Last Updated: May 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ULTOMIRIS


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ULTOMIRIS

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03920293 ↗ Safety and Efficacy Study of Ravulizumab in Adults With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Active, not recruiting Alexion Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2019-03-26 The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ravulizumab for the treatment of participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).
NCT04248465 ↗ An Efficacy and Safety Study of Ravulizumab in ALS Participants Active, not recruiting Alexion Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2020-03-30 The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of ravulizumab for the treatment of adult participants with ALS.
NCT04390464 ↗ mulTi-Arm Therapeutic Study in Pre-ICu Patients Admitted With Covid-19 - Repurposed Drugs (TACTIC-R) Recruiting Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Phase 4 2020-05-08 TACTIC-R is a randomised, parallel arm, open-label platform trial for investigating potential treatment for COVID-19 disease. While SARS-CoV infection evades detection by the immune system in the first 24 hours of infection, it ultimately produces a massive immune system response in the subgroup of people who develop severe complications. Most tissue damage following infection with COVID19 appears to be due to a later, exaggerated, host immune response. This leads to lung and sometimes multi-organ damage. Most people who develop these severe complications still have virus present in their respiratory tract at the time-point when the disease starts to evolve. Immune modulation in the presence of active infection has potential to cause more harm than benefit. Safety considerations when studying immune modulation strategies are paramount. Therefore, this study proposes to assess the efficacy of immunomodulatory agents that target dysregulated immune response that drive the severe lung, and other organ, damage. The medications investigated for efficacy in this trial are Baricitinib and Ravulizumab.
NCT04543591 ↗ Ravulizumab in Thrombotic Microangiopathy After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recruiting Alexion Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2020-09-16 This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ravulizumab in adult and adolescent participants with hematopoietic stem cell transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (HSCT-TMA). In Stage 1, an open-label, single-arm period, the dosing regimen will be confirmed. In Stage 2, participants will be randomized to receive either blinded ravulizumab plus best supportive care or matching placebo plus best supportive care. The treatment period is 26 weeks (open-label for Stage 1, and randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled for Stage 2) followed by a 26-week follow-up period.
NCT04557735 ↗ Study of Ravulizumab in Pediatric Participants With HSCT-TMA Recruiting Alexion Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2020-11-06 This study will evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ravulizumab administered by intravenous infusion to pediatric participants, from 1 month to < 18 years of age, with HSCT-TMA. The treatment period is 26 weeks, followed by a 26-week off-treatment follow-up period.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ULTOMIRIS

Condition Name

Condition Name for ULTOMIRIS
Intervention Trials
Healthy 5
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria 2
Thrombotic Microangiopathy 2
Covid19 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ULTOMIRIS
Intervention Trials
Thrombotic Microangiopathies 3
Hemoglobinuria 2
Vascular Diseases 2
COVID-19 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ULTOMIRIS

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ULTOMIRIS
Location Trials
United States 73
Japan 23
France 13
Spain 11
Canada 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ULTOMIRIS
Location Trials
California 5
Illinois 4
Texas 4
Georgia 3
Florida 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ULTOMIRIS

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ULTOMIRIS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 7
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ULTOMIRIS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 6
Completed 5
Not yet recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ULTOMIRIS

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ULTOMIRIS
Sponsor Trials
Alexion Pharmaceuticals 12
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals 2
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ULTOMIRIS
Sponsor Trials
Industry 14
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

ULTOMIRIS (ravulizumab-cwvz) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity-Driven Revenue Projection

Last updated: May 21, 2026

Ultomiris (ravulizumab-cwvz, Ultomiris) is a terminal complement C5 inhibitor for PNH and atypical hemolytic uremia syndrome (aHUS). The last major competitive and regulatory inflection is the patent-and-exclusivity landscape around C5 complement inhibitors and the ongoing expansion of ravulizumab into additional patient segments. A market forecast depends on (i) dosing schedule durability, (ii) payer adoption versus Soliris-based strategies, and (iii) any entry of biosimilars or inter-IL comp comparators in the complement C5 inhibitor class.

What clinical trials are ongoing or most recently updated for Ultomiris (ravulizumab-cwvz)?

Featured snippet answer: The most decision-relevant clinical updates for Ultomiris are typically in (1) PNH long-term extension durability, (2) aHUS durability and sequencing, (3) pediatric and weight-tier dosing expansions, and (4) comparative effectiveness in clinical practice settings. Without a specific trial-by-trial dataset and dates, this section cannot be completed with hard, source-verified milestone claims.

Which indications drive Ultomiris trial readouts (PNH and aHUS)?

For high-intent market and IP planning, the trial activity to monitor is concentrated around:

  • PNH: durability of LDH normalization and transfusion independence over long-term follow-up
  • aHUS: renal outcomes, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) control, and complement pathway suppression durability
  • Pediatric enrollment and dosing: pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety confirmation across weight bands

How do new trials change payer adoption for complement C5 inhibitors?

Clinical trial endpoints that materially affect market uptake:

  • Sustained hemolysis control without rescue therapy
  • Reduced relapse rates and stable dosing adherence
  • Renal function stabilization metrics and time-to-TMA response
  • Safety profile consistency (infections, meningococcal risk management)

How big is the Ultomiris market and what share does it capture versus Soliris (eculizumab)?

Featured snippet answer: This section cannot be completed with complete accuracy because no sales, prescribing, or reimbursement data were provided, and the required hard data inputs for 1) current U.S. and ex-U.S. revenue and 2) share against Soliris and other complement inhibitors are not available in this request.

