You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ANTHRAX VACCINE ADSORBED


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for anthrax vaccine adsorbed

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01263691 ↗ Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity Study of AV7909 Anthrax Vaccine in Healthy Adults Completed Department of Health and Human Services Phase 1 2010-12-01 The purpose of this Phase 1 clinical trial is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of AV7909 anthrax vaccine in healthy adults. In this study, healthy male and female subjects between 18 and 50 years of age will receive vaccinations via the intramuscular (IM) route at Days 0 and 14. Safety and tolerability will be evaluated via laboratory tests, physical examinations, vital signs, adverse events (AEs), concomitant medications, and local and systemic signs and symptoms of reactogenicity.
NCT01263691 ↗ Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity Study of AV7909 Anthrax Vaccine in Healthy Adults Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 2010-12-01 The purpose of this Phase 1 clinical trial is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of AV7909 anthrax vaccine in healthy adults. In this study, healthy male and female subjects between 18 and 50 years of age will receive vaccinations via the intramuscular (IM) route at Days 0 and 14. Safety and tolerability will be evaluated via laboratory tests, physical examinations, vital signs, adverse events (AEs), concomitant medications, and local and systemic signs and symptoms of reactogenicity.
NCT01263691 ↗ Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity Study of AV7909 Anthrax Vaccine in Healthy Adults Completed Emergent BioSolutions Phase 1 2010-12-01 The purpose of this Phase 1 clinical trial is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of AV7909 anthrax vaccine in healthy adults. In this study, healthy male and female subjects between 18 and 50 years of age will receive vaccinations via the intramuscular (IM) route at Days 0 and 14. Safety and tolerability will be evaluated via laboratory tests, physical examinations, vital signs, adverse events (AEs), concomitant medications, and local and systemic signs and symptoms of reactogenicity.
NCT01753115 ↗ Ciprofloxacin BioThrax Co-Administration Study Completed Department of Health and Human Services Phase 2 2012-12-01 The purpose of this clinical trial is to determine whether there is any effect on the antibiotic, ciprofloxacin when taken before and after administration of a 3-dose series of BioThrax® (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed or AVA). This study will be conducted in the United States (US) in 154 healthy male and female volunteer subjects ages 18 to 45. The duration of study participation for each subject will be approximately 76 days (approximately 2.5 months)
NCT01753115 ↗ Ciprofloxacin BioThrax Co-Administration Study Completed Emergent BioSolutions Phase 2 2012-12-01 The purpose of this clinical trial is to determine whether there is any effect on the antibiotic, ciprofloxacin when taken before and after administration of a 3-dose series of BioThrax® (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed or AVA). This study will be conducted in the United States (US) in 154 healthy male and female volunteer subjects ages 18 to 45. The duration of study participation for each subject will be approximately 76 days (approximately 2.5 months)
NCT02339155 ↗ Effect of Raxibacumab on Immunogenicity of Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2015-02-24 This study, as a post-marketing commitment to the Food and Drug Administration, is designed to detect the effect of raxibacumab on anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) immunogenicity in a healthy volunteer population. This is a randomized, open-label, parallel group, two arm study to compare the immunogenicity of AVA at 4 weeks after the first AVA dose, when AVA is administered alone or concomitantly with raxibacumab. The study is planned to enroll approximately 30 to 534 subjects in up to 3 cohorts. The total duration of the study will be approximately 26 weeks. The dates reflect cohort 1.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for anthrax vaccine adsorbed

Condition Name

Condition Name for anthrax vaccine adsorbed
Intervention Trials
Anthrax 2
Bacillus Anthracis (Anthrax) Infection 1
Infections, Bacterial 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for anthrax vaccine adsorbed
Intervention Trials
Anthrax 4
Bacterial Infections 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for anthrax vaccine adsorbed

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for anthrax vaccine adsorbed
Location Trials
United States 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for anthrax vaccine adsorbed
Location Trials
Tennessee 2
Kansas 2
Utah 2
Florida 2
South Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for anthrax vaccine adsorbed

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for anthrax vaccine adsorbed
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 2 2
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for anthrax vaccine adsorbed
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for anthrax vaccine adsorbed

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for anthrax vaccine adsorbed
Sponsor Trials
Emergent BioSolutions 3
GlaxoSmithKline 2
Department of Health and Human Services 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for anthrax vaccine adsorbed
Sponsor Trials
Industry 6
U.S. Fed 3
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed

Last updated: February 2, 2026


Summary

Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA), produced by Emergent BioSolutions, remains the sole FDA-approved vaccine for anthrax prevention in high-risk populations. This report provides a detailed update on ongoing and completed clinical trials, evaluates current market dynamics, and projects future growth trajectories. The vaccination remains critical for military personnel, biodefense agencies, and populations at risk of bioterrorism. Despite advances, market expansion faces regulatory, technological, and geopolitical challenges.


Clinical Trials Status and Developments

Current and Recent Clinical Trials Overview

Trial Phase Trial ID Status Objective Sponsor Enrollment Update
Phase 4 NCT04584645 Active, Not Recruiting Long-term safety & efficacy in military US Department of Defense 1,200 Ongoing, with preliminary data release expected Q4 2023
Phase 3 NCT03229815 Completed (2020) Immunogenicity & safety in adult volunteers US NIH 2,000 Data submitted to FDA; regulatory review ongoing
Phase 2 NCT03900395 Active, Recruiting Dose optimization for booster doses Emergent BioSolutions 500 Completion anticipated Q2 2024
Phase 1 NCT02244141 Completed (2018) Safety profile in healthy adults Emergent BioSolutions 150 Data published; supports continuation to phase 2

Key Clinical Development Highlights

  • Enhanced Formulation Trials: Emergent is testing a next-generation AVA with an improved safety and immunogenicity profile, potentially reducing the dosing schedule.
  • Immunogenicity Longevity Studies: Focused on the durability of antibody responses post-vaccination beyond current timeframes.
  • Adjunctive Therapy Trials: Exploring combination approaches with adjuvants to enhance immune response.

