You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PROLEUKIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PROLEUKIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000825 ↗ The Effects of Giving Interleukin-2 (IL-2) Plus Anti-HIV Therapy to HIV-Positive Patients With CD4 Cell Counts of at Least 350 Cells/mm3 Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1998-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of giving IL-2 plus anti-HIV (antiretroviral) therapy to HIV-positive patients with CD4 cell counts (cells of the immune system that fight infection) of at least 350 cells/mm3. This study will also examine the ability of antiretroviral therapy combined with IL-2 to boost the immune system. IL-2, given through injection under the skin, in combination with anti-HIV therapy can increase CD4 cell counts. This study examines 3 doses of IL-2 in order to determine the safest and most effective dose to use.
NCT00000889 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Giving Interleukin-2 (IL-2) Plus Anti-HIV Therapy to HIV-Positive Patients With CD4 Cell Counts of at Least 350 Cells/mm3 Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1997-10-01 To demonstrate the safety and tolerability of subcutaneously administered interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus antiretrovirals in patients with HIV infection and CD4 counts of 350 cells/mm3 or more. To demonstrate the immunological efficacy of subcutaneous IL-2 therapy plus antiretroviral therapy relative to antiretroviral therapy alone. IL-2, given through injection under the skin, in combination with anti-HIV therapy can increase CD4 cell counts. This study examines 3 doses of IL-2 in order to determine the safest and most effective dose to use.
NCT00000909 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Giving IL-2 Alone to HIV-Positive Patients With CD4 Cell Counts of at Least 350 Cells/mm3 Who Do Not Wish to Receive Anti-HIV Therapy Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of giving interleukin-2 (IL-2) alone to HIV-positive patients with CD4 cell counts greater than 350 cells/mm3 who do not wish to receive anti-HIV (antiretroviral) therapy. This study will also determine if IL-2 given alone can increase CD4 cell counts or decrease the level of HIV in the blood. IL-2 (a protein found in the blood that helps boost the immune system) can result in increases in CD4 cell count (immune system cells that fight infection). IL-2 is normally given in combination with antiretroviral therapy to treat HIV infection; however, some HIV patients do not wish to take antiretrovirals. This study asks if it is safe and effective to take IL-2 alone to treat HIV infection.
NCT00000948 ↗ Effects of Giving Interleukin-2 (IL-2) Plus Anti-HIV Therapy to HIV-Positive Patients With CD4 Cell Counts of at Least 350 Cells/mm3 Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1998-02-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of giving IL-2 plus anti-HIV (antiretroviral) therapy to HIV-positive patients with CD4 cell counts (cells of the immune system that fight infection) of at least 350 cells/mm3. This study will also examine the ability of antiretroviral therapy combined with IL-2 to boost the immune system. IL-2, given through injection under the skin, in combination with anti-HIV therapy can increase CD4 cell counts. This study examines 3 doses of IL-2 in order to determine the safest and most effective dose to use.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PROLEUKIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for PROLEUKIN
Intervention Trials
Melanoma 22
Metastatic Melanoma 18
HIV Infections 13
Neuroblastoma 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PROLEUKIN
Intervention Trials
Melanoma 47
Neoplasms 18
Leukemia 17
HIV Infections 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PROLEUKIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PROLEUKIN
Location Trials
United States 418
Canada 29
Australia 25
United Kingdom 13
Denmark 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PROLEUKIN
Location Trials
Texas 40
California 29
Maryland 25
New York 21
Washington 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PROLEUKIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PROLEUKIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 17
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PROLEUKIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 67
Active, not recruiting 28
Terminated 28
[disabled in preview] 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PROLEUKIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PROLEUKIN
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 62
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 27
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 14
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PROLEUKIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 200
NIH 79
Industry 59
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for ProLeukin (aldesleukin)

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

ProLeukin, the brand name for aldesleukin, is a recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) immunotherapy primarily indicated for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and metastatic melanoma. Originally approved in the 1990s, ProLeukin's therapeutic landscape has evolved with advancements in immuno-oncology. Analyzing recent clinical developments, market dynamics, and future projections is vital for stakeholders aiming to navigate this niche yet significant segment of cancer immunotherapy.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Trials

Over the past few years, the landscape of ProLeukin's clinical evaluation has shifted from broad usage to targeted, combination-focused studies. Notably:

  • Combination Therapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Multiple Phase II and III trials are examining ProLeukin’s efficacy alongside PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab. The rationale centers on leveraging IL-2’s T-cell activating effects with checkpoint blockade to enhance durable responses.

  • Biomarker-Driven Trials: Efforts are underway to identify predictive biomarkers (e.g., cytokine profiles, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes) that can stratify patient populations most likely to benefit. These studies aim to optimize patient selection, considering ProLeukin’s toxicity profile.

  • Novel Delivery and Dosing Regimens: Trials investigating low-dose or subcutaneous formulations seek to mitigate adverse events associated with high-dose systemic IL-2 therapy, such as capillary leak syndrome.

Regulatory and Approval Status

While ProLeukin retains FDA approval for metastatic RCC and melanoma, recent European Medicines Agency (EMA) decisions have seen its use diminish, supplanted by newer immunotherapies with more manageable safety profiles. Currently, no significant new indications or reformulations have received regulatory approval based on recent data, but ongoing trials could alter this status.

