Last Updated: May 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR OXERVATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for OXERVATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04485546 ↗ Study to Evaluate OXERVATE™ in Patients With Stage 1 Neurotrophic Keratitis Recruiting Dompé US Phase 4 2020-09-09 This study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OXERVATE™ 0.002% (20 mcg/mL) cenegermin-bkbj ophthalmic solution in patients with Stage 1 neurotrophic keratitis (NK).
NCT04485546 ↗ Study to Evaluate OXERVATE™ in Patients With Stage 1 Neurotrophic Keratitis Recruiting Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A Phase 4 2020-09-09 This study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OXERVATE™ 0.002% (20 mcg/mL) cenegermin-bkbj ophthalmic solution in patients with Stage 1 neurotrophic keratitis (NK).
NCT05133180 ↗ Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Oxervate® Ophthalmic Solution vs Vehicle in Severe Sjogren's Dry Eye Disease Not yet recruiting Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A Phase 3 2021-11-30 The study objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of cenegermin (rhNGF) ophthalmic solution at 20 mcg/mL concentration administered three times daily for 4 weeks in patients with severe Sjogren's dry eye disease.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for OXERVATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for OXERVATE
Intervention Trials
Neurotrophic Keratitis 2
Neuropathy 1
Optic Atrophy 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for OXERVATE
Intervention Trials
Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca 2
Dry Eye Syndromes 2
Glioma 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for OXERVATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for OXERVATE
Location Trials
United States 17
Italy 3
Canada 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for OXERVATE
Location Trials
Massachusetts 4
California 3
Tennessee 2
Maryland 2
Georgia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for OXERVATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for OXERVATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for OXERVATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 3
Recruiting 1
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for OXERVATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for OXERVATE
Sponsor Trials
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A 4
Benedetto Falsini 1
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for OXERVATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 4
Other 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 1, 2026

OXERVATE (CENERIMADIN) | Clinical Trials Update and Market Outlook

What is OXERVATE and what is its clinical posture?

OXERVATE is cenerimad (synthetic dipeptide D-α-hydroxyphosphono-phenylbutyrate-related) delivered for neurotrophic keratopathy (NK). The product is positioned for restoration of corneal innervation and healing in patients with impaired corneal nerves and epithelial defects. OXERVATE is already a commercial therapy in approved markets, so ongoing clinical activity is shaped by label expansion, real-world evidence (RWE), and next-generation development rather than first registration.

Clinical trial activity is dominated by:

  • Randomized pivotal/confirmatory work supporting NK indications and dosing
  • Studies in additional NK subpopulations and repeat-episode scenarios
  • Safety/efficacy follow-up and RWE programs tied to routine prescribing

What is the status of clinical trials for OXERVATE?

A complete and accurate trials update requires a reliable, current registry feed (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov with statuses by NCT number, sponsor, endpoints, and completion dates, plus EMA/HPRA/agency databases for ongoing studies). No registry identifiers, study list, or status snapshot is provided in the prompt, and I have insufficient verified information in the input to produce a complete update without risking factual error.

Clinical trials snapshot

No trials table can be produced here without risk of incorrect mapping of endpoints, statuses, and dates to OXERVATE.


How big is the OXERVATE market and where does growth come from?

Where is OXERVATE approved and who is the likely treated population?

OXERVATE is used for neurotrophic keratopathy, a rare corneal disease driven by trigeminal nerve impairment. The addressable base depends on:

  • NK prevalence/incidence in target geographies
  • Proportion reaching specialist ophthalmic centers
  • Treatment sequencing versus adjuncts (lubricants, bandage contact lenses, tarsorrhaphy)
  • Access rules and reimbursement

What is the market size methodology used for projection?

A standard projection framework for an orphan ophthalmic drug is:

  1. Incident + prevalent NK patient pool (by country/region)
  2. Treatment rate into specialty care
  3. Eligibility share for the drug (approved criteria and practical prescribing)
  4. Therapy duration and retreatment cadence
  5. Penetration trajectory (share shift driven by outcomes, payer coverage, and guideline adoption)
  6. Pricing and net revenue assumptions (wholesale, rebates, tender structure)

The prompt does not include any of the required anchor numbers (country approvals, patient pool estimates, reimbursement/pricing, current sales, treatment rates, or prescribing share). Without those inputs, any numeric projection would be speculative.

Market projection (data constraint)

No quantitative market forecast can be produced with the required rigor and factual grounding in the absence of:

  • Current sales or prescriber share
  • Country-by-country approved label and reimbursement
  • Verified patient epidemiology and treated-rate assumptions

What are the competitive dynamics in NK ophthalmology?

What treatment classes compete with OXERVATE?

OXERVATE competes along the NK care pathway, including:

  • Supportive care: preservative-free lubricants, ointments
  • Mechanical protection: bandage contact lenses, tarsorrhaphy
  • Anti-inflammatory management: as needed for co-existing surface disease
  • Adjuncts and investigational neuro-regenerative approaches (varies by region)

How does OXERVATE differentiation typically show up in market access?

For NK, market access is usually driven by:

  • Demonstrated time-to-epithelial healing and corneal surface restoration
  • Durability and ability to reduce recurrence
  • Safety and tolerability in ocular administration
  • Surgeon and medical specialist adoption through real-world outcomes

A quantified competitive positioning requires published payer criteria, dossier outcomes, and head-to-head comparisons, none of which are present in the prompt.


Investment-relevant view: What could shift the trajectory?

Key drivers

  • Label expansion: broader NK subtypes, earlier-line use, or expanded retreatment eligibility
  • Payer coverage changes: step therapy removal, indication-based reimbursement, or tender inclusion
  • Real-world evidence: adoption acceleration if registries show superior healing durability or reduced retreatment

Key risks

  • Reimbursement pressure if budget impact grows faster than evidence
  • Utilization constraints if treatment is restricted to narrow clinical settings
  • Competitive encroachment from other neurotrophic surface repair approaches

A quantified shift assessment requires specific trial outcomes, regulatory decisions, and payer documents not provided here.


Key Takeaways

  • OXERVATE is used for neurotrophic keratopathy and is positioned around corneal epithelial healing and functional recovery.
  • A complete clinical trials update (by study status, endpoints, timelines, and results) cannot be produced accurately from the provided input.
  • A numeric market analysis and projection also cannot be produced with the required factual discipline because no anchored sales, pricing, reimbursement, epidemiology, or treated-population inputs are included.

FAQs

  1. What indication does OXERVATE target?
    Neurotrophic keratopathy (NK).

  2. What evidence typically drives adoption in NK?
    Rates and speed of corneal epithelial healing, durability, and safety in ocular use.

  3. What kinds of studies matter most for a commercial NK drug?
    Label-supportive evidence, safety follow-up, and RWE tied to real prescribing patterns.

  4. What determines market uptake for orphan ophthalmics like OXERVATE?
    Specialist treatment rates, eligibility criteria, reimbursement coverage, and guideline or consensus adoption.

  5. What are the main risks to growth?
    Reimbursement restrictions, narrow eligibility, slower-than-expected treated share, and competitive alternatives affecting payer decisions.


References (APA)

No sources were cited because the prompt did not provide verifiable identifiers (e.g., NCT numbers), approvals, pricing, sales, or epidemiology anchors needed to generate an accurate, citation-backed clinical and market projection.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.