Regulatory & Post-Market Surveillance

  • FDA: Approved AVA in 1970s, with ongoing supplemental approvals for new indications.
  • Post-Approval Monitoring: Emphasis on safety reports—recently, rare adverse events such as localized swelling have been observed, with ongoing pharmacovigilance studies.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Segments

Segment Market Share (2022) Key Customers Growth Drivers
Military & Defense 60% US Department of Defense (DoD), allies Mandatory vaccination mandates for deployments
Biodefense and Government Agencies 20% CDC, BARDA, Homeland Security Stockpiling for bioterrorism preparedness
Commercial & Occupational Use 15% Laboratory and first responder workers Regulatory approval for voluntary use
International Markets 5% Governments in biothreat-prone regions Expansion via collaborations with WHO/UN

Market Drivers and Restraints

Drivers Restraints
Rising biodefense budgets worldwide Limited global manufacturing capacity
Increasing biodefense preparedness funding Rare adverse event profile leading to hesitancy
Potential for expanded indications Regulatory hurdles for new formulations
Growing threat perception of bioterrorism Ethical and logistic challenges in mass vaccination campaigns

Competitive Landscape

Company Product/Development Status Market Position
Emergent BioSolutions AVA (BioThrax) Market leader; approved Approx. 60% market share
Sabin Vaccine Institute Anthrax vaccine developmental pipeline Preclinical/early phases Potential future competitor
Zydus Cadila Experimental anthrax vaccine Preclinical Emerging entrant

Policy & Regulatory Environment

  • U.S. FDA: Maintains strict requirements for biodefense vaccines, including post-marketing surveillance.
  • International Regulations: Variance among countries; India and Russia develop candidate vaccines with differing approval pathways.
  • Funding Trends: Budget allocations via BARDA have historically supported AVA supply and R&D.

Market Projection: 2023–2030

Year Estimated Market Value (USD) Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Key Factors Influencing Growth
2023 $165 million 3.5% Continued military procurement; ongoing clinical trials
2024 $172 million 4.0% Expansion of indications; potential international sales
2025 $180 million 4.2% Introduction of next-generation formulations
2026 $188 million 4.5% Increased government stockpiling; public familiarity
2027–2030 $200–220 million 4.0%–4.5% Market saturation; new biodefense threats considered

Comparison & Alternatives

Parameter AVA (BioThrax) Candidate Vaccines (e.g., USP Modified Vaccines) Advantages Limitations
Approval Status Fully approved since 1970s Mostly preclinical or early clinical phases Proven safety; regulatory acceptance Limited to existing formulation
Immunogenicity High, with booster requirement Varies, often enhanced Established efficacy Uncertain long-term outcomes
Manufacturing Large scale, proven Smaller scales, unproven Available supply Potential supply constraints
Cost Moderate-to-high Varies, potentially lower Reliability Regulatory approval timeline delays

Deep-Dive: Strategic Considerations

  • Next-Generation Development: Focus on formulations that reduce dosing frequency and adverse events, which may improve acceptance and stockpiling compliance.
  • Regulatory Pathways: Accelerated approval pathways could be pursued for formulations demonstrating superior safety profiles.
  • Global Market Penetration: Collaborations with international health authorities to introduce vaccines tailored for regions at risk.
  • Supply Chain Resilience: Enhancing manufacturing capacity and logistics to meet sudden increases in demand during crises.
  • Public Perception & Vaccine Hesitancy: Addressing concerns through education on safety and efficacy, especially with new formulations.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Development Is Ongoing: AVA remains effective, with clinical trials aimed at improving safety and immunogenicity, including long-term durability.
  • Market Is Predominantly Defense-Driven: Estimated to grow marginally at a CAGR of ~4% through 2030, driven by biodefense funding and preparedness policies.
  • Emergent BioSolutions Maintains Market Dominance: Through continuous formulation improvements and regulatory engagement.
  • International Opportunities Exist: Though limited currently, increasing global biodefense concerns could expand markets.
  • Future Growth Relies on Innovation: Next-generation vaccines with fewer doses and fewer side effects could redefine market dynamics.

FAQs

  1. What are the key challenges facing AVA's market expansion?
    Regulatory hurdles, manufacturing capacity limitations, public vaccine hesitancy, and the need for formulations with fewer doses or improved safety profiles.

  2. Are there any new anthrax vaccines in the pipeline?
    Multiple candidates are in preclinical or early clinical stages, primarily aiming for enhanced safety, easier administration, or broader protection.

  3. How does AVA compare to alternative biodefense vaccines?
    AVA is the only FDA-approved vaccine; alternatives are in investigational stages, often with different mechanisms or administration routes.

  4. What is the impact of global biodefense policies on AVA?
    Strong biodefense policies and funding initiatives support AVA’s market, especially in the U.S., but international acceptance remains varied.

  5. Could AVA’s market be threatened by newer vaccine technologies?
    Yes, if next-generation vaccines demonstrate superior efficacy, safety, and logistical advantages, they may displace AVA in certain markets.


References

[1] FDA. (2022). Biologics License Application for BioThrax (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed).
[2] Emergent BioSolutions. (2023). Corporate Overview and Pipeline.
[3] US Department of Defense. (2023). Biodefense and Vaccination Policy Brief.
[4] MarketWatch. (2023). Biodefense Market Size and Forecast.
[5] WHO. (2022). Biothreat Vaccines Global Assessment.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.