Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NOVOLIN R


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for NOVOLIN R

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00071448 ↗ Insulin Aspart vs. Insulin Lispro vs. Regular Insulin in Paediatric Population Completed Novo Nordisk A/S Phase 3 2002-06-01 This trial is conducted in the United States of America (USA). The aim of this trial is to to determine whether insulin aspart can be used effectively and safely in paediatric patients.
NCT00487162 ↗ The Association Between Peri-Operative Hyperglycemia and Major Morbidity and Mortality Terminated University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey N/A 2007-06-01 Surgery induces a stress effect on the body partially through a catabolic energy state. In turn, glucose levels may rise to levels which have been associated with major morbidity (Golden, 1999) and mortality (Ouattara, 2005). An increasing body of evidence suggests that intensive insulin therapy for tight control of blood glucose levels in certain surgical and critical care patient populations may improve mortality and selected morbidity outcomes when compared to those patients receiving conventional insulin therapy and blood glucose management. More specifically, poor intra-operative blood glucose control is associated with worse outcome after cardiac surgery. Intensive insulin therapy with tight blood glucose control in surgical patients while in the ICU may reduce morbidity and mortality. Such outcome improvements would clearly provide benefits to patients, providers and payers. To date, there is scant research examining whether intensive insulin therapy for tight control of blood glucose in the perioperative period can alter outcomes for the non cardiac surgery population. The purpose of this study is to determine whether intensive insulin therapy for tight control of blood glucose in the perioperative period in non cardiac major surgery patients is associated with altered morbidity and mortality rates.
NCT00522210 ↗ Comparison of a Twice Daily Versus a Three Times Daily Insulin Regimen in Children With Type 1 Diabetes Completed University of Calgary N/A 2008-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in blood sugar control (as measured by hemoglobin A1c (HA1c)), in children given twice daily insulin injections incorporating a new long acting insulin analogue (detemir) compared to children using their current three times a day insulin injections (with intermediate and rapid acting insulin).
NCT00593255 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Aspart in Subjects With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Completed Novo Nordisk A/S Phase 4 2004-07-01 This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy of postprandial plasma glucose of two treatment regimens in Chinese subjects.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for NOVOLIN R

Condition Name

Condition Name for NOVOLIN R
Intervention Trials
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 3
Type 1 Diabetes 2
Diabetes 2
Type 2 Diabetes 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for NOVOLIN R
Intervention Trials
Diabetes Mellitus 8
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 4
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 3
Hyperglycemia 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for NOVOLIN R

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for NOVOLIN R
Location Trials
United States 44
India 7
Italy 7
Canada 6
China 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for NOVOLIN R
Location Trials
California 3
Georgia 2
Utah 2
Texas 2
Pennsylvania 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for NOVOLIN R

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for NOVOLIN R
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for NOVOLIN R
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 9
Terminated 3
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for NOVOLIN R

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for NOVOLIN R
Sponsor Trials
Novo Nordisk A/S 3
University of Calgary 2
University Health Network, Toronto 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for NOVOLIN R
Sponsor Trials
Other 10
Industry 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Novolin R clinical trials update, market analysis, and exclusivity-backed projection for regular human insulin

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Novolin R (regular human insulin; Humulin R is the closest comparator) is a legacy recombinant insulin used for basal-bolus and sliding-scale regimens in diabetes. There are no current, widely reported late-stage “new product” registrational programs for Novolin R itself; trial activity is largely centered on biosimilar/insulin alternatives, post-approval observational studies, and combination or device-adjacent insulin development. Commercially, Novolin R remains a volume-driven, low-to-mid pricing insulin in multiple markets, with near-term demand supported by broad diabetes prevalence, but long-term pricing pressure and substitution risk remain elevated as payers shift toward newer insulin analogs and concentrated insulins.

What is the latest clinical trials status for Novolin R (regular human insulin) in 2024–2026?

Snapshot (what is typically observable for Novolin R specifically):

  • Novolin R is usually not the subject of large Phase 3 registrational trials in recent years in the way newer insulins (e.g., GLP-1s, basal analogs, ultra-rapid analogs) are.
  • Clinical activity for regular human insulin tends to concentrate in:
    • Comparative effectiveness studies vs insulin analogs (observational or randomized open-label).
    • Use in specific populations (pregnancy/gestational diabetes, renal impairment, hospital protocols).
    • Device and administration studies (e.g., pump compatibility where applicable, education and titration protocols).
    • Safety follow-ups, adherence, and outcomes research.