What market segments matter most for Ultomiris revenue?

  • U.S. and EU hospital and specialty center prescribing for PNH
  • Nephrology-led aHUS management and center-of-excellence referral patterns
  • Long-term maintenance therapy switching from eculizumab to ravulizumab where administratively favorable

What pricing and administration factors influence share gains over eculizumab?

  • Dosing interval convenience (maintenance schedule length drives infusion/clinic efficiency)
  • Switching friction (patient continuity, meningococcal vaccination protocol management)
  • Payer formulary dynamics (step edits, prior authorization, specialty pharmacy vs in-hospital pathways)

When does Ultomiris lose exclusivity, and what are the key patent-expiration dates that matter for revenue?

Featured snippet answer: This section cannot be completed because the request does not include the Orange Book status, patent list, or jurisdictional expiration dates tied to Ultomiris. Without those, there is no defensible, litigation-ready exclusivity timeline.

Which exclusivity layers typically protect C5 inhibitor biologics?

  • U.S. biologics exclusivity (BLA-related exclusivity periods)
  • Composition-of-matter and formulation or method-of-use patents
  • Additional protection from pediatric exclusivity, if applicable
  • Any settlement-driven “no-approval” covenants (where present)

How to model revenue risk from exclusivity loss

Revenue projections in this class usually hinge on:

  • Timing of first biosimilar entry vs “switching” behavior
  • Uptake of biosimilars by payer and provider
  • Contracting and rebate pressure after entry

What Paragraph IV or biosimilar risks exist for Ultomiris?

Featured snippet answer: This section cannot be completed with accuracy because it requires a current listing of biosimilar applications, FDA actions, and any related litigation records.

What to watch for in biosimilar risk modeling

  • FDA acceptance and first filing for C5 complement inhibitors in the same therapeutic space
  • Whether applicants target the same labeled indications and dosing schedule
  • Any competitive entrants with pegylated/extended dosing or alternative C5-binding constructs
  • Switching and contracting strategies post-approval

What formulations and delivery systems are protected for Ultomiris?

Featured snippet answer: This section cannot be completed because it requires patent and regulatory-formulation detail tied to Ultomiris manufacturing and composition.

What formulation categories usually impact IP and launch barriers?

  • Concentration, stabilizers, buffer systems
  • Lyophilized vs liquid presentation (if applicable)
  • Container-closure system and shelf-life-related patents
  • Manufacturing process patents (cell line, purification, filtration)

How manufacturing IP affects launch timing

For biologics, launch delay often comes from:

  • Process reproducibility and comparability requirements
  • Analytical similarity datasets and process validation time
  • Scale-up capacity at contract manufacturers

What patent estate strength protects Ultomiris, and how strong is it versus competing C5 inhibitors?

Featured snippet answer: This section cannot be completed with the required hard data because no patent list, jurisdiction set, or expiration matrix was provided for Ultomiris or its key competitors.

Comparison framework for ravulizumab vs eculizumab and other complement inhibitors

An IP-strength comparison should be built from:

  • Number of active patents by category (composition, method-of-use, formulation, manufacturing)
  • Remaining life by jurisdiction (U.S., EU5, UK, Japan, etc.)
  • Injunction risk from active litigation or enforceable patents
  • Settlement or licensing constraints that narrow generic/biosimilar pathways

What FDA regulatory status does Ultomiris have, and what label expansions matter for projection?

Featured snippet answer: This section cannot be completed because the request does not include FDA label version, approval dates, or post-marketing labeling updates.

What regulatory milestones typically drive market growth

  • Expanded pediatric or adult subgroup labeling
  • Additional geographic approvals (EU member states and other territories)
  • Safety updates affecting risk management programs

How label expansion affects revenue forecasts

A label expansion can shift:

  • Eligibility criteria and patient access
  • Network-of-care referral patterns
  • Payer willingness to cover within newly eligible categories

What competitive landscape changes affect Ultomiris projections (switching, new entrants, contracting)?

Featured snippet answer: This section cannot be completed with accuracy because it requires competitor-by-competitor factual updates (market access, reimbursement, uptake, and competitor pipeline status).

Switching dynamics between eculizumab (Soliris) and ravulizumab (Ultomiris)

Modeling drivers:

  • Clinic infusion scheduling benefits
  • Switch clinical outcomes and prior authorization cadence
  • Payer mandates after contract renegotiations

Alternative terminal complement and proximal complement strategies

Market share risk could come from:

  • Complement inhibitors with differentiated dosing or administration
  • Non-C5 mechanisms that fit payer preference or clinical guidelines

Key Takeaways

  • Ultomiris is a long-duration complement C5 inhibitor franchise supported by PNH and aHUS use.
  • Revenue projection hinges on exclusivity durability, biosimilar/biologic competition timing, and payer switching behavior.
  • This request does not include the patent-exclusivity record, FDA label milestones, clinical trial registry update dates, or market sales inputs needed to produce a defensible, numbers-driven projection and patent risk assessment.

FAQs

  1. What endpoints in PNH and aHUS trials most influence Ultomiris reimbursement decisions?
  2. How should investors model ravulizumab biosimilar entry risk in the U.S. and EU?
  3. Which Ultomiris patient segments typically have the highest switching rates from eculizumab?
  4. What evidence matters most for payers when updating prior authorization criteria for C5 inhibitors?
  5. How do dosing logistics (infusion cadence and clinic capacity) affect market growth for Ultomiris?

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.