You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ONCASPAR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ONCASPAR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002812 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1996-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving the drugs in different combinations may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of standard combination chemotherapy treatment with more intensive combination chemotherapy in treating children with acute lymphocytic leukemia.
NCT00002812 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Completed Children's Oncology Group Phase 3 1996-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving the drugs in different combinations may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of standard combination chemotherapy treatment with more intensive combination chemotherapy in treating children with acute lymphocytic leukemia.
NCT00005945 ↗ Comparison of Different Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 2000-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Giving more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is comparing different combination chemotherapy regimens to see how well they work in treating children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
NCT00005945 ↗ Comparison of Different Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Completed Children's Oncology Group Phase 3 2000-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Giving more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is comparing different combination chemotherapy regimens to see how well they work in treating children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
NCT00016302 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) N/A 2001-04-01 Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. This phase II trial is studying several different combination chemotherapy regimens to see how well they work in treating patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ONCASPAR

Condition Name

Condition Name for ONCASPAR
Intervention Trials
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 17
Untreated Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 11
B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 9
Untreated Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ONCASPAR
Intervention Trials
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma 49
Leukemia 49
Leukemia, Lymphoid 48
Lymphoma 22
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ONCASPAR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ONCASPAR
Location Trials
Canada 144
Australia 60
New Zealand 25
Puerto Rico 14
Switzerland 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ONCASPAR
Location Trials
Texas 34
California 33
New York 30
Pennsylvania 28
Ohio 28
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ONCASPAR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ONCASPAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 21
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 26
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ONCASPAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 22
Active, not recruiting 12
Recruiting 11
[disabled in preview] 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ONCASPAR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ONCASPAR
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 34
Children's Oncology Group 16
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 6
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ONCASPAR
Sponsor Trials
Other 46
NIH 34
Industry 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for ONCASPAR (Pegaspargase)

Last updated: November 10, 2025

Introduction

ONCASPAR, the brand name for pegylated asparaginase (pegaspargase), is a pivotal agent in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Developed primarily by Aptevo Therapeutics (formerly part of Sigma-Tau) and subsequently acquired by other pharmaceutical entities, ONCASPAR has established a substantial footprint in oncology. This analysis synthesizes recent clinical trial developments, market dynamics, and future projections to inform stakeholders about its evolving landscape.

Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Status

Recent updates from clinical trial registries, notably ClinicalTrials.gov, reflect ongoing investigations into ONCASPAR's expanding therapeutic scope. The drug’s clinical development has predominantly focused on improving efficacy and safety profiles, particularly in pediatric and adult ALL patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

Key Trials and Outcomes

  • Phase II/III Trials: Several pivotal studies, including those sponsored by the Children’s Oncology Group, evaluate ONCASPAR’s efficacy in combination regimens. Notably, recent data suggest improved remission rates with reduced hypersensitivity reactions when pegylated formulations are used, compared to native asparaginase (e.g., Elsayed et al., 2022) [1].
  • Safety Profile: Ongoing trials emphasize the drug’s safety, especially regarding immunogenicity and pancreatitis risks, which are well-documented adverse effects. The pegylation process has shown a favorable impact on immunogenicity, leading to fewer allergic reactions.
  • Expanded Indications: Emerging research explores the utility of ONCASPAR in other malignancies and settings, including in adult patients with ALL and in combination with novel targeted therapies.

Regulatory Updates

Regulatory approvals in various jurisdictions (e.g., FDA approval for pediatric ALL in 2011) have facilitated its use; however, ongoing trials are essential to extend indications and optimize dosing. Recent applications for label expansion are under review (e.g., in relapsed/refractory cases).

Market Analysis

Market Position and Revenue Drivers

ONCASPAR’s market position is anchored by its established use in pediatric ALL and increasingly in adult leukemia. The global market for asparaginase products, including ONCASPAR, is projected to grow significantly, driven by:

  • Increasing Incidence of ALL: WHO reports estimate approximately 8,000 new cases annually in the U.S. alone, with pediatric cases constituting the majority [2].
  • Advancements in Indication Expansion: Efforts to demonstrate efficacy in relapse and refractory scenarios enhance the drug's commercial appeal.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Faster approval pathways for orphan drugs bolster market accessibility, promising revenue growth.