Where “trial updates” usually appear

  • Trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and regional counterparts) typically list studies with endpoints around glycemic control (HbA1c), time-in-range, hypoglycemia incidence, insulin dosing algorithms, and healthcare utilization.
  • For regular human insulin, the most repeated study themes are hypoglycemia risk comparison and regimen optimization, not novel mechanism claims.

Which recent trial types drive the most relevant evidence for Novolin R?

  • Insulin strategy comparisons: Regular insulin (R) compared with rapid-acting or ultra-rapid for prandial coverage within basal-bolus frameworks.
  • Hospital/ED protocols: Protocol trials where regular insulin dosing is used for inpatient glycemic control, often comparing outcomes like hypoglycemia rates.
  • Pregnancy and perinatal care: Studies and protocols that include regular human insulin due to its established use in gestational diabetes pathways.
  • Real-world adherence and outcomes: Claims-based or registry-based analyses of insulin persistence, switching, and associated costs.

What endpoints are used most often in recent regular human insulin studies?

  • HbA1c change or non-inferiority margins
  • Documented hypoglycemia (overall and severe)
  • Glycemic variability and dosing adjustments
  • Treatment persistence and discontinuation
  • Healthcare utilization (ED visits, admissions, length of stay)

How big is the market for Novolin R and regular human insulin globally, and what is its competitive position?

Market context:

  • Regular human insulin sits in the “older generation insulin” segment.
  • The competitive set includes:
    • Other regular human insulin brands (same active ingredient class).
    • Insulin analogs (rapid-acting for meals; basal analogs for fasting).
    • Concentrated insulins and newer delivery systems that reduce dosing volume and improve user experience.

Competitive mechanics that matter for Novolin R revenue:

  • Substitution: Payers often favor formulary-preferred insulin products, and regular human insulin frequently becomes a lower-cost alternative to analogs.
  • Price erosion: High generic entry and interchangeability in many geographies compress margins.
  • Channel dependence: Strong performance usually correlates with retention by health systems and chronic care formularies.

Key competitors and substitutes

  • Humulin R (regular human insulin; same class competitor)
  • Multiple country-specific regular human insulin products and authorized generics
  • Rapid-acting insulin analogs (prandial coverage) and basal analogs (fasting coverage), which can displace R in some regimens

What matters for forecasting Novolin R share

  • Formulary outcomes: Whether payers list Novolin R as preferred vs alternative R products.
  • Switching behavior: Whether patients and clinicians maintain R regimens or switch to analog-based basal-bolus.
  • Tender and procurement cycles: Especially in large centralized healthcare purchasers.
  • Insulin pump and administration protocols: Not a universal driver for R, but operational protocols can sustain use.

When does Novolin R lose exclusivity and how do patent expiries affect generic substitution risk?

Core exclusivity reality for regular human insulin:

  • Novolin R is not a single short-lived “new biologic” exclusivity story. Market exclusivity has historically been anchored around:
    • Manufacturing process and specific formulation/packaging patents (varies by jurisdiction).
    • Marketing authorization exclusivities (country-dependent).
    • Biosimilar exclusivity frameworks are not the same as for modern biosimilars because regular human insulin is a well-established recombinant product and the competitive landscape often involves authorized versions and interchangeable/market-entry equivalents rather than biosimilar-style innovation.

Practical impact on substitution:

  • The competitive risk for Novolin R is not a distant “generic entry event.” It is an ongoing substitution environment where multiple regular insulin offerings exist.
  • Any remaining differentiation typically sits in:
    • Packaging and delivery device ecosystem (e.g., vial vs cartridge vs prefilled formats)
    • Traceability and supply reliability
    • Local regulatory permissions and authorized manufacturing

What patents protect Novolin R (regular human insulin) and how strong is the patent estate?

This analysis is not deliverable in a complete, accuracy-guaranteed way without a jurisdiction-specific patent-to-product mapping (Orange Book in the US, national registers in EU, SPC catalogs, and country-specific biologics registers where relevant) tied to the exact Novolin R submission and dosage form.

What is the Orange Book status of Novolin R and what does it imply for US generic entry?

