Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PEDVAXHIB


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PEDVAXHIB

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04978818 ↗ Immunogenicity of H. Influenzae Type b PRP-OMP Vaccines in American Indian and Alaska Native Children (the HibVax Study) Not yet recruiting Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 4 2021-11-15 The main goal of this study is to compare the Haemophilus influenzae type b antibody response in American Indian / Alaska Native (AI/AN) infants to two licensed vaccines: Vaxelis and PedvaxHIB.
NCT04978818 ↗ Immunogenicity of H. Influenzae Type b PRP-OMP Vaccines in American Indian and Alaska Native Children (the HibVax Study) Not yet recruiting Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Phase 4 2021-11-15 The main goal of this study is to compare the Haemophilus influenzae type b antibody response in American Indian / Alaska Native (AI/AN) infants to two licensed vaccines: Vaxelis and PedvaxHIB.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PEDVAXHIB

Condition Name

Condition Name for PEDVAXHIB
Intervention Trials
Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Infection 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PEDVAXHIB
Intervention Trials
Influenza, Human 1
Haemophilus Infections 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PEDVAXHIB

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PEDVAXHIB
Location Trials
United States 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PEDVAXHIB
Location Trials
New Mexico 1
Arizona 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PEDVAXHIB

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PEDVAXHIB
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PEDVAXHIB
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PEDVAXHIB

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PEDVAXHIB
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 1
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PEDVAXHIB
Sponsor Trials
Industry 1
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 11, 2026

PEDVAXHIB: Clinical Trials Update and Market Projection

What is PEDVAXHIB and what is the competitive context?

PEDVAXHIB is a licensed vaccine containing Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugated to tetanus toxoid. It is used to prevent invasive Hib disease in pediatric populations. Market dynamics for Hib-conjugate vaccines are shaped by:

  • Routine pediatric immunization schedules and national vaccine program coverage
  • Public-sector tendering and long-term formulary commitments
  • Manufacturer switching risk driven by supply continuity, price, and contract terms
  • Biosafety and manufacturing consistency requirements under biologics regulation

Competitive set (global, label-level):

  • Sanofi: Hiberix (and related Hib conjugate offerings by geography)
  • GSK: ActHIB (and legacy Hib conjugates depending on country)
  • Serum Institute of India and other supply-chain players in low- and middle-income markets (pricing-led)

Because vaccine pricing and access depend heavily on country immunization financing, PEDVAXHIB market value is best assessed through country-specific procurement and contract structures rather than pure “brand sales” alone.


What does the latest clinical trials landscape show for PEDVAXHIB?

A “clinical trials update” for a widely licensed vaccine depends on whether there are current Phase 3 efficacy trials, Phase 4 immunogenicity studies, or pediatric schedule bridging studies. For PEDVAXHIB, the practical clinical footprint is typically immunogenicity and schedule-consistency work rather than new efficacy end points, given the established Hib disease prevention framework.

Clinical trial activity pattern typical for PEDVAXHIB-type Hib conjugates:

  • Post-authorization studies focused on:
    • Antibody persistence
    • Immune response after dosing schedule changes
    • Lot consistency and bridging across manufacturing sites or formulations
  • Bridging trials that use immunogenicity endpoints such as anti-PRP antibody concentrations and proportions achieving prespecified thresholds

Result: Without specific, currently published trial identifiers and statuses attributable to PEDVAXHIB (e.g., NCT numbers tied to PEDVAXHIB rather than general Hib conjugate classes), a deterministic “latest trials update” cannot be produced.


Can a PEDVAXHIB market projection be quantified without fragmenting into country-by-country tenders?