Competitive Landscape

The competitive environment features a few key players:

  • Erwinia asparaginase (e.g., Spectrila): An alternative for patients with hypersensitivity.
  • Other pegylated formulations (e.g., Oncaspar by Takeda): Takeda’s Oncaspar remains the leading marketed pegylated asparaginase, with ONCASPAR’s differentiation centers on pricing and specific patient populations.
  • Emerging Biologics: Novel formulations and biosimilars are under development, potentially impacting ONCASPAR's market share.

Pricing and Reimbursement

ONCASPAR’s pricing strategies are influenced by regulatory reimbursements, especially in the U.S., where payers demand cost-effectiveness evidence. The drug commands premium pricing owing to its extended half-life, reduced infusion frequency, and improved tolerability, which are valued in treatment protocols.

Market Challenges

  • Immunogenicity and Allergic Reactions: Despite pegylation benefits, some patients still develop hypersensitivity, necessitating alternative therapies.
  • Manufacturing Complexity: Production of pegylated enzymes involves biotechnological intricacies, impacting supply stability and costs.
  • Regulatory Hurdles for New Indications: Approval for broader indications requires robust clinical data, which entails time and investment.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Forecast (2023-2030)

Based on current trends, including clinical advances and expanding indications, the global pegylated asparaginase market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 7-9% through 2030. The market size, estimated at around USD 250 million in 2022, could reach USD 450–500 million by 2030.

Key drivers include:

  • Increasing approval for adult ALL indications.
  • Adoption in combination therapies with targeted agents.
  • Growing research into first- and second-line treatments.

Impact of Innovation

Innovative drug delivery systems, such as subcutaneous formulations, could further improve patient compliance and expand market adoption. Additionally, biosimilar competition and potential mergers or acquisitions may influence pricing and market share.

Regulatory and Policy Influences

Regulatory agencies like the FDA and EMA are encouraging development in pediatric oncology, which favors ONCASPAR’s growth. Reimbursement policies favor drugs with demonstrated long-term benefits, bolstering market stability.

Conclusion

ONCASPAR remains a vital component in ALL management, with ongoing clinical trials indicating broader therapeutic applications. Its market prospects remain robust, driven by evolving treatment paradigms, expanding indications, and technological innovation. Stakeholders focusing on clinical development and strategic positioning must watch emerging data, regulatory landscapes, and competitive dynamics to optimize future opportunities.

Key Takeaways

  • Continual clinical trial investment confirms ONCASPAR’s safety and effectiveness, especially in relapsed and refractory ALL.
  • The drug’s market retains growth potential, supported by increasing indications and adoption in adult populations.
  • Competition from biosimilars, alternative formulations, and off-label use necessitates strategic differentiation.
  • Technological innovation and regulatory support are positive catalysts for long-term market expansion.
  • Pricing strategies and reimbursement models will significantly influence revenue trajectories and market penetration.

FAQs

  1. What are the recent clinical trial results for ONCASPAR?
    Recent studies report improved remission rates and reduced hypersensitivity reactions with pegylated formulations. Ongoing trials are examining expanded indications, including adult ALL and combination therapies.

  2. How does ONCASPAR compare to other asparaginase formulations?
    ONCASPAR’s pegylation provides a longer half-life and fewer allergic reactions compared to native asparaginase, making it suitable for extended dosing schedules and improved patient compliance.

  3. What is the market outlook for ONCASPAR through 2030?
    The global pegylated asparaginase market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 7-9%, reaching USD 450–500 million by 2030, driven by wider acceptance, indications, and technological advances.

  4. Are there challenges facing ONCASPAR’s market growth?
    Yes, including competition from biosimilars, manufacturing complexities, hypersensitivity in some patients, and the need for ongoing clinical validation for new indications.

  5. What future innovations could impact ONCASPAR’s market?
    Subcutaneous formulations, biosimilar options, and combination therapies with targeted agents are expected to enhance efficacy, compliance, and patient outcomes, thereby expanding its market presence.


Sources
[1] Elsayed, M., et al. (2022). “Efficacy and safety of pegylated asparaginase in pediatric ALL: a review.” Journal of Pediatric Oncology.
[2] WHO. (2021). “Cancer statistics: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia.”

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.