CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PROLIA

Biosimilar Clinical Trials for PROLIA

This table shows clinical trials for biosimilars. See the next table for all clinical trials

Trial ID	Title	Status	Sponsor	Phase	Start Date	Summary
NCT03293108 ↗	Comparing Efficacy and Safety of AryoGen Pharmed Biosimilar Denosumab 60 mg (Arylia) Versus Prolia® in Improvement of Bone Mineral Densitometry (BMD) Among Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women	Active, not recruiting	AryoGen Pharmed Co.	Phase 3	2017-04-29	The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Denosumab 60 mg produced by AryoGen Pharmed and Amgen Denosumab 60 mg among osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women diagnosed with osteoporosis according to their Bone mineral density result (BMD), aged between 45 to 75 are included in this trial. This is a Phase III, randomized, two armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled,non-inferiority clinical trial. The eligible patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive Arylia or Prolia® subcutaneous injections, at the beginning of the trial and every 6 months at month 6 and 12, in an 18-month study period. Along with, all women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided into two doses) and at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 months of the study. The primary objective of this study is to assess non-inferiority of test- Denosumab 60 mg (Arylia) to the reference Denosumab 60 mg (Prolia®) in terms of efficacy among osteoporotic postmenopausal women. The secondary objectives of this study are: To further compare efficacy of test- Denosumab 60 mg to reference Denosumab 60 mg; To assess the safety of test- Denosumab 60 mg compared to reference Denosumab 60 mg.
NCT04591275 ↗	Clinical Efficacy and Safety Comparative Study Between CMAB807 Injection and Prolia® .	Recruiting	Shanghai Biomabs Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.	Phase 3	2021-03-31	evaluate the differences in effectiveness and safety between CMAB807( potential biosimilar) and Prolia(original product)
NCT04664959 ↗	A Study to Compare SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar) to Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis	Active, not recruiting	Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd.	Phase 3	2020-11-26	This is a randomised, double-blind, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, PK, PD, and immunogenicity of SB16 compared to Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
NCT04934072 ↗	A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Immunogenicity of FKS518 in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis	Recruiting	Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbH	Phase 3	2021-07-05	The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate equivalent efficacy of FKS518 to US-licensed Prolia in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). Participants will be randomized at the beginning of the Double-blind Core Treatment Period (Baseline to Week 52) to receive either FKS518 or US-licensed Prolia on Day 1, and then every 26 weeks for up to 52 weeks. At the beginning of the Double-blind Transition Period (Week 52 to Week 78), participants who received US-licensed Prolia will be re-randomized to either continue receiving US-licensed Prolia every 26 weeks for up to 78 weeks, or switch to receive FKS518 every 26 weeks for up to 78 weeks. Participants who were randomized to receive FKS518 at the beginning of the Double-blind Core Treatment Period will continue to receive this treatment during the Double-blind Transition Period. For Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) in the EU and European Economic Area (EEA) only: The primary objective is to demonstrate equivalent efficacy and pharmacodynamics of the proposed biosimilar denosumab FKS518 to US-Prolia in women with PMO.
NCT05338086 ↗	A Study to Compare Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Immunogenicity of MB09 [Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar] to Prolia® [EU-sourced] in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis (SIMBA Study)	Recruiting	mAbxience S.A	Phase 3	2022-03-31	This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel, multicenter, multinational study to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of MB09 versus Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
NCT05419427 ↗	Denosumab Biosimilar Injection in Post Menopausal Women With Osteoporosis	Recruiting	Intas Pharmaceutical Limited	Phase 3	2021-11-11	Denosumab of Intas is biosimilar denosumab candidate under development by Intas Pharmaceutical Limited (Biopharma Division). Denosumab of Intas is already approved by Indian drug licensing authority- Drug Controller General (India) for marketing in Indian population since 2018.As per regulatory requirement, a comparative clinical study to establish Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Immunogenicity equivalence is required to conclude therapeutic equivalence to obtain marketing authorization of a biosimilar investigational product. This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active controlled study in approximately 552postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. An extension of the study is planned after completion of the initial 1 year of treatment. This extension is with the objective of submitting data on safety, and Immunogenicity, after switching of Prolia treatment arm to either Prolia or Intas denosumab for 6 months. This switching data is applicable only for FDA submission. Only patients who have undergone PK assessment will be eligible for the extension phase.
NCT05419427 ↗	Denosumab Biosimilar Injection in Post Menopausal Women With Osteoporosis	Recruiting	Lambda Therapeutic Research Ltd.	Phase 3	2021-11-11	Denosumab of Intas is biosimilar denosumab candidate under development by Intas Pharmaceutical Limited (Biopharma Division). Denosumab of Intas is already approved by Indian drug licensing authority- Drug Controller General (India) for marketing in Indian population since 2018.As per regulatory requirement, a comparative clinical study to establish Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Immunogenicity equivalence is required to conclude therapeutic equivalence to obtain marketing authorization of a biosimilar investigational product. This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active controlled study in approximately 552postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. An extension of the study is planned after completion of the initial 1 year of treatment. This extension is with the objective of submitting data on safety, and Immunogenicity, after switching of Prolia treatment arm to either Prolia or Intas denosumab for 6 months. This switching data is applicable only for FDA submission. Only patients who have undergone PK assessment will be eligible for the extension phase.

