Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PREGNYL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PREGNYL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00415766 ↗ Comparison Between Recombinant Versus Urinary hCG for Ovulation Induction in High Responders Unknown status Eugonia Phase 4 2013-06-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (rHCG) and urinary HCG (uHCG) in patients undergoing IVF cycles.
NCT00415792 ↗ Comparison Between hCG and GnRH Agonist for Ovulation Induction in Patients With High Response to IVF Drugs Unknown status Eugonia Phase 4 2003-11-01 hCG and GnRH agonist can be used to induce final oocyte maturation and ovulation in IVF cycles. These two approaches will be compared in this study in terms of pregnancy rates and embryological data using patients with hyper-response to IVF drugs.
NCT00627406 ↗ Triggering of Final Oocyte Maturation With GnRHa (Buserelin) in GnRH Antagonist Cycles Completed Regionshospitalet Viborg, Skive Phase 4 2009-01-01 The purpose of this study is to possibly further improve the clinical outcome and explore the incidence of OHSS in patients, who have final oocyte maturation with GnRHa (Buserelin) in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles
NCT00809107 ↗ Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) in Natural Cycles or in Natural Cycles Controlled by Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Administration Completed Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel N/A 2006-10-01 The rational of the study is to assess the implantation, pregnancy and live birth rates after the transfer of frozen- thawed embryos in natural cycles with spontaneous Luteinizing Hormone (LH)/Progesterone rise or in natural cycles controlled by human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for final oocyte maturation and ovulation.
NCT00823004 ↗ Antagonist/Letrozole in Poor Responders Completed Yazd Research & Clinical Center for Infertility Phase 1/Phase 2 2008-06-01 Failure to respond to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is still a major concern in assisted reproduction and there is no consensus on the ovarian stimulation choice regime for poor responders. Aim: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of a microdose GnRH agonist flare (MF) and a GnRH antagonist/letrozole (A/L) protocols in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods: One hundred eighty poor responder patients will be randomized to an ovarian stimulation protocol with either a MF or a letrozole and high dose FSH/hMG and flexible GnRH antagonist protocol.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PREGNYL

Condition Name

Condition Name for PREGNYL
Intervention Trials
Infertility 12
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 5
Invitro Fertilization 2
Female Infertility 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PREGNYL
Intervention Trials
Infertility 16
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 5
Infertility, Female 3
Syndrome 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PREGNYL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PREGNYL
Location Trials
Egypt 10
Belgium 5
United States 4
Greece 4
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PREGNYL
Location Trials
Minnesota 2
Connecticut 1
Washington 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PREGNYL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PREGNYL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 15
Phase 3 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 5
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PREGNYL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 18
Unknown status 11
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PREGNYL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PREGNYL
Sponsor Trials
Cairo University 3
Lito Maternity Hospital 3
University of Athens 3
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PREGNYL
Sponsor Trials
Other 47
Industry 3
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

PREGNYL Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

Pregnyl (hCG) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is Pregnyl and how is it positioned commercially?

Pregnyl is a brand of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), used as an ovulation trigger in reproductive medicine and in specific male hypogonadism regimens to stimulate testosterone production. Commercially, Pregnyl competes in the hCG therapeutic class, where supply, regulatory status, and pricing drive performance more than differentiated clinical innovation.

Core commercial attributes

  • Mechanism: hCG, LH-like activity via shared receptor biology
  • Use setting: fertility clinics and reproductive endocrinology; also parts of male hypogonadism management
  • Competitive landscape: other hCG products and, in some indications, alternative gonadotropin regimens (FSH/LH combinations) and GnRH-based strategies depending on market protocols and payor coverage

What does the clinical trial landscape look like for Pregnyl?

A Pregnyl-focused “pipeline” is limited by the product’s role as an established hormone therapy. The practical clinical-trials picture for hCG brands in recent years generally centers on:

  • formulation comparability,
  • local/regional registration studies,
  • label expansions tied to reproductive protocols,
  • real-world registry outcomes rather than late-stage, de novo “new drug” development.

At the global level, clinical activity in this class is primarily driven by registration and competitive lifecycle management, not brand-new efficacy paradigms. Publicly available sources for “Pregnyl” specifically show limited visibility versus broader hCG product class literature, and the current evidence base used by clinicians typically relies on well-established reproductive endocrinology practice rather than frequent new randomized trials for the brand.

Because the request is for a “clinical trials update” with market analysis and projections, a complete and accurate response requires a verifiable mapping from public trial registries to the specific brand Pregnyl (not just generic hCG) and current product-market status by geography. That mapping is not available in the provided information set.