This analysis is not deliverable in a complete, accuracy-guaranteed way without the specific FDA product identifiers and Orange Book listings for Novolin R formulations (vials, cartridges, concentration, and listed active ingredient terms). “Novolin R” may have multiple labeled presentations, and Orange Book coverage depends on the exact submission.

How do clinical outcomes of Novolin R compare with Humulin R and insulin analogs?

Regular human insulin vs rapid-acting analogs (prandial):

  • Regular insulin has slower onset and longer duration than rapid-acting analogs, which can lead to:
    • More pre-meal timing needs
    • Higher variability for some patients
    • Potential hypoglycemia risks if timing mismatch occurs
  • Analog-based regimens often show smoother postprandial coverage in trials, which can improve time-in-range outcomes.

Regular human insulin vs analogs in specific contexts:

  • Pregnancy: Regular human insulin is widely used due to extensive historical experience; insulin analog penetration depends on guideline adoption and local labeling.
  • Hospital protocols: Regular insulin protocols are common for inpatient management because of dosing familiarity, dosing flexibility, and cost.

Regular insulin vs other regular brands:

  • Clinical differences are usually attributable to device and dosing algorithm rather than biologic effect, assuming comparable bioavailability and concentration.

What generic entry risks exist for Novolin R by geography and dosage form?

This analysis is not deliverable in a complete, accuracy-guaranteed way without:

  • A geography-by-geography product list of market entrants (authorized vs non-authorized)
  • Evidence of FDA/EMA approvals and interchangeability status for each presentation
  • Confirmation of which Novolin R presentations (vial, pen, cartridge) are in scope

What are the biggest commercial risks to Novolin R revenue over the next 3–5 years?

  1. Insulin mix shift to analogs and concentrated formulations
    • Newer insulins often win formulary positioning by reducing dosing friction and improving postprandial control metrics.
  2. Ongoing price compression
    • Regular human insulin is heavily price competed.
  3. Supply chain and manufacturing scale constraints
    • Insulin is global demand sensitive; outages can swing sales temporarily but can also lead to substitution away from the brand.
  4. Payer switching and contracting
    • Pharmacy benefit managers and national tenders can reassign preferred status.
  5. Clinical protocol evolution
    • Hospital and care pathways may standardize analog-based protocols if they deliver better glycemic safety metrics at acceptable costs.

What is the revenue projection for Novolin R through 2029?

This analysis is not deliverable in a complete, accuracy-guaranteed way without:

  • A baseline of current unit volumes and net sales by geography and presentation
  • Known payer concentration, formulary placement, and current contract pricing
  • Confirmed market size estimates for regular human insulin in each target geography
  • Evidence of current market share and recent growth/decline rates for Novolin R specifically

How does Novolin R compare with Humulin R in market share, pricing power, and litigation exposure?

This analysis is not deliverable in a complete, accuracy-guaranteed way without a validated, up-to-date dataset covering:

  • Sales and share by brand for both products
  • Contracting and pricing differences by geography
  • US and non-US litigation dockets tied to each brand’s exact labeled presentations

What settlement or litigation events affect Novolin R competition?

This analysis is not deliverable in a complete, accuracy-guaranteed way without verified, current litigation and settlement records tied to the relevant product listings and jurisdictions.

Key Takeaways

  • Novolin R use persists because regular human insulin remains embedded in many clinical protocols and payer formularies, especially where cost control and dosing familiarity matter.
  • Clinical “updates” for Novolin R in recent years tend to be comparative, observational, or protocol-driven rather than brand-new, registrational mechanism-defining studies.
  • The competitive risk is ongoing substitution within insulin class formularies and price compression, not a single, distant exclusivity cliff.
  • A credible 3–5 year revenue projection requires product-specific sales baselines and current formulary positioning, which are not provided here.

FAQs

  1. What patient populations still drive regular human insulin (Novolin R) utilization versus insulin analogs?
  2. How do hospital insulin infusion or correction-scale protocols affect demand for Novolin R vials?
  3. What tender or formulary levers most influence whether payers keep Novolin R versus competing regular insulin products?
  4. How do time-to-meal mismatch and hypoglycemia risk shape real-world outcomes for regular insulin regimens?
  5. Which countries have the highest density of alternative regular human insulin products, increasing substitution risk for Novolin R?

References

  1. No sources were provided in the prompt, and no cited external documents are included.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.