Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MYOBLOC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MYOBLOC

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00125203 ↗ Study of Myobloc in the Treatment of Sialorrhea (Drooling) in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Completed ALS Association Phase 2/Phase 3 2003-07-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Myobloc in ALS patients who are having excessive drooling. The primary goal of the study is to determine if the patient perceives a benefit from the Myobloc in controlling excessive drooling.
NCT00125203 ↗ Study of Myobloc in the Treatment of Sialorrhea (Drooling) in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Completed Carolinas MDA Neuromuscular/ALS Center-Carolinas Medical System Phase 2/Phase 3 2003-07-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Myobloc in ALS patients who are having excessive drooling. The primary goal of the study is to determine if the patient perceives a benefit from the Myobloc in controlling excessive drooling.
NCT00125203 ↗ Study of Myobloc in the Treatment of Sialorrhea (Drooling) in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Completed University of Kansas Phase 2/Phase 3 2003-07-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Myobloc in ALS patients who are having excessive drooling. The primary goal of the study is to determine if the patient perceives a benefit from the Myobloc in controlling excessive drooling.
NCT00125203 ↗ Study of Myobloc in the Treatment of Sialorrhea (Drooling) in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Completed The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Phase 2/Phase 3 2003-07-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Myobloc in ALS patients who are having excessive drooling. The primary goal of the study is to determine if the patient perceives a benefit from the Myobloc in controlling excessive drooling.
NCT00208091 ↗ Quantifying Musical Performance After Treatment With Myobloc in Musician's Dystonia Completed Solstice Neurosciences Phase 4 2003-04-01 This study uses a computerized method of musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) quantification of performance before and after treatment with botulinum toxin type B (Myobloc ®, Solstice Neurosciences). Myobloc is a purified and diluted form of botulinum toxin used medically to relax unwanted muscle spasms and movements. The aim of the study is to determine the feasibility of quantifying change in performance following treatment.
NCT00208091 ↗ Quantifying Musical Performance After Treatment With Myobloc in Musician's Dystonia Completed Columbia University Phase 4 2003-04-01 This study uses a computerized method of musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) quantification of performance before and after treatment with botulinum toxin type B (Myobloc ®, Solstice Neurosciences). Myobloc is a purified and diluted form of botulinum toxin used medically to relax unwanted muscle spasms and movements. The aim of the study is to determine the feasibility of quantifying change in performance following treatment.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MYOBLOC

Condition Name

Condition Name for MYOBLOC
Intervention Trials
Sialorrhea 4
Low Back Pain 2
Cerebral Palsy 2
Spasticity 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MYOBLOC
Intervention Trials
Sialorrhea 4
Muscle Spasticity 4
Spinal Cord Injuries 2
Back Pain 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MYOBLOC

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MYOBLOC
Location Trials
United States 48
Russian Federation 4
Ukraine 2
Belarus 1
Lebanon 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MYOBLOC
Location Trials
California 4
Florida 3
Maryland 3
District of Columbia 3
New York 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MYOBLOC

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MYOBLOC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 4
Phase 2/Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MYOBLOC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 8
Unknown status 2
Not yet recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MYOBLOC

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MYOBLOC
Sponsor Trials
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 5
US WorldMeds LLC 3
Solstice Neurosciences 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MYOBLOC
Sponsor Trials
Industry 12
Other 11
U.S. Fed 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 25, 2026

MYOBLOC clinical trials update, market analysis, and 2026–2035 projection

MYOBLOC (rimabotulinumtoxinB) is a late-stage botulinum toxin product with a defined commercial footprint in US aesthetic and therapeutic uses. Public clinical-trials coverage is limited, with no new late-stage programs identifiable from the standard public trial registries. The market outlook is driven by (1) channel share versus competing botulinum toxin brands (US and EU), (2) label durability in target indications, and (3) pricing and payer contracting. Market growth is likely to track procedure volumes and toxin utilization rather than new pipeline-driven step changes, with downside risk from competitive pricing, substitution within the class, and manufacturing continuity.


What is MYOBLOC (rimabotulinumtoxinB) and what indications drive demand?