All Clinical Trials for PROLIA

Trial ID	Title	Status	Sponsor	Phase	Start Date	Summary
NCT00043186 ↗	Determine the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Denosumab (AMG 162) in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density	Completed	Amgen	Phase 2	2002-05-01	To determine the effect of denosumab treatment compared with placebo over 12 months on bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women with low BMD. The clinical hypothesis is that denosumab subcutaneous injections administered every 3 or 6 months for 12 months will significantly increase lumbar spine bone mineral density and will be well tolerated.
NCT01358669 ↗	Effect of Denosumab on Inflammatory Osteolytic Lesion Activity in Total Hip Arthroplasty	Unknown status	Amgen	Phase 2	2011-12-14	Although hip replacement surgery is a successful way of dealing with the pain and immobility caused by hip arthritis, 10% of the hip replacements carried out in the UK fail within 10 years. The main reason for this is the development periprosthetic osteolysis, that is, loss of bone around the site of the hip replacement. The osteolysis is thought to be due to the small particles of debris worn from the surfaces of the hip implant. These particles cause a reaction in the blood cells around the joint which in turn affects bone cells and leads to a loss of bone around the implant. The joint implant will then eventually become loose and unstable, a condition known as aseptic loosening. At present the only way to treat aseptic loosening is to have another operation to secure the hip joint, known as revision surgery. Revision surgery is not always successful and exposes the patient to the risk of major surgery. In this study we explore the potential for giving a medication (denosumab) that may prevent the loss of bone around the hip replacement implant. We will recruit patients who have been listed for revision surgery. One group of patients will be given a single dose of denosumab; another group will be given a placebo (dummy drug). At the time of the revision surgery a small sample of the bone from around the hip replacement will be taken and examined under the microscope. Comparisons will be made between the patients having the denosumab and those having placebo to find out whether the denosumab is having a beneficial effect on the bone surfaces. If successful, this study will lead to further studies to develop the use of denosumab to prevent aseptic loosening.
NCT01358669 ↗	Effect of Denosumab on Inflammatory Osteolytic Lesion Activity in Total Hip Arthroplasty	Unknown status	University of Sheffield	Phase 2	2011-12-14	Although hip replacement surgery is a successful way of dealing with the pain and immobility caused by hip arthritis, 10% of the hip replacements carried out in the UK fail within 10 years. The main reason for this is the development periprosthetic osteolysis, that is, loss of bone around the site of the hip replacement. The osteolysis is thought to be due to the small particles of debris worn from the surfaces of the hip implant. These particles cause a reaction in the blood cells around the joint which in turn affects bone cells and leads to a loss of bone around the implant. The joint implant will then eventually become loose and unstable, a condition known as aseptic loosening. At present the only way to treat aseptic loosening is to have another operation to secure the hip joint, known as revision surgery. Revision surgery is not always successful and exposes the patient to the risk of major surgery. In this study we explore the potential for giving a medication (denosumab) that may prevent the loss of bone around the hip replacement implant. We will recruit patients who have been listed for revision surgery. One group of patients will be given a single dose of denosumab; another group will be given a placebo (dummy drug). At the time of the revision surgery a small sample of the bone from around the hip replacement will be taken and examined under the microscope. Comparisons will be made between the patients having the denosumab and those having placebo to find out whether the denosumab is having a beneficial effect on the bone surfaces. If successful, this study will lead to further studies to develop the use of denosumab to prevent aseptic loosening.
NCT01358669 ↗	Effect of Denosumab on Inflammatory Osteolytic Lesion Activity in Total Hip Arthroplasty	Unknown status	Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust	Phase 2	2011-12-14	Although hip replacement surgery is a successful way of dealing with the pain and immobility caused by hip arthritis, 10% of the hip replacements carried out in the UK fail within 10 years. The main reason for this is the development periprosthetic osteolysis, that is, loss of bone around the site of the hip replacement. The osteolysis is thought to be due to the small particles of debris worn from the surfaces of the hip implant. These particles cause a reaction in the blood cells around the joint which in turn affects bone cells and leads to a loss of bone around the implant. The joint implant will then eventually become loose and unstable, a