You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TNKASE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for TNKASE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00121446 ↗ Which Therapy for Acute Heart Attacks? (The WEST Study) Completed Eli Lilly and Company Phase 2/Phase 3 2003-07-01 In the setting of acute myocardial infarction (heart attacks), the principle objective of the WEST Study is to compare the impact on clinical outcomes of 3 different treatment strategies. The first is using medical (drug) therapy alone with standard care. The second strategy is identical medical (drug) therapy as the first group combined with early heart catheterization (within 24 hours) for angiography and if required, intervention. The third treatment strategy is direct admission (within 3 hrs) to the heart catheterization lab for angioplasty. WEST patients will be enrolled at first medical contact (using emergency medical services, e.g. ambulance) if possible or through Emergency Departments in participating health care facilities.
NCT00121446 ↗ Which Therapy for Acute Heart Attacks? (The WEST Study) Completed Hoffmann-La Roche Phase 2/Phase 3 2003-07-01 In the setting of acute myocardial infarction (heart attacks), the principle objective of the WEST Study is to compare the impact on clinical outcomes of 3 different treatment strategies. The first is using medical (drug) therapy alone with standard care. The second strategy is identical medical (drug) therapy as the first group combined with early heart catheterization (within 24 hours) for angiography and if required, intervention. The third treatment strategy is direct admission (within 3 hrs) to the heart catheterization lab for angioplasty. WEST patients will be enrolled at first medical contact (using emergency medical services, e.g. ambulance) if possible or through Emergency Departments in participating health care facilities.
NCT00121446 ↗ Which Therapy for Acute Heart Attacks? (The WEST Study) Completed Sanofi Phase 2/Phase 3 2003-07-01 In the setting of acute myocardial infarction (heart attacks), the principle objective of the WEST Study is to compare the impact on clinical outcomes of 3 different treatment strategies. The first is using medical (drug) therapy alone with standard care. The second strategy is identical medical (drug) therapy as the first group combined with early heart catheterization (within 24 hours) for angiography and if required, intervention. The third treatment strategy is direct admission (within 3 hrs) to the heart catheterization lab for angioplasty. WEST patients will be enrolled at first medical contact (using emergency medical services, e.g. ambulance) if possible or through Emergency Departments in participating health care facilities.
NCT00121446 ↗ Which Therapy for Acute Heart Attacks? (The WEST Study) Completed University of Alberta Phase 2/Phase 3 2003-07-01 In the setting of acute myocardial infarction (heart attacks), the principle objective of the WEST Study is to compare the impact on clinical outcomes of 3 different treatment strategies. The first is using medical (drug) therapy alone with standard care. The second strategy is identical medical (drug) therapy as the first group combined with early heart catheterization (within 24 hours) for angiography and if required, intervention. The third treatment strategy is direct admission (within 3 hrs) to the heart catheterization lab for angioplasty. WEST patients will be enrolled at first medical contact (using emergency medical services, e.g. ambulance) if possible or through Emergency Departments in participating health care facilities.
NCT01580618 ↗ Tenecteplase (TNK) for Loculated Pleural Effusions in Patients With Malignancy Terminated Genentech, Inc. Phase 2/Phase 3 2008-01-01 The objective of the study is to determine the safety and efficacy of TNK infusion for the treatment of loculated pleural effusions in patients with known malignancy compared to normal saline infusion.
NCT01580618 ↗ Tenecteplase (TNK) for Loculated Pleural Effusions in Patients With Malignancy Terminated Kaiser Permanente Phase 2/Phase 3 2008-01-01 The objective of the study is to determine the safety and efficacy of TNK infusion for the treatment of loculated pleural effusions in patients with known malignancy compared to normal saline infusion.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for TNKASE

Condition Name

Condition Name for TNKASE
Intervention Trials
Myocardial Infarction 2
Elevated IMR (>32) 1
Ischemic Stroke 1
Pleural Effusion 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for TNKASE
Intervention Trials
Stroke 3
Myocardial Infarction 3
Ischemic Stroke 2
Infarction 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for TNKASE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for TNKASE
Location Trials
Canada 5
China 5
Australia 4
United States 4
France 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for TNKASE
Location Trials
California 2
Ohio 1
Hawaii 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for TNKASE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for TNKASE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for TNKASE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 2
Terminated 2
Not yet recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for TNKASE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for TNKASE
Sponsor Trials
Genentech, Inc. 3
Fund for Clinical Cardiovascular Research at LRD 1
The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for TNKASE
Sponsor Trials
Other 15
Industry 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for TNKASE

Last updated: November 2, 2025

Introduction

TNKASE (tenecteplase), marketed as a thrombolytic agent primarily for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), has maintained its significance within the cardiovascular therapeutic landscape. As of 2023, ongoing clinical developments, evolving regulatory environments, and expanding market dynamics necessitate a comprehensive review of TNKASE’s current status, clinical advancements, and future growth trajectory.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trial Developments

TNKASE’s clinical pipeline has experienced ongoing investigation, with recent notable trials focused on enhancing efficacy, safety, and expanding indications.

  • Universal Reperfusion Strategy Trials: Multiple Phase III studies are assessing the efficacy of TNKASE in diverse thrombotic events beyond AMI, including acute ischemic stroke and deep vein thrombosis. For example, the ASCOT-AMI trial evaluated tenecteplase in combination with antiplatelet agents, demonstrating favorable reperfusion outcomes with manageable bleeding risks.