Drug: MYOBLOC
Active ingredient: rimabotulinumtoxinB (botulinum toxin type B, BoNT/B)
Therapeutic class: neuromuscular blocking agent for localized muscle spasticity and selected motor disorders; also used in aesthetic applications in practice depending on local regulatory label scope.

Which labeled uses are most relevant to revenue?

In commercial models, MYOBLOC revenue is typically anchored to:

  • Therapeutic: cervical dystonia and other BoNT use cases where BoNT/B has an established role.
  • Aesthetic / off-label use: toxin utilization in facial aesthetic applications depends on regional labeling, physician preference, and payor policies.

What drives physician adoption in BoNT/B versus BoNT/A?

Key commercial drivers across the botulinum class:

  • perceived onset and duration profile
  • immunogenicity considerations over long horizons
  • patient switching behavior after partial/non-response to BoNT/A
  • payer and contracting dynamics
  • supply continuity and inventory management

What clinical trials have been run for MYOBLOC and what is the latest update?

Public registry updates for MYOBLOC are sparse relative to large BoNT/A products, which typically have multiple active phase 3/phase 4 studies. For MYOBLOC, the most decision-relevant status is whether ongoing trials exist that could extend duration, expand indications, or support differentiated dosing/regimens.

What phases and endpoints matter for the next market step?

The only trial categories that usually move MYOBLOC value materially:

  • Phase 3 / pivotal replication for a new indication or a clinically meaningful label expansion
  • Comparative trials versus other BoNT/B dosing regimens or BoNT/A comparators with standardized response endpoints
  • Long-term extension supporting durability and safety at scale
  • Formulation or delivery device studies that change dosing behavior, clinician workflow, or patient experience

Latest clinical-trials signal

No new late-stage, commercially material clinical program (as reflected in standard public trial listings) is clearly attributable to MYOBLOC in a way that would justify a pipeline-driven revenue step-up in the 2026–2030 window. The practical read-through is that near-term demand depends on market penetration and competitive dynamics rather than label expansion.


How strong is MYOBLOC’s competitive position versus other botulinum toxins?

US competitive landscape

MYOBLOC competes in a crowded toxin market against multiple products in:

  • BoNT/A: widely used first-line in aesthetics and many therapeutic workflows.
  • BoNT/B: a narrower class with targeted clinical switching behavior.

What does competitive substitution mean for pricing and volume?

In class markets, substitution typically creates:

  • price pressure during contracting cycles
  • share drift toward brands with better inventory, training support, and payer coverage
  • demand spikes tied to seasonal aesthetic volume and physician training capacity

For BoNT/B specifically, MYOBLOC’s competitive defense tends to be rooted in clinician experience and patient history, not broad first-line dominance.


What is MYOBLOC’s current market share and revenue exposure model?

Market model structure used for projection

A practical projection ties revenue to:

  1. Patient procedure volume in the relevant therapeutic and aesthetic segments
  2. Toxin utilization (mean dosing per treated patient)
  3. Net price realization after rebates/chargebacks
  4. Share of voice and channel penetration within the toxin mix
  5. Geographic distribution (US weight versus ex-US sales, if available)

Revenue exposure by demand driver

  • Therapeutic BoNT use: more stable, payer-constrained, less seasonal
  • Aesthetic BoNT use: more elastic to discretionary spending and pricing promotions

Given the absence of identifiable late-stage expansion catalysts, revenue growth is most likely to be volume and share-driven within existing labeled and effectively reimbursed segments.


When does MYOBLOC lose exclusivity?

A full exclusivity timeline requires Orange Book and patent-family mapping for rimabotulinumtoxinB (including formulation and method-of-use patents, if any, and regulatory exclusivity such as pediatric exclusivity, if applicable). The provided information does not include Orange Book listings, patent numbers, or expiration dates for MYOBLOC, so a complete and accurate exclusivity schedule cannot be produced.


What is the Orange Book status of MYOBLOC and what patents protect it?

A complete Orange Book status and patent estate requires:

  • active ingredient listing
  • product identifiers (RLD/NDC linkage)
  • listed patents and their expiration dates
  • patent categories (composition, method of use, formulation)
  • any delistings and revised expiration terms

The provided information does not include the necessary Orange Book patent list for MYOBLOC, so a complete protection map cannot be produced.


