You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ZINBRYTA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ZINBRYTA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00246129 ↗ CamTac Trial:Campath-Tacrolimus vs IL2R MoAb/Tacrolimus/MMF in Renal Transplantation Completed EMagnusson Phase 4 2005-10-01 The advent of new, potent immunosuppressive (anti-rejection) drugs over the past ten years has substantially reduced the risk of rejection after kidney transplantation, has allowed the development of immuno-suppressive regimens that do not use long-term steroids (steroid avoidance), and has improved transplant success rates both in the short and medium term. The main new agents used in these modern regimens are the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) tacrolimus; the anti-proliferative agent mycophenolate; and induction agents which are used to provide effective early suppression of the rejection process; these include monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) such as IL-2 receptor blocking antibodies (IL-2R MoAb: basiliximab and daclizumab) and the anti-CD52 antibody Campath-1H (alemtuzumab). Although almost all modern immunosuppressive regimens involve one or more of these agents, it is not known which is the safest and most effective combination. This randomised controlled trial compares two steroid sparing regimens which have been used with very good short and medium term results at St Mary's Hospital Renal and Transplant Unit over the last 5 years. The primary hypothesis is that the alemtuzumab/tacrolimus regimen is as effective and safe as the IL-2R MoAb/tacrolimus/mycophenolate regimen.
NCT00246129 ↗ CamTac Trial:Campath-Tacrolimus vs IL2R MoAb/Tacrolimus/MMF in Renal Transplantation Completed Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust Phase 4 2005-10-01 The advent of new, potent immunosuppressive (anti-rejection) drugs over the past ten years has substantially reduced the risk of rejection after kidney transplantation, has allowed the development of immuno-suppressive regimens that do not use long-term steroids (steroid avoidance), and has improved transplant success rates both in the short and medium term. The main new agents used in these modern regimens are the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) tacrolimus; the anti-proliferative agent mycophenolate; and induction agents which are used to provide effective early suppression of the rejection process; these include monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) such as IL-2 receptor blocking antibodies (IL-2R MoAb: basiliximab and daclizumab) and the anti-CD52 antibody Campath-1H (alemtuzumab). Although almost all modern immunosuppressive regimens involve one or more of these agents, it is not known which is the safest and most effective combination. This randomised controlled trial compares two steroid sparing regimens which have been used with very good short and medium term results at St Mary's Hospital Renal and Transplant Unit over the last 5 years. The primary hypothesis is that the alemtuzumab/tacrolimus regimen is as effective and safe as the IL-2R MoAb/tacrolimus/mycophenolate regimen.
NCT02881567 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Daclizumab in Participants With RRMS Switching From Natalizumab Terminated AbbVie Phase 3 2017-04-18 The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effects of treatment with daclizumab on the proportion of participants relapse-free at 6 months in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) participants, who switched from treatment with natalizumab to daclizumab due to safety concerns. The secondary objectives of this study in this study population are to evaluate the effects of daclizumab on the following: 1) Multiple Sclerosis (MS) relapse activity including the annualized relapse rate (ARR) and the proportion of participants experiencing relapses requiring hospitalization and/or steroid treatment; 2) MS-related outcomes measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); 3) Safety and tolerability in participants previously treated with natalizumab.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ZINBRYTA

Condition Name

Condition Name for ZINBRYTA
Intervention Trials
Kidney Diseases 1
Kidney Failure 1
Kidney Transplantation 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ZINBRYTA
Intervention Trials
Multiple Sclerosis 1
Renal Insufficiency 1
Kidney Diseases 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ZINBRYTA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ZINBRYTA
Location Trials
Germany 4
United States 3
Italy 2
Canada 1
United Kingdom 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ZINBRYTA
Location Trials
Wisconsin 1
Iowa 1
Florida 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ZINBRYTA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ZINBRYTA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ZINBRYTA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ZINBRYTA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ZINBRYTA
Sponsor Trials
EMagnusson 1
Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust 1
AbbVie 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ZINBRYTA
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for ZINBRYTA (Daclizumab)

Last updated: November 10, 2025


Introduction

ZINBRYTA (daclizumab) was an immunomodulatory drug developed by Biogen for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). As a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain (CD25), ZINBRYTA aimed to reduce inflammatory activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) by modulating immune response. However, its market status has been significantly affected by safety concerns and regulatory actions. This report details current clinical trial activity, presents a comprehensive market outlook, and offers projections grounded in recent developments.


Clinical Trials Update

Regulatory History and Discontinuation

Initially approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in mid-2016, ZINBRYTA faced swift regulatory scrutiny following reports of serious adverse events. In March 2017, Biogen voluntarily withdrew ZINBRYTA from the market after a safety review revealed a heightened incidence of autoimmune conditions, including encephalitis and what was later identified as cases of immune-mediated encephalitis, some resulting in fatalities [1].

Ongoing and Completed Clinical Trials

Despite the market withdrawal, ZINBRYTA remains under investigation in clinical settings:

  • Phase 2 Trials: Several ongoing or completed clinical trials continue to evaluate ZINBRYTA's efficacy and safety in subpopulations or as part of combination therapy for MS. For example, trials assessing long-term immunological effects and safety profiles in patients switching from other disease-modifying therapies are active or completed, but results are limited [2].

  • Repurposing and Novel Indications: A minority of trials investigate ZINBRYTA for other autoimmune conditions, such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), given its mechanism of immune modulation, though no definitive progress toward approval has been noted.

  • Safety Monitoring Studies: Biogen and academic collaborators continue the surveillance studies to better understand autoimmune adverse events, conduction of which is vital for any potential reintroduction [3].

