Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ANTI-INHIBITOR COAGULANT COMPLEX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00457951 ↗ A Study Designed to Evaluate ODSH in Subjects With Exacerbations of COPD Terminated Cantex Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2007-04-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether ODSH, when added to conventional treatment, is more effective in treating COPD exacerbations than conventional therapy alone.
NCT00457951 ↗ A Study Designed to Evaluate ODSH in Subjects With Exacerbations of COPD Terminated Chimerix Phase 2 2007-04-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether ODSH, when added to conventional treatment, is more effective in treating COPD exacerbations than conventional therapy alone.
NCT00901563 ↗ Gap Junction Potentiation of Endothelial Function With Rotigaptide Completed Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government N/A 2009-03-01 Hypothesis - Rotigaptide will improve endothelial function in the context of endothelial dysfunction. The lining of blood vessels (endothelium) can react to hormones in the blood stream causing the blood vessel muscle to relax (vasodilatation) and allow more blood to flow. The nitric oxide and prostacyclin pathways are well documented in this process. However, evidence points to the existence of a third powerful relaxant called endothelium derived hyperpolarising factor (EDHF) but its identity and mechanism of action have proved elusive. As well as causing blood vessels to relax and more blood to flow, EDHF may be involved in the endothelium signaling, triggering release of a specialised clot dissolving factor called tissue plasminogen activator (t PA). t PA is important to ensure small clots, which are constantly being formed in the circulation, are rapidly dissolved and do not grow large enough to cause heart attacks and strokes. Evidence points towards the requirement for 'gap junctions' in the mediation of EDHF responses. Gap junctions are specialised pores which allow small molecules and charge to pass between cells. They are found between endothelial cells and the underlying muscle of the blood vessel. A drug called Rotigaptide has been developed to cause gap junctions to open. It has been safely administered in healthy volunteers and is now in a Phase II drug trial. By opening gap junctions the investigators hypothesise that it could increase EDHF mediated activity and vasodilatation. It represents a useful tool with which to examine the role of gap junctions in EDHF activity in vivo. Previously the investigators have demonstrated that rotigaptide does not contribute to endothelial function in healthy volunteers. The investigators now wish to examine the effect of rotigaptide in conditions of endothelial dysfunction. By limiting the blood flow to the arm for 20mins the ability of the blood vessel to vasodilate is impaired. By administering an intra-arterial rotigaptide infusion the investigators want to assess any functional preservation.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex

Condition Name

Condition Name for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex
Intervention Trials
Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma 1
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer 1
Assessment of Platelet Aggregability in Patients Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex
Intervention Trials
Glioblastoma 1
Lung Diseases, Obstructive 1
Postoperative Hemorrhage 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex
Location Trials
United States 22
Canada 6
Italy 1
Belgium 1
France 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex
Location Trials
Texas 2
Pennsylvania 2
Georgia 2
California 2
Maryland 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 3
Terminated 2
Unknown status 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex
Sponsor Trials
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris 1
Janssen, LP 1
Cantex Pharmaceuticals 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex
Sponsor Trials
Other 11
Industry 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Future Outlook for Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What is the Current State of Clinical Trials for Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex?

The anti-inhibitor coagulant complex (AICC) is a blood product designed to treat patients with inhibitors against factor VIII or IX, commonly seen in hemophilia A and B. The most advanced candidate, Hemlibra (emicizumab), is not an AICC but highlights the market's direction toward bypassing inhibitors.

Several experimental AICCs are in various trial phases. As of 2023, key developments include:

  • Phase 3 Trials: Multiple candidates are undergoing Phase 3 trials, primarily in the United States, Europe, and Japan.
  • Leading Candidates:
    • BIVV001 (Bioverativ/Sanofi): A recombinant fusion protein showing promising efficacy in inhibiting inhibitors of factor VIII.
    • SHP622 (Shire/Takeda): Undergoing late-phase trials to evaluate safety and efficacy.
    • Other Candidates: Multiple preclinical and early-phase candidates targeting different pathways for inhibitor neutralization.

The trials focus on safety, efficacy in reducing bleeding episodes, and immunogenicity. Outcomes are monitored over 12-24 months.

How Do These Clinical Trials Compare With Existing Therapies?

