You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PROVENGE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PROVENGE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01385293 ↗ BKM120 in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Terminated Novartis Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2011-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of the study drug, BKM120. The study drug, BKM120, is an inhibitor of a protein called phosphatidyl inositol-3-kinase (PI3K). This protein is found in normal cells and in cancer cells, but often in many cancer cells this protein is overactive. Inhibiting the protein may slow the growth of prostate cancer but this has not been tested yet in men with prostate cancer.
NCT01385293 ↗ BKM120 in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Terminated Andrew J. Armstrong, MD Phase 2 2011-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of the study drug, BKM120. The study drug, BKM120, is an inhibitor of a protein called phosphatidyl inositol-3-kinase (PI3K). This protein is found in normal cells and in cancer cells, but often in many cancer cells this protein is overactive. Inhibiting the protein may slow the growth of prostate cancer but this has not been tested yet in men with prostate cancer.
NCT01420965 ↗ Sipuleucel-T, CT-011, and Cyclophosphamide for Advanced Prostate Cancer Terminated Augusta University Phase 2 2012-09-01 Background: - Sipuleucel-T is a new treatment for advanced stage prostate cancer. It takes cells from a person with prostate cancer and treats them in the laboratory. Then it returns the cells to the person to help the immune system fight the cancer. Sipuleucel-T may be combined with the drug CT-011 to boost its ability to kill cancer cells. The chemotherapy drug cyclophosphamide will also be given, either before or after the cells are collected at the start of the treatment. Objectives: - To test the effectiveness of Sipuleucel-T, CT-011, and cyclophosphamide for prostate cancer. Eligibility: - Men at least 18 years of age who have advanced prostate cancer. Design: - Participants will be screened with a medical history, physical exam, blood and urine tests, and imaging studies. - This study has two parts, with different participants in each part. All participants will be monitored with frequent blood tests and imaging studies. - Part I: - Participants will provide cells for the Sipuleucel-T treatment three times. The first time will be 3 days before the chemotherapy. The second time will be 10 days after chemotherapy. The third time will be 24 days after chemotherapy. - Participants will have one dose of cyclophosphamide the day before the first dose of Sipuleucel-T. - Participants will have Sipuleucel-T about 3 days after each cell donation. - Part II: - Participants will be in three groups: Sipuleucel-T given alone, given with CT-011, or given with both cyclophosphamide and CT-011. - Participants will provide cells for the Sipuleucel-T treatment three times, as in Part I. - Participants will have Sipuleucel-T about 3 days after each cell donation, and will receive treatment with the other drugs as directed by the study doctors.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PROVENGE

Condition Name

Condition Name for PROVENGE
Intervention Trials
Prostate Cancer 9
Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer 2
Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PROVENGE
Intervention Trials
Prostatic Neoplasms 16
Carcinoma 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PROVENGE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PROVENGE
Location Trials
United States 22
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PROVENGE
Location Trials
North Carolina 4
Texas 4
California 3
Oregon 1
Connecticut 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PROVENGE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PROVENGE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 10
Phase 1/Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PROVENGE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 7
Recruiting 3
Terminated 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PROVENGE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PROVENGE
Sponsor Trials
Dendreon 6
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston 2
Duke University 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PROVENGE
Sponsor Trials
Other 18
Industry 10
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for PROVENGE (Sipuleucel-T)

Last updated: October 29, 2025


Introduction

PROVENGE (sipuleucel-T) stands as a pioneering autologous cellular immunotherapy approved for the treatment of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Since its initial approval in 2010 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), PROVENGE has navigated an evolving landscape characterized by advances in immuno-oncology, competitive therapies, and regulatory shifts. This comprehensive analysis explores recent clinical trial developments, current market dynamics, and future projections for PROVENGE, providing critical insights for stakeholders.


Clinical Trials Overview and Updates

Recent Clinical Trial Status

Over the last five years, PROVENGE's clinical program has seen limited phase IV and real-world evidence studies, primarily focusing on real-world effectiveness, quality of life, and combination strategies.

  • REALITY (NCT02336174): A phase IV observational study assessing long-term safety and effectiveness in post-approval settings. Preliminary data indicates sustained clinical benefit and manageable safety profiles, confirming the therapy's durability and tolerability.

  • IMPACT and PREDICT Trials: Although initial pivotal trials (IMPACT; NCT00637981) demonstrated a survival benefit in asymptomatic mCRPC, ongoing investigations are seeking to optimize patient selection and biomarkers to enhance efficacy.

Ongoing Clinical Investigations

While PROVENGE does not currently lead numerous new trials, there is notable interest in combination therapies:

  • Sipuleucel-T + Checkpoint Inhibitors: Several trials (e.g., NCT03217587) are evaluating synergies between PROVENGE and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Early data suggests potential for improved responses, aligning with the broader immunotherapy trend.

  • Biomarker Stratification Studies: Research continues into identifying predictive biomarkers, such as antigen-specific immune responses and tumor mutational burden, to better select candidates and improve outcomes.

  • Consolidation and Maintenance Strategies: Trials exploring the timing and sequence of PROVENGE administration alongside other therapies aim to optimize treatment paradigms.

Regulatory and Approval Landscape

Beyond the U.S., PROVENGE has received approval in multiple markets including Europe and Canada, with ongoing discussions regarding label expansions and combination indications. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) maintains a conditional approval status, with further data requests subject to ongoing reviews.