Key Clinical Findings

  • Response Rates: Historically, IL-2 therapy resulted in durable responses in a small subset of patients (~15-20%). Recent combination studies suggest improved response rates, sometimes exceeding 30%, albeit with increased adverse events.

  • Safety Profile: Toxicities such as hypotension, fluid retention, organ dysfunction, and cytokine release syndrome remain concerns. Strategies to minimize these risks are pivotal in ongoing trials.

Market Analysis

Historical Market Performance

Initially, ProLeukin was a cornerstone in immunotherapy for metastatic RCC and melanoma, with peak annual sales estimated around $200–300 million in the early 2000s. However, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors like nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and combination regimens have significantly eroded its market share.

Current Market Landscape

The global immuno-oncology market is experiencing exponential growth, driven by:

  • Increasing Incidence of RCC and Melanoma: RCC accounts for approximately 2-3% of adult malignancies, with melanoma being one of the most aggressive skin cancers.

  • Better Patient Survival with New Therapies: Checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated superior survival benefits, pushing IL-2 therapies to a niche market, primarily among select patients with refractory disease.

  • Pricing and Reimbursement Challenges: ProLeukin’s older formulation often faces reimbursement hurdles due to toxicity and cost-ineffectiveness compared to newer options.

Competitive Dynamics

The market is crowded with biologic agents that outperform ProLeukin in safety and efficacy:

  • Checkpoint Inhibitors: Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and combinations like nivolumab + ipilimumab dominate treatment algorithms.

  • Targeted Therapies: For RCC, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as sunitinib and pazopanib remain standard, competing with immunotherapies.

Emerging Opportunities and Niche Markets

ProLeukin could find renewed relevance through:

  • Combination Strategies: Synergistic effects with checkpoint inhibitors could unlock specific patient subsets.

  • Low-Intensity or Oral Formulations: To improve tolerability, especially in outpatient settings.

  • Rare Tumors and Orphan Indications: Potential application in niche areas where immune activation is beneficial and competition limited.

Future Market Projections

Short-Term Outlook (Next 2-5 Years)

  • Stable or Declining Sales: Given the dominance of newer immunotherapies, ProLeukin’s market share is expected to decline further. Sales are projected to remain modest, primarily supported by specialized indications and clinical trials.

  • Research-Driven Growth: Investment in combination therapies and biomarker-driven approaches could temporarily stabilize or modestly boost usage, especially if trials demonstrate favorable safety profiles and enhanced efficacy.

Long-Term Outlook (Beyond 5 Years)

  • Niche and personalized medicine focus may sustain ProLeukin’s role in selected cases where other therapies fail or are contraindicated.

  • Regulatory approvals for novel combinations could revive its market, especially if ongoing trials show significant improvements over current standards.

  • Market Volume: Estimated to decline at CAGR of 2–4%, reaching low double-digit million USD levels globally by 2030.

Potential Catalysts and Risks

  • Catalysts: Successful combination trial results, approval for new indications, or innovative delivery methods.

  • Risks: Toxicity profile, competition from newer agents, and shifting payer preferences toward more tolerable therapies.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Advancement Indicates Focus on Combinations: Current clinical trials emphasize combining ProLeukin with checkpoint inhibitors to enhance efficacy and manage toxicity, which could redefine its therapeutic positioning.

  • Market Decline Expected but Not Obsolete: Older biologic immunotherapies like ProLeukin are experiencing diminished markets due to superior alternatives, yet niche applications and combination regimens may sustain modest demand.

  • Strategic Opportunities Lie in Personalized and Combination Approaches: Tailoring therapy based on biomarkers and integrating ProLeukin into multi-modal regimens could unlock renewed clinical relevance.

  • Regulatory and Economic Challenges Limit Upside: Safety concerns and high costs relative to newer agents hinder broad adoption; targeted efforts in rare indications or refractory patient populations are more feasible.

  • Competitive Pressure is Intense: The rapid evolution of immuno-oncology favors newer agents, requiring ProLeukin’s developers and stakeholders to innovate proactively.

FAQs

1. What is the current FDA approval status of ProLeukin?
ProLeukin remains FDA-approved for metastatic melanoma and RCC; however, its use has declined due to the rise of checkpoint inhibitors with better safety profiles.

2. Are there ongoing clinical trials promising for ProLeukin?
Yes, several trials focus on combining ProLeukin with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, aiming to improve response rates in refractory cancers, though results are preliminary.

3. How does ProLeukin compare to newer immunotherapies?
ProLeukin has demonstrated durable responses but is limited by significant toxicity and lower efficacy rates relative to checkpoint inhibitors, leading to its niche positioning.

4. What are the main challenges facing ProLeukin’s market renewal?
Safety concerns, toxicity management, high treatment costs, and strong competition from less toxic, more effective therapies are major hurdles.

5. Could ProLeukin find a role in rare or orphan indications?
Potentially, yes. Its immunostimulatory mechanism might benefit specific, underserved patient populations where other therapies are unsuitable.

References

[1] National Cancer Institute. "Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Aldesleukin." Accessed February 2023.
[2] Farkkila, M. et al. "Clinical development of interleukin-2 for cancer therapy." Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2021.
[3] Grand View Research. "Immuno-Oncology Market Size & Share Analysis," 2022.
[4] FDA. "Proleukin (aldesleukin) prescribing information," 2022.
[5] European Medicines Agency (EMA). "Review of IL-2 therapies," 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.