A quantified projection requires:

  • Current net sales by geography (or procurement volumes by tender category)
  • Contracted pricing, volume caps, and renewal schedules
  • Evidence of supply constraints or expansion capacity
  • Patent/market exclusivity constraints that materially change competitive intensity

For PEDVAXHIB, the key market variable is not patent life in the usual small-molecule sense. Vaccine competitiveness is driven by:

  • Regulatory exclusivity periods and data protection rules by jurisdiction
  • Tender cycles and procurement preferences
  • Segment-specific tender switching due to price differentials among licensed Hib conjugates

Projection feasibility constraint: Producing an accurate PEDVAXHIB market forecast for 2026 to the end of the projection horizon needs current commercial performance and a defensible pricing-volume model. That dataset is not provided, so any numeric projection would be non-actionable.


What market structure is most relevant for PEDVAXHIB revenue durability?

For investment and R&D planning, PEDVAXHIB revenue durability is governed by four mechanisms:

  1. Routine immunization schedule embedding

    • Hib conjugate vaccines are typically delivered as part of pediatric multi-dose programs.
    • Once a country’s schedule embeds a product class, switch risk centers on tender cycles.
  2. Public-sector procurement economics

    • Major revenue pools are secured through competitive tenders.
    • Price declines and margin compression typically follow the entry of additional licensed manufacturers.
  3. Supply continuity and manufacturing qualification

    • Vaccine contracts reward predictable supply, validated cold chain logistics, and lot-to-lot consistency.
    • In biologics, short-term shortages can shift volumes to alternative suppliers even without a label-driven differentiation.
  4. Safety profile and pharmacovigilance record

    • For vaccines, perceived tolerability and established immunogenicity acceptance reduce switching friction.
    • Regulatory changes that modify age indications or combination product usage can reallocate volume across the class.

What are the actionable takeaways for business strategy (without speculative numbers)?

  • Treat PEDVAXHIB as a “tender-driven, schedule-anchored” asset, not a typical brand with linear price and demand.
  • Focus commercial strategy on contract renewal readiness: tender response cadence, manufacturing site qualification, and logistics performance.
  • R&D strategy should assume the competitive barrier is procurement and immunobridging, not new disease efficacy evidence.
  • Pipeline and lifecycle activity should be aligned to schedule changes and combination product compatibility, because those are the levers that reallocate uptake within the Hib conjugate class.

Key Takeaways

  • PEDVAXHIB is a licensed Hib conjugate vaccine used in routine pediatric immunization; its market performance is driven by tendering and schedule embedding.
  • A deterministic, “latest clinical trials update” with concrete trial statuses cannot be produced without trial identifiers tied specifically to PEDVAXHIB.
  • A quantified market projection requires current geographic net sales, tender pricing, and procurement volumes; absent that, the forecast would be non-actionable.
  • Revenue durability is most sensitive to procurement cycles, supply continuity, and schedule compliance rather than patent-like exclusivity dynamics.

FAQs

  1. Is PEDVAXHIB’s clinical development typically efficacy trials or immunogenicity/bridging studies?
    Hib conjugate vaccines generally rely on immunogenicity and schedule-bridging studies after authorization rather than new efficacy Phase 3 trials.

  2. What most determines PEDVAXHIB sales in key markets?
    Public-sector tender cycles, routine schedule uptake, supply continuity, and contract pricing.

  3. What competitive pressures exist for Hib conjugate vaccines?
    Price-led tender competition across licensed Hib conjugate manufacturers and supply-chain qualifications.

  4. How do regulatory or schedule changes affect Hib vaccine markets?
    They can shift dose timing, eligibility windows, and combination product utilization, reallocating volumes across products in the same class.

  5. What is the most important input for a credible market projection?
    Current net sales and procurement volumes by geography tied to tender schedules and pricing.


References

[1] American Academy of Pediatrics. Red Book: 2024 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. (Hib vaccine recommendations and background).
[2] FDA. Product labels and approvals for Hib conjugate vaccines (PEDVAXHIB label history and indication/usage context).
[3] WHO. Position papers on Hib conjugate vaccines and immunization guidance (schedule and program considerations).
[4] CDC. Immunization schedules and Hib vaccine guidance (pediatric routine immunization context).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.