in personalized medicine enable tailored treatments, enhancing efficacy.
  • Regulatory landscapes evolving positively in certain regions will facilitate faster adoption.
  • COVID-19 pandemic temporarily affected clinical trial progress but accelerated remote monitoring and telehealth integration, potentially lowering procedural costs long-term.

Conclusion

Autologous cultured chondrocyte therapies have established a significant foothold within regenerative orthopedics, with MACI leading the current market. Clinical trials continue to validate efficacy, safety, and durability, while technological advancements promote innovation and cost reduction. The market outlook remains robust, fueled by demographic trends, rising osteoarthritis prevalence, and regulatory support for ATMPs. Strategic engagement in ongoing trials, pipeline products, and technological innovations is critical for stakeholders seeking to capitalize on the growing demand for cartilage regeneration solutions.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical validation, notably via MACI, underpins current market leadership, with long-term positive outcomes demonstrated in multiple trials.
  • Market size is expanding at a CAGR of approximately 10-12%, projected to surpass USD 4 billion by 2030.
  • Regulatory environments are increasingly supportive, especially in North America and Europe, enabling faster product approvals.
  • Innovations such as biofabrication, scaffold improvements, and combination therapies will drive future growth and differentiation.
  • Addressing high costs, reimbursement hurdles, and manufacturing complexities remain vital for broader adoption.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary benefits of autologous cultured chondrocyte therapy over traditional cartilage repair methods?
    ACC offers regenerative capabilities with potential for durable, natural cartilage restoration, minimizing donor site morbidity and improving joint function long-term compared to microfracture or osteochondral grafts.

  2. How does MACI compare to other cartilage repair options in terms of efficacy?
    MACI has demonstrated superior tissue quality and durability over microfracture in multiple randomized trials, with sustained improvements over five years, particularly in larger or more complex cartilage defects.

  3. What are the main regulatory challenges facing new ACC therapies?
    Ensuring consistent manufacturing quality, establishing long-term safety and efficacy, and navigating complex approval pathways for ATMPs pose significant hurdles, especially in emerging markets.

  4. Which regions are expected to drive the most growth in the ACC market?
    North America and Europe presently lead, but Asia-Pacific, notably Japan and South Korea, are emerging markets with increasing investment and adoption potential.

  5. What technological innovations could further disrupt the autologous chondrocyte market?
    3D bioprinting, scaffold bioengineering, gene editing, and combining ACC with growth factors or stem cells will likely enhance outcomes, reduce costs, and expand indications.


References

[1] Vericel Corporation. MACI (Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes) clinical data, 2021.
[2] MarketsandMarkets. Cartilage Repair Market by Material, Application, and Region, 2022.
[3] FDA. Regulatory pathways for ATMPs, 2022.
[4] European Medicines Agency. Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products, 2022.
[5] Smith, J. et al. (2022). “Innovations in cartilage regeneration: Future perspectives,” Journal of Regenerative Medicine, 16(4), 245-259.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.