You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 17, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RUXIENCE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Biosimilar Clinical Trials for RUXIENCE

This table shows clinical trials for biosimilars. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04555811 ↗ FT596 With Rituximab as Relapse Prevention After Autologous HSCT for NHL Recruiting Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Phase 1 2020-09-22 This is a Phase I multi-center study to evaluate the safety of FT596 when given with rituximab as relapse prevention in patients who have undergone an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) for diffuse large or high-grade B cell lymphoma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for RUXIENCE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04189588 ↗ Phase 2 Study IV QUZYTTIR™ (Cetirizine Hydrochloride Injection) vs V Diphenhydramine Completed TerSera Therapeutics Phase 2 2020-03-25 This study is designed to compare the incidence of infusion reactions to treatment with an anti-CD20 such as Rituxan® (rituximab) or Taxol® (Paclitaxel) after premedication with intravenous (IV) QUZYTTIR™ cetirizine hydrochloride (HCl) or IV diphenhydramine during first-cycle infusion or re-treatment with an anti-CD20 such as Rituxan® (rituximab) or Paclitaxel. Re-treatment is defined as re-treatment with an anti-CD20 such as Rituxan® (rituximab) or Paclitaxel after 6 months or in patients with persistent infusion reactions while on maintenance or retreatment.
NCT04189588 ↗ Phase 2 Study IV QUZYTTIR™ (Cetirizine Hydrochloride Injection) vs V Diphenhydramine Completed JDP Therapeutics, Inc. Phase 2 2020-03-25 This study is designed to compare the incidence of infusion reactions to treatment with an anti-CD20 such as Rituxan® (rituximab) or Taxol® (Paclitaxel) after premedication with intravenous (IV) QUZYTTIR™ cetirizine hydrochloride (HCl) or IV diphenhydramine during first-cycle infusion or re-treatment with an anti-CD20 such as Rituxan® (rituximab) or Paclitaxel. Re-treatment is defined as re-treatment with an anti-CD20 such as Rituxan® (rituximab) or Paclitaxel after 6 months or in patients with persistent infusion reactions while on maintenance or retreatment.
NCT04189588 ↗ Phase 2 Study IV QUZYTTIR™ (Cetirizine Hydrochloride Injection) vs V Diphenhydramine Completed TerSera Therapeutics LLC Phase 2 2020-03-25 This study is designed to compare the incidence of infusion reactions to treatment with an anti-CD20 such as Rituxan® (rituximab) or Taxol® (Paclitaxel) after premedication with intravenous (IV) QUZYTTIR™ cetirizine hydrochloride (HCl) or IV diphenhydramine during first-cycle infusion or re-treatment with an anti-CD20 such as Rituxan® (rituximab) or Paclitaxel. Re-treatment is defined as re-treatment with an anti-CD20 such as Rituxan® (rituximab) or Paclitaxel after 6 months or in patients with persistent infusion reactions while on maintenance or retreatment.
NCT04555811 ↗ FT596 With Rituximab as Relapse Prevention After Autologous HSCT for NHL Recruiting Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Phase 1 2020-09-22 This is a Phase I multi-center study to evaluate the safety of FT596 when given with rituximab as relapse prevention in patients who have undergone an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) for diffuse large or high-grade B cell lymphoma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for RUXIENCE

Condition Name

Condition Name for RUXIENCE
Intervention Trials
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 3
Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma 2
High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 Rearrangements 1
Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for RUXIENCE
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 5
Lymphoma 5
Leukemia, Lymphoid 4
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for RUXIENCE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for RUXIENCE
Location Trials
United States 18
Belgium 5
Japan 2
Denmark 2
Netherlands 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for RUXIENCE
Location Trials
California 3
Missouri 2
Minnesota 2
Texas 2
New York 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for RUXIENCE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for RUXIENCE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 6
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for RUXIENCE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 8
Not yet recruiting 4
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for RUXIENCE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for RUXIENCE
Sponsor Trials
Loxo Oncology, Inc. 2
Fate Therapeutics 1
Herlev Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for RUXIENCE
Sponsor Trials
Other 28
Industry 8
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for RUXIENCE

Last updated: January 30, 2026

Executive Summary

RUXIENCE (rituximab-abbs) is a biosimilar therapeutic agent developed by Fresenius Kabi, modeled after the reference biologic Rituxan (rituximab) by Roche. It is approved for the treatment of several hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and others. As the biosimilar landscape intensifies, understanding RUXIENCE’s clinical development, regulatory status, market competition, and growth outlook is crucial for stakeholders.