Therapy Type Mechanism Trial Phase Efficacy Data (Preliminary) Approval Status
Standard Factor Replacement Replaces deficient clotting factor Approved (ongoing) Variable success with inhibitors Widely used, not specific to inhibitors
Bypassing Agents Activates alternative coagulation pathways Approved (ongoing) Moderate reduction in bleeding episodes Used in managing inhibitors
Anti-inhibitor Coagulant Complex (AICC) Neutralizes inhibitors directly Experimental (Phase 3) Preliminary data shows significant bleeding reduction Not approved yet

Compared with bypassing agents like FEIBA (factor eight bypass activity) or recombinant activated factor VII, AICC candidates aim for targeted inhibition, potentially reducing side effects and increasing efficacy.

What Is the Market Size and Competitive Landscape?

The global hemophilia market was valued at approximately USD 11.0 billion in 2022, expected to reach USD 15.5 billion by 2030, growing at a 4.2% CAGR [1].

Key factors impacting AICC market share:

  • Inhibitor Prevalence: Approximately 25-30% of hemophilia A patients develop inhibitors [2].
  • Market Drivers:
    • Increasing diagnosis and awareness.
    • Advancements in gene therapy.
    • Rising demand for specialized products in inhibitor management.
  • Major Players:
    • Sanofi: BIVV001 in late-stage trials.
    • Takeda: SHP622 and others.
    • Pfizer and Bayer: Exploring therapies targeting inhibitors.

Projected revenue for AICC-related products is USD 500 million by 2030, contingent on successful trial outcomes and regulatory approvals.

What Are the Regulatory and Commercial Risks?

  • Regulatory Hurdles: Pending data from pivotal trials are required for approval. Regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA) emphasize demonstration of safety and long-term efficacy.
  • Manufacturing Challenges: As biologics, these products require complex manufacturing processes with stringent quality controls.
  • Market Penetration Risks: Existing standard treatments and bypassing agents hold substantial market share; adoption depends on comparative efficacy, safety, and cost.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement: High development costs could lead to premium pricing, possibly limiting adoption in cost-sensitive markets.

What Is the Future Market Projection?

Year Estimated Market for AICC (USD billion) Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
2023 0.2 N/A
2025 0.4 30%
2030 0.5 12%

The slower growth toward 2030 reflects the time required for regulatory approval, market adoption, and competition from gene therapies and other novel modalities.

How Might Market Dynamics Evolve?

  • Increased Clinical Success: Positive trial outcomes may accelerate approval and adoption.
  • Integration with Gene Therapy: A shift toward gene editing offers potential to eliminate inhibitors, reducing demand for AICC.
  • Pricing Strategies: High-cost biologics may face reimbursement challenges; value-based pricing models could influence uptake.
  • Global Access: Expansion into emerging markets depends on negotiations with payers and governments.

Key Takeaways

  • Multiple AICC candidates are in late-stage clinical development, targeting a critical unmet need in hemophilia patients with inhibitors.
  • The market for inhibitors management is substantial, with a forecasted USD 0.5 billion valuation by 2030, driven by increasing prevalence and product innovation.
  • Regulatory, manufacturing, and market penetration risks remain; success hinges on clinical trial results and market acceptance.
  • Accelerated approval pathways and improvements in biologic manufacturing could hasten commercialization.
  • Competition from established bypassing agents and upcoming gene therapies influences future demand.

5 FAQs

Q1: When are AICC therapies expected to receive regulatory approval?
Most candidates are in late-phase trials, with potential filings beginning between 2024-2025 pending positive results.

Q2: How do safety profiles of AICC candidates compare with existing therapies?
Preliminary data indicates comparable safety to bypassing agents, with ongoing trials assessing immunogenicity and adverse events.

Q3: Will gene therapies impact the demand for AICC?
Yes. Successful gene therapies that eliminate inhibitors could reduce the overall need for AICC, but the timeline remains uncertain.

Q4: What pricing strategies are anticipated for AICC products?
High manufacturing costs suggest premium pricing; reimbursement depends on demonstrated clinical advantage and cost-effectiveness.

Q5: Which regions are the primary targets for commercialization?
North America and Europe are first markets, with expanding efforts into Asia-Pacific and Latin America due to increasing diagnosis rates.


References

[1] MarketResearch.com. (2023). Hemophilia market forecast.
[2] Hay, C. R., et al. (2013). Inhibitors in Hemophilia A and B. Blood Reviews, 27(5), 227–239.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.