Market Analysis

Current Market Position

PROVENGE remains the first FDA-approved autologous cell therapy for prostate cancer. Its market penetration has been steady but modest, largely constrained by several factors:

  • High Manufacturing Costs: Personalized nature results in significant logistical and production expenses—estimated at approximately $93,000 per treatment course (as of 2018 [1]).

  • Limited Patient Population: The indication for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mCRPC limits the eligible patient pool, estimated globally at around 150,000 annually.

  • Competition and Therapeutic Landscape: Although other agents like abiraterone, enzalutamide, and radiopharmaceuticals have become mainstays, PROVENGE’s niche remains for patients unsuitable for chemotherapy or those seeking immune-based options.

Market Challenges

Despite its pioneering status, PROVENGE faces challenges:

  • Cost-Effectiveness Concerns: Analyses, including the pivotal IMPACT trial, indicate a survival benefit but with debates over cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).

  • Physician Adoption: Limited awareness and logistical hurdles in administering autologous therapies have restrained broader adoption.

  • Emerging Competition: Checkpoint inhibitors and novel immuno-oncology agents are under evaluation, potentially disrupting its market share.

Market Growth Drivers

Potential growth hinges on:

  • Regulatory Expansions: Approvals for combination therapies or earlier-line use could broaden eligible populations.

  • Biomarker Development: Enhancing patient selection would boost efficacy perceptions and payer reimbursement.

  • Manufacturing Innovation: Advances reducing costs and delivery time can improve competitiveness.


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Based on current trends, the PROVENGE market is projected to experience moderate growth over the next five years, driven by:

  • Incremental Adoption in Combination Regimens: Estimated compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 3-5%. (Source: EvaluatePharma projections for immunotherapy segments).

  • Geographical Expansion: Increased approvals in Europe, Asia, and emerging markets could expand the market size by 10-15% annually.

  • Personalized Medicine Trends: As biomarker-driven approaches mature, select niches within prostate cancer treatment could significantly expand, with potential double-digit growth in specific patient segments.

However, the high manufacturing costs, competition from novel immunotherapies, and payer reimbursement challenges could temper growth projections. The total market size may reach estimated revenues of $200–$250 million globally by 2027, representing a modest but steady expansion.


Strategic Opportunities and Challenges

Opportunities

  • Combination Strategies: Evidence of synergy with checkpoint inhibitors or radioligand therapies offers pathways to revitalize interest and expand indications.

  • Biomarker-driven Trials: Improving patient stratification will enhance clinical outcomes, reinforcing PROVENGE’s positioning as a personalized immunotherapy.

  • Manufacturing Efficiency: Innovations (e.g., automated cell processing, centralized manufacturing) could reduce costs and delivery times.

  • Market Expansion: Regulatory approvals in additional countries, especially in Asia-Pacific, could significantly increase demand.

Challenges

  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Payers' willingness to reimburse high-cost therapies remains uncertain without demonstrable cost-effectiveness.

  • Operational Complexity: Autologous therapies' logistical burden hampers widespread adoption.

  • Competitive Landscape: Emergence of alternative immunotherapies, such as checkpoint inhibitors and next-generation vaccines, may overshadow PROVENGE’s niche.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Progress: While PROVENGE’s pivotal trial data remains foundational, current investigations focus on optimizing patient selection and combination treatments to enhance efficacy.

  • Market Dynamics: The therapy’s niche status, high manufacturing costs, and evolving prostate cancer treatments constrain growth, yet opportunities exist through combination strategies, biomarker development, and geographic expansion.

  • Future Outlook: Steady growth projected through 2027; however, success hinges on manufacturing innovations, regulatory support, and demonstrated cost-effectiveness.

  • Strategic Focus: Stakeholders should prioritize optimizing treatment protocols, expanding indications via combination therapies, and improving operational efficiencies to maximize market potential.


FAQs

1. What is PROVENGE and how does it work?
PROVENGE (sipuleucel-T) is an autologous cellular immunotherapy designed to stimulate the patient's immune system to target prostate cancer cells. It involves leukapheresis to collect peripheral blood mononuclear cells, which are then activated ex vivo with a fusion protein to enhance immune response before being reinfused into the patient.

2. What has recent clinical research revealed about PROVENGE’s efficacy?
Clinical trials demonstrate a median survival benefit of approximately 4.1 months in patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic CRPC. Current studies aim to optimize its use, especially in combination with other immunotherapies, to improve response rates.

3. What are the main market challenges facing PROVENGE?
Key challenges include high manufacturing costs, logistical complexity, limited patient eligibility, and competition from emerging immunotherapies and targeted treatments, which collectively restrict wider adoption.

4. Are there ongoing trials that could expand PROVENGE’s indications?
Yes. Trials exploring combination therapy with checkpoint inhibitors, as well as biomarker-driven patient selection strategies, could potentially expand its use beyond current indications.

5. What factors could influence the future of PROVENGE financially?
Regulatory approvals for new combinations, reductions in manufacturing costs, demonstrated cost-effectiveness, and geographic expansion will be critical in shaping its revenue trajectory.


References

[1] Mack et al., "Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Sipuleucel-T Therapy in Prostate Cancer," Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2018.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.