What is the market size and value proposition for hCG brands like Pregnyl?

The relevant market is the broader hCG therapeutics segment within fertility and endocrinology. Market outcomes depend on:

  • clinic adoption of ovulation-trigger protocols,
  • reimbursement dynamics,
  • product availability and manufacturing continuity,
  • biosimilar/competitor penetration where applicable,
  • regulatory and supply chain constraints.

Without authoritative brand-level revenue data and without a validated geographic product status baseline for Pregnyl, a “hard-number” market analysis and projection cannot be produced without risking incorrect figures.

What demand drivers matter most for Pregnyl/hCG?

Even without brand-specific trial counts, demand drivers for hCG in fertility care are consistent across major markets:

  1. ART cycle volume and IVF adoption
    • hCG dosing and timing requirements make it a recurring line item per stimulation cycle.
  2. Ovulation induction and controlled ovarian stimulation protocols
    • clinical pathways use hCG as a trigger in specific protocol selections.
  3. Male hypogonadism treatment protocols
    • hCG regimens are used to stimulate endogenous testosterone in selected patient subsets.
  4. Regulatory and supply continuity
    • fertility clinics run tight scheduling; product disruptions translate into immediate workflow shifts and competitor substitution.

What constraints limit credible projections for Pregnyl specifically?

A projection for Pregnyl needs these locked inputs:

  • verified brand-level sales history by geography (or at minimum a consistent regional revenue baseline),
  • confirmed current regulatory status and commercial availability by market,
  • competitor mapping by active ingredient and formulation form factors,
  • trial and lifecycle events tied to Pregnyl (label changes, discontinuations, supply expansion).

None of those inputs are provided here in a way that supports a complete and accurate market model. Producing numeric projections without them would create material error.

Market analysis framework (used for Pregnyl projections when inputs are available)

When brand-specific data exists, the standard method is:

  • Step 1: Identify addressable utilization
    • fertility clinic cycles requiring hCG trigger per year
    • % of cycles using hCG versus alternatives by protocol and geography
    • male hypogonadism treated with hCG where applicable
  • Step 2: Convert utilization to units
    • dosing patterns by indication and typical kit/vial usage
  • Step 3: Apply pricing net of rebates
    • list price, tender pricing, government/insurer reimbursement
  • Step 4: Model substitution and retention
    • competitor share shift under availability and pricing
  • Step 5: Incorporate lifecycle and supply shocks
    • shortages, manufacturing changes, regulatory actions
  • Step 6: Scenario ranges
    • base case plus downside/upside around utilization and price

This is the only defensible structure for Pregnyl because “pregnyl market” is not a standalone epidemiology market. It is a protocol-driven utilization line within fertility care.

Key Takeaways

  • Pregnyl is an hCG fertility and endocrinology product; demand is protocol-driven.
  • A brand-specific “clinical trials update” requires mapping from registries to the Pregnyl brand, not just class-level hCG literature.
  • A numeric “market analysis and projection” requires brand-level sales history and confirmed commercial/regulatory status by geography; those inputs are not available in the provided information set.
  • The correct projection approach is utilization-driven, converting fertility cycles and hCG trigger selection into units and pricing, then applying competitive substitution and lifecycle/supply events.

FAQs

1) What is Pregnyl used for?

Pregnyl is used in reproductive medicine as an hCG ovulation trigger and in selected male endocrinology regimens to stimulate testosterone production.

2) Is Pregnyl still actively studied in clinical trials?

Clinical activity for hCG products typically centers on registration, formulation comparability, and label-relevant studies rather than new late-stage efficacy breakthroughs.

3) What drives Pregnyl demand most?

ART cycle volumes and clinic protocol selection for ovulation triggering drive most demand; male hypogonadism protocols add a smaller secondary driver.

4) How do competitors affect Pregnyl performance?

Competitor hCG products and alternative stimulation/trigger protocols affect share via pricing, availability, and protocol preferences.

5) What would be required to build a credible Pregnyl revenue projection?

Brand-level sales history, current regulatory/availability status by market, dosing utilization assumptions, net pricing/rebate parameters, and competitor substitution curves.


References

[1] European Medicines Agency. EPAR product information for hCG-containing medicines. https://www.ema.europa.eu/
[2] FDA. Drug Approval Reports and product labeling for gonadotropins and hCG products. https://www.fda.gov/
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and ovulation triggering indications. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.