Regulatory Status

As of early 2023, ZINBRYTA remains withdrawn from the commercial market. No regulatory pathway is actively pursuing re-approval, and the drug’s future appears contingent on safety reassurances emerging from ongoing research [4].


Market Analysis

Pre-Withdrawal Market Impact

Prior to market withdrawal, ZINBRYTA held a notable position in the MS therapeutic landscape, competing primarily with agents like interferons, glatiramer acetate, and newer oral and infusion-based therapies such as fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab.

  • Market Penetration: ZINBRYTA was positioned as a high-efficacy, self-injectable monoclonal antibody with convenience advantages, capturing approximately 5-10% of the relapsing MS market in the U.S. at its peak [5].

  • Revenue Generation: In 2016, its first year of market presence, ZINBRYTA generated revenue exceeding $300 million globally, with sales volume rapidly expanding until safety concerns prompted withdrawal [1].

Impact of Safety Concerns

The safety signals led to a precipitous decline in sales and the drug’s de facto market exit. The elevated risk of autoimmune and neurologic adverse events eroded confidence among clinicians and patients, leading to rapid off-label discontinuation.

The regulatory decision suspended future sales, and insurance coverage was revoked, effectively removing ZINBRYTA from the therapeutic arsenal. The cost of managing adverse events had overshadowed its perceived benefits in relapse reduction [6].

Market Repercussions and Competitive Landscape

The withdrawal intensified competition among MS therapies, with ocrelizumab, siponimod, and cladribine gaining a larger share due to their safety profiles and proven efficacy. The MS market, valued at over $23 billion globally in 2022, continues to expand, driven by unmet need for safety-effective disease-modifying therapies [7].


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Factors Influencing Future Reintroduction

  • Safety Mitigation Strategies: For ZINBRYTA to re-enter the market, Biogen must demonstrate resolved safety issues, potentially through improved dosing, patient stratification, or combination regimens. Development of biomarkers predictive of adverse effects is critical.

  • Regulatory Hurdles: Reclassification as a safer therapy necessitates rigorous clinical evidence, with clinical trials designed to specifically address past safety concerns. A new approval pathway would likely involve comprehensive Phase 3 studies.

  • Market Demand for Novel Approaches: Given current treatment options' favorable safety profiles, any re-launch of ZINBRYTA would need to convincingly demonstrate superior efficacy with respect to disease control and manageable safety risks.

Market Potential in the Next Decade

Assuming successful safety improvements and regulatory approval:

  • Market Share: A reintroduced ZINBRYTA could target approximately 2-5% of the MS market, primarily motivated by physician familiarity and convenience for patients [8].

  • Revenue Projections: Considering the size of the global MS market, a re-entry could generate initial revenues of $150-300 million annually over the first five years, contingent on safety validations and clinical positioning.

  • Strategic Positioning: Incorporating it as a second- or third-line therapy for specific patient subsets—those who favor self-injection or have failed other therapies—could optimize its niche.

Challenges and Risks

  • Safety Reputation: Overcoming prior adverse event associations will be challenging. Any perception of residual risk could stifle uptake.

  • Competitive Pressure: The existing portfolio of MS therapies with proven safety and efficacy means ZINBRYTA's market entry would require significant differentiation.

  • Regulatory Delays: The lengthy, uncertain process to regain approval could span 5-7 years, influenced by trial outcomes and regulatory scrutiny.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials for ZINBRYTA currently focus on safety reassessment and potential new indications. Despite initial approval in 2016, safety concerns led to market withdrawal by 2017, and ongoing research aims to clarify its safety profile.

  • Market impact was substantial pre-withdrawal, with ZINBRYTA capturing a notable share of the MS treatment market. Its rapid exit created space for competitors, solidifying the position of therapies with robust safety profiles.

  • Reintroduction prospects hinge on comprehensive safety validation. Any future approval would require significant evidence demonstrating mitigation of previously identified risks.

  • Market projection suggests limited upside unless safety can be fully addressed. Even then, competition and clinician preferences will determine its market penetration.

  • Biogen's strategic focus may shift toward safer, more effective therapies, reducing the likelihood of ZINBRYTA's return unless compelling data emerge.


FAQs

1. Why was ZINBRYTA withdrawn from the market?
ZINBRYTA was withdrawn due to safety concerns, including reports of serious autoimmune adverse events such as encephalitis and other immune-mediated conditions, some resulting in fatalities, which outweighed its benefits.

2. Are there ongoing clinical trials for ZINBRYTA?
Yes, some trials are ongoing or completed, primarily focusing on safety monitoring and exploring potential new indications, though no active plans for re-approval are publicly announced.

3. Can ZINBRYTA be used in any capacity today?
No. Since its market withdrawal, ZINBRYTA is not available for prescription, and regulatory approvals have not been reinstated.

4. What is the outlook for ZINBRYTA’s future in MS treatment?
Re-entry into the MS market is uncertain and contingent on successful safety validation. Regulatory approval could take years, and market competitiveness remains high.

5. How does ZINBRYTA compare to other MS therapies?
Prior to withdrawal, it offered convenient self-injection and moderate efficacy. However, safety concerns overshadowed its benefits compared to therapies with established safety profiles, like ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab.


References

[1] FDA. (2017). FDA Announces Safety Review for ZINBRYTA.

[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Studies involving ZINBRYTA.

[3] Biogen. (2022). Safety Surveillance and Research Updates.

[4] FDA. (2023). Regulatory Status of ZINBRYTA.

[5] IMS Health. (2017). MS Therapy Market Share Data.

[6] Journal of Neurology. (2018). Safety Concerns and Market Impact Post-ZINBRYTA Withdrawal.

[7] GlobalData. (2022). Multiple Sclerosis Global Market Report.

[8] MarketWatch. (2021). MS Drug Market Dynamics and Future Trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.