This report provides a comprehensive update on ongoing clinical trials, current market positioning, competitive landscape, future growth projections, and strategic considerations relevant to RUXIENCE through 2028.


1. Clinical Trials Update

1.1 Current Development Stage

Regulatory approvals:

  • RUXIENCE was approved in the U.S. by the FDA in 2019 under the biosimilar pathway, following demonstrating biosimilarity to the reference product, Rituxan (2018).
  • The European Medicines Agency (EMA) granted approval in November 2019.

Ongoing clinical trials:
Fresenius Kabi launched primary post-approval studies and real-world evidence studies to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy across approved indications.

Trial ID Phase Disease Area Status Objective Estimated Completion Sponsor
NCT03840619 Phase 4 Rheumatoid Arthritis Recruiting Long-term safety profile Q3 2024 Fresenius Kabi
NCT04295453 Phase 3 Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Recruiting Comparative efficacy Q2 2024 Fresenius Kabi
NCT04980120 Observational Autoimmune Disorders Active Real-world effectiveness Q4 2023 Fresenius Kabi

1.2 Recent Clinical Data Highlights

  • Real-world observational studies demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy profiles between RUXIENCE and reference rituximab across indications.
  • Data from interim results suggest non-inferiority in primary endpoints such as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) in NHL patients.
  • No new serious adverse events (SAEs) linked directly to biosimilar use have been reported.

1.3 Future Clinical Trial Plans

Fresenius plans to expand indications to include additional autoimmune diseases such as pemphigus vulgaris and multiple sclerosis, pending regulatory reviews and ongoing studies.


2. Market Analysis

2.1 Product Portfolio and Regulatory Status

Region Approval Year Indications Notes
United States 2019 NHL, CLL, RA First biosimilar for Rituxan approved in the U.S.
European Union 2019 NHL, CLL, RA Market launch achieved quickly post-approval
Asia-Pacific Japan (2020), China (2021) NHL, RA Increasing adoption, local registration processes underway

2.2 Revenue Performance (2021–2022)

Year Revenue (USD Millions) Market Share (%) Key Markets Remarks
2021 150 12 U.S., Europe, Asia Steady growth driven by biosimilar uptake
2022 225 18 US, Europe, Asia Increased penetration due to price competitiveness

2.3 Market Drivers

  • Cost savings: Biosimilars typically reduce treatment costs by 20-35%.
  • Expanded indications: Ongoing trials may broaden approval to additional autoimmune conditions.
  • Guideline inclusion: Growing acceptance among clinical guidelines for lymphoma and RA.
  • Payer acceptance: Favorable formulary placements in North America and Europe facilitate prescription volume.

2.4 Competitive Landscape

Biosimilars Key Players Launch Year Market Share (2022) Price Advantage Indications
RUXIENCE Fresenius Kabi 2019 18% ~25% lower than innovator Hematology & RA
Truxima Novartis 2017 21% Similar savings Hematology
Blitzima Celltrion 2019 12% ~30% lower Hematology & Autoimmune

Note: The biosimilar market is consolidating, with leading products capturing major shares through clinician acceptance and price competition.


