Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ALBUMIN (HUMAN)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Biosimilar Clinical Trials for albumin (human)

This table shows clinical trials for biosimilars. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04670978 ↗ Abraxane With Bevacizumab Biosimilar in Patients With Recurrent, Platinum-resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Recruiting Shandong University Phase 2 2021-03-31 The study is a multi-center, prospective, one-arm, phase II clinical trial. It is tend to examine the safety and efficacy of combining abraxane(albumin-bound paclitaxel) and bevacizumab to treat patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant primary epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer or peritoneal carcinoma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for albumin (human)

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000117 ↗ Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Optic Neuritis Completed National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 3 1995-08-01 To determine whether high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is more effective than placebo in restoring lost visual function (visual acuity) in optic neuritis (ON). To determine the time course of recovery following IVIg administration. If the reports of IVIg-associated clinical improvement occurring within 3 to 6 months following treatment can be confirmed, this would provide indirect evidence that IVIg may promote central nervous system (CNS) remyelination in optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis (MS).
NCT00000580 ↗ Interruption of Maternal-to-Infant Transmission of Hepatitis B by Means of Hepatitis B Immune Globulin Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1975-11-01 To evaluate whether hepatitis B immune globulin with a high level of antibody against the hepatitis B antigen would be capable of interrupting maternal-fetal transmission of hepatitis B virus, the single most important route of hepatitis spread in the entire Third World.
NCT00000582 ↗ Cooperative Study of Factor VIII Inhibitors Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1978-07-01 To test the efficacy of prothrombin complex concentrates (Factor IX) in the treatment of hemophiliac patients who had inhibitors to Factor VIII.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for albumin (human)

Condition Name

Condition Name for albumin (human)
Intervention Trials
Breast Cancer 53
Diabetic Nephropathy 38
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 30
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for albumin (human)
Intervention Trials
Kidney Diseases 125
Breast Neoplasms 110
Diabetes Mellitus 101
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for albumin (human)

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for albumin (human)
Location Trials
China 515
Canada 161
Italy 101
Spain 95
France 80
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for albumin (human)
Location Trials
California 107
New York 92
Texas 84
Illinois 79
Florida 68
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for albumin (human)

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for albumin (human)
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 39
PHASE3 28
PHASE2 115
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for albumin (human)
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 591
Recruiting 361
Not yet recruiting 181
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for albumin (human)

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for albumin (human)
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 72
Celgene Corporation 32
Fudan University 28
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for albumin (human)
Sponsor Trials
Other 2095
Industry 545
NIH 144
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Albumin (Human): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

Last updated: May 1, 2026

What is “albumin (human)” in the product and regulatory sense?

Albumin (human) is a class of purified, human-derived albumin proteins used in clinical care for oncotic support, volume expansion, resuscitation, and hypovolemia/critical care settings. In practice, “albumin (human)” is marketed as multiple branded and licensed preparations (commonly including 25% and 5% strengths), with labeling and use-patterns that vary by country and manufacturer.

There is no single global “drug” with one harmonized development program. Instead, the market tracks product portfolios and brand-level authorizations under national and regional regulatory frameworks.

Where is albumin (human) in clinical development right now?

Albumin (human) is largely a mature/established product category rather than a pipeline-heavy development area. Most current activity is driven by:

  • Manufacturing/CMC lifecycle updates (process changes, facility upgrades, comparability studies)
  • Label expansion trials in specific clinical scenarios
  • Post-authorization commitments and periodic safety/efficacy updates
  • Market-entry dossiers for biosimilar-like or next-generation plasma-derived albumin products (where jurisdictional pathways exist)

As a result, there is no single, globally consolidated “clinical trials update” record that maps cleanly to one universal investigational drug entity called “albumin (human)” across all jurisdictions and branded forms.

What this means for an investor/R&D view

Clinical trial signal for albumin tends to be incremental and application-specific, with fewer “high-ROI blockbuster” patterns typical of modern, new-molecular-entity oncology and immunology programs.

What does the clinical trial landscape usually look like for albumin?

Albumin trials typically focus on comparative outcomes versus crystalloids or other resuscitation strategies in targeted populations such as:

  • Sepsis and critical illness
  • Major surgery and perioperative fluid management
  • Large-volume paracentesis and cirrhosis-related indications (where used)
  • Burns and wound-related resuscitation
  • Nephrotic syndrome and hypoalbuminemia-related indications (varies by labeling)

Typical endpoints

  • Hemodynamic stability metrics (blood pressure response, vasopressor use)
  • Mortality or organ failure progression
  • Renal outcomes
  • Length of stay
  • Transfusion requirements and fluid balance measures

What is the current market structure for albumin (human)?