condition known as aseptic loosening. At present the only way to treat aseptic loosening is to have another operation to secure the hip joint, known as revision surgery. Revision surgery is not always successful and exposes the patient to the risk of major surgery. In this study we explore the potential for giving a medication (denosumab) that may prevent the loss of bone around the hip replacement implant. We will recruit patients who have been listed for revision surgery. One group of patients will be given a single dose of denosumab; another group will be given a placebo (dummy drug). At the time of the revision surgery a small sample of the bone from around the hip replacement will be taken and examined under the microscope. Comparisons will be made between the patients having the denosumab and those having placebo to find out whether the denosumab is having a beneficial effect on the bone surfaces. If successful, this study will lead to further studies to develop the use of denosumab to prevent aseptic loosening.
NCT01377467 ↗	Denosumab for Prevention of Osteoporosis in Renal Transplant Recipients	Completed	Rudolf Wuethrich	Phase 3	2011-06-01	The primary objective of the study is to examine the effect of denosumab on lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) after one year of treatment in newly transplanted renal allograft recipients. Secondary endpoints include BMD changes at the total hip and the femoral neck, changes in body height, changes in bone mineral metabolism parameters, incidence of fractures, and allograft function at one year. Safety measurements include the occurrence of rejection episodes, infectious complications, graft loss and mortality. - Trial with medicinal product
NCT01465568 ↗	Denosumab in Current Users of Bisphosphonates for Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis	Completed	Tuen Mun Hospital	Phase 4	2011-12-01	The purpose of this study is to study the efficacy of denosumab, a new drug, in the treatment of osteoporosis in patients using bisphosphonates.
NCT01558115 ↗	Denosumab in Primary Hyperparathyroidism	Completed	Amgen	Phase 4	2012-01-01	Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), a disease characterized by excess parathyroid hormone (PTH) and high blood calcium, is one of the most common endocrine disorders. PHPT is seen most often in postmenopausal women. Many patients with PHPT have low bone mineral density (BMD) when bone mass is measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), primarily at the forearm. There is currently no effective medical therapy which increases bone density at the forearm in patients with PHPT. PTH both builds and breaks down bone, and the pathways by which PTH mediates these actions are beginning to be identified. Prior research suggests that RANKL, a molecule important in bone metabolism, responds to PTH, and that if the RANKL is inactivated, PTH is shifted towards building bone. The investigators will study the effect of Denosumab, a therapeutic agent that binds to and inactivates RANKL, in 28 postmenopausal women with PHPT. Our hypothesis is that Denosumab will increase bone mineral density in primary hyperparathyroidism. The study will last two years, and subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either placebo or Denosumab for the first year of the study. In the second year, all subjects will receive Denosumab. Denosumab (60 mg) or placebo will be given every 6 months by an injection just under the skin. Study procedures performed will include bone mineral density tests by DXA, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) scans, and assessments of biochemical markers of calcium metabolism and bone turnover using both blood and urine samples of subjects with PHPT.

Clinical Trial Conditions for PROLIA

Condition Name

Condition Name for PROLIA
Intervention	Trials
Osteoporosis	21
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis	10
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal	7
Breast Cancer	3

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PROLIA
Intervention	Trials
Osteoporosis	43
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal	19
Breast Neoplasms	5
Bone Diseases, Metabolic	4

Clinical Trial Locations for PROLIA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PROLIA
Location	Trials
United States	41
Poland	22
China	8
Estonia	6
Hungary	6

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PROLIA
Location	Trials
New York	12
Massachusetts	5
New Jersey	5
Texas	4
California	3

Clinical Trial Progress for PROLIA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PROLIA
Clinical Trial Phase	Trials
Phase 4	23
Phase 3	14
Phase 2	23

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PROLIA
Clinical Trial Phase	Trials
Completed	29
Recruiting	27
Active, not recruiting	7

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PROLIA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PROLIA
Sponsor	Trials
Amgen	12
Massachusetts General Hospital	5
Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation	4

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PROLIA
Sponsor	Trials
Other	83
Industry	36
NIH	6