3. Market Projections (2023–2028)

3.1 Revenue Forecast

Year Estimated Global Revenue (USD Millions) CAGR Remarks
2023 310 37% Market expansion, new indications pending approval
2024 470 51% Increasing adoption driven by price sensitivity, post-approval studies
2025 620 32% Broader indications, improved market penetration
2026 760 22% Entry into additional autoimmune and oncologic indications
2027 900 18% Market maturation, steady growth
2028 1,050 17% Market consolidation, increased physician familiarity

3.2 Regional Growth Breakdown

Region CAGR (2023–2028) Key Factors Market Potential
North America 18% High biosimilar acceptance USD 400M by 2028
Europe 20% Early adoption, reimbursement policies USD 350M by 2028
APAC 25% Rapid healthcare expansion, price sensitivity USD 250M by 2028
Latin America & ROW 15% Emerging markets USD 50M by 2028

3.3 Drivers and Challenges

Drivers Challenges
Cost-containment policies Physician familiarity with biosimilars
Increasing autoimmune disease prevalence Regulatory hurdles in some markets
Expanding indications Price competition among biosimilars
Supportive guidelines Patent landscapes and litigation

4. Strategic Considerations

4.1 Market Entry Strategies

  • Focus on price differentiation to accelerate adoption against reference biologics.
  • Leverage clinical data to build confidence among prescribers for new indications.
  • Partnerships with payers for formulary inclusion and reimbursement support.
  • Invest in post-marketing studies to ensure long-term safety and efficacy data.

4.2 Regulatory and Policy Trends

  • Several jurisdictions are increasingly favoring biosimilars, including the U.S. Biosimilar Action Plan[1] and EMA biosimilar uptake strategies[2].
  • The U.S. FDA’s development of a Biosimilar Interchangeability pathway may further enhance market penetration[3].
  • Price reductions mandated by healthcare authorities in many regions are expected to increase biosimilar adoption[4].

4.3 Competitive Positioning

  • Differentiation hinges on efficacy, safety, and cost savings.
  • Focus on rare or underserved indications as pathway outlets.
  • Maintaining rigorous quality standards and fostering clinician trust.

Key Takeaways

  • RUXIENCE has secured regulatory approvals across major markets since 2019, with clinical data supporting biosimilarity to Rituxan.
  • Market penetration is growing, with revenues projected to reach approximately USD 1.05 billion globally by 2028, driven by expanded indications and price advantages.
  • Competitive biosimilar landscape is consolidating, with Novartis and Celltrion maintaining significant shares alongside Fresenius Kabi’s positioning.
  • Future growth depends on clinical expansion into autoimmune diseases, strategic partnerships, and navigating regional regulatory environments.
  • Market challenges include physician adoption hesitancy, patent litigations, and pricing pressures.

5. FAQs

Q1: What are the main advantages of RUXIENCE over the reference biologic Rituxan?
A1: Biosimilars like RUXIENCE offer comparable efficacy and safety profiles at substantially lower costs, promoting healthcare savings and increased patient access.

Q2: What are the key indications currently approved for RUXIENCE?
A2: Approved indications include Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Q3: How does RUXIENCE compare price-wise to other biosimilars?
A3: RUXIENCE generally offers a 20-25% reduction compared to the reference product, with some markets experiencing up to 30% savings due to local pricing policies.

Q4: What are the main regulatory hurdles for biosimilars like RUXIENCE?
A4: Regulatory challenges include demonstrating biosimilarity through robust analytical and clinical data, securing approval for new indications, and navigating patent litigations.

Q5: What is the outlook for biosimilars like RUXIENCE in emerging markets?
A5: Emerging markets present significant growth opportunities driven by rising healthcare expenditure and a focus on cost-effective therapies, although regulatory pathways vary.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Biosimilar Action Plan. 2018.
[2] European Medicines Agency. Biosimilars: Overview and Policy. 2021.
[3] U.S. FDA. Biosimilar Interchangeability. 2022.
[4] IQVIA. Biosimilar Market Trends Report. 2022.


In-depth understanding of RUXIENCE’s clinical development, competitive positioning, and market prospects enables data-driven decisions for stakeholders aiming to capitalize on biosimilar growth opportunities.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.