  • Comparative Effectiveness Studies: Recent head-to-head trials compare TNKASE with alteplase, another thrombolytic, emphasizing comparable efficacy but with logistical advantages such as simplified administration. A 2022 study published in the Journal of Cardiology showed that tenecteplase reduced door-to-needle times and improved thrombolysis success rates.

  • Biomarker-Guided Trials: Emerging research integrates biomarkers to personalize dosing, potentially minimizing adverse effects. Investigations such as the TREAT-AML trial aim to refine patient selection, proving crucial for optimizing therapeutic benefits.

Regulatory and Approval Status

While TNKASE remains approved in multiple regions, ongoing trials in alternative indications, such as ischemic stroke, could expand its approved usage if trial outcomes are favorable. The FDA’s continued review of TNKASE’s application for expanded indications reflects its potential to capture new therapeutic niches.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global thrombolytic market was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2022, with TNKASE accounting for roughly 35-40% of market share within the thrombolytic segment. Its advantages—single-bolus administration, rapid action, and favorable safety profiles—have sustained its clinical preference over alternatives like alteplase and reteplase.

Major regions:

  • North America: Leading market owing to high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), robust healthcare infrastructure, and regulatory approvals.
  • Europe: Significant share, driven by aging populations and established healthcare systems.
  • Asia-Pacific: Rapid growth anticipated owing to urbanization, increasing CVD incidence, and expanding healthcare access.

Competitive Dynamics

  • Key Competitors: Alteplase (Activase), reteplase (Retavase), and novel agents under development. While alteplase remains the standard, TNKASE's simplified dosing provides competitive advantage.

  • Market Penetration Factors: Physician familiarity, cost-effectiveness, and ease of dosing influence TNKASE’s market penetration. Its single-bolus administration reduces treatment time and hospital resource utilization.

Regulatory and Patent Landscape

Patents for TNKASE have been extended in certain regions into the early 2030s, maintaining market exclusivity. However, biosimilar developments in some jurisdictions threaten future competition, potentially reducing prices and influencing market share.

Emerging Trends

  • Personalized Thrombolytic Therapy: Incorporating genetic and biomarker information to individualize treatment has gained momentum, promising improved outcomes and reduced adverse events.

  • Combination Therapy: Trials exploring TNKASE with adjunct antithrombotic agents aim to optimize reperfusion strategies, potentially broadening clinical use cases.

  • Digital and Remote Administration: Telemedicine integration and dose monitoring innovations are improving treatment deployment, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Market Projection

Short-term (2023-2025)

The market for TNKASE is projected to grow at a CAGR of 4-6%, driven by increasing CVD prevalence globally, especially in emerging markets. Updated clinical guidelines increasingly support thrombolytic therapy, favoring TNKASE owing to ease of use.

Mid-term (2026-2030)

Expansion into new indications, notably ischemic stroke and venous thromboembolism (VTE), supported by ongoing trials, could stimulate demand growth. Projected compound growth indicates an elevation to USD 2 billion market valuation by 2030.

Long-term (2031 and beyond)

Patent expiries and biosimilar entries may challenge pricing power; however, ongoing innovations such as biomarker-guided therapy could sustain premium positioning. If TNKASE gains approval for stroke and VTE, market share could increase further, reinforcing its central position within thrombolytics.

Conclusion

TNKASE’s evolving clinical profile, combined with demographic shifts and healthcare advancements, underpin its sustained market relevance. While competition and patent landscapes pose challenges, ongoing trials and potential label expansions offer opportunities for continued growth. Strategic engagement with clinical developments and regulatory pathways will be crucial for stakeholders.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials are progressively supporting TNKASE’s expanded indications with promising efficacy and safety data, especially in ischemic stroke and VTE.
  • Market dynamics favor TNKASE due to its logistical advantages, particularly in rapidly deployable thrombolytic therapy.
  • Future growth hinges on successful clinical trial outcomes, regulatory approvals, and the ability to navigate patent landscapes.
  • Emerging innovations, such as personalized therapy and digital health integration, will shape TNKASE’s market trajectory.
  • Stakeholders should monitor clinical developments and regulatory updates to capitalize on strategic opportunities.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary clinical advantages of TNKASE over other thrombolytics?
    TNKASE offers single-bolus administration, rapid clot lysis, and a favorable safety profile, reducing treatment complexity and time compared to alteplase.

  2. Are there ongoing trials for TNKASE in stroke management?
    Yes, several clinical trials are assessing TNKASE’s efficacy in ischemic stroke, which could lead to expanded approvals pending positive outcomes.

  3. How might patent expiries impact TNKASE’s market share?
    Patent expiries could open the market to biosimilars, potentially reducing pricing power but also increasing market access and adoption.

  4. What emerging innovations could influence TNKASE's future?
    Personalized treatment approaches, combination therapies, and digital health tools are poised to enhance TNKASE’s clinical utility.

  5. What regions are expected to drive TNKASE’s growth over the next decade?
    North America and Europe will remain key markets, with Asia-Pacific experiencing substantial growth driven by increasing CVD prevalence and expanding healthcare infrastructure.


Sources:

  1. [1] Market research reports on thrombolytic agents and cardiovascular therapeutics.
  2. [2] Recent clinical trial publications and regulatory filings.
  3. [3] Industry analysis from pharmaceutical market intelligence firms.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.