What generic entry risks exist for MYOBLOC (Paragraph IV and ANDA pathways)?

MYOBLOC is rimabotulinumtoxinB, a complex biologic-toxoid class product where “generic toxin” pathways depend on regulatory classification and FDA framework in effect at the time of approval. A Paragraph IV ANDA risk assessment requires:

  • existence of any filed ANDAs referencing the product
  • FDA acceptance/response timelines
  • lawsuit dockets and settlement terms
  • 30-month stay and triggering events

No such registry and litigation dataset is included here, so a Paragraph IV/ANDA risk profile cannot be produced.


What patent litigation affects MYOBLOC and how are disputes likely to shape timing?

A litigation impact analysis requires:

  • court case numbers
  • asserted patents and claims
  • injunction or stay posture
  • settlement dates and terms
  • any current appeal status

No litigation data is provided, so litigation-driven timing cannot be stated.


How does MYOBLOC compare with other rimabotulinumtoxinB competitors?

A competition-by-competition analysis requires:

  • named competitors in the same BoNT/B category and their label scope by jurisdiction
  • pricing and reimbursement comparisons
  • documented switching and persistence curves

The provided information does not include competitor product-level data sufficient for a complete comparative market assessment.


What regulatory milestones matter for MYOBLOC’s next commercialization step?

For a toxin product, regulatory value is typically driven by:

  • label updates (new indication, dosing regimen, patient population)
  • postmarketing commitments that enable continued supply and confidence
  • inspection outcomes affecting manufacturing continuity
  • manufacturing site changes and validated process changes

Without MYOBLOC’s FDA supplement history and CMC post-approval activity, milestones cannot be enumerated here.


How should MYOBLOC’s 2026–2035 market projection be modeled?

Base-case projection logic

With no identifiable late-stage trial catalysts:

  • Growth is primarily volume-driven (ongoing toxin utilization)
  • Share changes depend on physician preference and competitive contracting cycles
  • Net price is constrained by biosimilar-like substitution dynamics within the toxin class (even if not regulated as biosimilars)
  • Reinvestment is needed to defend inventory position and clinician education

Three scenario framework

  • Conservative: share erosion due to BoNT/A dominance, continued pricing pressure.
  • Base case: stable share with modest market growth aligned to procedural volume.
  • Upside: improved payer coverage and successful clinical differentiation narrative in cervical dystonia and switching populations.

What can be concluded from the absence of pipeline signals

No new program can be used as a “timing lever” for a step-change in revenue. Projections should treat MYOBLOC as a mature product with incremental gains.


Key risks to the MYOBLOC forecast (what breaks the model)

  1. Competitive pricing and contracting within the toxin category leading to unfavorable net price.
  2. Inventories and supply continuity affecting physician adoption and reorder patterns.
  3. Clinical switching dynamics if clinicians move toward alternatives based on patient response patterns.
  4. Regulatory label changes by competitors that re-shape first-line selection.
  5. Manufacturing disruptions in toxin production chains.

Key Takeaways

  • MYOBLOC is best modeled as a mature BoNT/B product with demand driven by existing indication utilization and competitive share dynamics rather than pipeline-driven label expansion.
  • Public clinical-trial visibility for MYOBLOC appears limited, with no clearly identifiable late-stage catalyst for 2026–2030.
  • Market upside likely comes from incremental share gains and payer coverage, not new indications.
  • A complete exclusivity, Orange Book patent, and litigation-based forecast cannot be produced from the information provided.

FAQs

  1. What indications contribute most to MYOBLOC demand in the US?
  2. How does MYOBLOC dosing duration compare with BoNT/A products in real-world switching?
  3. What procurement and contracting dynamics typically impact MYOBLOC net pricing?
  4. How do manufacturing supply constraints affect botulinum toxin reorder behavior for MYOBLOC?
  5. What competitive events (new label expansions, pricing changes) most influence BoNT/B share?

References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. “MYOBLOC” (rimabotulinumtoxinB) search results. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
  2. FDA Orange Book. Search: rimabotulinumtoxinB / MYOBLOC. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.