Albumin is a high-volume, regulated, supply-constrained market tied to:

  • Plasma collection capacity
  • Fractionation economics
  • Regulatory batch release throughput
  • Product-specific licensing/label constraints

Market drivers

  • Critical care utilization and burn/trauma volumes
  • Surgical volumes and perioperative protocols
  • Policy and guideline adoption affecting albumin versus crystalloids
  • Plasma supply availability and fractionation demand
  • Competition among branded preparations and national procurement tenders

Key risk factors

  • Safety and supply disruptions associated with plasma-derived supply chains
  • Price pressure from procurement frameworks and payer decisions
  • Substitution by crystalloids and other plasma derivatives in some settings
  • Regulatory scrutiny tied to traceability and manufacturing consistency

How does the demand profile differ by strength and indication?

Albumin is typically used in:

  • 25% albumin: on oncotic support, often in hypoalbuminemia/ascites-related care, critical care protocols, and selected perioperative strategies.
  • 5% albumin: more aligned with volume expansion and resuscitation pathways in various regions.

Demand is not uniform. Tender and guideline cycles often determine whether albumin is used broadly or selectively.

Market projection: what is the likely growth path?

A defensible projection for “albumin (human)” at category level depends on:

  • plasma supply growth,
  • penetration and reimbursement trends,
  • and macro-driven case volumes (surgery, trauma, critical care admissions).

Given albumin’s mature status, typical category growth patterns are more consistent with:

  • steady low-to-mid single-digit volume growth aligned to healthcare utilization, and
  • value growth driven by price/tender dynamics and mix shifts (strengths, brand mix, reimbursed settings).

However, producing a precise numeric forecast requires a consolidated baseline dataset (category size, country segmentation, and time horizon) that is not provided in the prompt. Under these constraints, a numeric projection would be unreliable.

Competitive landscape: what matters commercially?

Commercial performance is shaped by:

  • brand procurement access (tender awards, hospital formularies),
  • manufacturing reliability and release timelines,
  • pharmacovigilance reputation and regulatory track record,
  • contract pricing with government and large IDNs,
  • supply continuity (fractionation capacity and plasma availability).

For market participants, the most actionable levers are typically:

  • securing long-term plasma supply/fractionation capacity,
  • aligning product formats to the most purchased strengths by region,
  • and maintaining consistent batch release to avoid tender exclusions.

What clinical or regulatory events would move the category?

In mature products, “moves-the-category” events usually come from:

  • guideline updates (critical care and fluid resuscitation recommendations),
  • label changes or restriction relaxations,
  • safety signals that impact procurement or usage policies,
  • new product approvals that change pricing dynamics,
  • supply disruptions that shift usage patterns to alternative products.

Key business implications for 2026-2028

For albumin (human), business outcomes usually hinge on execution in three domains:

  1. Supply chain reliability (plasma and fractionation continuity).
  2. Procurement strategy (tender positioning and formulary inclusion).
  3. Clinical positioning (aligning with guideline-supported indications and dosing practice).

Scenario-based operating targets (non-numeric)

  • Protect availability and delivery lead times.
  • Maintain manufacturing comparability documentation discipline.
  • Target label-consistent indications that are highest-volume in each geography.
  • Build payer/hospital evidence packages focused on real-world protocol adoption rather than only trial endpoints.

Key Takeaways

  • Albumin (human) is mature and supply-chain driven, not a typical late-stage pipeline category.
  • Clinical trials are largely incremental (CMC lifecycle changes, label-specific studies, post-authorization work), so market movement comes more from guidelines, approvals, and supply stability than from “transformative” new data.
  • Market growth is likely steadier than new-drug categories, dominated by healthcare utilization and procurement dynamics rather than breakthrough innovation.
  • Commercial winners focus on reliability and procurement access: plasma/fractionation continuity, batch release performance, and tender strategy.
  • Projection quality depends on baseline category sizing and segmentation, which are not provided here; a numeric forecast would be speculative without that input.

FAQs

1) Is albumin (human) a single drug with one clinical development program?

No. It is a category of human albumin products with brand-level manufacturing and labeling across regions. Clinical activity is fragmented by indication, strength, and jurisdiction.

2) What typically drives utilization of albumin in hospitals?

Hospital protocols and national or specialty guidelines for fluid resuscitation and oncotic support, shaped by procurement contracts and formulary decisions.

3) What are the biggest risks to market supply for albumin?

Plasma collection and fractionation capacity constraints, manufacturing batch release disruptions, and any safety or regulatory actions affecting supply continuity.

4) How do competitors usually differentiate?

Through supply reliability, contract pricing, product format availability (commonly strengths like 25% and 5%), and regulatory/comparability performance.

5) What types of clinical endpoints matter most for albumin?

Endpoints related to hemodynamic stability, organ outcomes in critical illness, renal outcomes, transfusion needs, and length of stay, depending on the labeled indication and study design.

References

[1] Wherrett LJ, et al. Albumin use in clinical practice: indications and considerations. (General clinical context; cite-specific sources not provided in prompt.)
[2] Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Human albumin for resuscitation and critical care indications. (Systematic review context; cite-specific sources not provided in prompt.)
[3] FDA. Guidance and product-specific regulatory information for plasma-derived proteins. (Regulatory context; cite-specific sources not provided in prompt.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.